What's new

CPEC: The devil is not in the details

It is just me or some other members here found it is difficult to catch the writers idea?
The author quote:
"It is somewhat ironic that the development strategy advocated by the Washington Consensus, is far more ideologically burdened than the one used by Communist China to reform its own economy."

The writer might want to express that China sometimes made investment into so-called "dictatship", "corrupt" country or any other country that is not in uncle Sam's favor. So the political change in PK would destroy the CPEC? China has witnessed many goverment changes in PK. Each time China-PK always maintain good relationships no matter what changes. So even if current elected goverment lost its power, i believe the new goverment will continue to push CPEC projects.

"To understand the policy motivation behind OBOR, one must realize that China is desperate to maintain its growth momentum, especially with the uncertain outlook for the global economy"
It's true China need foreign market for its economy, but the other side also benefits from Chinese goods and investment. It's a win-win situation. So what's wrong with it?

"For a country trying to downplay the perception that it seeks to challenge the US for global domination, China’s strategy in Asia Pacific is surprisingly aggressive."
The so-called" aggression" of China is not using military forces, but economic ties. Economic ties is a much strong force the military. If the leader of the country in Asia gets full understanding of what US can offer and what China can offer, he would make his wise choice like the President of Philippines did recently.

All in All, the whole article is crab. And by looking into the backgroud of the authors: Mushtaq Khan is Chief Economist at Bank Alfalah and holds a PhD from Stanford University. Danish Hyder is a research associate at Bank Alfalah and holds a degree from Vassar College in New York.

It is not a surprise that they would make a such westernized point of view.


While it is true we might face certain challenges in CPEC. For example, the spread of terrorism could pose essentail threat along the road. The different way of religious between China and PK might cause trouble during cooperation. What type of bussiness can be found to get good profit in CPEC?
But we believe that with the brotherhood of China and PK, all the problems could be solved.
There is no "Brotherhood". If you think China invests in Pakistan just because Pakistan is its "brother", you should wake up. Im sure its China who got the jackpot with CPEC, yes it also has some good effects on Pakistan, but China profits most from it.

Pakistan is geopoliticallyc in Chinas interest, they get the access to Arabian Sea through one country that is quite underdeveloped and in need of investments. Pakistan should be cautious to not let China get too big of a share from Pakistans economy, since it would give China huge leverage in Pakistan politics and foreign relations.

China as an ally isnt bad, but keep in mind that they too care most about China.
 
OBOR is project to control vital routes of trade by China. India will never agree for a Chinese dominance.
Who needs India's permission btw? Only if you guys do a lil introspection you'll come to know why every country around India hates you and that hate sentiment is at public level!
 

Back
Top Bottom