What's new

China, India and Pakistan dissing -- Canadian style

ao333

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
0
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
India, surrounded

As it approaches the 63rd anniversary of its independence this weekend, India is under siege.

The world’s largest democracy – a necessary cliché here – is finally making impressive economic gains, and establishing itself as a tough-minded great power, in contrast to the tender-minded Nehru-Gandhi decades. But, largely for these very reasons, India finds itself confronted by dictatorial China or its proxies – most notably, Pakistan – on every side of the subcontinent.

To the north, complementing Tibet-based Chinese missiles aimed at Indian cities, Communists tied to Beijing have taken over Nepal, long considered part of India’s sphere of influence. Forty-eight years after the Sino-Indian War in the Himalayas, and with the recent fall of the discredited Nepalese monarchy, it matters not that some Communists play a democratic game and others are rural insurgents. What matters is that India’s main Himalayan buffer against Chinese expansion is gone.

To the south, neither Sri Lanka nor the delighted Chinese are trying to hide Beijing’s effective capture of the civil-war-weary island. Traditional ties with India have been overwhelmed by a deluge of Chinese products, aid, investment and infrastructure projects. China’s aim is a major base on the Indian Ocean to counter the Indian and U.S. navies. A strong presence in the Indian Ocean used to be a Russian threat. Now it is a Chinese near-reality.

To the east, China is firmly allied with the brutal military regime in Burma, also known as Myanmar, supplying arms to keep the Burmese people subjugated. India unwisely seeks to compete for the junta’s favour. Indian interests in all of Southeast Asia are imperilled as China spreads its economic influence, including free trade with the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Again, Beijing’s strategic goal is naval control.

To the west, the military-dominated Pakistani government has not only reignited its compulsive drive to seize the Indian-held Kashmir Valley, as shown by anti-India protests by Kashmiris even as floods devastated much of Pakistan. It is pushing hard for control of Afghanistan when U.S. and North Atlantic Treaty Organization troops pull out, and in the process seeking to end India’s diplomatic presence in Afghanistan. Beijing would be euphoric if the international mission to save Afghanistan failed. And, never forget, China made Pakistan’s nuclear weapons possible.

China’s direct or indirect pressures on India are a vital part of its campaign, now openly proclaimed, to establish itself – and be recognized – as a global power, not just a regional one. But, despite its spreading economic clout, and its intimidation tactics and arm-twisting of smaller countries, it is still far from its goal. The U.S. Pacific Fleet, whose theatre of operations includes the Indian Ocean, is still the dominant military force in Asia and the Pacific, as demonstrated by its recent exercise off the Korean Peninsula and China itself – protested mightily by Beijing. India remains the dominant regional power in South Asia, by virtue of having won four wars against Pakistan. Its navy is comparable to China’s and boasts two aircraft carriers, while Beijing still has none.

But there is no doubt that China has made substantial gains all around India – in Tibet and Nepal, in Sri Lanka, in Burma and Southeast Asia, in supporting Pakistan in Afghanistan.

In order to prevent further gains, Indian foreign and defence policy needs to remain firm but not provocative, and to reinforce India’s strategic alliance with the United States.

This is not guaranteed. A strong anti-U.S. lobby still exists in India. If Rahul Gandhi should become the fourth-generation Nehru to become prime minister, it would not only mock Indian democracy – it would greatly increase the risk that India would return to the policies of non-alignment, appeasement of China and state control of the economy.

At that fateful August midnight in 1947, Jawaharlal Nehru spoke of keeping India’s “tryst with destiny.” But only now can that tryst be fulfilled by India’s taking its place as an indispensable member of an alliance for democracy.

India, surrounded - The Globe and Mail
 
Last edited:
The writer of this article has a sieze mentality.
 
Started another thread for flame war have we, i know these kind of threads fanboys jumping in with suggestions and lo behold we have a perfect flaming burning thread. oooooh too hot to handle.

India and China are not going for a war, period.

I urge all the Indian posters to refrain from making any kind of unnecessary posts which will be bad.
 
Started another thread for flame war have we, i know these kind of threads fanboys jumping in with suggestions and lo behold we have a perfect flaming burning thread. oooooh too hot to handle.

India and China are not going for a war, period.

I urge all the Indian posters to refrain from making any kind of unnecessary posts which will be bad.

Well, if you bothered reading it, it's simply a western promotional paper worded to piss Indian ex-patriots off so they'd convince their families at home to align with the US to a strategic advantage against China.

Nevertheless, I commend you for not jumping into the fire.:tup:
 
This is not guaranteed. A strong anti-U.S. lobby still exists in India. If Rahul Gandhi should become the fourth-generation Nehru to become prime minister, it would not only mock Indian democracy – it would greatly increase the risk that India would return to the policies of non-alignment, appeasement of China and state control of the economy.

Translation - Join US/Canada or DIE~~!!!

Ridiculous article.
 
India does not find itself confront by China, Chinese proxies or Pakistan. This author has show his incompetent vision of world view by thinking Pakistan is Chinese proxy. North Korea may be but Pakistan isnt. India is facing resistance of popular support due to its own actions. The Kashmirs dont want Indian rule, Bengladeshis are crying day and night about Indian take over, Chinese have sensivities towards tibet which Indian diplomats lack manners to handle, Srilanka is partnering with China and Pakistan to hedge against India and its terrorist proxies.

India is not a saint which deserves to rule south asia and such delibrate propoganda of rising india has smell of "akhand bharat" swine.

In nutshell India is not surrounded but Indian delibarate aggression by proxies is why India is resisted. Because nobody wants to welcome a power which will bring massive flood of destitute poor rahter than offer economic migranation of people from smaller countries.
 
India does not find itself confront by China, Chinese proxies or Pakistan. This author has show his incompetent vision of world view by thinking Pakistan is Chinese proxy. North Korea may be but Pakistan isnt. India is facing resistance of popular support due to its own actions. The Kashmirs dont want Indian rule, Bengladeshis are crying day and night about Indian take over, Chinese have sensivities towards tibet which Indian diplomats lack manners to handle, Srilanka is partnering with China and Pakistan to hedge against India and its terrorist proxies.

India is not a saint which deserves to rule south asia and such delibrate propoganda of rising india has smell of "akhand bharat" swine.

In nutshell India is not surrounded but Indian delibarate aggression by proxies is why India is resisted. Because nobody wants to welcome a power which will bring massive flood of destitute poor rahter than offer economic migranation of people from smaller countries.

within one year u will start to say srilanka,bangladesh r ready 4 war with india,then again after few year u will say nepal,bhutan r ready to contain india.

evry country is not pakistan dude
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom