What's new

BrahMos can't be intercepted in next 20 years

The Biggest problem with DRDO is..... There is no moderator and they let all their senior fellows troll big time...... And their idiotic comments make us (pdf indians) listen to the trolls from countries who cannot even make a 9 mm pistol.....
 
Like u don't kill Kashmiri's or in baluchistan ..so don't give me ur pathetic reasons... and wen u know u can't do **** about PAKISTAN then u talk like this ( o u destroying urself u destruct :blah::blah::blah: Grapes r sour baby...

Isay kehty hain Baniye ka danda Baniye ki **** main


Kid lets not count each others' sins coz the 3 millions raped and murdered in 1971 should exceed what India has ever done or will do in Balochistan or Kashmir.

We don't need to send in expensive weaponry or rats(Kasaab & Co.) to make holes in our neighbors home, you are doing a fine job of it, all we need to do is sit and watch as u burn.
 
@gambit sir can't a CIWS do the job ?
Sure, but the problems of detection and tracking remains. You need to keep in mind that CIWS will be at ground level, therefore most susceptible to line-of-sight issues. When the Brahmos breaks horizon, the gun will have only literally seconds to reorient itself and fire. This short time span require equally precise radar information as if you are relying on a missile's radar to make its interception.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure, but the problems of detection and tracking remains. You need to keep in mind that CIWS will be at ground level, therefore most susceptible to line-of-sight issues. When the Brahmos breaks horizon, the gun will have only literally seconds to reorient itself and fire. This short time span require equally precise radar information as if you are relying on a missile's radar to make its interception.
so any experience with AN/APY-1/2 ? cause our radar used with type 730 ciws operates the same way and is said to be based on SPG-74 technology !
 
@gambit sir im sorry for bothering u again but lets say that the radar can track the missile @ 8km but the gun can engage @ 3km, so how can the missile be intercepted by the ciws when its speed is 2 km/s and the ciws is itself the target ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@gambit sir im sorry for bothering u again but lets say that the radar can track the target @ 8km but the gun can engage @ 3km, so how can the target be intercepted when it's speed is 2.0653248 km/s ?
Assume radar tracking and gun reorient is perfect. It does not matter if target is supersonic. If the gun can engage at 3km, which in this case the assumption is head-on, then target speed is not an issue. The gun radar will calculate target speed, estimate when it will reach that 3km point, then fire just before the target reach that 3km point. If radar tracking and gun response are perfect, then bullets and target will meet at 3km distance out.

You should understand that in a head-on intercept, and continue to assume that tracking is perfect, the only reason why target approach speed is important is IF you want to avoid shrapnel. Because the intruder is coming so fast, even if you successfully hit him, there is still forward momentum at supersonic speed for a lot of small masses, still capable of doing a lot of damages if not kill something/someone.

So if we return to that 3km engagement distance, if radar tracking and gun reorient is not as good as you like, even though your bullets may intercept the intruder, that interception may be at 100 meters instead of 3km, spraying you with supersonic shrapnel. But let us say that your AWACS alerted you to a supersonic intruder, your gun reorient to the indicated direction and your gun radar begin transmitting. The moment the supersonic intruder breaks your horizon view, gun radar will have a solution and you will have interception at 3km distance out.

If you are defending something else that the intruder is going after, then the gun solution will lead the intruder, in other words, the bullets will be at an estimated point AHEAD of the intruder's flight and you still will have an interception at 3km distance out. In this situation, the lead depends on the off angle between you and whatever it is that you are defending.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Assume radar tracking and gun reorient is perfect. It does not matter if target is supersonic. If the gun can engage at 3km, which in this case the assumption is head-on, then target speed is not an issue. The gun radar will calculate target speed, estimate when it will reach that 3km point, then fire just before the target reach that 3km point. If radar tracking and gun response are perfect, then bullets and target will meet at 3km distance out.

You should understand that in a head-on intercept, and continue to assume that tracking is perfect, the only reason why target approach speed is important is IF you want to avoid shrapnel. Because the intruder is coming so fast, even if you successfully hit him, there is still forward momentum at supersonic speed for a lot of small masses, still capable of doing a lot of damages if not kill something/someone.

So if we return to that 3km engagement distance, if radar tracking and gun reorient is not as good as you like, even though your bullets may intercept the intruder, that interception may be at 100 meters instead of 3km, spraying you with supersonic shrapnel. But let us say that your AWACS alerted you to a supersonic intruder, your gun reorient to the indicated direction and your gun radar begin transmitting. The moment the supersonic intruder breaks your horizon view, gun radar will have a solution and you will have interception at 3km distance out.

If you are defending something else that the intruder is going after, then the gun solution will lead the intruder, in other words, the bullets will be at an estimated point AHEAD of the intruder's flight and you still will have an interception at 3km distance out. In this situation, the lead depends on the off angle between you and whatever it is that you are defending.
thank you sir for giving ur precious time ! its always a pleasure to hear frm u.
 
BrahMos, the world's only supersonic cruise missile and a symbol of the India's military prowess has been billed to be "uninterceptable" for the "next 20 years", by none other than the "father of BrahMos" himself.
"The equivalent of BrahMos is yet to built. And, in the next 20 years, it cannot be intercepted by an enemy," says A Sivathanu Pillai, scientist, and CEO and MD of BrahMos Aerospace sharing the vision for the future trajectory of growth for the iconic missile technology developed jointly by India and Russia.

BrahMos can't be intercepted in next 20 years: Scientist - Indian Express
India can't make the Brahahahmos without Russian engines but it can do boasting 100% indigenously.
 
India can't make the Brahahahmos without Russian engines but it can do boasting 100% indigenously.

"The equivalent of BrahMos is yet to built. And, in the next 20 years, it cannot be intercepted by an enemy," says A Sivathanu Pillai, scientist, and CEO and MD of BrahMos Aerospace sharing the vision for the future trajectory of growth for the iconic missile technology developed jointly by India and Russia.

Time for you to visit your ESOL teacher, again. :D
 
@gambit sir can't a CIWS do the job ? @Neptune any idea ?

sure it can, but as @gambit explained, there'll be problems on tracking&detecting. Remember, there's no missile on this earth that is not interceptable. Only the succes rate can be increased :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:rofl:

if this troll were the father of brahtmos, then the ruksies would be the great grandpas of it?

the next thing you know another troll from DRDO or HAL will start calling himself the father of PAKFA. :lol:

btw, was India's father of modern rifle or modern bullet born yet?

India can't make the Brahahahmos without Russian engines but it can do boasting 100% indigenously.

not only engines, but also almost every thing from concept to design to key parts to testing to validating, to produce...
 
The Biggest problem with DRDO is..... There is no moderator and they let all their senior fellows troll big time...... And their idiotic comments make us (pdf indians) listen to the trolls from countries who cannot even make a 9 mm pistol.....

he would have more credibility if he is to call himself the Father of Apache. :lol:
 
Why would anyone try to intercept Bramhos in the 1st place?
Its maximum range is 290kms, its area of operation will be around border and its adjoining region isn't it....
 

Back
Top Bottom