What's new

Bill Gertz: Chinese Jet Threatened U.S. Intelligence Aircraft

Europa

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
911
Reaction score
-1
Country
Germany
Location
India
Chinese Jet Threatened U.S. Intelligence Aircraft | Washington Free Beacon

AP177841193313.jpg


Su-27 flew within 50 feet of new P-8 anti-submarine warfare jet near Japan


A Chinese jet fighter flew dangerously close to a U.S. Navy P-8 anti-submarine warfare aircraft near Japan this week in an encounter that highlights China’s continued aggressiveness in the region.

The P-8, a new, militarized Boeing-737 anti-submarine warfare aircraft, was conducting routine surveillance of the Chinese coast over the East China Sea on Monday when the incident occurred, said U.S. defense officials familiar with reports of the encounter.

Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Jeffrey Pool had no immediate comment but said he would provide “an explanation of the event” on Friday.

The defense officials said the Chinese Su-27 interceptor jet flew within 50 feet of the P-8 and then carried out a barrel roll over the top of the aircraft—a move described by officials as dangerous and meant to threaten the surveillance aircraft.

It was the second threatening encounter of a U.S. surveillance aircraft this year. In April, a Russian Su-27 flew within 100 feet of a U.S. Air Force RC-135 aircraft during another dangerous intercept over waters north of Japan.

One defense official said the Pentagon’s failure to produce a tough response to the April event likely spurred the Chinese to conduct the similar threatening intercept on Monday.

Chinese military officials have said they oppose all U.S. electronic surveillance flights and described ship-based monitoring of their facilities and territory an encroachment of sovereignty. U.S. military officials have said the monitoring is carried within international airspace and thus does not violate international or Chinese law.

The Chinese attempt at aerial intimidation comes amid unprecedented Chinese military exercises held recently and currently underway in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea.

On Monday, Chinese air force and navy jets conducted combat simulation drills in the East China Sea—a possible target of the P-8’s monitoring.

China also is holding international military exercises in Inner Mongolia with Russia and several Central Asia states that are part of the Beijing-led anti-U.S. alliance known as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

The P-8 that was intercepted by the Su-27 is part of the Navy’s first squadron of new sub hunters deployed to Asia. Six P-8s, that can fire both missiles and torpedoes, are under the command Navy’s Seventh Fleet and are based at Okinawa’s Kadena Air Base. They support the fleet’s maritime surveillance operations as part of the U.S. pivot to Asia.

The P-8s were deployed in December—a month after China declared an air defense identification zone over the East China that encroaches on both Japanese and South Korean maritime zones. The U.S. government said it does not recognize the Chinese defense zone. China has threatened to use force to maintain its control over the area covering most of the East China Sea.

The Navy has described the P-8 as “the most advanced long range anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare aircraft in the world.” The jet also conducts maritime intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions.

The U.S.-China close encounter also is a setback for Adm. Samuel Locklear, commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, who has been leading Obama administration efforts to develop closer relations with the Chinese military.

Locklear has sought to play down the growing military threat from China as part of efforts to develop closer cooperation with the Chinese military.

The commander’s dovish policies are being opposed by some in the Pentagon and Air Force who are concerned that the conciliatory approach will appease the Chinese at a time when Beijing has made aggressive territorial claims in the East China Sea and South China Seas.

Rick Fisher, a China military affairs analyst, said increased U.S. surveillance flights near China are part of the United States’ strategy of responding to China’s aggressive imposition of controls in disputed maritime regions.

“In response, China is applying the same aggressive flying intimidation tactics to U.S. surveillance aircraft that it is using on Japanese surveillance aircraft,” said Fisher, a senior fellow with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.

Chinese warplanes conducted similar close intercepts to Japanese P-3 aircraft in May and June, flying within 50 feet of the aircraft, Fisher said.

“The U.S. needs to consider a stronger response and make clear to China that unprovoked deadly aggression will result in an allied military response,” Fisher said.

The latest Chinese aerial assertiveness should prompt the United States to conduct mount joint fighter escorts with Japan’s military for surveillance aircraft, he said. Additionally, the Pentagon should increase the number of U.S. fighters deployed to Okinawa, and to request that the Philippines permit the stationing of a wing of fighters at Philippine air bases, as well as boost U.S. military assistance to the Manila government.

Fisher said the Chinese objective with the aggressive aerial encounters is to “make U.S. political leaders fear another ‘April 1’ incident.”

In April 2001, a Chinese F-8 interceptor crashed into a U.S. EP-3 surveillance aircraft off the southern China coast, causing the J-8 to crash and nearly causing the crash of the EP-3.

That encounter set off an international crisis after the propeller-driven U.S. aircraft made an emergency landing on China’s Hainan Island and the 24 crew members were imprisoned for 10 days.

“This kind of intimidation is intended to make White House officials fear a larger incident with China and to ‘stand down’ American surveillance flights,” Fisher said. “Beijing is hoping to take advantage of the distraction of these U.S. officials by multiple crises in Iraq and the Ukraine to push the Americans out of maritime regions in Asia that China is seeking to dominate.”

Until Monday’s encounter, China had been operating its intercepts in a more careful manner, defense officials said, describing most past encounters as “professional.”

The U.S. military has sought to engage China in talks on maritime rules of engagement and a code of conduct aimed at preventing such close encounters with limited success.

In the RC-135 encounter, the U.S. electronic surveillance aircraft was flying near the Russian Far East coast north of Japan on April 23 when an the Russian Su-27 intercepted the jet.

During that encounter, the Russian warplane rolled sideways to reveal its air-to-air missiles and then flew within 100 feet of the RC-135 cockpit. The incident was video recorded by the crew but the Pentagon declined to release the video.

The Pentagon protested the Russian encounter with officials in Moscow. However, no additional steps were taken to warn the Russians about further dangerous intercepts.

Fisher said U.S. P-8s have flown surveillance missions over the South China Sea, where China has been engaged in aggressive naval and coast guard tactics against Vietnam and Philippines over competing maritime claims.

“If such patrols are over shallower waters near to China, another ‘controlled crash’ into the P-8 could also be part of a Chinese intelligence operation to capture the latest U.S. Navy anti-submarine and patrol aircraft,” he said.

“China is just now testing its first long range anti-submarine aircraft based on the turboprop powered Y-9 transport,” he added. “Gaining insights into the twin-turbofan powered P-8 may accelerate a likely Chinese program to make an ASW/maritime patrol version of its twin-turbofan C-919 regional airliner.”
 
Last edited:
i think china needs more time, china is still not militarily prepared. any accidents may further escalate tension. do you think china needs to make temporary compromises with japan to deescalate the already tense situation? do you think china needs to increase the defense budget first?

Does U.S. seriously want conflict with China? - People's Daily Online

Military, we are still not US level. Economy and international leveraging, China is. US superpower status is based on economy power, not military prowess. Soviet Union has failed becos it lacks the economy factor. Not becos, its military fail.

Any war with China will be a total war(military, economically, info tech structure). A war that will not just restrict on military fighting alone. You expect China will still ship out iphone 6 from Shenzhen factory to US if US and China fights a war? No iphone ship out from China will means the collapse of Apple Corp. Not too mention many other US companies that gets supply from China. You can imagine the chaos and destruction on world economy scale if both start fighting each other.

And remember, China is unconquerable becos she possess nuke. Any attempt by US to force a landing on China soil or destruction to her cities will result in Armageddon.

China is trying to play the equal status. US fighter jets too confront Chinese military surveilance often at very close and dangerous range. It just that the news are not in the western main stream and US will make a mountain out of a mole in this incident in trying to paint China as aggressor. A great example is ADIZ. Both US and Japan has long set up those zone near China waters in the 60s,70s. While China only setup such ADIZ in 2014 and yet the hypocrite US dare to accuse China of rising the tension and aggressive strategy. Are US trying to say US can set up ADIZ that overlaps China water while China can't do that back on Japan water becos China is an inferior country compare to US? That does not make sense.

US repeatly accuse China military of systematic hacking US government system but snowden, a CIA contractor, reveal US too are on a large scale actively hacking China system. But China being a victim too never start pointing finger at any particular countries first when regards to the threat they face. Are US again trying to say China shall just sit there and let US hack their system and do nothing becos China in the eyes of the world is an inferior country compare to US again?

China is just learning all this tricks from US and apply back on them. China and US are on the equal ground. If US jets try to intimidate China jet, China will an eye for an eye. Simple!
 
@Beast

good points. i may add some more.

usa is beyond a country, as we think of a country conventionally. usa is a system that transcends temporal and spatial borders, unless you develop a counter-system, even with all the finances and military hardware, the usa system would still prevail invincible. we may see the world as very big place but the world is as small as a drawing room for usa. i think, one first need to have a vision and develop strategy accordingly. china's traditional outlook may not help china develop a counter-system to pose all out challenges to the globalized usa system.

pardon me, i hardly flatter and so in think, it is suicidal for china to confront usa in terms of total war. i think, if china doesn't want to evolve into a global idea and a world system, it would be better to stay outside the usa system and never be part of it. here the concept of area denial gets relevancy. Area denial weapon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

but then again, how long? they will somehow find ways to get access anyway. ccp wants no intervention, ccp wants multiporal world, fine but is it that easy to do? russia is today a friend because putin is there but what will happen when putin will not be there? individuals can't compensate a system. there are more complex matters and it will take a lengthy discourse to unravel all the exegesis of imperial doctrines. in short, i say, its never too late to develop a vision first and toe the dream after it
 

Back
Top Bottom