What's new

BCB on board, Big Three one vote away

Jade

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
5,622
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
With the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) accepting revised proposals for the restructure of the ICC after securing the assurance that their Test status will not be revoked, the Big Three are one vote away from the number required to push through constitutional amendments in order that the revamp be completed in full.

"BCB has stood firm on [not agreeing] to the two-tier format...but they have agreed upon the position paper," a BCB official confirmed today, referring to the two-tier format that would automatically put the No. 9 and 10 teams in the ICC rankings outside the existing group of eight Test playing nations. The lack of clarity as to whether the BCB had signed off on the guiding principles or on the resolutions pertaining to the amendments, with the official saying the board had not put pen to paper, took the Big Three a step closer to gaining greater control of the ICC's functioning and its revenues.

Of the four boards that had opposed the content and speed with which the document was being pushed through, BCB's concerns about their Test status appear to have been addressed. It now leaves the cricket boards of Pakistan, South Africa and Sri Lanka as the only three who have made it clear that their "support" for the ICC's key principles as announced on Tuesday still remained subject to approval by their home boards.

There appears to be confidence in the Big Three camp that they will be able to get the support of one of the three by the end of the week and thus have a total of eight on their side, which makes up the three-fourths majority needed to pass constitutional amendments in the ICC. Rather than the two-thirds majority required for more routine decisions regarding ICC's functioning, constitutional amendments require three-fourths majority, i.e. eight out of ten members in agreement so that "special resolutions" be passed. There are several components of the ICC's Finance & Commercial Affairs committee working group's paper that require constitutional amendments - like the creation of a new internal Executive committee (ExCo), changes in the ICC Board and a new ICC commercial entity to be called IBC.

A Big Three insider told ESPNcricinfo on Tuesday night: "The next round of negotiations, read bargaining, begins now." On Wednesday, another representative said the message from the group was that, "There are no more negotiations left except in terms of the FTP and minor issues regarding promotion and relegations."

At the end of the ICC Executive Board meeting which ICC president Alan Isaac called, "one of the most productive and participatory meetings of all that I have been in," he said that there were several stages left for the completion of the revamp, with key principles agreed to. "The detail around those principles needs to be worked out and obviously be further approved by the board at further meetings. We've agreed principles at the moment, we haven't adopted resolutions or recommendations from the draft report subsequently negotiated. We've just agreed to a set of principles."

ICC revamp : BCB on board, Big Three one vote away | Cricket News | Cricinfo ICC Site | ESPN Cricinfo
 
I think Pakistan will be the next board to give in. They cannot even play at home, given the security concerns and have to rely on other boards agreeing to play them at neutral venues.
 
@Jade @Raja.Pakistani What this ICC revamp is all about. Sorry for my ignorance, as I don't have IOTA of clue about it.

In crux:
BCCI, ACB, ECB would take over ICC
Majority of revenues would go to these 'big three'
All the ICC tournaments until 2023 will be held only in India, England and Australia,
India, England and Australia would play who they want, while the other won't have the choice
 
im so disappointed with BD .. they back stabbed us again ....
 
@Jade @Raja.Pakistani What this ICC revamp is all about. Sorry for my ignorance, as I don't have IOTA of clue about it.
You are not reading the topics running in cricket section :p
To add it further to what Jade said the bottom team of the first division would play home and away series against the top team of the second division in every four year in order to decide promotion or relegation of teams

India, England and Australia can not be relegated even if they are at the bottom of first division :D

READ WHAT EX ICC PRESIDENT SAY

Ehsan Mani's paper to the ICC - Cricbuzz
 
Last edited:
im so disappointed with BD .. they back stabbed us again ....
The so called tiger could not resist and just wanted to save their test status lol

Three big(south africa, Sri Lanka, Pakistan) are still opposing it. Now three idiots will offer them greed or will give them threats to secure one more vote
 
The so called tiger could not resist and just wanted to save their test status lol

Three big(south africa, Sri Lanka, Pakistan) are still opposing it. Now three idiots will offer them greed or will give them threats to secure one more vote

what's wrong in it?
They had their concerns and now their concerns has sought out.
What is the meaning of their objection now?
 
You are not reading the topics running in cricket section :p
To add it further to what Jade said the bottom team of the first division would play home and away series against the top team of the second division in every four year in order to decide promotion or relegation of teams

India, England and Australia can not be relegated even if they are at the bottom of first division :D

READ WHAT EX ICC PRESIDENT SAY

I did go through one of the thread, members were bashing each other, so I quoted you. Later, in the day, I'm going to read on it & counter..:D :enjoy:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom