What's new

Babri Masjid Case Ruling Today

Fasih Khan

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
0
Babri Masjid Case Ruling Today, Could India fail Again by genociding It's Minority Muslim Population as ever on the Issue, or would be reasonable, for a change.

Heavy security for India Ayodhya mosque ruling

Security is tight in Ayodhya ahead of the court order Tens of thousands of security personnel have been deployed across northern India ahead of a court ruling on the long-running Ayodhya religious dispute.

Helicopters are keeping watch overhead and authorities have urged calm amid fears the ruling could spark unrest.

The Allahabad High Court will decide who owns land where Hindu mobs tore down a 16th Century mosque in 1992.

Hindus claim the site of the Babri Masjid is the birthplace of their God, Ram, and want to build a temple there.

The destruction of the mosque led to widespread rioting between Hindus and Muslims in which some 2,000 people died.

It was some of the worst religious violence since the partition of India in 1947.

Peace appeal

Home Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram said there would be 190,000 security personnel on duty in the state of Uttar Pradesh for the ruling.

"The central government has taken adequate measures and has deployed adequate forces to assist state governments in maintaining peace," Mr Chidambaram told a press conference in Delhi.

"I once again appeal to the people to maintain peace."

Correspondents say the authorities are anxious as the legal decision could have potentially explosive consequences.

An appeal for peace, signed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, has appeared in several Indian newspapers urging people to respect the rule of law and abide by the court order.

Correspondents say the Ayodhya ruling could not have come at a worse time for the authorities - they already have their hands full dealing with security preparations for the Delhi Commonwealth Games which begin on Sunday.

Moreover, many troops are engaged in fighting Maoist rebels across vast tracts of India and the worsening situation in Indian-administered Kashmir has added to security problems.

The high court ruling in the Ayodhya case is due to be announced in the city of Lucknow on Thursday at 3:30 pm (1000 GMT).

The court ruling was due last Friday but the Supreme Court deferred the decision, saying it wanted to give Hindus and Muslims more time to resolve the dispute amicably. On Tuesday it said the high court could proceed.

At stake is whether the disputed site in Ayodhya should be given to the Hindu community to build a temple or returned to the Muslim community to rebuild the Babri Mosque.

Correspondents say Thursday's ruling is unlikely to be final and expect the judgement to be appealed.

BBC News - Heavy security for India Ayodhya site ruling
 
India boosts security, braces for verdict on holy September 30, 2010
Updated 0614 GMT (1414 HKT)



New Delhi, India (CNN) -- India has beefed up security across the country as it braces for a court verdict that could trigger religious violence.

India's Supreme Court is expected to rule Thursday afternoon on ownership of land in the northern town of Ayodhya that has been long disputed by Hindus and Muslims.

Destruction of a mosque in Ayodhya in 1992 sparked religious riots across India, in which more than 2,000 people died.

"The central government has taken adequate measures and has deployed adequate security forces all over the country in order to assist the state government to maintain law, order and peace," Union Home Minister Shri P. Chidambaram said Thursday. "I would once again appeal to all sections of the people of the country to cooperate with the government and uphold the values that are dear to our country."

Paramilitary forces have been deployed in the state of Uttar Pradesh, Home Ministry spokesman Onkar Kedia said Thursday. In the rest of the country, paramilitary forces and air force aircraft are being kept on reserve.

About 190,000 forces are in place in Uttar Pradesh, Kedia said, without disclosing the total number of troops that have been deployed across India as a "precautionary measure."

India's Home Ministry also has temporarily banned bulk text messages and has urged the media to exercise restraint and to not sensationalize any possible violence.

The town of Ayodhya has been a religious flash point for more than 400 years. Hindus believe that Lord Rama, one of the religion's most revered deities, was born there.

In 1859, British colonial administrators annexed the site because of growing religious disputes and created separate Muslim and Hindu places of worship there. Two years after independence, in 1949, the gates were locked after Muslims claimed Hindus had placed deities of Rama in their area.

Hindu groups have pushed to build a temple in Ayodhya, to replace a Muslim mosque razed by a Hindu extremists 1992. The destruction of the 16th-century Babri mosque sparked widespread riots in which more than 2,000 people died nationwide.

The court battle over who has rights to build on the site has dragged on for years.

This month, Hindus and Muslims were urged to pray for peace after a judgment date was announced, and some Ayodhya residents fled to avoid any violence.

CNN's Sumnima Udas contributed to this report.

India boosts security, braces for verdict on holy site - CNN.com
 
There is no chance, justice and hard science should prevail.

Let the High Court of Allahabad decide that.

The Archaeological Society of India knows the hard science behind it. Just a few hours more and the whole world will know about it.
 
Most importantly, there should be no bloodshed and violence and I hope the federal law enforcement authorities as put in and there is no dependency on the Gujarat authorities who are led by a genocidal maniac.
 
Most importantly, there should be no bloodshed and violence and I hope the federal law enforcement authorities as put in and there is no dependency on the Gujarat authorities who are led by a genocidal maniac.

Then you must agree with my first post.
 
Do you have any doubt they wont?

Why dont you show a little patience, its a question of few more hours?

Why are u in a hurry to pass your own judgement, lets the judges do it, its their job.

As I said above, the best possible solution is for the status quo to be maintained.
 

Back
Top Bottom