What's new

Australia's ruling Labor clears uranium sales to India

MINK

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
556
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Australia's ruling Labor clears uranium sales to India

By James Grubel
SYDNEY | Sun Dec 4, 2011 8:19am IST

(Reuters) - Australia's ruling Labor Party on Sunday endorsed plans to open up uranium sales to India, clearing the way for talks on a bilateral nuclear agreement and resolving an issue that has caused diplomatic tensions between the two nations.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced the plan in November, but needed her party's national policy conference to overturn its ban on selling uranium to countries which are not signatories to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Gillard successfully pushed her uranium policy through the conference, despite an often heated debate and chants from protesters who remain opposed to nuclear energy and weapons.

"We should take a decision that is in our nation's interest, a decision about strengthening our strategic partnership with India in this the Asian century," Gillard said, adding Australia already sold uranium to China, the United States and Japan.

Australia has almost 40 percent of the world's known uranium reserves, but supplies only 19 percent of the world market. It has no nuclear power stations.

India, Asia's third-largest economy and the world's largest democracy, has long complained about the Australian ban and wants more access to uranium to meet an ambitious target for nuclear energy, with plans to build 30 nuclear power stations in the next 20 years.

The move to allow sales to India follows a landmark U.S. agreement to support the civil nuclear programme in India, signed in 2008.

Australia's uranium industry welcomed the policy shift, which it said could lead to more Indian investment in Australian mining projects.

"Chinese, Japanese and Russian companies are seeking out these opportunities and we would expect Indian companies will do the same," Australian Uranium Association chief executive Michael Angwin said.

He said India would potentially buy up to 2,500 tonnes of Australian uranium a year by 2030, although the first sales could still be some years away as it could take several years to negotiate a nuclear safeguards agreement.

Before selling uranium, Australia negotiates nuclear safeguards agreements with customer nations to ensure nuclear material can only be used for energy and not for nuclear weapons.

Australia now has four mines, BHP Billiton's (BHP.AX) (BLT.L) Olympic Dam, potentially the world's biggest; Energy Resources Australia's (ERA.AX) Ranger mine; the Beverly mine, owned by U.S. company General Atomics, and Honeymoon mines, owned by Uranium One (UUU.TO) and Mitsui & Co (8031.T).

Canberra has forecast uranium exports to rise from around 10,000 tonnes a year to 14,000 tonnes in 2014, worth around A$1.7 billion.

Sunday's party vote was a victory for Gillard, but exposed deep divisions within the government over nuclear energy, with Transport Minister Anthony Albanese leading opposition to any sales to India or expansion of exports.

Albanese said since Japan's Fukushima nuclear disaster in March, most nations, including Germany, Switzerland and Italy, were winding back their commitment to nuclear energy.

"Under these circumstances, it is absurd that we should be expanding ours," Albanese told the conference.

Former anti-nuclear campaigner and rock singer Peter Garrett, whose band Midnight Oil railed against nuclear energy, said Labor needed to honour its support for the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

"Labor has a great disarmament tradition," Garrett, who is now Australia's Schools Education Minister, told the conference.

"Where is our vision here? Where is our commitment to a nuclear free future?"


Australia's ruling Labor clears uranium sales to India | Reuters
 
This was Expected After India has rejected Trilateral Pact with US/Aus !!

Welcome Move !

"We should take a decision that is in our nation's interest, a decision about strengthening our strategic partnership with India in this the Asian century,"
 
So, if the Australian ruling party has supported this deal, does that mean it faces no more hurdles?

In 2008, the opposition to the nuclear deal in India was so great that there was a vote showdown in the parliament.

There is significant political opposition to the lifting of this ban in Australia and I think that the Labor party might have to seek consensus in Australia's parliament.
 
So, if the Australian ruling party has supported this deal, does that mean it faces no more hurdles?

In 2008, the opposition to the nuclear deal in India was so great that there was a vote showdown in the parliament.

There is significant political opposition to the lifting of this ban in Australia and I think that the Labor party might have to seek consensus in Australia's parliament.

The opposition already supports the uranium deal. So its pretty much a go now.
 
India would potentially buy up to 2,500 tonnes of Australian uranium a year by 2030, although the first sales could still be some years away as it could take several years to negotiate a nuclear safeguards agreement.

India is not obliged to disclose what it does with the uranium it mines in India.
And that is 2500 tonnes of local produced uranium in India that is freed to be used in an area of choice.

:cheers:
 
The opposition already supports the uranium deal. So its pretty much a go now.

I was just reading some of the online comments in Sydney Morning Herald regarding this lifting of ban. Nearly all comments are against this policy change (and as usual, Australians love to spill out their racist garbage against Indians).

Sometimes, I feel that Australians are too full of themselves. Don't we have long-term uranium supply agreements with Russia, Kazakhistan and Areva of France (with Areva having access to uranium mines in Niger)? After the 2008 nuclear deal, we have plenty of uranium supply options. Then why were we so keen on getting this ban lifted from Australia?

Fact remains, Australia, with its history of anti-India tirade, can never become a close-ally of India no matter how many strategic interests we share.
 
I was just reading some of the online comments in Sydney Morning Herald regarding this lifting of ban. Nearly all comments are against this policy change (and as usual, Australians love to spill out their racist garbage against Indians).

Sometimes, I feel that Australians are too full of themselves. Don't we have long-term uranium supply agreements with Russia, Kazakhistan and Areva of France (with Areva having access to uranium mines in Niger)? After the 2008 nuclear deal, we have plenty of uranium supply options. Then why were we so keen on getting this ban lifted from Australia?

Fact remains, Australia, with its history of anti-India tirade, can never become a close-ally of India no matter how many strategic interests we share.

Australia is the biggest supplier of Uranium, the move augers well and reinforces the fact that India is a responsible player and a trustworthy one.
 
I was just reading some of the online comments in Sydney Morning Herald regarding this lifting of ban. Nearly all comments are against this policy change (and as usual, Australians love to spill out their racist garbage against Indians).

Sometimes, I feel that Australians are too full of themselves. Don't we have long-term uranium supply agreements with Russia, Kazakhistan and Areva of France (with Areva having access to uranium mines in Niger)? After the 2008 nuclear deal, we have plenty of uranium supply options. Then why were we so keen on getting this ban lifted from Australia?

Australian Uranium miners were more keen to get the ban lifted, than the Indian Government. Why India needs Australian Uranium? because it gives India more options, more suppliers. And not to forget we have the largest uranium reserves.

About the comments in SMH, couple of things, lot of false flags and trolls in news comment sections on every website, so don't mold your opinions based on these comments.

Having said that, there are obviously Australians who oppose the deal. Namely the Greens and the Labour left. But it has nothing to do with Australians hating Indians, it has more to do with what these people and political parties believe in. These are the same people who oppose nuclear power for Australia.

But at the end of the day both the opposition and the ruling party of Australia now support the uranium sale, and thats what matters. Not what people write in the comments section on news websites.
 
if voting happens than only Greens(max. 5 seats) will go for negative voting. ruling party nd opposition will go for the deal.
 
So, if the Australian ruling party has supported this deal, does that mean it faces no more hurdles?

No, it has to pass parliament first AND India has to agree to strong conditions of sale.

The party just agreed to change its platform, that's all.


There is significant political opposition to the lifting of this ban in Australia and I think that the Labor party might have to seek consensus in Australia's parliament.

The vote only passed by 20 votes.
 

Back
Top Bottom