Aung San Suu Kyi's silence on the genocide of Rohingya Muslims is tantamount to complicity

[Steve781]

People who have a "could do no wrong" reputation almost always have deep flaws which are frequently overlooked.Nelson Mandela, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Winston Churchill, John F Kennedy and even Mother Theresa lived a far from flawless existence.

 

[volcano]

Lets pop you in a district and impose stupid laws on you, suppress you for DECADES, dont recognize you nor give you citizenship if you open your bloody mouth we will blame Hinduism

SO keep your shameless shitty replies to yourself!

I have noticed ONLY Indians seem to get ISLAMOPHOBE diarrhea on this issue!

ohhhh... you are just bullshiting, Rohingya's citizenship got striped off in 1982. They started islamofacisam long before that. Revocking citizenship is not the cause but an effect. They bertrayed their country long brfore 1982.

 

[Diggy]

ohhhh... you are just bullshiting, Rohingya's citizenship got striped off in 1982. They started islamofacisam long before that. Revocking citizenship is not the cause but an effect. They bertrayed their country long brfore 1982.

one thing is clear people of myanmar are not pacifist's like those liberal fools in our country.

 

[pakdefender]

Have to say that she turned out to be quite biatch , far detached from the picture of the good leader under house arrest by military junta

 

[Dubious]

ohhhh... you are just bullshiting, Rohingya's citizenship got striped off in 1982. They started islamofacisam long before that. Revocking citizenship is not the cause but an effect. They bertrayed their country long brfore 1982.

Typical misinformed Indian:

The Rohingya are Muslims who reside in the northern parts of the Rakhine (historically known as Arakan) State, a geographically isolated area in western Burma, bordering Bangladesh. The British annexed the region after an 1824-26 conflict and encouraged migration from India. Since independence in 1948, successive Burmese governments have considered these migration flows as illegal. Claiming that the Rohingya are in fact Bengalis, they have refused to recognize them as citizens. Shortly after General Ne Win and his Burma Socialist Programme Party (BSPP) seized power in 1962, the military government began to dissolve Rohingya social and political organizations. The 1974 Emergency Immigration Act stripped Burmese nationality from the Rohingya. In 1977, Operation Nagamin (Dragon King) constituted a national effort to register citizens and screen out foreigners prior to a national census.

The International Observatory on Statelessness - Nationalityforall.org

no...you got it wrong. It has nothing to do with me being an indian...muslims are hated more or less by all nationalities of ppl.

Get outside of PDF world...you would see the RESPECT that muslims have earned in the countries THEY go to!!!



Again..you gotts visit outside of PDF...to see how lovable and peaceful muslims are...countries are dying to get more muslims in...





How is Sri Lanka monks doing? i heard even they have run out of patience with them?

Just coz people hate you and you hate your origins (cant even fly your own flag coz dual national dont exist so you aint indians by indian standards and you aint American without the word American indians) doesnt mean people view the world through your narrow eyes or the neighbourhood you live in!

Kindly dont quote me with your infested phobia!

 

[asad71]

All Burmans are united in their hatred for Muslims - particularly the Rohingyas. This has been a visible feature with the rise of Burmese Buddhist extremist nationalism when it was apparent pre-WW II that the British were leaving soon.

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

Have to say that she turned out to be quite biatch , far detached from the picture of the good leader under house arrest by military junta

Some questions please.

If she turned out to be quite the B___ as you put it. What does that make you muslims and your islamic country that never stepped for its own people?

Second- How many ISLAMIC countries and muslims supported her when she was being held?

Third, when your benafactor China mistreats, prisons and kills muslims, where is your passion then?

 

[24 Hours]

Good news
Myanmar opposition backs Rohingya rights
She didn't say anything directly herself, but it's a step forward.

 

[Diggy]

Some questions please.

If she turned out to be quite the B___ as you put it. What does that make you muslims and your islamic country that never stepped for its own people?

Second- How many ISLAMIC countries and muslims supported her when she was being held?

Third, when you benafactor China mistreats, prisons and kills muslims, where is your passion then?

exactly , where are these sympathies for ughur refugees , it wont take more than a minute to punch holes in their arguments.

 

[24 Hours]

exactly , where are these sympathies for ughur refugees , it wont take more than a minute to punch holes in their arguments.

I've seen the Turkish members give their sympathies, granted, that may have more to do with the fact that they are turks rather than Muslim.

 

[Diggy]

I've seen the Turkish members give their sympathies, granted, that may have more to do with the fact that they are turks rather than Muslim.

i am talking about pak man , they don't see ugh as muslims bcz their best ally china is involved and now suddenly they are just turks , but if isreal , india or myanmar does it then its a genocide , hypocrisy at its best .

 

[ito]

Where is IOC and are Muslim Countries...Why is nobody questioning them?

 

[24 Hours]

i am talking about pak man , they don't see ugh as muslims bcz their best ally china is involved and now suddenly they are just turks , but if isreal , india or myanmar does it then its a genocide , hypocrisy at its best .

I understand China's treatments of Ugyhurs isn't necessarily fantastic, but they have a pretty good deal compared to Myanmar since well, there actually considered citizens of China.

 

[Diggy]

I understand China's treatments of Ugyhurs isn't necessarily fantastic, but they have a pretty good deal compared to Myanmar since well, there actually considered citizens of China.

they are not allowed to pray , build mosques , wear burkha , keep a beard and a lot more stuff is prohibited , even 5% of that would have been done in india then pakistanies would have gone crazy ..on one hand you raise rohingya issues but don't speak about ughurs and please check the condition of muslim minorities shias and ahmedis in pakistan , it would shame any pakistani , so why this duplicity ? ...if you think that ughur is a chinese internal affair then so is rohingya mayanmars matter just like the shia genocide undergoing in pakistan is a pakistans internal affair.


off-topic --- Welcome to the forum and enjoy your stay

 

[24 Hours]

they are not allowed to pray , build mosques , wear burkha , keep a beard and a lot more stuff is prohibited , even 5% of that would have been done in india then pakistanies would have gone crazy ..on one hand you raise rohingya issues but don't speak about ughurs and please check the condition of muslim minorities shias and ahmedis in pakistan , it would shame any pakistani , so why this duplicity ? ...if you think that ughur is a chinese internal affair then so is rohingya mayanmars matter just like the shia genocide undergoing in pakistan is a pakistans internal affair.


off-topic --- Welcome to the forum and enjoy your stay

First I would like to thank you for the welcome, it is very much appreciated.

Anyway, going past the religious issues I still believe the Rohingya do have it worse than the Ugyhurs. Yes, their religious freedom is limited but, they are still the country's citizens and not stateless. Anyway, I do think the matters with Myanmar was an internal problem but, it's grown past that. It is now a regional problem moving towards South and Southeast Asia. As we can see with all the boat people out in the seas. I cannot speak on the Pakistani viewpoint as I am not a Pakistani though. Though I am aware of the problems surrounding the Shia and Ahmadiyya Muslims.