Anti Pakistan articles in Afghan newspaper

[Samandri]

One of the article is saying that greater Afghanistan was the dream of Bacha Khan, thats not true. Before June 1947, he was actually supporting united India. At referendum he was demanding inclusion of option of azad Pakhtunistan (not loy afghanistan) and after referendum he was hoping for autonomous NWFP within Pakistan.

 

[Stag112]

Every time the current leadership in Kabul and its population attempt to talk about taking sovereign land from Pakistan, then retribution will most certainly be on its way and they will know true despair. If the national interests of Pakistan dictates the assumption that we must support the Afghan Taliban to secure our borders, then the fate of Afghanistan is the least of our concerns on who actually controls the country as long as they pro-Pakistan.

Pakistan also has concerns because Radio Mullah is hiding in their country, however you don't actually see the constant accusation and warmongering rhetoric in our media calling out for blood on the Afghans. Furthermore, they are an ungrateful bunch who we have fed and housed in our country for more than 30 years and they still have the audacity to talk negatively about Pakistan. Everyone in Pakistan understand's the involvement of the Indian intelligence in supporting the Baluchistan Liberation Army, therefore please save your preaching lessons to someone who actually gives a flying hoot.

Boundary disputes are common, but they are not a license for state sponsored terrorism. They are not attacking you, but you are proudly boasting of using terroists for attacking them. And like a true aggressor you sure have excuses presented as a grievance, while openly admitting you interfere in their country.

You are accusing others of doing what you are boasting of doing to them. You obviously do not see the hypocrisy.

 

[Indika]

Boundary disputes are common. They are not attacking you, but you are proudly boasting of using terroists for attacking them. And like a true aggressor you sure have excuses presented as a grievance, while openly admitting you interfere in their country.

You are accusing others of doing what you are boasting of doing to them. You obviously do not see the hypocrisy.

Oh thats pretty much common with them, like 1965 when pakistan attacked in kashmir and expected india not to retaliate .

 

[Tiger Genie]

Every time the current leadership in Kabul and its population attempt to talk about taking sovereign land from Pakistan, then retribution will most certainly be on its way and they will know true despair. If the national interests of Pakistan dictates the assumption that we must support the Afghan Taliban to secure our borders, then the fate of Afghanistan is the least of our concerns on who actually controls the country as long as they pro-Pakistan.

Pakistan also has concerns because Radio Mullah is hiding in their country, however you don't actually see the constant accusation and warmongering rhetoric in our media calling out for blood on the Afghans. Furthermore, they are an ungrateful bunch who we have fed and housed in our country for more than 30 years and they still have the audacity to talk negatively about Pakistan. Everyone in Pakistan understand's the involvement of the Indian intelligence in supporting the Baluchistan Liberation Army, therefore please save your preaching lessons to someone who actually gives a flying hoot.

you seem to be approving Pakistan meddling inside Afghanistan including supporting taleban; and in the same breadth equivocating Baluchistan. Does that mean you're fine with say Iran or India installing an insurgency there? Interesting.

 

[Rasengan]

Boundary disputes are common, but they are not a license for state sponsored terrorism. They are not attacking you, but you are proudly boasting of using terroists for attacking them. And like a true aggressor you sure have excuses presented as a grievance, while openly admitting you interfere in their country.

You are accusing others of doing what you are boasting of doing to them. You obviously do not see the hypocrisy.

Boundary disputes are common, although when the Afghan Intelligence meddles in the affairs of Pakistan and actively supports miscreants in our territory, then its only fair that we return the favor in kind. Previously during the 50s, the Afghan establishment tried to invade Pakistan, however they failed spectacularly and now we will only co-exists with a neighbor which is pro-Pakistani in nature. Yes we interfere in their country and what exactly are the Indians and the Afghans are actually going to do about it? I mean the Taliban will come into power and anyone who dares to openly challenges the existence of Pakistan will be silenced forever. Clearly you are naive and have no understanding of how countries and their intelligence services work. The Indian Intelligence service is involved in Afghanistan, Baluchistan, TTP ect. Therefore pleased take your preaching lessons elsewhere and along the way take all the Afghan refugees with you.

you seem to be approving Pakistan meddling inside Afghanistan including supporting taleban; and in the same breadth equivocating Baluchistan. Does that mean you're fine with say Iran or India installing an insurgency there? Interesting.

Technically the Indian intelligence service is involved in the insurgency of Baluchistan, therefore your example was extremely poor in this instance. Iran would never support the insurgency, because the same groups are causing havoc in the province of Sistan. However, in general most intelligence services do interfere in the domestic matters of other countries, because clearly if you fails to see this assumption then you are simply naive and have no knowledge of the operations of the CIA around the globe.

 

[Tiger Genie]

Technically the Indian intelligence service is involved in the insurgency of Baluchistan, therefore your example was extremely poor in this instance. Iran would never support the insurgency, because the same groups are causing havoc in the province of Sistan. However, in general most intelligence services do interfere in the domestic matters of other countries, because clearly if you fails to see this assumption then you are simply naive and have no knowledge of the operations of the CIA around the globe.

you missed the question (r u a politician?) Do you approve if a foreign country installs an insurgency inside your country?

 

[Rasengan]

you missed the question (r u a politician?) Do you approve if a foreign country installs an insurgency inside your country?

I selectively answered your question because frankly it was hogwash in nature, since every intelligence agency in the world meddles in the affairs of others. Its justifiable to logistically support and fund an insurgency in another country which would be a direct threat to you and this is common sense known as realpolitik. Furthermore a large percentage of the population in Afghanistan actually welcomes Pakistan's support of the Taliban and denying this would simply be delusional on your part. The Kabul establishment has supported the TTP and we are simply returning the favor in kind. I will not take preaching lessons from a Indian whose country is quite clearly involved in the insurgency problem of Baluchistan.

 

[Tiger Genie]

I selectively answered your question because frankly it was hogwash in nature, since every intelligence agency in the world meddles in the affairs of others. Its justifiable to logistically support and fund an insurgency in another country which would be a direct threat to you and this is common sense known as realpolitik. Furthermore a large percentage of the population in Afghanistan actually welcomes Pakistan's support of the Taliban and denying this would simply be delusional on your part. The Kabul establishment has supported the TTP and we are simply returning the favor in kind. I will not take preaching lessons from a Indian whose country is quite clearly involved in the insurgency problem of Baluchistan.

you must be a politician...all that bla bla to just yes!

 

[I <3 PAK ARMY]

Foreign agencies paid puppets in newspaper agencies....just nothing more important they always want to do propaganda against Pakistan ...

 

[TMA]

Lets face the reality right now, Kabul is under the controls of anti-Pakistan darri/persian speaking tribes and if you figure in their sectarian affiliation, it will become clear. Pashtuns in general do not hate Pakistan while NATO and USA installed non-Pashtuns and anti-Pakistanis in Kabul so as soon as Taliban take over the govt in Kabul, that problem is gone. Secondly not all Afghan refuges are against Pakistan rather they are happy here and love Pakistan as much we Pakistan. But the one who are against Pakistan should be thrown out.

But how do we found out which Afghan refugees are anti-Pakistan? Do we issue them a questionnaire, if we can track them down? It is better to thoroughly screen them before they enter, however we have to clear up our corrupt officials first.

 

[Rasengan]

you must be a politician...all that bla bla to just yes!

I can be the tooth fairy instead of a politician, therefore what exactly is your point.

 

[war&peace]

But how do we found out which Afghan refugees are anti-Pakistan? Do we issue them a questionnaire, if we can track them down? It is better to thoroughly screen them before they enter, however we have to clear up our corrupt officials first.

This is where intelligence services can be helpful. If they are given with the task to find out by allocating special resources i.e. by making a section for monitoring refugees and asylum seekers. It won't take long since have similar physical features and culture so it is not very difficult to penetrate their community. I think agencies may already have collected a good amount of data about Afghan refugees and we just need to ask them. The anti-Pakistan elements can be classified into categories ranging from harmless to the extremist who can't even contain their hatred publicly.
We weed out all the bad ones and let good Afghans to stay and enjoy a peaceful life here. Many have got married to local people so this is their home now.

 

[Super Falcon]

@WebMaster sir plese take care of him, he is wishing for peaceful people to die and calling Indians in degrading manners.

He is right if u poke ur nose wgere it not fits u bound to see these words more often

Karzai is dog abdullah is ........

Soon they will get their fate

 

[TMA]

This is where intelligence services can be helpful. If they are given with the task to find out by allocating special resources i.e. by making a section for monitoring refugees and asylum seekers. It won't take long since have similar physical features and culture so it is not very difficult to penetrate their community. I think agencies may already have collected a good amount of data about Afghan refugees and we just need to ask them. The anti-Pakistan elements can be classified into categories ranging from harmless to the extremist who can't even contain their hatred publicly.
We weed out all the bad ones and let good Afghans to stay and enjoy a peaceful life here. Many have got married to local people so this is their home now.

We should only accept the women who have married the local men, not men who have married local women. Those men who have married local women should be thoroughly scrutinised before being accepting as Pakistani.

 

[somebozo]

Afghanistan itself is a destabilizing force and they somehow dream of colonizing India...and Pakistan being a major obstacle in their path to India...Pakistan should stop playing the role of border nanny and let Afghans unleash their migration to India...