pakistani342
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,485
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Article on WPost here, excerpts below:
But Afghan and U.S. officials, who monitored the talks along with a delegation from China, offered far more cautious assessments.
In a statement, Ghani described the talks as a “first step towards reaching peace.”
...
Many Afghans remain deeply skeptical of Pakistan’s motives because of the country’s long-standing ties to the Afghan Taliban.
There are also doubts about whether the Taliban negotiators speak for the fighters on the ground. The Taliban’s supreme leader, Mohammad Omar, has not been seen publicly in years, and it’s unclear whether he endorses the talks.
And there are fears that a peace deal may fuel the Islamic State in Afghanistan. One influential Taliban commander, Abdul Qayyum Zakir, has threatened to join the Islamic State or form his own group if the talks continue, according to Reuters.
...
“He gave clear directives to the ISI to make it happen,” said one Pakistani security official, referring to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency.
...
Many analysts believe that the Pakistani military holds enough leverage over Taliban leaders to keep them engaged in the process.
But a former Pakistani general, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he didn’t want to appear as if he were interfering in the process, said he worries hard-liners within the Taliban or the Afghan government could “sabotage” the process.
But Afghan and U.S. officials, who monitored the talks along with a delegation from China, offered far more cautious assessments.
In a statement, Ghani described the talks as a “first step towards reaching peace.”
...
Many Afghans remain deeply skeptical of Pakistan’s motives because of the country’s long-standing ties to the Afghan Taliban.
There are also doubts about whether the Taliban negotiators speak for the fighters on the ground. The Taliban’s supreme leader, Mohammad Omar, has not been seen publicly in years, and it’s unclear whether he endorses the talks.
And there are fears that a peace deal may fuel the Islamic State in Afghanistan. One influential Taliban commander, Abdul Qayyum Zakir, has threatened to join the Islamic State or form his own group if the talks continue, according to Reuters.
...
“He gave clear directives to the ISI to make it happen,” said one Pakistani security official, referring to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency.
...
Many analysts believe that the Pakistani military holds enough leverage over Taliban leaders to keep them engaged in the process.
But a former Pakistani general, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he didn’t want to appear as if he were interfering in the process, said he worries hard-liners within the Taliban or the Afghan government could “sabotage” the process.