What's new

A-10 remains the favourite CAS aircraft of US

SBD-3

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
15,115
Reaction score
-9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
October 13, 2010: In Afghanistan, the most requested ground support aircraft is the U.S. A-10. It's been that way since 2002, and there was similar A-10 affection in Iraq. Troops from all nations quickly come to appreciate the unique abilities of this 1970s era aircraft, that the U.S. Air Force has several times tried to retire. Now, over 300 remaining A-10s are being upgraded, so that they can fly until 2028. This includes new electronics as well as structural and engine refurbishment.

A-10s are worked hard. An A-10 squadron has a dozen aircraft and 18 pilots. Pilots often average about a hundred hours a month in the air. That's about twenty sorties, as each sortie averages about five hours. The aircraft range all over southern Afghanistan, waiting for troops below to call for some air support. The A-10, nicknamed "Warthog", or just "hog", could always fly low and slow, and was designed, and armored, to survive lots of ground fire. The troops trust the A-10 more than the F-16, or any other aircraft used for ground support.

For the last three years, pilots have been flying a new version of the A-10, the A-10C. The air force has been upgrading A-10s to the "C" model for most of the past decade. The new goodies for the A-10C equip the pilot with the same targeting and fire control gadgets the latest fighters have. The new A-10C cockpit has all the spiffy color displays and easy to use controls. Because it is a single-seat aircraft, that flies close to the ground (something that requires a lot more concentration), all the automation in the cockpit allows the pilot to do a lot more, with less stress, exertion and danger.

The basic A-10 is a three decade old design, so the new additions are quite spectacular in comparison. New commo gear is installed as well, allowing A-10 pilots to share pix and vids with troops on the ground. The A-10 pilot also has access to the Blue Force Tracker system, so that the nearest friendly ground forces show up on the HUD (Head Up Display) when coming in low to use the 30mm cannon. The A-10 can now use smart bombs, making it a do-it-all aircraft for troops support. The air force is also upgrading the engine and structural components on the A-10s, which may cost another $10 million per aircraft. But this extends the service life of each aircraft to 16,000 hours.

The newly equipped A-10s are so abundant now, that only A-10Cs are flying in combat zones. But it will take several more years to upgrade all 350 A-10s in service. Beyond that, the air force will continue to upgrade the engines and structures of the 1970s era aircraft. All the upgrades will cost about $13 million per aircraft.

The A-10 is a 23 ton, twin engine, single seat aircraft whose primary weapon is a multi-barrel 30mm cannon originally designed to fire armored piercing shells at Russian tanks. These days, the 1,174 30mm rounds are mostly high explosive. The 30mm cannon fires 363 gram (12.7 ounce) rounds at the rate of about 65 a second. The cannon is usually fired in one or two second bursts. In addition, the A-10 can carry seven tons of bombs and missiles. These days, the A-10 goes out with smart bombs (GPS and laser guided) and Maverick missiles. It can also carry a targeting pod, enabling the pilot to use high magnification day/night cameras to scour the area for enemy activity. Cruising speed is 560 kilometers an hour, and the A-10 can slow down to about 230 kilometers an hour. In Afghanistan, two drop tanks are usually carried, to give the aircraft maximum time over the battlefield.
 
a-10_1.jpg

A10s.jpg
 
I like the sound it makes when it fly pass.
But i will surely not like if it opens the front mounted avenger on me :P
 
US never realized its potential before Gulf war...But it remains the premier GA aircraft
 
The history of the A-10 (the development phase) is very interesting. In the 1970's, there was a group in the Pentagon nicknamed the "fighter mafia", a group of maverick thinkers who went against the "higher/faster/costlier" paradigm pushed by the Generals. The first product of the fighter mafia was the F-15, but they were very unhappy that it had been as heavily modified as it had from their concept. They then pushed the F-16, which turned into one of the finest modern fighters ever made. The A-10 was #3.

It was literally JAMMED down the USAF's throat. One must remember that the three main US force branches (Army, Air Force, Navy) compete viciously for funding, and the USAF saw the A-10 as taking $$ away from other, more desirable systems. In this case they were wrong, the fighter mafia (led by an amazing officer named Col. John Boyd who was a military thinker of the highest caliber, literally on par with Sun Tzu and Von Clausewitz, and whose land warfare theorems are in use today), was correct; they saw the need and made it happen. It's a very interesting story.

For those interested in fighter planes and this story, try reading this book by Robert Coram. A really fine read.
 
Warthog is beauty plane, however, it is easy visible to shot down from Anti-Air systems. Only good against weak countries.

If I remember correctly, did you know USAF offered A-10 Warthog to Pakistan? It was rejected, PAF demanded F-16s in 1980s to meet their specific requirements.

:smokin:

The thing about A-10 is while it is a great anti-ground platform it is a dedicated platform as well. It is really expensive to maintain a plane just for the sake of attack operations. Pakistan made the correct decision in going with the F-16, a multirole fighter capable of both air and ground operations.
 
The thing about A-10 is while it is a great anti-ground platform it is a dedicated platform as well. It is really expensive to maintain a plane just for the sake of attack operations. Pakistan made the correct decision in going with the F-16, a multirole fighter capable of both air and ground operations.
Meaningless. You can make the same argument against the tank, the machine gun or even the airplane in general.
 
Meaningless. You can make the same argument against the tank, the machine gun or even the airplane in general.

Given Pakistan's defence budget, which is quite limited, I think they made the correct decision going for a multirole aircraft. You don't expect them to go against the Indian Su-30s with A-10 do you?
 

Back
Top Bottom