What's new

16th December 1971: From East Pakistan to Bangladesh

If We Go Through This whole False Stories of Pakistan Army Targeting Bengali One seems Surprised where are the 2 Million Biharis Who Murdered Them.
The Census Clearly Reflects There were around 3 Million Biharis in East Pakistan.
When Dhaka Fall there No was Just 300000 so where Were The Bihari Gone
These were Killed By The Indian Army and Mukti Bahini and Put the Blame on Pakistan Army.
We Pakistan dont Believe in concoted Stories.
Indian Army themselves Admitted They were In East Pakistan under The False Flag Mukti Bahini.
This is Just Distortion of Facts
Where The Bihari Gone.
 
heros of 71.jpg
zia.jpg


zia. 2 jpg.jpg
 
https://www.globalvillagespace.com/93000-pakistani-soldiers-did-not-surrender-in-1971-because/
93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?
April 1, 2017


Dr. Junaid Ahmad|

December 16, 1971, was an ominous day for Pakistan, because the Pakistani army’s scattered divisions sandwiched between an internal insurgency supported by Indian war machine and Indian army columns finally decided to surrender. To this day popular imagination and rhetoric is that 93,000 soldiers of Pakistan surrendered to victorious India and were taken as POWs (Prisoners of War).

But the funny thing is: Pakistan, in December 1971, could not have more than 45,000 soldiers on ground in former east-Pakistan. So where the magical figure of 93,000 came from?

This highly exaggerated figure is sustained by Indian, Bangladeshi, international and even Pakistani media. Many Pakistani politicians, out of spite for army, keep on repeating the cliched figure. Ironically, this propagated number has remained unchallenged and is also widely believed in Pakistan, as few accounts have been written to challenge it and today reportedly 65% of Pakistanis are younger than 35 years of age who have no idea of what happened, 45 years ago, in 1971.

But the funny thing is: Pakistan, in December 1971, could not have more than 45,000 soldiers on ground in former east-Pakistan. So where the magical figure of 93,000 came from?

How many Pakistani troops were in East Pakistan?
The number of 93,000 soldiers that is talked about has been conflated with civilians. West Pakistani civilians who were present in large numbers in former East-Pakistan were taken over into custody by Indian army to protect them from revengeful Bengali crowds and Mukit Bahni.

Undisputed fact is that Pakistan had only one corps comprising three divisions in East Pakistan during 1971. In fact when operation search light began on 25th March, 1971, the total number of Pakistani troops on ground were around 27,000. More troops were sent from west Pakistan but they had to arrive through a long circuitous route since India had blocked air route over India taking advantage of the famous “Ganga Hijacking Case” (believed to be a false flag planned by RAW for this purpose)

The three divisions, of Pakistan army, by end November 1971, comprised a total force of 45,000, on books, including combatant and non-combatant troops. Out of these, there were 34,000 combatant troops and the remaining 11,000 were non-combatants, supporting men and CAF personnel. But between six to seven thousand Pakistani soldiers died in the war also.

It was also helpful in putting meat to the story of three million killed, hundreds and thousands of rapes and genocide. An army of less than 40,000, spread over a large theatre of conflict under attack from guerrillas supported by Indian army was hardly in a situation of doing what it was accused of.

This one corp was pitched against three corps of Indian Army from the West and North West and another two corps from the North East and East, a total of five Indian Corps plus 175,000 Indian backed and trained Mukti Bahini and many thousands of Awami League miscreants. When the total number of Pakistan army troops ranged between 34,000 to 45,000 how could 93,000 soldiers surrender?

From time to time various officers and commentators have attempted clarifying the myth but the power of first narrative is such that still the figure of 93,000 POW’s sticks in popular imagination.

According to Lt Gen Naizi, Corps Commander of Eastern Command in 1971.

The total fighting strength available to me [Gen Naizi] was forty-five thousand – 34,000 from the army, plus 11,000 from CAF and West Pakistan civilian police and armed non-combatants”who were fighting against the insurgents. Even if the strength of HL, MLA, depots, training institutes, workshops, factories, nurses and lady doctors, non-combatants like barbers, cooks, shoemakers and sweepers are added, even then the total comes to only 55,000.

Air Marshal Rahim khan, CNC Pakistan Air Force (1969-1972), had stated:

The number of regular Pakistani troops in East Pakistan never exceeded 33,000-34,000. The rest is just propaganda by India and the Awami League, to magnify their success….”

Air Marshal Zulfiqar Ali Khan, who commended Eastern Wing of Pakistan Air Forces had asserted the same in these words:

At the maximum, our regular fighting force in East Pakistan in December 1971 stood at 34,000. This figure does not include paramilitary personnel, military police, etc. Even if you include the auxiliaries, the total does not cross 45,000”.

General Akhtar Abdul Rehman. Former Vice Chief of Army Staff, speaking on the 1971 conundrum stated

It was impossible for the 34,000 Pakistani troops in East Pakistan or for that matter any army in the world to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and 170,000 Mukti Bahini, If not more, that too in a hostile environment 1200 miles away from West Pakistan …… Keeping into account all this, if the Indians still feel that they achieved a stunning military victory against Pakistan, I can only say they have fallen prey to their own propaganda”.

US congressman, Charles Wilson (famous for Charlie Wilson’s War) in a discussion with Pakistani diplomats in Washington DC remarked.

“……In 1971, it was certainly not possible for the 35,000 Pakistani troops in Dhaka to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and the more than 100,000 Indian-trained Bengali guerillas.”

Another US congressman, Stephen Solarz, commenting on the War of 1971 in June 1989, remarked,

Pakistanis are energetic, vibrant, and resilient. We must not be misled by 1971. It was certainly not possible for the 40,000 odd Pakistani army in Dhaka to fight against much larger Indian army and Indian-trained Bengali Bahinis in a hostile territory ….”

K C Pant, Indian former Defense Minister in September, 1994 during a discussion on Indo-Pak relations held in New Delhi, said

Peace is important between Pakistan and India. We respect the professional competence of the Pakistani soldier. Had democracy continued in Pakistan, Islamabad would not have suffered the debacle resulting in the surrender of its 40,000 military personnel to India in East Pakistan”.

Sarmila Bose, the famous Indian Bengali writer and Associate Researcher at Oxford University in her book Dead Reckoning published in 2011, asserts

“…… t appears that while the total figure in Indian custody is about right, to state that 93,000 soldiers were taken prisoner is wrong, and creates confusions by greatly inflating the Pakistani fighting force in East Pakistan”.

Javed Jabbar, former Pakistani Minister of Information in his article, Estranged siblings-Pakistan and Bangladesh, 40 years later, wrote

Pakistan’s armed forces did not exceed 45,000 troops at optimal levels. The 90,000 prisoners-of-war held by India included over 50,000 non- combatant, unarmed West Pakistani civilians.”

S. M. Hali, a well-known Pakistani analyst in his article, Breaking myths of 1971 Pak-India war writes,

The total strength of Pakistan Army in East Pakistan (in 1971) was 40,000….”

All the aforementioned references point toward one fact that the number of total army personnel who surrendered were far less than 93,000. Whereas my research shows that they were only around 34,000 but in any case they could not have been more than 40,000. The number of 93,000 soldiers that is talked about has been conflated with civilians. West Pakistani civilians who were present in large numbers in former East-Pakistan were taken over into custody by Indian army to protect them from revengeful Bengali crowds and Mukit Bahni.

The figure of 93,000 also included children, women, civil administration officials and staff, non-combatant troops such as nurses, doctors, cooks, barbers, shoemakers, carpenters and others. The higher number talked about was a deliberate attempt to defame and demoralize Pakistani army, to demonstrate to the world extent of Indian victory. It was also helpful in putting meat to the story of three million killed, hundreds and thousands of rapes and genocide. An army of less than 40,000, spread over a large theatre of conflict under attack from guerrillas supported by Indian army was hardly in a situation of doing what it was accused of.

The total figure, a mix of soldiers and civilians was deliberately floated by Indians, and later by Bangladeshis to support their case for victimization. In Pakistan, a clever Bhutto used this for various reasons of his own politics. No one ever wanted to clarify. In reality, the actual number of Pakistani troops who surrendered on 16th December 1971 was only around 34,000.

Piece by Dr Junaid Ahmad, Author of ‘Creation of Bangladesh: Myths Exploded.’ Additional comments and editing by Editorial Desk of Global Village Space.
 
http://bangladeshchronicle.net/2017...-release-93000-pakistani-pows-after-1971-war/

The Untold Story of India’s Decision to Release 93,000 Pakistani POWs After 1971 War
March 26, 2017 | Filed under: South Asia | Posted by: gms


The Untold Story of India’s Decision to Release 93,000 Pakistani POWs After 1971 War
By Sashanka S. Banerjee on 26/03/2017
Indira Gandhi’s biggest worry after the surrender of Pakistan in 1971 was the safety of Mujibur Rahman. The release of Pakistani POWs was the price Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (and the ISI) extracted for the safe return of the Bangladeshi leader.
 
Diplomats’ role during liberation war of Bangladesh

Mohammad Amjad Hossain

Diplomacy is the first defence while war is the second defence of the country’s sovereignty. The role of diplomats played in mobilizing public opinion around the world from April of 1971 following Pakistan army’s crackdown on unarmed people in erstwhile East Pakistan which is separated from Western part of Pakistan about 1200 miles over Indian territory. The role played by diplomats would be written in red letter the history of Independent Bangladesh.
Defection of Bangladeshi diplomats in Pakistan embassies around the world mobilized public opinion against Pakistan’s atrocities and genocidal activities in what was then East Pakistan. Even American diplomat, in particular, Archer Blood, American Consul-General in Dacca, who relentlessly highlighted the events in Bangladesh in his diplomatic cables though they were met with deafening silence in Washington.

Defections of Bengali diplomats
Eventually Blood lost his job in the State Department at the instigation of Henry Kissinger, National Security advisor under President Richard Nixon and Secretary of State to President Gerald Ford. Gary J Bass in the book: ‘The Blood Telegram’ which reflected the moral bankruptcy of US leaders, pointed out that Archer Blood was not allowed to protest to the Pakistan authorities but started sending in a blistering cables tagged selective genocide, urging his bosses to speak out against atrocities being committed by the Pakistani military regime.

On 6 April most staff members of the Dhaka American Consulate practically revolted against the Nixon administration by sending telegram “for silence in the face of atrocities”. Archer Blood is no more in this world but US embassy in Dhaka established a library in Archer Blood’s name to show respect. He was source of information to BBC and other news agencies for disseminating information at a time when Military government of Pakistan bundled 36 foreign correspondents out of Dhaka on 28 March 1971. He was recalled a few months later.

This is one side of story of the diplomats. On the other hand, Pakistan’s President Gen. Yahya Khan’s faith retaining unified Pakistan was shattered when 14 diplomats posted in Pakistan embassy in Washington, including present Finance Minister AMA Muhith, declared allegiance on 5 August, 1971 to the government of Bangladesh in exile. The declaration of allegiance had caused serious repercussions in Islamabad. That was reflected in the briefing session of the officers by Dr. Maqbool Bhatti, Director-General of External Publicity and National affairs on 16 August where this writer was present.

How Kolkata mission created
The Director General only regretted and wished them well as some Senior Bangladeshi diplomats were his batch mate in foreign service, and said that situation would be normal soon in East Pakistan. I was the only Bengali officer amidst the Punjabis and Sindhis present. Another Bengali officer Ezrajul Alam from Press Information department was appointed on an ad hoc basis a few months early. This writer left Islamabad on 27 August on leave via Karachi and Colombo in Sri Lanka because India had disallowed air traffic to overfly to Dhaka. This writer did not join after expiry of leave in November, 1971.

In fact the ball began to roll at the Pakistan Deputy High Commission in Calcutta (now Kolkata) when as many as 60 diplomats and non-diplomats under the leadership of Pakistan’s Deputy High Commissioner Hossain Ali declared allegiance to Bangladesh government in exile on 18 April. It happened just a day after the Bangladesh government in exile was formed under the leadership of Mr. Tajuddin Ahmad, an unsung hero.

Deputy High commissioner Hossain Ali’s decision was important as it facilitated Bangladesh government in exile to use the High Commission office as its secretariat. Hossain Ali also made history by hoisting Bangladesh flag in the chancery. Both Deputy High commissioner and third secretary Mr. Anwarul Karim Chowdhury worked tirelessly as spokespersons of Bangladesh government in exile. Pakistan government lodged protest to Indian government and sought assistance for repatriation of diplomats to Pakistan but without any success.

This was an all-time record in the history of diplomacy when diplomats and officials defected en masse to an emerging country. Second secretary Mohiuddin Ahmed from London defected on April 10 who was the first diplomat from London’s Pakistan embassy.

Top Bengali ambassadors joined
The name of Khwaja Mohammad Kaiser may be mentioned in this context who served as Pakistan Ambassador to China who remained in his post at the advice of the Bangladesh government in exile who repatriated to Bangladesh some time in 1972. Ambassador Kaiser was a close friend of Chinese Prime Minister Chou En Lai who gave him farewell dinner in his honor. Ambassador Abul Fateh was in Iraq as Pakistan Ambassador. Ambassador K.K. Panni from Manila and Ambassador Abdul Momen from Argentina defected as well. Pakistan government sent warrant of arrest against Ambassador Abul Fateh, who withdrew entire amount of twenty five thousand pounds from Embassy’s bank account and gave to Bangladesh government in exile through Indian Ambassador in Iraq.
The first in the series of defection began with K.M. Shehabuddin, Second Secretary and Amjadul Haq, Assistant Press Attache in New Delhi followed by A.H. Mahmood Ali in New York who is now serving as Foreign Minister of Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League government.

Among the high ranking diplomats, who declared their allegiance for Bangladesh, names of Abdul Fatah, Abdul Momin, K.K Panni and Abdul Momen are worth mentioning. All of them were holding Ambassadorial assignments.
Officially, the first Bangladesh mission was set up in Calcutta on 18 April, 1971 when Bengali diplomats stopped normal functioning at Pakistan Deputy High Commission and converted it into Bangladesh mission. It was followed by an Information Centre in New Delhi on 26 April with K.M.Shehabuddin as its chief.

Abu Sayeed Chowdhury, others
On December 06, 1971 Bangladesh government in exile decided to open trade missions in USSR, Romania, and Czechoslovakia etc. to establish commercial relations with different countries until Bangladesh is recognized by international community. The Government of India gave green signal to operate Bangladesh Trade Mission from Calcutta. That was indeed a success story of diplomacy in pre-liberation days.

The role played by Justice Abu Sayeed Choudhury, after quitting the position of head of Pakistan delegation to the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva, was very effective indeed. Justice Abu Sayeed along with Bengali diplomats in different parts of the world played a significant role in mobilizing public opinion against genocide and in favour of recognition of Bangladesh. The role of first Foreign Secretary Mahbubul Alam Chashi, who resigned in protest from Pakistan Foreign service during the regime of Gen. Ayub Khan, has many caps to his credit in dealing with foreign policy during crucial days of Bangladesh. It would be unfair to ignore the role of Iqbal Ather, a Pakistani diplomat, who resigned in protest from Ambassadorship in Italy against repressive measures in erstwhile East Pakistan. Iqbal Ather joined the diplomatic corps of the newly independent Bangladesh and contributed towards improving the image of Bangladesh along with Ambassador Ataur Rahman in Arab and African countries.

Mohammad Amjad Hossain, retired diplomat from Bangladesh and former President of Nova chapter of prestigious Toastmasters International Club of America, writes from Virginia.
 
https://www.globalvillagespace.com/93000-pakistani-soldiers-did-not-surrender-in-1971-because/
93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?
April 1, 2017


Dr. Junaid Ahmad|

December 16, 1971, was an ominous day for Pakistan, because the Pakistani army’s scattered divisions sandwiched between an internal insurgency supported by Indian war machine and Indian army columns finally decided to surrender. To this day popular imagination and rhetoric is that 93,000 soldiers of Pakistan surrendered to victorious India and were taken as POWs (Prisoners of War).

But the funny thing is: Pakistan, in December 1971, could not have more than 45,000 soldiers on ground in former east-Pakistan. So where the magical figure of 93,000 came from?

This highly exaggerated figure is sustained by Indian, Bangladeshi, international and even Pakistani media. Many Pakistani politicians, out of spite for army, keep on repeating the cliched figure. Ironically, this propagated number has remained unchallenged and is also widely believed in Pakistan, as few accounts have been written to challenge it and today reportedly 65% of Pakistanis are younger than 35 years of age who have no idea of what happened, 45 years ago, in 1971.

But the funny thing is: Pakistan, in December 1971, could not have more than 45,000 soldiers on ground in former east-Pakistan. So where the magical figure of 93,000 came from?

How many Pakistani troops were in East Pakistan?
The number of 93,000 soldiers that is talked about has been conflated with civilians. West Pakistani civilians who were present in large numbers in former East-Pakistan were taken over into custody by Indian army to protect them from revengeful Bengali crowds and Mukit Bahni.

Undisputed fact is that Pakistan had only one corps comprising three divisions in East Pakistan during 1971. In fact when operation search light began on 25th March, 1971, the total number of Pakistani troops on ground were around 27,000. More troops were sent from west Pakistan but they had to arrive through a long circuitous route since India had blocked air route over India taking advantage of the famous “Ganga Hijacking Case” (believed to be a false flag planned by RAW for this purpose)

The three divisions, of Pakistan army, by end November 1971, comprised a total force of 45,000, on books, including combatant and non-combatant troops. Out of these, there were 34,000 combatant troops and the remaining 11,000 were non-combatants, supporting men and CAF personnel. But between six to seven thousand Pakistani soldiers died in the war also.

It was also helpful in putting meat to the story of three million killed, hundreds and thousands of rapes and genocide. An army of less than 40,000, spread over a large theatre of conflict under attack from guerrillas supported by Indian army was hardly in a situation of doing what it was accused of.

This one corp was pitched against three corps of Indian Army from the West and North West and another two corps from the North East and East, a total of five Indian Corps plus 175,000 Indian backed and trained Mukti Bahini and many thousands of Awami League miscreants. When the total number of Pakistan army troops ranged between 34,000 to 45,000 how could 93,000 soldiers surrender?

From time to time various officers and commentators have attempted clarifying the myth but the power of first narrative is such that still the figure of 93,000 POW’s sticks in popular imagination.

According to Lt Gen Naizi, Corps Commander of Eastern Command in 1971.

The total fighting strength available to me [Gen Naizi] was forty-five thousand – 34,000 from the army, plus 11,000 from CAF and West Pakistan civilian police and armed non-combatants”who were fighting against the insurgents. Even if the strength of HL, MLA, depots, training institutes, workshops, factories, nurses and lady doctors, non-combatants like barbers, cooks, shoemakers and sweepers are added, even then the total comes to only 55,000.

Air Marshal Rahim khan, CNC Pakistan Air Force (1969-1972), had stated:

The number of regular Pakistani troops in East Pakistan never exceeded 33,000-34,000. The rest is just propaganda by India and the Awami League, to magnify their success….”

Air Marshal Zulfiqar Ali Khan, who commended Eastern Wing of Pakistan Air Forces had asserted the same in these words:

At the maximum, our regular fighting force in East Pakistan in December 1971 stood at 34,000. This figure does not include paramilitary personnel, military police, etc. Even if you include the auxiliaries, the total does not cross 45,000”.

General Akhtar Abdul Rehman. Former Vice Chief of Army Staff, speaking on the 1971 conundrum stated

It was impossible for the 34,000 Pakistani troops in East Pakistan or for that matter any army in the world to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and 170,000 Mukti Bahini, If not more, that too in a hostile environment 1200 miles away from West Pakistan …… Keeping into account all this, if the Indians still feel that they achieved a stunning military victory against Pakistan, I can only say they have fallen prey to their own propaganda”.

US congressman, Charles Wilson (famous for Charlie Wilson’s War) in a discussion with Pakistani diplomats in Washington DC remarked.

“……In 1971, it was certainly not possible for the 35,000 Pakistani troops in Dhaka to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and the more than 100,000 Indian-trained Bengali guerillas.”

Another US congressman, Stephen Solarz, commenting on the War of 1971 in June 1989, remarked,

Pakistanis are energetic, vibrant, and resilient. We must not be misled by 1971. It was certainly not possible for the 40,000 odd Pakistani army in Dhaka to fight against much larger Indian army and Indian-trained Bengali Bahinis in a hostile territory ….”

K C Pant, Indian former Defense Minister in September, 1994 during a discussion on Indo-Pak relations held in New Delhi, said

Peace is important between Pakistan and India. We respect the professional competence of the Pakistani soldier. Had democracy continued in Pakistan, Islamabad would not have suffered the debacle resulting in the surrender of its 40,000 military personnel to India in East Pakistan”.

Sarmila Bose, the famous Indian Bengali writer and Associate Researcher at Oxford University in her book Dead Reckoning published in 2011, asserts

“…… t appears that while the total figure in Indian custody is about right, to state that 93,000 soldiers were taken prisoner is wrong, and creates confusions by greatly inflating the Pakistani fighting force in East Pakistan”.

Javed Jabbar, former Pakistani Minister of Information in his article, Estranged siblings-Pakistan and Bangladesh, 40 years later, wrote

Pakistan’s armed forces did not exceed 45,000 troops at optimal levels. The 90,000 prisoners-of-war held by India included over 50,000 non- combatant, unarmed West Pakistani civilians.”

S. M. Hali, a well-known Pakistani analyst in his article, Breaking myths of 1971 Pak-India war writes,

The total strength of Pakistan Army in East Pakistan (in 1971) was 40,000….”

All the aforementioned references point toward one fact that the number of total army personnel who surrendered were far less than 93,000. Whereas my research shows that they were only around 34,000 but in any case they could not have been more than 40,000. The number of 93,000 soldiers that is talked about has been conflated with civilians. West Pakistani civilians who were present in large numbers in former East-Pakistan were taken over into custody by Indian army to protect them from revengeful Bengali crowds and Mukit Bahni.

The figure of 93,000 also included children, women, civil administration officials and staff, non-combatant troops such as nurses, doctors, cooks, barbers, shoemakers, carpenters and others. The higher number talked about was a deliberate attempt to defame and demoralize Pakistani army, to demonstrate to the world extent of Indian victory. It was also helpful in putting meat to the story of three million killed, hundreds and thousands of rapes and genocide. An army of less than 40,000, spread over a large theatre of conflict under attack from guerrillas supported by Indian army was hardly in a situation of doing what it was accused of.

The total figure, a mix of soldiers and civilians was deliberately floated by Indians, and later by Bangladeshis to support their case for victimization. In Pakistan, a clever Bhutto used this for various reasons of his own politics. No one ever wanted to clarify. In reality, the actual number of Pakistani troops who surrendered on 16th December 1971 was only around 34,000.

Piece by Dr Junaid Ahmad, Author of ‘Creation of Bangladesh: Myths Exploded.’ Additional comments and editing by Editorial Desk of Global Village Space.

Speaking of numbers, India continuously breast thumps that they have lost 1,670 soldiers here. And conveniently ignores that we lost 70,000 Mukti Bahini men beside others.
 
Speaking of numbers, India continuously breast thumps that they have lost 1,670 soldiers here. And conveniently ignores that we lost 70,000 Mukti Bahini men beside others.
Is India's Duty fight your war ??? your Million refugees Invaded our Western states And Exploited our resources

Its Not our fault that you Fighting A Professional Army With Amoured Brigade If Hadn't Been To India Pakistan Eastern command Might ended the Uprising In year or So
 
Is India's Duty fight your war ??? your Million refugees Invaded our Western states And Exploited our resources

Its Not our fault that you Fighting A Professional Army With Amoured Brigade If Hadn't Been To India Pakistan Eastern command Might ended the Uprising In year or So

Since you know nothing, just shut up.
 
Is India's Duty fight your war ??? your Million refugees Invaded our Western states And Exploited our resources

Its Not our fault that you Fighting A Professional Army With Amoured Brigade If Hadn't Been To India Pakistan Eastern command Might ended the Uprising In year or So

Then why did you fight? Why? Because there were immense advantages to be gained for the Hindu agenda in SA.
 
The role of Journalists during war of liberation

Mohammad Amjad Hossain

The role of journalists during war of liberation of Bangladesh could hardly be overemphasised. A batch of 36 foreign journalists who came to erstwhile East Pakistan to cover talks between Gen. Yahya Khan, President of Pakistan, Z.A Bhutto, President of Pakistan People’s Party and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, President of Awami League who won majority seats in general election held in November 1970 in Pakistan, were bundled out of the country from Dacca (now Dhaka) Intercontinental Hotel on the eve of preplanned crack down by the Pakistan army on the unarmed people.
The incident took place on fateful night of 26 March 1971. The army cracked down on the unsuspecting people of Dhaka without any warning almost everywhere. They attacked the dormitories of Dhaka University, and also concentrated their bombardments at the Shankari Patti area in old Dacca, Rajarbagh police HQ, East Pakistan Rifle HQ. The main reason to bundle out of foreign journalists was to conceal from the World what they intended to do in the provincial capital to frighten the people. Foreign journalists were stripped of all notes, cameras and documents and forced to fly to Karachi.
However, the truth could not be suppressed. Luckily Simon Dring of Daily Telegraph of London and Michael Lawrence, a French photographer of Associate Press news agency escaped the official dragnet. The game of Pakistan military leader Gen. Yahya Khan was exposed by Simon Dring in his report to Daily Telegraph. I quote a brief report of Simon Dring as reported by Journalist David Loshak, South-Asia bureau chief of London’s Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph in his book: Pakistan Crisis. Simon Dring gave an eyewitness accounts of terror campaign by saying “the first targets as the tanks rolled into Dacca were the students lived. Caught completely by surprise some two hundred students were killed in Iqbal Hall, headquarters of the militantly anti government student’s union, as shells slammed into the building and their rooms were sprayed with machine gun fire.”
After one month of massacres by Pakistan army a group of Pakistan Journalists were flown from Karachi to show them the situation in erstwhile East Pakistan was under control. One of reporters, Anthony Mascarenhas, Assistant Editor of Daily Morning News of Karachi and stringer of Sunday Times of London managed to flee Karachi on his return and had exposed the startling and heinous crime of the Pakistan army in East Pakistan. He described the killings in East Pakistan as” Pogrom”. In his article on genocide in the Sunday Times on 13 June,1971 created hell for Pakistan government which provided insight story of cruel behavior of ruthless violation of human rights.
That and some other stories of atrocities by the Pak army persuaded Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi to take a stand against Pakistan. Anthony Mascarenhas wrote two books on Bangladesh including massacres in erstwhile East Pakistan: The rape of Bangladesh and the legacy of Blood. In 1972 he was awarded the Granada’s Gerald Barry award for lifetime achievement in journalism as well as the International publishing company’s special award for reporting on the human rights violation committed during war of liberation of Bangladesh. During the regime of Gen. Ershad Anthony Mascarenhas visited Bangladesh as his guest sometime in August of 1985 and interviewed him. The legacy of blood appeared in 1986.
Sydney Schanberg of New York Times managed to preserve his notes from marauding Pakistan army who reported that the army started shooting at students coming from the University, up the road from about a mile. They were singing patriotic songs in Bengali. And then the army opened up. We could not tell when they hit the ground if they were ducking or killed. They headed for a newspaper. The English-language newspaper The People and Daily Ittefaq were the target of the army.
Peter Hazelhurst of The Times of London gave wide coverage of atrocities in erstwhile East Pakistan by Pakistan army. According to Professor Rehman Sobhan, Sydney Schanberg, Selig Harrison and Simon Dring “went beyond the call of professional duty in projecting the struggle of the Bengalis before their readers”. John Pilger reported in Daily Mirror of London on 16 June under the caption: Death of a nation gave vivid description of torture meted out by Pakistan army.
From erstwhile East Pakistan ABM Musa of Pakistan Observer, Moinul Alam, Chittagong bureau chief of Daily Ittefaq, Taheruddin Thakur, Political reporter of Daily Ittefaq, M.R. Akhtar, Bureau Chief of UPI news agency managed to secured safe places in Tripura in adjoining Indian state of Tripura after initial stage of army crackdown. Editor of Daily Azadi of Chittagong Mohammad Khaled was one of them. Mohammad Khaled, Taheruddin Thakur and M. R. Akhtar were working for Shadhin Bangla Betar (Free Bengal Radio) and M.R. Akhtar became famous with his satirical Charompatra. People stranded in erstwhile East Pakistan during war of liberation was avid listener of Charompatra and the Shadhin Bangla Betar.
This writer has had excellent relations with Mohammad Khaled and Moyenul Alam while he served News organization of Chittagong Radio from 1963-1965 as Assistant editor. Wahidul Huq of Pakistan Observer —- a connoisseur of Rabindra Sangeet—organized cultural team in Calcutta during war of liberation.
Bangladeshi journalist S.M. Ali who was the roving foreign editor of Singapore-based The New Nation in an article in the International Herald Tribune from Saigon in a pseudonym had exposed Yahya Khan’s false claim that the revolt of the Bengalee’s in the country was an internal affairs of Pakistan. The article appeared on 9 August 1971.
War between India and Pakistan, Pakistan’s threat to quit Commonwealth, the decision by the World Bank to stop financing the government of Yahya Khan and concerns expressed by the Senate of the United States, reflected that the Bangladesh crackdown has become an international crisis.
Another Bangladeshi journalist Abdul Matin who had settled in London sometimes in the early 1960s, brought out a newsletter in April of 1971 in collaboration with Tasadduque Ahmed and his wife Rosemary Ahmed to publish news emanating from Bangladesh. Abdul Matin snapped his relations with Pakistan Observer as its London Correspondent after the army crackdownPakistan. Pakistani journalist Farid Jaffery who married Rokeya Anwar, Awami League MP in East Pakistan became the editor of Bangladesh newsletter in London.
At one stage during 1971 Pakistan administration allowed some foreign journalists to enter erstwhile East Pakistan. Sydney Schanberg of the New York Times, who had been expelled in March took the advantage of visiting East Pakistan. He reported, the Pakistani Army personnel had painted ‘H’ in big yellow on the Hindu shops still standing in this town. Quoting Sydney Schanberg this was added by Gary Bass in his book: The Blood Telegram. “Sydney Schanberg saw Dacca half-deserted with fresh of troops arriving daily from West Pakistan at the airport”. This writer himself was a witness to the fact that many army personnel were being flown into Dacca from Karachi when he was flying on 27 August 1971 from Karachi by PIA.

Mohammad Amjad Hossain, retired diplomat, writes from Virginia, USA

আমাদের আসমা খালা
Lot of glorious Story made lot of history! But today I will tell another Story of a Very Brave Mother who was behind those entire glorious stories of whom not much is known ever! She is our beloved আসমা খালা. (Asma Khala). Yes! She is not only a caring mother of four but she is also a brave Mukti Mother of 2 brave FF Son.
They are Subsector 4 commander Ruhel Ahmed Babu and Dhaka-Dhamrai Guerrilla Shoail Ahmed. For lot many other crack platoon guerrilla of Dhaka area she was just their আসমা খালা. Dhanmondi, House No 18, of Road No-7 was a Safe haven for lot of Mukti Jodha and all other people like me and our family! During April to December 1971 countless family and young guerrilla like famous Artist ShahabUddin Ahmed, crack platoon member Bachu Bhai and so many others took shelter under her supervision.
She not only cooks extra food but also arrange fresh clothing, supporting money and medicine for hidden Guerrilla for their need. Her 2 story Dhanmondi House had a unique location. On the right side of that house was a big pond with clear water all the way up to Green Road. Lots of Coconut and other tree give a good cover. Her husband and our মামা(Maternal Uncle) late Mr.Noor-Ur-Rahman, a founder member of Awami League and close friend of Sheikh Mujib, an ex-federal Minister of Pakistan and had a very good liaison with various high level foreign and national source. Upper floor was already rented to UN delegate.
So it was a Safe Haven for Dhaka city Guerrilla. Some of those Flower pot were used to hide Explosive. Yes! Those flower pots with flower looks very fresh and beautiful! From the very beginning Muslim League Leader of Sylhet and an ex-Muslim league Minister Mahmood Ali and his wife were continuously bothering our আসমা খালা (Asma Khala) to collect information about his 2 son, Ruhel and Sohail. When she Failed to get any information from our আসমা খালা(Asam Khala), she make this comment with anger in Sylheti dialog " তুমার বাবু এ কিতা তুমারে কুছ ভোরিয়া স্বাধীনতা আনিয়া দিবনি?"( Is your Babu will bring Freedom as your Gift?) – Our আসমা খালা (Asma Khala) Keep her leap tight and hide her anger and did not reveal any information ever. আসমা খালা and her whole family were facing high danger every day during those 9 months. But they never lose their smile any time! Interestingly collaborator Mahmood Ali along with Mr. Z.A. Bhutto represent Pakistan in UN in December 1971 and he never come back to Bangladesh again!
After surviving from Lalmonirhat I took shelter in Rangpur and then in Mid-August 1971, I came to this House and meet with my other Family member who were alive. I will also like to mention those two great caring Daughter of our আসমা খালা. Who were also took high risk and busy to help আসমা খালা to take care so many refugee and FF in that house. They are our Jugnoo Aapa and Sheloo Aapa.
During Last phase of the war it become difficult to live in the same house because of continuous suspicious Al Badar watcher, so আসমা খালা and মামা decide to move to their Company Guest House in Road No 3. In this house over 25 people used to live till 18th, December 1971. Without their active support and bravery our guerrilla war was Impossible. But I wonder, no one awarded them any certificate neither ever they ask for it! Our heart full Salute to our আসমা খালা - May Allah keep her in good health, long life with happiness. May Allah also bless our great মামা late Noor-ur-Rahman, who was like a light house for all of us to Jannah - Ameen.
 
Liberation War Museum presents the history

People from all strata of society are visiting the newly-opened Liberation War Museum in Agargaon which offers a detailed and rich history of liberation war through displaying over 1000 photographs and other items in four galleries.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina inaugurated the new museum building in Agargaon on Sunday which comprises four galleries, auditorium, library, research centre, a temporary gallery, amphitheatre, office space, archive and lab.
Previously the museum operated at a private building in Segunbagicha for 21 years and it could not display a lot of artifacts due to lack of space. The new museum building has nine floors - three basements and six floors - with a display space of 1,85,000 sqft.
‘The museum possesses around 20,000 artifacts in total. Initially we have tried to present the history of liberation war by arranging minimum possible artifacts in four galleries in such a way so that a visitor can see all the displays in 45 minutes and get an idea about the liberation war’, said Ziauddin Tariq Ali, trustee and member secretary of the museum.
When visiting the museum this correspondent saw crowds thronging the galleries.
Visitors praised the way the artifacts have been displayed. Kariman Nesa, wife of a freedom fighter, who came with her son, said, ‘The museum is like a book on the liberation war’.
An aircraft used in the liberation war and bronze sculptures of founding president of the country Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and four national leaders Syed Nazrul Islam, Tajuddin Ahmed, Captain (rtd) Mansur Ali and AHM Quamruzzaman welcome visitors at the entrance.
The four galleries of the museum narrate the history of liberation war in four stages - from the war’s initial days to liberation of the country on December 16, 1971.
The first gallery named Our Heritage Our Struggle provides visitors with a brief historical background of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta by displaying terracotta artifacts, map of undivided Bengal, photographs of historical and archeological sites with information and photographs of major political events from British era to 1970s election.
The second gallery named Our Rights Our Sacrifices shows different political events, upheavals, participation and sacrifices by people prior to the liberation war.
The gallery displays a copy of the Proclamation of Independence of Bangladesh, photographs of formation and oath-taking of historical Mujibnagar Government in Meherpur. Memorabilia like clothes, notebooks, diaries, spectacles, pipes, wallets, utensils and others items used by historic figures like Tajuddin Ahmed, martyrs Jyotindranath Guhathakurta, Madhusudan Dey and many others.
A dim-lighted room at the gallery displays photographs of Operation Searchlight showing atrocities by the Pakistan Army on the fateful night of March 25, 1971. The photographs show innocent people lying dead on the streets.
The third gallery named Our Battles Our Friends depicts the events during the liberation war including life at different refugee camps in India.
Photographs depicting people’s plights at refugee camps are displayed at the entrance. A displayed tally shows an astounding number of 98, 99, 305 refugees who took shelter at 828 camps in India.
The gallery also shows photographs of cultural activists performing at different refugee and training camps, posters, memorabilia of freedom fighters, photographs and paper cuttings of coverage of the war by the international media and others.
The last gallery named Our Victory Our Values display photographs, documents, weapons used in the war and memorabilia depicting the last days of the liberation war.

From war field to diplomacy: Major General K.M. Safiullah
Mohammad Amjad Hossain

Diplomacy is the first line of defence of a country from external aggression while war is recognized second line of defence to protect the country. Major K.M. Safiullah of East Bengal regiment could not kept his eyes shut when marauding Pakistan army unleashed terror in killing unarmed defenceless people. He took up arms to fight against Pakistan like other members of East Bengal regiment based in erstwhile East Pakistan. I planned to write about Major-General K.M. Safiullah, first Chief of staff of the army in Bangladesh turned diplomat.
As luck would have it Major K.M. Safiullah from East Bengal regiment who had fought against occupation Pakistan army in sector 3 comprising Mymensingh, Brahmanbaria and Sylhet was promoted to the rank of Major-General on 7 April of 1972 and awarded gallantry award Bir Uttam. Major-General KM Safiullah served as Chief of staff of the army until 25 August of 1975 following changeover of the government of Awami League through coup d’état led by Junior army officers.
He was retired from the army and appointed the High Commissioner to Malaysia by Khandakar Mushtaq Ahmed and was there till 1981. Incidentally, I joined the Bangladesh embassy there as third secretary in 1977. It was a two-member embassy and I became the third home-based staff member.
Syed Nur Hossain was the first Secretary political. Curiously, the High commissioner asked me to keep my eyes and ears open. I was following internal and external issues carefully through news media and TV channels, apart from meetings with diplomats. Incidentally, I became member of three diplomatic groups in Kuala Lumpur. High commissioner asked me to write reports on such and such issue which I did. High commissioner had made changes here and there and sent them to the foreign office under his signature.
Since then I became his ghost writer. My assignment was to send reports on news media and to speak to the news media on the events in Bangladesh in a positive vein. On national day of Bangladesh I succeeded to telecast documentary film on Bangladesh. The New Straits Times, a prominent English daily of Malaysia, brought out two page special supplement on Bangladesh on 29 March of 1981 in connection with Independence day of Bangladesh for the first time during Maj-General KM Safiullah’s his tenure as High Commissioner. It was a stupendous task to collect advertisements to bring out special supplement in Malaysia.
High commissioner Safiullah had to receive President Ziaur Rahman in April of 1979 when he paid a two-day official visit. Major-Gen K.M. Safiullah was the chief of army staff while Major-General Ziaur Rahman served as Deputy Chief of Staff of the army during the same period. However, in the army list of seniority, General Zia was his senior. The 42-member delegation included two women parliamentarians and first lady Khaleda Zia. The Foreign Minister had instructed this writer to look after the first lady as well as the two women MPs. I succeeded to organize a trip to Malaysian museum for them. The visit of Bangladesh President took place following the visit of Malaysian Foreign Minister Tengku Ahmad Rithauddeen in April of 1978. Foreign policy of President Ziaur Rahman was to promote relations with Muslim countries, apart from America and Europe.
Credit, however, goes to High commissioner Major-General K.M. Safiullah for improvement of relations with Malaysia. In the High commission, I organized display center of Bangladesh products and High commissioner showed President Ziaur Rahman the display center and the president formally opened the display center. Display center received wide publicity in the news media there.
Interestingly when the High Commissioner introduced me to President Zia, the president said that he knew me very well. Actually, I came in contact with President Ziaur when he was the Deputy Chief of Staff of the army for handing over a book written by professor and celebrated writer Robert Payne. I was instructed by Foreign Secretary Enayet Karim to do. An interview was also fixed with Ziaur Rahman for Robert Payne. Subsequently I met President Ziaur Rahman several occasions while introducing visiting foreign journalists who interviewed him.
During his stay in Malaysia, High Commissioner Safiullah came across another problem which related to the eviction of Burmese Rohingya Muslims to Bangladesh in 1978. The High Commissioner was briefed by Foreign Ministry and DGFI on the Genesis of Rohingya problem and urged him to put pressure on Malaysia government to pursue the Burmese military junta led by Gen. Ne Win to take them back in view of best of relations maintained by both the countries.
For about a week, High commissioner Safiullah could not get an appointment in the hierarchy of Wisma Putra (Foreign Ministry). High commissioner had sought my advice. My suggestion was to brief editors of important newspapers which he accepted gladly. I had arranged meetings with chief editors of New Straits Times, Utusan Melayu, Berita Harian, Sin Chew and Daily Star. A series of reports on eviction of Muslims from Burma appeared in the media critizing the inaction of the Malaysian government.
 
https://www.globalvillagespace.com/93000-pakistani-soldiers-did-not-surrender-in-1971-because/
93,000 Pakistani soldiers did not surrender in 1971 because….?
April 1, 2017


Dr. Junaid Ahmad|

December 16, 1971, was an ominous day for Pakistan, because the Pakistani army’s scattered divisions sandwiched between an internal insurgency supported by Indian war machine and Indian army columns finally decided to surrender. To this day popular imagination and rhetoric is that 93,000 soldiers of Pakistan surrendered to victorious India and were taken as POWs (Prisoners of War).

But the funny thing is: Pakistan, in December 1971, could not have more than 45,000 soldiers on ground in former east-Pakistan. So where the magical figure of 93,000 came from?

This highly exaggerated figure is sustained by Indian, Bangladeshi, international and even Pakistani media. Many Pakistani politicians, out of spite for army, keep on repeating the cliched figure. Ironically, this propagated number has remained unchallenged and is also widely believed in Pakistan, as few accounts have been written to challenge it and today reportedly 65% of Pakistanis are younger than 35 years of age who have no idea of what happened, 45 years ago, in 1971.

But the funny thing is: Pakistan, in December 1971, could not have more than 45,000 soldiers on ground in former east-Pakistan. So where the magical figure of 93,000 came from?

How many Pakistani troops were in East Pakistan?
The number of 93,000 soldiers that is talked about has been conflated with civilians. West Pakistani civilians who were present in large numbers in former East-Pakistan were taken over into custody by Indian army to protect them from revengeful Bengali crowds and Mukit Bahni.

Undisputed fact is that Pakistan had only one corps comprising three divisions in East Pakistan during 1971. In fact when operation search light began on 25th March, 1971, the total number of Pakistani troops on ground were around 27,000. More troops were sent from west Pakistan but they had to arrive through a long circuitous route since India had blocked air route over India taking advantage of the famous “Ganga Hijacking Case” (believed to be a false flag planned by RAW for this purpose)

The three divisions, of Pakistan army, by end November 1971, comprised a total force of 45,000, on books, including combatant and non-combatant troops. Out of these, there were 34,000 combatant troops and the remaining 11,000 were non-combatants, supporting men and CAF personnel. But between six to seven thousand Pakistani soldiers died in the war also.

It was also helpful in putting meat to the story of three million killed, hundreds and thousands of rapes and genocide. An army of less than 40,000, spread over a large theatre of conflict under attack from guerrillas supported by Indian army was hardly in a situation of doing what it was accused of.

This one corp was pitched against three corps of Indian Army from the West and North West and another two corps from the North East and East, a total of five Indian Corps plus 175,000 Indian backed and trained Mukti Bahini and many thousands of Awami League miscreants. When the total number of Pakistan army troops ranged between 34,000 to 45,000 how could 93,000 soldiers surrender?

From time to time various officers and commentators have attempted clarifying the myth but the power of first narrative is such that still the figure of 93,000 POW’s sticks in popular imagination.

According to Lt Gen Naizi, Corps Commander of Eastern Command in 1971.

The total fighting strength available to me [Gen Naizi] was forty-five thousand – 34,000 from the army, plus 11,000 from CAF and West Pakistan civilian police and armed non-combatants”who were fighting against the insurgents. Even if the strength of HL, MLA, depots, training institutes, workshops, factories, nurses and lady doctors, non-combatants like barbers, cooks, shoemakers and sweepers are added, even then the total comes to only 55,000.

Air Marshal Rahim khan, CNC Pakistan Air Force (1969-1972), had stated:

The number of regular Pakistani troops in East Pakistan never exceeded 33,000-34,000. The rest is just propaganda by India and the Awami League, to magnify their success….”

Air Marshal Zulfiqar Ali Khan, who commended Eastern Wing of Pakistan Air Forces had asserted the same in these words:

At the maximum, our regular fighting force in East Pakistan in December 1971 stood at 34,000. This figure does not include paramilitary personnel, military police, etc. Even if you include the auxiliaries, the total does not cross 45,000”.

General Akhtar Abdul Rehman. Former Vice Chief of Army Staff, speaking on the 1971 conundrum stated

It was impossible for the 34,000 Pakistani troops in East Pakistan or for that matter any army in the world to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and 170,000 Mukti Bahini, If not more, that too in a hostile environment 1200 miles away from West Pakistan …… Keeping into account all this, if the Indians still feel that they achieved a stunning military victory against Pakistan, I can only say they have fallen prey to their own propaganda”.

US congressman, Charles Wilson (famous for Charlie Wilson’s War) in a discussion with Pakistani diplomats in Washington DC remarked.

“……In 1971, it was certainly not possible for the 35,000 Pakistani troops in Dhaka to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and the more than 100,000 Indian-trained Bengali guerillas.”

Another US congressman, Stephen Solarz, commenting on the War of 1971 in June 1989, remarked,

Pakistanis are energetic, vibrant, and resilient. We must not be misled by 1971. It was certainly not possible for the 40,000 odd Pakistani army in Dhaka to fight against much larger Indian army and Indian-trained Bengali Bahinis in a hostile territory ….”

K C Pant, Indian former Defense Minister in September, 1994 during a discussion on Indo-Pak relations held in New Delhi, said

Peace is important between Pakistan and India. We respect the professional competence of the Pakistani soldier. Had democracy continued in Pakistan, Islamabad would not have suffered the debacle resulting in the surrender of its 40,000 military personnel to India in East Pakistan”.

Sarmila Bose, the famous Indian Bengali writer and Associate Researcher at Oxford University in her book Dead Reckoning published in 2011, asserts

“…… t appears that while the total figure in Indian custody is about right, to state that 93,000 soldiers were taken prisoner is wrong, and creates confusions by greatly inflating the Pakistani fighting force in East Pakistan”.

Javed Jabbar, former Pakistani Minister of Information in his article, Estranged siblings-Pakistan and Bangladesh, 40 years later, wrote

Pakistan’s armed forces did not exceed 45,000 troops at optimal levels. The 90,000 prisoners-of-war held by India included over 50,000 non- combatant, unarmed West Pakistani civilians.”

S. M. Hali, a well-known Pakistani analyst in his article, Breaking myths of 1971 Pak-India war writes,

The total strength of Pakistan Army in East Pakistan (in 1971) was 40,000….”

All the aforementioned references point toward one fact that the number of total army personnel who surrendered were far less than 93,000. Whereas my research shows that they were only around 34,000 but in any case they could not have been more than 40,000. The number of 93,000 soldiers that is talked about has been conflated with civilians. West Pakistani civilians who were present in large numbers in former East-Pakistan were taken over into custody by Indian army to protect them from revengeful Bengali crowds and Mukit Bahni.

The figure of 93,000 also included children, women, civil administration officials and staff, non-combatant troops such as nurses, doctors, cooks, barbers, shoemakers, carpenters and others. The higher number talked about was a deliberate attempt to defame and demoralize Pakistani army, to demonstrate to the world extent of Indian victory. It was also helpful in putting meat to the story of three million killed, hundreds and thousands of rapes and genocide. An army of less than 40,000, spread over a large theatre of conflict under attack from guerrillas supported by Indian army was hardly in a situation of doing what it was accused of.

The total figure, a mix of soldiers and civilians was deliberately floated by Indians, and later by Bangladeshis to support their case for victimization. In Pakistan, a clever Bhutto used this for various reasons of his own politics. No one ever wanted to clarify. In reality, the actual number of Pakistani troops who surrendered on 16th December 1971 was only around 34,000.

Piece by Dr Junaid Ahmad, Author of ‘Creation of Bangladesh: Myths Exploded.’ Additional comments and editing by Editorial Desk of Global Village Space.

Always look carefully at this pix of the surrender ceremony put out by GOI media cell. Group Capt A R Khandokar is photo-shaped out to totally erase any contribution of our forces in a war WE have won.
 
Yes. General M.A G Osmani and all other sector commanders were also cunningly kept away from the surrender ceremony. Real Chanakya/Kautilya diplomacy by the Indians.

I have always stressed that we would have eventually won our own Independence even without the India's direct involvement, perhaps could have taken a little while longer. Pakistan had already agreed with the U.S and had agreed to withdraw from the East.

With the direct assistance of the former USSR,both in International forums,i.e twice applying its veto power in the U.N, and entering into a Defence treaty,receiving all out military equipments/assistance,could the Indians with a much larger force piggybacked by us, enter into the Dhaka bowl, within the time frame set .i,e third week of December, at the latest.

The history of our region would have been completely different, had the Indians failed to do so within the stipulated time or if the Pakistani Army had engaged in a prolonged war instead of surrendering, at least for a few more weeks.
 
General M A G Osmani, Commander in Chief of Bangladesh Armed Forces in 1971.
Veterans never retire.

g_kf1vXYV_O.png

াধীনতা যুদ্ধ পরিচালনা করে বাংলাদেশ জন্ম হয়েছে যে সর্বাধিনায়কের নেতৃত্বে, তিনি ছিলেন অবসরপ্রাপ্ত এক কর্নেল! তাঁর কাধেই লেগেছিল জেনারেলের র‌্যাংক ব্যাজ।
1f1e7_1f1e9.png
তিন বছর যেতে না যেতেই দেশ দ্বিতীয়বার বিপদমুক্ত হয় কয়েকজন অবসরপ্রাপ্ত সেনা অফিসারের পরিকল্পনায় ও সক্রিয় অংশগ্রহনে! দেশের চলমান ক্রান্তিকালে সবকিছু জেনে বুঝেও ডিসিপ্লিনের কারনে সার্ভিংরা হয়ত শুরুটা করতে পারছেন না, তাই গ্রাউন্ড ব্রেকিংয়ের জন্য তাকিয়ে আছেন রিটায়ার্ডদের দিকে।

The Legend- Saheed President Ziaur Rahman,BU.

The forgotten brave Heros of 1971.

Guerrilla 1971
একাত্তর পরবর্তী প্রজন্মের প্রতিনিধি হিসেবে নতজানু হয়ে ছবির এই মানুষটির কাছে করজোড়ে ক্ষমা ভিক্ষে চাইলাম। বীর মুক্তিযোদ্ধা স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেন এ লজ্জা আপনার নয়, এই লজ্জা আমাদের সবার।

★ স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেন, যিনি 'মুক্তিযুদ্ধ জাদুঘরে'র নকশা প্রতিযোগিতার প্রধান উদ্যোক্তাদের একজন।

★ স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেন, যিনি 'মুক্তিযুদ্ধ জাদুঘরে'র অর্থ সংগ্রহে দেশব্যপী লটারীর ১ম পুরষ্কার হিসাবে একটি অ্যাপার্টমেন্ট প্রদান করেছিলেন।

★ স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেন, যিনি 'মুক্তিযুদ্ধ জাদুঘরে'র নকশা প্রনয়ন ও নির্মান চলাকালীন বিভিন্ন সময়ে বুদ্ধিবৃত্তিক সহযোগিতা করেছিলেন।

★ স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেন, যিনি 'মুক্তিযুদ্ধ জাদুঘরে'র নির্মানে অন্তর দিয়ে সম্পৃক্ত হয়েছিলেন,এবং তিনি নিজেও যুক্ত ছিলেন মহান 'মুক্তিযুদ্ধে'।

★স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেন, যিনি সদ্য প্রসূত স্ত্রী ও সন্তানকে নিশ্চিত মৃত্যুর মুখে রেখে যুদ্ধে গিয়েছিলেন। ফলাফল হিসেবে তার স্ত্রী মানসিক ভারসাম্য হারিয়েছিলেন।

কিন্তু, এই মানুষটি আজ মুক্তিযুদ্ধ জাদুঘরের নতুন ও স্থায়ী ভবনের উদ্বোধনী অনুষ্ঠানে আমন্ত্রণ পাননি। সমস্যা নেই, স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেন কারও পদলেহন করে জীবন যাপন করেননি, সততার প্রতীক হিসেবে তাঁকে চিনেছি আমরা। আজ বীর মুক্তিযোদ্ধা স্থপতি মোবাশ্বের হোসেনের সম্মান ভূলুণ্ঠিত হয়নি, বরং উন্মোচন হয়েছে মুক্তিযুদ্ধকে সিঁড়ী হিসেবে ব্যবহার করা কতিপয় মুখচেনা বর্ণচোরার।

এই বর্ণচোরার দল মুক্তিযুদ্ধ'কে অপব্যবহার করে। তাঁদের ভাবসাবে মনে হয় এরা মুক্তিযুদ্ধের ইমাম ও খতিব। অথচ ৫৬,০০০ বর্গ মাইলে মুক্তিযুদ্ধ করেছে সাদামাটা মাটির মানুষগুলো। এই ৯৫ ভাগ মানুষের ৫৬,০০০ বর্গ মাইলের মুক্তিযুদ্ধ আজ ছিনতাই হয়ে গিয়েছে।

বর্ণচোরার দল আমাদের ৫৬,০০০ বর্গ মাইলের মুক্তিযুদ্ধটাকে শহুরে একটা উৎসব বানিয়েছে।
 
http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.c...remember-Lahirirhat-genocide-in-Rangpur-May-7

06 May 2017, 22:05:29 | Updated : 06 May 2017, 22:09:30
People remember Lahirirhat genocide in Rangpur May 7


The local people still remember the horrific genocide of 32 'Musollis' committed by the Pakistani occupation forces just after Juma prayers near Lahirirhat mosque under Rangpur Sadar Upazila on May 7 in 1971.

"Genocide of the 'Musollis' after Juma prayers at Lahirirhat factually unmasked the so called 'religious' face of the Pakistani junta," said District Muktijoddha Commander Mosaddek Hossain Bablu.

"The Lahirirhat genocide helped the common people irrespective of caste, creed and religion---- to easily understand the false propaganda conducted by the then Pakistani junta of saving Islam from the enemies ----," he said.

According to the book 'Mukitjuddhe Rangpurer Itihas' published by Rangpur district administration, the occupation forces came by four trucks got down in front of Lahirirhat Mosque and soon caught the Musollis just after Juma prayers on the day.

"The innocent 'Musollis' soon started running all around to escape from the human beasts when 32 of them, including a father and his son, were caught by the occupation forces," the book wrote.

After catching, the occupation forces started torturing the innocent 'Musollis', who repeatedly claimed with indescribable fear in minds that they were Muslims and came to the mosque for offering Juma prayers, in last bid to save their lives.

Eye-witnesses Rafiul Islam, 75, told BSS that the Pakistani army took the 'Musollis' to the nearby pond, forced them to stand in four rows and opened brass fire at them.

"All of the 'Musollis' fell down on earth after brass firing when most of them breathed last immediately while the others were critically injured getting numerous bullet hits at their heads, chests, bellies, necks and other organs," he said.

"The occupation forces charged bayonets on the injured 'Musollis' in a medieval style to ensure deaths amid their cracking sounds when the nature became silent observing the unimaginable atrocities," said another eyewitness Rafikul Islam, 65.

"After committing heinous crimes against humanity by killing the Musollis at Lahirirhat, the occupation forces with collaborators buried their bodies into a mass grave there before leaving the area," said eyewitness Raj Kumar, 84.

Relatives of the martyred 'Musollis' started gathering there since the evening, dug the mass grave taking advantage of darkness, recovered and took away the buried bodies to their own areas for burial, said freedom fighter Majibar Rahman Master.

"Martyrdom of the 32 'Musollis' uncovered real face of the Pakistani army igniting sleeping heroism in every Bangalee when they started joining the Mukti Bahini en-masse to liberate the nation," said Chairman of local Chandanpat union Aminur Rahman.

Conducting research, valiant freedom fighter Mukul Mostafiz indentified 27 of the martyred 32 'Musollis' and put their names in his book 'Mukitjuddhe Rangpur' published in February 2011.

source – BSS
 

Back
Top Bottom