What's new

‘Paper cat’ Australia will learn its lesson - Global Times

Beidou2020

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
7,857
Reaction score
-48
Country
China
Location
New Zealand
Around the announcement of the arbitration tribunal over the South China Sea, Australia was one of the most delirious countries. Canberra immediately supported the arbitration result and claimed China "must" abide by it, and also signed a joint declaration with the US and Japan. Australia has inked a free trade agreement with China, its biggest trading partner, which makes its move of disturbing the South China Sea waters surprising to many.

Australia is a unique country with an inglorious history. It was at first an offshore prison of the UK and then became its colony, a source of raw materials, overseas market and land of investment. This country was established through uncivilized means, in a process filled with the tears of the aboriginals.

Even with a scarce population and vast land, Australia has disputes with other countries over territory. It claims nearly 5.9 million square meters of land in the Antarctic, accounting for 42 percent of the continent. In order to back its territorial claims, Australia even brought up the activities of the British in the Antarctic as evidence.

Since The Antarctic Treaty was signed, all territorial claims over the continent were suspended. Canberra then raised another claims to demand the Antarctic continental shelf. It cited Article 298 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to avoid a demand by arbitration by others.

Both historical rights and the exemption of arbitration as ruled in Article 298 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea were denied by the arbitration tribunal. Australia showed blunt double standards as if no one had a memory of what it did and said over the Antarctic.

Australia calls itself a principled country, while its utilitarianism has been sizzling. It lauds Sino-Australian relations when China's economic support is needed, but when it needs to please Washington, it demonstrates willingness of doing anything in a show of allegiance.

Analysts say that besides trying to please the US, it also intends to suppress China so as to gain a bargaining chip for economic interests. China must take revenge and let it know it's wrong. Australia's power means nothing compared to the security of China. If Australia steps into the South China Sea waters, it will be an ideal target for China to warn and strike.

Australia is not even a "paper tiger," it's only a "paper cat" at best. At a time when its former caretaker country the UK is dedicated to developing relations with China, and almost the whole of Europe takes a neutral position, Australia has unexpectedly made itself a pioneer of hurting China's interest with a fiercer attitude than countries directly involved in the South China Sea dispute. But this paper cat won't last.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/997320.shtml

-------------
@HongWu002 did you write this Op-Ed? :lol:
 
Australia is not even a "paper tiger," it's only a "paper cat" at best. At a time when its former caretaker country the UK is dedicated to developing relations with China, and almost the whole of Europe takes a neutral position, Australia has unexpectedly made itself a pioneer of hurting China's interest with a fiercer attitude than countries directly involved in the South China Sea dispute. But this paper cat won't last.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Australia is not even a "paper tiger," it's only a "paper cat" at best. At a time when its former caretaker country the UK is dedicated to developing relations with China, and almost the whole of Europe takes a neutral position, Australia has unexpectedly made itself a pioneer of hurting China's interest with a fiercer attitude than countries directly involved in the South China Sea dispute. But this paper cat won't last.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Pls don't insult lovely animals for a puppet country without real independence.
You must apologise to tigers and cats.
 
please just invade Australia, like the US do against Iraq and Afghanistan, after all Australia is just a paper cat according to your piece of mouth
 
Beijing is using both soft and hard tactics. Australia already said no to patrolling within territorial waters. But we believe a deeper cut can be rendered in the alliance by threatening Australia with an "accident" involving its warships. This is a form of political sanction. You are either with us or against us.
 
Autralia still has pretensions of being a regional power. Its competition with indonesia is well known.

It must let go of its colonial mentality.

It has no place or relevance in asia.

By hiding behind america it can not achieve any goals.

Friendly relationship with China are in its best interests.

Warning by the Chinese state is a right course of action.

Enough is enough.

When you are kind and polite people take it as weakness.

Asian affairs must be managed by the asians.

Imperial moment has past now.

SCS is the beginning of the end for the outside trouble makers.
 
Around the announcement of the arbitration tribunal over the South China Sea, Australia was one of the most delirious countries. Canberra immediately supported the arbitration result and claimed China "must" abide by it, and also signed a joint declaration with the US and Japan. Australia has inked a free trade agreement with China, its biggest trading partner, which makes its move of disturbing the South China Sea waters surprising to many.

Australia is a unique country with an inglorious history. It was at first an offshore prison of the UK and then became its colony, a source of raw materials, overseas market and land of investment. This country was established through uncivilized means, in a process filled with the tears of the aboriginals.

Even with a scarce population and vast land, Australia has disputes with other countries over territory. It claims nearly 5.9 million square meters of land in the Antarctic, accounting for 42 percent of the continent. In order to back its territorial claims, Australia even brought up the activities of the British in the Antarctic as evidence.

Since The Antarctic Treaty was signed, all territorial claims over the continent were suspended. Canberra then raised another claims to demand the Antarctic continental shelf. It cited Article 298 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to avoid a demand by arbitration by others.

Both historical rights and the exemption of arbitration as ruled in Article 298 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea were denied by the arbitration tribunal. Australia showed blunt double standards as if no one had a memory of what it did and said over the Antarctic.

Australia calls itself a principled country, while its utilitarianism has been sizzling. It lauds Sino-Australian relations when China's economic support is needed, but when it needs to please Washington, it demonstrates willingness of doing anything in a show of allegiance.

Analysts say that besides trying to please the US, it also intends to suppress China so as to gain a bargaining chip for economic interests. China must take revenge and let it know it's wrong. Australia's power means nothing compared to the security of China. If Australia steps into the South China Sea waters, it will be an ideal target for China to warn and strike.

Australia is not even a "paper tiger," it's only a "paper cat" at best. At a time when its former caretaker country the UK is dedicated to developing relations with China, and almost the whole of Europe takes a neutral position, Australia has unexpectedly made itself a pioneer of hurting China's interest with a fiercer attitude than countries directly involved in the South China Sea dispute. But this paper cat won't last.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/997320.shtml

-------------
@HongWu002 did you write this Op-Ed? :lol:
with all due respect to our chinese brothers if there is going to be a war between austrailia and china
i m clearly "backing" Austrailia
latest

d1d00e6a1a2d1629f37c662cc3fe85ce.jpg


well this should bring china and indonesia closer
 
Chinese should buy out their resources and buy their houses so that locals cannot afford.
When I traveled in Melbourne, I found homeless white people everywhere.

There are no homeless people in Australia. You saw beggar or panhandler, not homeless people.

Homeless means you do not have a home to go back to, but since every Australian Citizen get up to $1000 a months in rent subsidise, you can easily afford to rent at least a room or a board.

Beggar or Panhandler is another question. They are just lazy people don't like to work.

China don't invade countries like the US. Invade and do what?

China will just buy up Australia like it's doing now.

You do know the Australian Government have put a stop to many "Chinese Buying" due to its illegal status. You cannot "Buy" anything in Australia unless you are an Australian, so basically, you are wrong.

please just invade Australia, like the US do against Iraq and Afghanistan, after all Australia is just a paper cat according to your piece of mouth

They can try to sink our ship, I don't mind, they are more than welcome to invade Australia, but I think we even need our soldier to defend Australia, we will simply let the crippy clawer and big black spider do the job. I mean, I don't think these people can survive 3 days in Australian Outback.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure Australia and China will be on good terms.
Australia is our brother country and we will support it, and we have good ties with China, which is now a priority for the UK.
 
with all due respect to our chinese brothers if there is going to be a war between austrailia and china
i m clearly "backing" Austrailia
latest

d1d00e6a1a2d1629f37c662cc3fe85ce.jpg


well this should bring china and indonesia closer

Ok ok

You already know who I am backing.
 
I'm sure Australia and China will be on good terms.
Australia is our brother country and we will support it, and we have good ties with China, which is now a priority for the UK.

The UK is too far away to China so you may not feel or think the same as us Aussie.

To be clear, we don't have any stake in SCS, and we do not have any view on SCS, this is not our fight, all we did is that we observe international law, and if the law call for the action the Chinese did not being legal, then this is the position we hold.

Do bear in mind, we did not start this article, nor did we particularly antagonizing China, this article is solely a pure opinion piece from the Chinese media, and if this is how they see thing in this particular situation, and calling to sink our ship for observing international law. That is not going to end well with the Australian Public, which is already quite low in the mind of any Ozzie.

So no, I don't think Australian and China will be on good term if the Chinese Government endorse this type of article.
 

Back
Top Bottom