What's new

Major Changes Ahead on JF-17 Block-3

I might get banned again for saying the truth. But I keep saying it, not to offend anyone, but to educate people so they understand the mistakes of the past and avoid them and grow Pakistan in the future!!

The problem is not that these people don't know how to play two countries against each other (there is no need to actually). The MAIN problem is, that Pakistanis can't play ONE country within their OWN country. So how do you play two people against each other :rofl: :angel:

The problem lies in the history........always been a ONE man show, always been a guy in uniform looking all tough. So....you've suppressed the "political savvy" due to the military rule.

Take a look at it now, whether you like or not, the current government of Pakistan has made relations from US to Europe to Russia to Sri Lanka, China and India. Did this ever happen in the history? NO!! So now, Pakistan is buying F-16's from the US, is buying Jets from China, is selling jets to Sri Lanka, is buying combat helicopters from the Russians, and you have many defense projects with Turkey...........guess what?

The civilian leaders who have the political and business savvy way to handling business (the car salesmen you call them), are ALREADY doing that. So right now, the MAIN issue is, how do the Pakistanis learn to respect the system and plan ONE country. Once that starts to happen, Pakistan has the potential to be buying stuff from any country she wants to. Just like India :enjoy:.

I agree with your comment about FC-20's purchase. It needed to be inked way the hell back when. But its not too late now either :tup:
.
realistic analysis ....i mean just look at the CPEC project ....things are always planned in "most profitable" order by the investor ...but here we see our great ..... useless ...drunk politicians threatening to hinder the project jst cuz thy or their BS advisers cant understand the project norms .... i couldn't stop thinking that did gawadar moved to Punjab due to some supernatural anomaly or CEPC can cross over KPK via some supa dupa bridge ......
hopeless as ever we r :(
 
I might get banned again for saying the truth. But I keep saying it, not to offend anyone, but to educate people so they understand the mistakes of the past and avoid them and grow Pakistan in the future!!

The problem is not that these people don't know how to play two countries against each other (there is no need to actually). The MAIN problem is, that Pakistanis can't play ONE country within their OWN country. So how do you play two people against each other :rofl: :angel:

The problem lies in the history........always been a ONE man show, always been a guy in uniform looking all tough. So....you've suppressed the "political savvy" due to the military rule.

Take a look at it now, whether you like or not, the current government of Pakistan has made relations from US to Europe to Russia to Sri Lanka, China and India. Did this ever happen in the history? NO!! So now, Pakistan is buying F-16's from the US, is buying Jets from China, is selling jets to Sri Lanka, is buying combat helicopters from the Russians, and you have many defense projects with Turkey...........guess what?

The civilian leaders who have the political and business savvy way to handling business (the car salesmen you call them), are ALREADY doing that. So right now, the MAIN issue is, how do the Pakistanis learn to respect the system and plan ONE country. Once that starts to happen, Pakistan has the potential to be buying stuff from any country she wants to. Just like India :enjoy:.

I agree with your comment about FC-20's purchase. It needed to be inked way the hell back when. But its not too late now either :tup:

Hi,

I was a little slow yesterday----. Okay---current govt has not done anything and neither does it have the ability to do anything constructive in the U S----.

The only thing that changed was the onslaught of ISIS-----that is the only reason that U S is talking to pakistan---otherwise it was done and dusted----.
 
I think we need @jaibi here he could send messages to senior leadership that it's time to say bye bye to USA when it comes to weapon deals and go for J-10 C or ask Russia to sell us Fighter Jets. Also increase corporation with both Turkey and China for Navy and Army.
And senior leadership is waiting for advice from members of internet forum. Good going.
 
I was a little slow yesterday----. Okay---current govt has not done anything and neither does it have the ability to do anything constructive in the U S----.

The only thing that changed was the onslaught of ISIS-----that is the only reason that U S is talking to pakistan---otherwise it was done and dusted----.

MK...out of your personal bias (among many on here for reasons I very clearly understand), what is your source of your statements? My source is the US Dept. of the State!! There are many on here who hate the current government of Pakistan for reasons related to Mushy, being IK's Pashtun supporters or purely, anti-growth and peace in Pakistan. And these guys can write accusatory statement and miss-statements like kids talk about their favorite super hero's.

There are things that are better remaining in silence. Would you like for me to tell you what General RS told the US law makers with reference to Pakistan and India (if you didn't follow CPAN on it)? If I start writing that on here, I'll break many hearts who think Pakistani Army has supermen soldiers (irrespective of how the country is doing without $$$$$).

Let's not derail the thread, the Army love, or the Pashtun love are beyond being Pakistani and a nation for many. I am tired of these "personal opinions" as you can't win over a conspiracy theory, you can, however, win over factual debate!! Let's open up a new thread for discussion like that.

On the topic, the F-16's are being provided to Pakistan, on three commitments from NS and two from RS. I'll leave it at that.
 
I think J-10 B and J-10 C are using new powerful engine Am I right guys ? @Beast @Deino

5NtG3.jpg

Yes, some of the J-10B/C are equipped with Chinese WS-10A instead of AL-31. However due to the production rate of WS-10A (majority of WS-10A have been installed on the J-11 family, including J-11B, J-11D, J-16, J-15, etc) and the abundance of AL-31s already purchased from Russia, the majority of J-10B/C in mass production still retained AL-31.
ws-10a_al-31f.jpg

Official Chinese engine design essay a few years ago states that “XX10A" (WS-10A) produce 10% higher thrust to weight ratio than the russian AL-31 and has superior performance but is less reliable. (Hence why more WS-10A has been used on twin-engine fighters til now).
 
The Block-3 was explicitly confirmed by the PAF on numerous occasions, especially during the Paris Air Show.
How can it be immuned from sanctions or be "owned "by Pakistan,when the supply of engine will be at the mercy of Russia,Aesa radar,avionics and landing gear will be supplied by China?.
 
Last edited:
一般认为JF-17的雷达孔径大约在600毫米左右,大约可以支持800个T/R模块,国内X波段T/R模块大约可以提供10W的峰值,2W的平均功率,也就是说JF-17BLOCK3R 有源相控阵雷达的平均功率可以达到1.6KW左右,考虑到有源相控阵可以实现在空间的叠加和合成,实际功率可能更高,相比较之下一般机械扫描雷达如AN/APG-68平均功率也只有300W,印度空军目前作战能力最强的苏-30MKI,它的BARS雷达的平均功率也只有1KW左右,即使BARS的孔径大于JF-17的雷达天线孔径,但是考虑到后者有源相控阵在功率、损耗上的胜出,所以JF-17BLOCK3雷达探测距离距离仍然高于SU-30MKI。
需要指出的是根据巴基斯坦空军的说法以,除了SD-10A空空导弹之外,他们还计划引进更加先进的SD-10B主动雷达制导空空导弹,按照巴空军的说法SD-10B采用了“主/被动制导系统”和“新的火箭发动机”-有可能是中国最新PL-15导弹上面的双脉冲火箭发动机,与SD-10A相比,它的发射包线更大,完全可以压制印度空军目前装备的R-77E和MICA两种主动雷达制导空空导弹,因此对于JF-17BLOCK3来说,凭借有源相控阵和SD-10B的组合,完全可以压制印度空军现有的三代作战飞机,并且具备与阵风这样的三代作战飞机对抗的能力。

Very professional word, my translation not good,you can google tranlate
 
一般认为JF-17的雷达孔径大约在600毫米左右,大约可以支持800个T/R模块,国内X波段T/R模块大约可以提供10W的峰值,2W的平均功率,也就是说JF-17BLOCK3R 有源相控阵雷达的平均功率可以达到1.6KW左右,考虑到有源相控阵可以实现在空间的叠加和合成,实际功率可能更高,相比较之下一般机械扫描雷达如AN/APG-68平均功率也只有300W,印度空军目前作战能力最强的苏-30MKI,它的BARS雷达的平均功率也只有1KW左右,即使BARS的孔径大于JF-17的雷达天线孔径,但是考虑到后者有源相控阵在功率、损耗上的胜出,所以JF-17BLOCK3雷达探测距离距离仍然高于SU-30MKI。
需要指出的是根据巴基斯坦空军的说法以,除了SD-10A空空导弹之外,他们还计划引进更加先进的SD-10B主动雷达制导空空导弹,按照巴空军的说法SD-10B采用了“主/被动制导系统”和“新的火箭发动机”-有可能是中国最新PL-15导弹上面的双脉冲火箭发动机,与SD-10A相比,它的发射包线更大,完全可以压制印度空军目前装备的R-77E和MICA两种主动雷达制导空空导弹,因此对于JF-17BLOCK3来说,凭借有源相控阵和SD-10B的组合,完全可以压制印度空军现有的三代作战飞机,并且具备与阵风这样的三代作战飞机对抗的能力。

Very professional word, my translation not good,you can google tranlate

Wow!
According to google translate JFT Block-3 is aimed at neutralizing InAF upper tier and achieving air superiority.

It is generally believed that the JF-17 radar aperture of about 600 mm, can support about 800 T / R modules, domestic X-band T / R modules can provide about 10W of peak, 2W average power, that there is JF-17BLOCK3R phased array radar source average power can reach about 1.6KW, taking into account the active phased array can be achieved superimposed and synthesized in space, the actual power may be higher, compared to under the general mechanical scanning radar as AN / APG-68 the average power is only 300W, the Indian Air Force combat capability of the strongest Soviet -30MKI, its average power BARS radar only about 1KW, even BARS aperture radar antenna aperture is larger than the JF-17, but considering the latter active phased array win on power loss, so the JF-17BLOCK3 radar detection distance is still higher than the SU-30MKI.
It is noted that according to the Pakistan Air Force to say, in addition to SD-10A air missiles, they also plan to introduce more advanced SD-10B active radar guided air to air missiles, according to the Pakistan Air Force statement SD-10B uses "Active / Passive guidance system "and" the new rocket engine "- may be the latest Chinese PL-15 missile above double pulse rocket engine, compared with the SD-10A, its greater launch envelope, can suppress the Indian Air Force currently equipped R-77E and two MICA active radar guided air to air missiles, so the JF-17BLOCK3 who, by virtue of a combination of active phased array and SD-10B, and can suppress the existing three generations of Indian Air Force combat aircraft, and with the gust such a confrontation of three generations of combat aircraft capability.
 
Last edited:
I was a little slow yesterday----. Okay---current govt has not done anything and neither does it have the ability to do anything constructive in the U S----.

The only thing that changed was the onslaught of ISIS-----that is the only reason that U S is talking to pakistan---otherwise it was done and dusted----.

MK, both you and I know your statement is flawed. I know a little bit more as I know what's cooking inside. Why do you think out of majority of the republicans, who've openly accused Pakistan of double play, etc.....only a couple came out with opposition to the 8 jet deal? Its because of the discussions NS had with them. For ONCE, you have a sales guy who can pitch to the US what the Indian's been pitching since 1995!! Go check out the assets profile of Mitt Romney, Bush and others. All you'll see if business. Hillary Clinton was making $ 600,000.00 per speech from Goldman Sachs.

What do this combo of politicians and billion dollar companies have in common with India outside of the Chinese factor? Tax breaks on investments in India, profits from a larger market, etc, etc. NS has done the SAME, he pitched what India can't, take all the profits offshore but remain business operations in Pakistan. This as an investor, has 0% liability on the investors side and their investments takes a huge profit and Pakistan benefits from creating millions of new jobs and all, while they bring the profits back intact!!!!

This is THE REAL issue behind the Indian pissiness on all these deals, the CPEC, 8 jets and all. They don't want Pakistani labor to compete with theirs as they'd lose dozen of billions every year and millions of jobs to cheaper Pakistani labor. As of this second, Lehman Brothers, Barclays, Goldman Sachs, Citi and JP Morgan, ALL are conducting assessments in terms of where, how and how much to invest in Pakistan. Which means, you won't have any opposition from the US once these investments go in (granted the democratic system continues to run).

So for you to say that the current government hasn't done anything, you live in a world that's very colorful to say the least. Far way from the reality.
 
Is it just integrated on JFT or PAF purchased it too? Which HMS/HMD will be used with it?
Integrated with Jf17 ................... will be used when on Block 3 when HMCS will be available..............
You can't just shoot a missile................ firstly you have to integrate the weapon on platform through which it is meant to be fired.............
 

Back
Top Bottom