What's new

In Asia infrastructure race Vietnam is among the leaders

Viet

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
29,950
Reaction score
0
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Germany
Vietnam is spending billions to attract foreign investors

by Karl Lester M Yap and Nguyen Dieu Tu Uyen
22 March 2017, 22:00 CET
800x-1.jpg
Motorcyclists travel along a road during sunset in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Photographer: Linh Luong Thai/Bloomberg


It may be one of the smallest economies in Asia, but Vietnam is among those leading the infrastructure race.

Vietnam's public and private sector infrastructure investment averaged 5.7 percent of gross domestic product in recent years, the highest in Southeast Asia and compares with 6.8 percent in China, according to the Asian Development Bank. Indonesia and the Philippines spend less than 3 percent, while Malaysia and Thailand spend even less at under 2 percent.

The ADB estimates that emerging economies in the region will need to invest as much as $26 trillion through 2030 to build transport networks, boost power supply and upgrade water and sanitation facilities. Vietnam, among the fastest-growing nations in the world, is boosting infrastructure to lure more foreign investors as it positions itself as Asia's next Tiger Economy.

"The government knows that if they want to compete for investment, low wages aren't enough," said Eugenia Victorino, an economist at Australia & New Zealand Banking Group in Singapore. "They need infrastructure good enough to entice companies to put up factories. The development has been fairly spread out, with airports and roads being built across the country."

800x-1.png


Those efforts are paying off. Foreign direct investment surged to a record $15.8 billion in 2016, and the economy is forecast by the World Bank to expand more than 6 percent until 2019, among the top performers this decade.

Its challenges are formidable. Vietnam needs about $480 billion through 2020 for infrastructure including 11 power plants with total capacity of 13,200 megawatts and about 1,380 kilometers of highways, according to the government. Just last week, Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc ordered the transport ministry to speed up plans to attract more private investment for infrastructure as the state budget can only meet a third of the financial need.

The share of private investment in infrastructure spending in Vietnam may be less than 10 percent, said Rana Hasan, ADB director of development economics. In India, the private sector plays a bigger role, accounting for more than 30 percent of total infrastructure investments in recent years, he said.

Others are planning to catch up. Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has embarked on an ambitious goal of infrastructure spending at 7 percent of GDP, valued at $160 billion through 2022. While Indonesian President Joko Widodo struggled to get infrastructure off the ground in his early years in office, momentum is now building with the government speeding up projects including an uninterrupted toll-road connection in the country’s main islands and construction of a 720-kilometer railway from Jakarta to Surabaya.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rastructure-race-vietnam-is-among-the-leaders
 
"Spending as percentage of the GDP" is one thing, but percentage is quite relative.

The more important figure is the ACTUAL amount of spending.

This Bloomberg article is clearly half-baked for not putting the actual spending in infrastructure of the nine nations along with the percentage chart! Those two charts should be given in pair to depict the real conditions :coffee:
 
hey it is good? put the percentage instead of the actual number of spending in nominal value so they can get a better perspective
 
a ranking based on infra. spending as a % of GDP... and call Vietnam as a leader.
North Korea has the highest military spending as a % of GDP, among all Asian countries. Why not writing an article and titled as "In Asia arms race DPRK is the leader"
 
hey it is good? put the percentage instead of the actual number of spending in nominal value so they can get a better perspective
sis mado the article mentions the sum: $480b through 2020. 4 years. $120b a year. But the government can only cover a part by the budget, a third, thus a necessity to tap money from private companies, internal and external banks and other international organizations.

a ranking based on infra. spending as a % of GDP... and call Vietnam as a leader.
North Korea has the highest military spending as a % of GDP, among all Asian countries. Why not writing an article and titled as "In Asia arms race DPRK is the leader"
Relax see my response to mado. You should not worry. look at the chart: China is the leader.
 
"Spending as percentage of the GDP" is one thing, but percentage is quite relative.

The more important figure is the ACTUAL amount of spending.

This Bloomberg article is clearly half-baked for not putting the actual spending in infrastructure of the nine nations along with the percentage chart! Those two charts should be given in pair to depict the real conditions :coffee:
Yes percentage is relative. Also relative is the land area, the population size, the size of the economy and the individual infrastructure needs. The infrastructure required in 1 Chinese province would be sufficient for the whole of Vietnam and therefore absolute numbers are useless here..They can only be used for chest thumping not analysis.
 
Vietnam is better than Supa Powans
if one compares the pictures of VN in the 1990s to today, it is a remarkable transformation. from one of the poorest countries on the planet. I remember back then we had not enough food to eat, nor enough electricity to light up the streets. I believe you made several visits to VN and notice the change too?






20170319013530-1.jpg
 
As Pakistanis we should feel ashamed that several countries much backwards than our own have steadied their ships towards becoming major leaders in economic growth.

Especially if you consider what Pakistan was achieving in the Past.

VLQIOxr.png


We could've seen the same infrastructure and human capital development in Pakistan if our leaders had took better approach than to fight off fucking wars for the past 70 years since our independence.

main-qimg-1eaf6ed93a905d0c8d052fff48f0263b-c

This is Dubai in 1990s

main-qimg-b7ca27b0817c754ef616e186ec228e5b-c

This is Karachi in late 1960s.

We Pakistanis have tried our best to ruin Pakistan to the point it stands today. We're our own worst enemies.

We cry about terrorism when there are huge socio-economic issues related to it which are being completely ignored by our rich elite class that governs us today.

Anyways, good luck Vietnam and Vietnamese, you guys have got lesser problems than Pakistan and I hope you make the best of it.
 
Yes percentage is relative. Also relative is the land area, the population size, the size of the economy and the individual infrastructure needs. The infrastructure required in 1 Chinese province would be sufficient for the whole of Vietnam and therefore absolute numbers are useless here..They can only be used for chest thumping not analysis.
You are wrong because you said above with China as the sole picture in your mind... but how about the other SEVEN nations, is no one comparable to VIE in terms of the land area, the population size, the size of the economy and the individual infrastructure needs?

hey it is good? put the percentage instead of the actual number of spending in nominal value so they can get a better perspective
It should have put both the percentage AND actual number side by side... it's a common and proper practice when dealing with growth, economy, and so on. A media as big as Bloomberg should have no problem to extract those figures.

As Pakistanis we should feel ashamed that several countries much backwards than our own have steadied their ships towards becoming major leaders in economic growth.
Especially if you consider what Pakistan was achieving in the Past.
VLQIOxr.png


We could've seen the same infrastructure and human capital development in Pakistan if our leaders had took better approach than to fight off fucking wars for the past 70 years since our independence.
main-qimg-1eaf6ed93a905d0c8d052fff48f0263b-c
This is dubhai in 1990s
main-qimg-b7ca27b0817c754ef616e186ec228e5b-c
This is karachi in late 1960s.
We Pakistanis have tried our best to ruin Pakistan to the point it stands today.
We're our own worst enemies.
We cry about terrorism when there are huge socio-economic issues related to it which are being completely ignored by our Rich elite class that governs us today.
Anyways ,Good luck vietnam and Vietnamese,You guys have got lesser problems than Pakistan and i hope you make the best of it.
I believe wars & conflicts, terrorism, political stability, rampant corruptions and ineffective govt have impeded the development in Pakistan.

How many governments have Pakistan experienced after Ayub Khan? I believe President Zia-ul-Haq had the longest reign after Ayub Khan.
 
According to the ADB report dated 2015, between 2016-2030, China will need 13 to 15 trillion USD of investment in infrastructure, which is 5% of the GDP annually.

Although it does not give an individual account Vietnam, it indicates that Southeast Asia 2.7 to 3.1 trillion USD between 2016-2030 for infrastructure, which is 5% of the GDP annually.

So, China and SEA need for infrastructure investment is clear and, in terms of percentage (not absolute numbers), they need to allocate an equal amount of their GDP to infrastructure development.

I cannot upload the table as the website is having problems. I may add it in the future.
 
How many governments have Pakistan experienced after Ayub Khan? I believe President Zia-ul-Haq had the longest reign after Ayub Khan.

I think it was Zia ul haq who started the religious fundamentalism and allowed the chain reaction of fundamentalist schools inside Pakistan's smaller to larger cities that radicalized our tribal belts and gave our army specialties of proxy war against USSR since they did it so brilliantly to us in 71.

The idea to use proxy against Soviets was right, but it was then allowed on total leash inside the country which took deep roots to this day in our society when they talk about so called "Religious school reforms".

After Ayub it was Yahya that divided Pakistan on ethnic lines in a civil war who later died chocking on his alcohol while under house arrest.

It was then Zulfiqar Bhutto's socialism who basically nationalized certain industries and institutions also changed the economy 360 degrees which ruined it. His legacy left a big black hole in political evolution of the country which elects our "elite class" to power.

Afterwards it was Zia ul Haq who introduced the menace of terrorism and it all started during his tenure to meddle in Afghan affairs then take millions of unregistered Afghan refugees.

Pakistan started decline from rapid industrialization after Ayub Khan's era. (However I think Musharraf ruled the longest) successive political instability denied any economic growth.
 
https://www.pwc.com.au/asia-practic...ummary-of-south-east-asian-infrastructure.pdf

I think we should refer to this analysis by pwc instead

Indonesia: Spending growth: 7%; spending by 2025: USD 165 bn
Malaysia: Spending growth: 9%: spending by 2025: N/A
Philippines: Spending growth: 10%; spending by 2025: USD 27 bn
Vietnam: Spending growth: 9%; spending by 2025: USD 56 bn
Thailand: Spending growth: N/A; spending by 2025: 58.5 bn
 
https://www.pwc.com.au/asia-practic...ummary-of-south-east-asian-infrastructure.pdf

I think we should refer to this analysis by pwc instead

Indonesia: Spending growth: 7%; spending by 2025: USD 165 bn
Malaysia: Spending growth: 9%: spending by 2025: N/A
Philippines: Spending growth: 10%; spending by 2025: USD 27 bn
Vietnam: Spending growth: 9%; spending by 2025: USD 56 bn
Thailand: Spending growth: N/A; spending by 2025: 58.5 bn

nuo, Vietnam cant unto submission meh, yuo data mostly inaccurate :(


:p: just let them analyze as much as they can meanwhile we are doing what we can with less talk and doing more
 
if one compares the pictures of VN in the 1990s to today, it is a remarkable transformation. from one of the poorest countries on the planet. I remember back then we had not enough food to eat, nor enough electricity to light up the streets. I believe you made several visits to VN and notice the change too?






20170319013530-1.jpg
I myself have only visited the tourist areas like downtown Hanoi and downtown Saigon.
I did not see any expressway or subway in 2012.
Of course things are different now.
 
What's with all the butthurt comments, %GDP spent is a good indication of the commitment and drive of a nation to improve the livelihood of its people. With this level of commitment, it won't be long before VN is near the top in absolute values as well, at least when compared to countries of similar size.
 
Back
Top Bottom