What's new

9-11 attack was also funded from India!!!

Nobody donates to them.
Donating to RSS is good however, they maintain thousands of schools and hostels throughout the country.

Islamists however much they try to equate the terrorism/violent tendencies of Islam with that of Hinduism, will not be able to. No other religion in the world is as predisposed to violence as Islam.

Government of India is aware that the problem is not religion from anywhere and this is the reason that centre and state Governments even provide funds for Indian Muslim students who are studying in Madarsas and have introduced modern education within the madarsas.

Is that it ? One person ? I thought you were going to make a list of bomb blasts by VHP !:)
BTW Purohit is no way related to VHP.

When it comes to Purohit then we can see that Indian Judicairy system has not gave him bail but its not the case with those who were involved in 26/11 attacks.
 
Is that it ? One person ? I thought you were going to make a list of bomb blasts by VHP !:)
BTW Purohit is no way related to VHP.

Col. Purohit is not related to terror either :lol:

Supreme Court opens door for Pragnya, Purohit bail in Malegaon blast case - The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed prima facie doubts about charging Malegaon blasts accused Sadhvi Pragnya Singh Thakur, Lt. Col S. Purohit under the draconian MCOCA and opened the doors for the Special Court to consider their bail.

A bench of Justices Ibrahim Kalifulla and Shiva Kirti Singh said there is no "reliable material" to prima facie show that the duo along with four other accused were criminally liable under provisions of MCOCA.

"Their applications for bail can be considered for bail by the Special Judge... there is considerable doubt about their involvement," the court observed in the judgment.


When it comes to Purohit then we can see that Indian Judicairy system has not gave him bail but its not the case with those who were involved in 26/11 attacks.

really ? :cheesy:
 
try to see the difference between India and Pakistan Judiciary System in here.

Why ? pakistan is a military state where everything including the judiciary is run by the military.

India and pakistan cannot be compared. Its pointless.

As far as Col. Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya is concerned, its pretty clear there is no evidence to like them to any crime. They have been victims of CONgress Communal politics.

Malegaon blasts: NIA may let off Sadhvi Pragya, Lt Col Purohit - timesofindia-economictimes

A source said it was also being legally vetted if Pragya could be charged simply because the bike used in the blast was registered in her name. :cheesy: "It is a matter of record that she was not using the bike for 2 years before the blasts and had sold it to deceased Sunil Joshi. Bills for the bike's servicing during those 2 years were paid by Joshi. The bike with a bomb was planted by one Ramji Kalsangre who is absconding,"
 
Is that it ? One person ? I thought you were going to make a list of bomb blasts by VHP !:)

there must be dozens more colonel purohits in service and many more retired ones... look at all those sangh-affiliated retired generals writing filthily in newspapers and appearing on tv panel discussions and on the boards of "think tanks".

BTW Purohit is no way related to VHP.

not directly, yes, but vhp is the main fund raiser of the sangh.
 
there must be dozens more colonel purohits in service and many more retired ones... look at all those sangh-affiliated retired generals writing filthily in newspapers and appearing on tv panel discussions and on the boards of "think tanks".

LOL......Jihadi Jamahir now wants to restrict freedom of expression to Kafirs :lol:

How dare they write in newspapers and appear on tv panels or become think tanks. Those are reserved for true Jihadis.

not directly, yes, but vhp is the main fund raiser of the sangh.

Any links to prove it ? :coffee:
 
there must be dozens more colonel purohits in service and many more retired ones... look at all those sangh-affiliated retired generals writing filthily in newspapers and appearing on tv panel discussions and on the boards of "think tanks".



not directly, yes, but vhp is the main fund raiser of the sangh.

Mani Shankar Aiyer, Rana Ayyub, and Shakeel Ahmed are true think tanks right !?
 
How dare they write in newspapers and appear on tv panels or become think tanks. Those are reserved for true Jihadis.

disregarding your misuse of "jihadi", did i support appearance on tv and writings by owaisi senior or by some dar-ul-uloom deoband mullah??

Any links to prove it ? :coffee:

is the sun hot?? is mars cold??

Mani Shankar Aiyer, Rana Ayyub, and Shakeel Ahmed are true think tanks right !?

shakeel ahmed though not a intellectual is generally a smooth-talker, though i don't know if that should be a plus point.

mani shankar aiyar is generally a sensible person, debonair and peace talker, though i don't support the congress party.

of rana ayyub i have seen a few tweets and she seems a sensible person.
 
i have no objection to that. :)

all reactionaries are the same, despite their community differences, and must be eradicated.


Lol

Let's list down all muslim terrorist groups according to your logic then. .

Please guess the thousands of...

Takfiri
Salafi
Wahaabi
Hanafi
Deobandi
Jamaati
Hanbali
Maliki
Ikhwani
Etc etc..groups

who have extremist, separatist, islamist views.

P. S. Please add up any more extremist islamic schools of thought to the list.
 
Last edited:
So Karfirs should not open their mouth, right ?

why are you going on about "kafirs"??

certainly all have the right to speak but once someone's reactionary attitude is known and it is also known that such attitude cannot be controlled/redirected, what would be the point of allowing them a platform?? allowing them would only lead to the wrong people getting encouragement signal.
 
why are you going on about "kafirs"??

certainly all have the right to speak but once someone's reactionary attitude is known and it is also known that such attitude cannot be controlled/redirected, what would be the point of allowing them a platform?? allowing them would only lead to the wrong people getting encouragement signal.

Ah ...so Kafirs have to be "controlled" and be denied any platform to make a public speech :lol: ....... I get it.

Such platform should ONLY be provided for the "true believer" :enjoy: NICE.
 
Cool down guys.. Jamahir's views should also be heard. I don't necessarily agree with all of it but there needs to be a discourse.
 
True. We need to know the nutty Jihadi to know what he wants.

C'mon man.. I'm also a Sangh member, but I abhor some of the stupid actions of Sangh affiliates like Sri Ram Sene etc. The aim should be to mobilize and make a sensible and highly active Sangh that does not provoke but react strongly to anything against national interests and Indian public.

A lot of change in the public image and an extensive support base can be ensured by simply getting rid of fringe elements. Both you and I know this stuff. If the Sangh does clean up it's act then there is no basis for criticism.
 

Back
Top Bottom