What's new

Russia's Terrifying 'Nuke Trains' Will Be Roving The Rails By 2018

SvenSvensonov

PROFESSIONAL
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
1,617
Reaction score
207
Country
United States
Location
Sweden
n0lb5alintcziifhvd2z.jpg


Banned under the previous STARTII treaty, but not excluded in 2011's New START treaty, Russia is pulling from its Soviet strategic playbook and reviving the intercontinental ballistic missile toting, hiding in plain sight, 'Nuke Train' concept.



Sounding more like a set-piece from a James Bond movie, this new and improved Nuke Train will be carrying even more terrifying cargo than its Soviet predecessors. The Combat Railway Missile Complex (as the Russians call it) is somewhat akin to a ground-based nuclear ballistic missile submarine, although it is much less expensive to operate. Its constantly moving nature and 'hiding in plain sight' camouflage represents a survivable, hard to target, land-based nuclear second strike deterrent. The idea is that a portion of the Combat Railway Missile Complex fleet will roam the countryside at any given time, operating among similar looking passenger and cargo trains, thus making continuous satellite tracking by Western powers extremely difficult.

khnup6yqelly1eqq79sd.jpg


This new railway based missile platform is said to be named 'Barguzin' after the strong eastern wind that blows off Lake Baikal. Russian news site RT reports that like its 12 Soviet-era Nuke Train predecessors, which were removed from service in 1993, Barguzin will also have its cars disguised as standard commercial refrigeration cars, although they will not need heavy steel reinforced wheels like past units. This is due to the fact that the new RS-24 'Yars' ICBM these trains will carry weighs half the weight of the RT-23 'Molodets' ICBM carried on Soviet-era Nuke Trains. Without the tell-tale reinforced running gear, the fact that these ICBM toting train cars will look exactly like normal refrigeration cars will make them nearly impossible to track, even by informants on the ground.

Each of these new Railway Missile Complexes will hold six RS-24s, which are each capable of carrying four Multiple Independently Targeted Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs). This means that each train, of which five are currently planned, could hold 24 thermonuclear warheads, each able to take out a town of its own. That is a lot of apocalyptic firepower roving around the countryside on train tracks.

The RS-24 in particular is not Russia's most powerful ICBM, even the RT-23 'Molodets' that it replaces in the Nuke Train ICBM role carried over double the MIRVs, each with larger explosive yield options. Yet, for what the RS-24 lacks in punch it makes up for in accuracy and survivability. It speeds to its target at over mach 20, making it one of the fastest ICBMs in the world, this means that quicker reaction times are required when dealing with an RS-24 launch. In the end this equates into less enemy assets being dispersed once the RS-24's warheads hit their targets and less time for the enemy, in this case the US, to deploy its ballistic missile defenses.

The RS-24 also has a shorter infrared launch 'footprint,' making it harder to detect and track by space-based infrared early-warning satellites. The Yars also possess Russia's most advanced decoy systems aimed at fooling America's anti-ballistic missile systems and is rumored to be equipped with a highly-maneuverable post-boost vehicle. The RS-24's MIRVs are said to have a circular error probability of just 150 feet after flying some 7,500 miles to their target, making it very accurate ICBM, especially by Russian standards.

wx535qmsxokrfktxq7zu.jpg


Russia's renewed interest in Nuke Trains is said to be a response to America's Conventional Prompt Global Strike project, which looks towards a cocktail of hypersonic air-breathing missiles and aircraft as well as possibly ballistic missiles, and even space-based weaponry, to hit a target within an hour, anywhere on globe. This new requirement, which has produced nothing operational in the 'white world' as of yet, has been deemed a threat to road-mobile transporter-erector-launcher based ICBMs, which have to expose themselves for launch. A Nuke Train masquerading perfectly as a commercial train would be much harder to detect and can literally hide in plain sight, only transforming moments before launch.

Nuke Trains and Russia's reinvigorated focus on developing its nuclear arsenal is just another sign of how chilly the relationship between Russia and the West has become. These capabilities take a lot of money to develop and to sustain and along with Russia's recent investments in long-range aviation, its nuclear submarine force and ground-based nuclear forces, it is a very strong sign that Russia sees there may actually be a need for such a deterrent in the first place.

images.jpg


From Russia's Terrifying 'Nuke Trains' Will Be Roving The Rails By 2018

*We, the US, had our own "nuke train" concept... but it never left the drawing board. The "Peacekeeper Rail Garrison."

On Dec. 19, 1986, the White House announced President Ronald Reagan's approval to develop a rail system for basing part of the Peacekeeper Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) force. To increase survivability of this force, 50 Peacekeepers would be deployed in existing Minuteman silos and 50 more would be mounted on 25 USAF trains, two per train. Each train would consist of two locomotives, two security cars, two missile launch cars housing the missiles, one launch control car, one fuel car and one maintenance car. Each launch car carried one Peacekeeper ICBM, in a launch tube that could be elevated to fire the missile from the bed of the car. Overall body length of the launch car is 87 feet and fully loaded it weighs more than 520,000 pounds. The trains would be located in shelters located on USAF Strategic Air Command bases throughout the continental United States, with the missiles on continuous strategic alert. When necessary, the trains could be dispersed onto the nation's rail network, making it extremely difficult for an enemy to target and destroy them. Development of the rail garrison deployment system was terminated in 1991 as Cold War tensions eased. Major contractors for the rail garrison system were Boeing Aerospace Corp., Westinghouse Marine Division and Rockwell International Autonetics.

Nuke Train US.jpg


Peacekeeper-Rail-Garrison-Car-Cutaway-1986.jpg


Peacekeeper_Rail_Garrison_Car_-_Dayton_-_kingsley_-_12-29-08.jpg


But the Peacekeeper Rail Garrison wasn't the first iteration, as can be seen here:

AWST_19600620_p81_Minuteman_railcar_lr.jpg



Of course we also had an ALBM program at one point as well:


 
Is it really possible to hide it from advance spying satellite sensors and HALE UAVs like global hawk??
 
Is it really possible to hide it from advance spying satellite sensors and HALE UAVs like global hawk??
The tactic is that the spy satellites would not know which trains to look out for. There will be hundreds of commercial trains running across the country. The sats have no way of knwing which one has nukes and which one has ordinary cargo. There just aren't enough satellites to monitor every single train in that huge landmass.
 
Yes, this is the main point make mobile ICBM's launcher.



They wouldn't dare to fly over our territory otherwise they will be shoot down before they reach their goal.

US is way ahead in Stealth tech and they will not show their real game changer stuff, as it is their practice since long, remember B-2, SR-71 and list goes on. US only display's their stuff when next generation is ready or already deployed, I strongly believe that US is using stealth UAVs for spying where SAT don't provide required data.

The tactic is that the spy satellites would not know which trains to look out for. There will be hundreds of commercial trains running across the country. The sats have no way of knwing which one has nukes and which one has ordinary cargo. There just aren't enough satellites to monitor every single train in that huge landmass.

Do you really know what kind of sensors spy SATs have? if US can look below earth to find out caves how you think they can not look through metal or detect difference between normal locomotives and with ICBM ones?
 
Do you really know what kind of sensors spy SATs have? if US can look below earth to find out caves how you think they can not look through metal or detect difference between normal locomotives and with ICBM ones?

I'll tell you. Satellites, like your handheld mobile phone cameras, follow the Point-and-shoot principle. They can shoot images, but first they have to be told where to point.

Many satellites of today can even read the licence plates of a small car - but only if a human tells it where to look for the car. Even your cell phone can take a picture of the most secretive military item - say, a submarine or a nuclear storage depot - but only if you aim your cell phone on that subject.

So a satellite in space would have to be told which region of Russian surface to aim for.

@SvenSvensonov has professionally worked in closely related fields, so he should be able to explain it better.
 
I'll tell you. Satellites, like your handheld mobile phone cameras, follow the Point-and-shoot principle. They can shoot images, but first they have to be told where to point.

Many satellites of today can even read the licence plates of a small car - but only if a human tells it where to look for the car. Even your cell phone can take a picture of the most secretive military item - say, a submarine or a nuclear storage depot - but only if you aim your cell phone on that subject.

So a satellite in space would have to be told which region of Russian surface to aim for.

You are taking about US spy SATS which are backed by UAVs and other assets and they have many kind of spy SATs and in different orbits too, now SATs have very powerful radars and other sensor to cover large area, it will be difficult initially but they can create mechanism to track those trains. it will be game of cat and mouse.
 
US is way ahead in Stealth tech and they will not show their real game changer stuff, as it is their practice since long

You highly overestimate American capabilities, especially in stealth technologies. Read about F-22 scandal. F-117 was shot downed by S-125 and so on.
B-2, SR-71
And what is that? B-2 is a bomber created to fly at low altitude to penetrate air defense. The SR-71 isn't even a stealth plane. Not to mention it's not in service, unlike U-2(U-2 was shot downed by S-75, btw).

As i said, they can't fly over countries who has real air defense protection.
 
You highly overestimate American capabilities, especially in stealth technologies. Read about F-22 scandal. F-117 was shot downed by S-125 and so on.

And what is that? B-2 is a bomber created to fly at low altitude to penetrate air defense. The SR-71 isn't even a stealth plane. Not to mention it's not in service, unlike U-2(U-2 was shot downed by S-75, btw).

As i said, they can't fly over countries who has real air defense protection.

What I mean is that Elephant has two type of Teeth a pair for show off and others for eating, US never show their top of the line predators teethes which they use to eat opponents.
 
What I mean is that Elephant has two type of Teeth a pair for show off and others for eating, US never show their top of the line predators teethes which they use to eat opponents.

Serial product and prototype is not the same. This is goes to all kind of stuffs.
 
You are taking about US spy SATS which are backed by UAVs and other assets and they have many kind of spy SATs and in different orbits too, now SATs have very powerful radars and other sensor to cover large area, it will be difficult initially but they can create mechanism to track those trains. it will be game of cat and mouse.
It doesn't matter how sensitive the sensors are - unless they are told to observe a certain object, they will not know what to observe.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom