Don't bother to lie. This is what you said, exactly, copied from your post:
I told you what it is.She is a terrorist sympathizer and actively supports anti-national activities, making her a terrorist herself. You, on the other hand is fooling none but yourself for taking a pin-hole view on the matter.I couldn't care less if you want to take it otherwise.
Quite obviously, having seen that the game is up, you are now trying to shift your ground. It was not about Arundhati Roy, it was about your foul libels about me that I challenged.
Once again, put up or shut up.
Ohh.. stop patting you own back, will you ? The thread is about Arundhati Roy and her deliberate attempts to undermine the government and thereby the people of India, not about you.
Are you so dense that you assume that supporting an individual's human rights is at the expense of denying the human rights of the victims of terrorist murder?
I am concerned about her freedom of speech, because of those like you who threaten it.
And I have never, ever failed to speak up for those who were the victims of terror. Read my posts.
Of course not..But one has to see things in the light of the other intertwined events from a holistic point of view, before reaching to a conclusion.I have given it a thought and I will admit, advocating lynching was going a bit too far and that is wrong, I got carried away.But, there is no point denying the fact that her deliberate and repetitive abuse of the freedom extended to her by the constitution is obnoxious and tantamount to sedition.
Aren't you being a little obvious?
If you can't answer or are cornered, just compare the other person to Rahul Gandhi and everyone thinks you are the one right. That is infantile; try something better.
Again.. stop patronizing yourself.I will tell you what is obvious.You being rhetorical, repeating words like freedom of expression and vehemently denying to see the bigger picture is obvious.If each and everyone starts to think like you then there will not be any India the way we see it today, for the diversity is way too much.It is in the very interest of the state that such separatist voices are toned down, for the sake of greater good.It is doing us no benefit..Talk about that if you have to, instead of trying to paint it me vs you,for that is infantile.
Let's hear from you.
Who did the things you assert were done? The portions in bold?
Come again please ? Pardon my poor comprehension skill.The language has always been foreign to me.
The conscience is clear? Who's talking about conscience? We are discussing your ability to think straight. Unfortunately, from the evidence on display, your ability to think is not clear.
Next, are you really saying that Arundhati Roy is not free to sympathise with terrorists, and should be killed in an encounter because of what she says?
What does that say about your supporting terrorism and murder in your own turn? What is the difference between what you have suggested here, and what terrorists have done in J&K, or what Maoists do in Chhatisgarh?
Why should we not condemn you in the same terms as we have condemned, and will continue to condemn terrorists and Maoists?
Yes, I see the point there.My apologies.I was wrong.If we start behaving like those henchmen, then there is no difference between us and them.I would rather ask for a civilized way of dealing with the problem, and I do believe she should be brought to justice and should be made to answer in front of we, the people for her actions.
