What's new

Hindus in Pakistan temple celebrates Durga Puja

Original Hindus? Converted Hindus? Sounds interesting. And hats off to Pakistani Hindu's, for continuing to follow Hinduism even against all odds and hatred, surely they ate the true Hindus, no doubt, proud of them.
Btw, regarding your signature, I hope by this time, someone would have pointed you that Adamanese tribes are not even Asian, but actualy are Africans.

Aryan wannabe going by your id, Adamanese are South Indian tribe which didn't mix with invader ANI's.

Common people spoke Apabhramsha(slang or vernacular) but claiming Sanskrit wasn't a spoken language is itself sounds bizarre. BTW who told you only Brahmins spoke Sanskrit :wacko: Vedic Sanskrit sounds different and complex than Classical Sanskrit, Vedic Sanskrit had an extra complex vowel sounding like "Lri" which disappeared in Classical Sanskrit.

Its common knowledge Sanskrit is known as language of kings and brahmins. The only possible place where it could have been spoken by sizeable population is ancient punjab-north west region.
 
Its common knowledge Sanskrit is known as language of kings and brahmins. The only possible place where it could have been spoken by sizeable population is ancient punjab-north west region.

You are just making guesses instead of knowing about the time of origin of both forms of Sanskrit. :omghaha:

Aryan wannabe going by your id, Adamanese are South Indian tribe which didn't mix with invader ANI's.

I read the genetic studies, it says ASI(Ancestral South Indians) were distantly related to Andamanese tribes. :girl_wacko:

Sanskrit used in Rigveda contains lots of Dravidian origin words, Dravidian languages aren't similar to Andamanese language. ;)
 
Since when did Hindi become native language of Pakistani hindus? Unless they migrated from India in 1947 lol And sanskrit?

If what you say is true then how come hindus felt a need to translate Gita "NOW"?
 
Aryan wannabe going by your id, Adamanese are South Indian tribe which didn't mix with invader ANI's.



Its common knowledge Sanskrit is known as language of kings and brahmins. The only possible place where it could have been spoken by sizeable population is ancient punjab-north west region.

The Andamanese have been
classified as Negritos.
And Negritos are the most genetically
distant human population from
Africans.
 
You are just making guesses instead of knowing about the time of origin of both forms of Sanskrit. :omghaha:



I read the genetic studies, it says ASI(Ancestral South Indians) were distantly related to Andamanese tribes. :girl_wacko:

Sanskrit used in Rigveda contains lots of Dravidian origin words, Dravidian languages aren't similar to Andamanese language. ;)

Its interesting to note similarity in Sanskrit and Dravidian language, because we actualy dont know which language influenced which one! or do we?
 
Its interesting to note similarity in Sanskrit and Dravidian language, because we actualy dont know which language influenced which one! or do we?

The complex phonology of Sanskrit and Indo-Aryan languages are native only to India. You won't find the use of these letters gh, chh, jh, ph, bh,th, dh etc. in the languages out of Indian Subcontinent. Persians pronounced Gandhara as Gandara.
 
The only possible place where it could have been spoken by sizeable population is ancient punjab-north west region.

This was the place where Rigvedas were written.

Rigvedic_geography.jpg
 
yeah this bold part in the above article about treatment of Hindus.

Kumar said Sanskrit shlokas written in Urdu script were chanted since the Hindus in Pakistan are not proficient in Sanskrit or Hindi and the new generation Hindus were more proficient in Urdu language which is why the Gita had also been written in the Nastaleeq script.

why hindus are forced to give up their ancestor's languages ?

Nobody available to teach them duh.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom