What's new

Hatf IX Nasr Missile Tested by Pakistan

No an IBG invading Pakistani territory would be the real suicidal.

although I expect some sense let's c

1. using nukes is not child's play, depends on various conditions major one is wind, doing an nuclear attack u can say its subkt but the gamma radiations will effect both sides specially when range is so low, that is the reason I believe regions close 2 border has less threat of a nuclear fallout than those which are deep inside.

2. using a nuke on an Indian citizen be it in holululu or in Pakistan will bring out an heavy retaliation acc. to Indian nuclear doctrine, Pakistani members says about using multiple missiles on a single target to evade abm shield but by using strategic nuke on ibg ull receive the first major series of nuclear strikes from India.
 
60 to 90 km MLRS are also good option but not acutate as nasar but MLRS have more impact damage and large area can be covered
 
although I expect some sense let's c

1. using nukes is not child's play, depends on various conditions major one is wind, doing an nuclear attack u can say its subkt but the gamma radiations will effect both sides specially when range is so low, that is the reason I believe regions close 2 border has less threat of a nuclear fallout than those which are deep inside.

2. using a nuke on an Indian citizen be it in holululu or in Pakistan will bring out an heavy retaliation acc. to Indian nuclear doctrine, Pakistani members says about using multiple missiles on a single target to evade abm shield but by using strategic nuke on ibg ull receive the first major series of nuclear strikes from India.

Pakistan can do what ever it want on its own soil. We are not nuking Indians in India (which of course we will do later when the time is right) but we are defending ourselves from the Indian invasion. So this missile is for defence purpose not offence.
 
although I expect some sense let's c

1. using nukes is not child's play, depends on various conditions major one is wind, doing an nuclear attack u can say its subkt but the gamma radiations will effect both sides specially when range is so low, that is the reason I believe regions close 2 border has less threat of a nuclear fallout than those which are deep inside.

2. using a nuke on an Indian citizen be it in holululu or in Pakistan will bring out an heavy retaliation acc. to Indian nuclear doctrine, Pakistani members says about using multiple missiles on a single target to evade abm shield but by using strategic nuke on ibg ull receive the first major series of nuclear strikes from India.

When you will invade Pakistan's territory and try to capture it, this itself is a nonsensical idea. The rest after that is just the continuation of nonsense. How India will react doesn't matter to us. Our nuclear doctrine is not related with India's response in the first place. That's why Pakistan has a policy of first strike about nukes.
 
When you will invade Pakistan's territory and try to capture it, this itself is a nonsensical idea. The rest after that is just the continuation of nonsense. How India will react doesn't matter to us. Our nuclear doctrine is not related with India's response in the first place. That's why Pakistan has a policy of first strike about nukes.
....... .. by using this, India will actually be the one doing first major strike but technically it would be second strike.
 
Good. I think more upgraded missiles are going to be tested in coming months.
 
Three fold range increment! Interesting. Let see if there any design changes.


I guess it will be extremely hard for the Anti ballistic systems of India to shoot them down......cuz of their small ranges and very high speed......:D

That is not true. We will have three solutions against tactical missiles like Nasr.

1) MRSAM / Barak-8
2) Iron Dome
3) David Sling.

The MRSAM will have good anti-tactical missile capability.
 
I guess it will be extremely hard for the Anti ballistic systems of India to shoot them down......cuz of their small ranges and very high speed......:D

Actually its the other way around. Its easier to intercept SRBM because they don't attain much velocity during their course. the max speed they can attain is Mach 5.

American PAC -2 has 100% interception success rate in 2003 Iraq operations against Iraqi TBMs.
 
nuclear attack on indian troops,ships, carriers will considered as attack on Indian soil and will be replied accordingly.

by the way congratulations.

If you don't invade, you don't get attacked. Its as simple as that. Also Pakistan has gained miniaturization of its nuclear technology but there is no proof of India having that. So Indian aggression is most likely to be towards the cities killing innocents while Pakistan's attacks are most likely to be on the soldiers and military installations eliminating them tactically and specifically.
 
Yup its always nice to have a surface nuclear explosion abt 160 km away from where you leave ...:hitwall:

Nothing like a fresh dose of radiation everytime you step out...:azn:

Fukishima incident let the fear of nuclear dust cloud spreading till europe and here you are trying to detonate a nuclear device 160 km away to stop an intruding brigade :lol:

Neither India nor pakistan can use nuclear weapon.... one who uses will also be not spared from nuclear winter ....So stop being childish.... Last thing you want to do sentence yourself a slow painful death of radiation:wave:

In terms of Nuclear Showers and Radiation Cloud, its India who's going to gain the most of it as winds blow from west to east in most parts of the areas bordering India. So either we Nuke India or India Nukes Pakistan, India will have its share of fruit nevertheless. Happy Celebrating!
 
~~Help from ALLAH and success is near~~ translation of Arabic Ayat
 

Back
Top Bottom