What's new

Seema PUBG player who converted to Hindu, do not know Qalma & other basic knowledge of Islam

It never ceases to amaze me how many praise Raja Dahir, a southern desi sister lover.
Its out of spite for Bin Qasim and his invasions. They ignore the fact that even a lot of Hindus and Buddhists allowed the Arabs to invade and embraced them as they couldn't stand the Dahirs rule.
 
Not another mug falling for them trash ?? There's one born every minute!! How anybody can be that stupid like this woman ?
 
It appears challenging for you to justify the content written in your own Sharia, and you resort to sharing arbitrary pictures and videos from the internet in an attempt to demonstrate that people of other religions are equally narrow-minded. When I mentioned that the Muslim Personal Law Board in India permits the marriage of 54-year-old men with 6-year-old girls, in contrast to the Hindu Code Bill that prohibits it, none of you presented any evidence to counter my statement.
Because you diverted away from the main topic.
You presented Muslims as evil but we see your religion and history show these practises 10-100 times more than Islam.
Laws are there but who cares in India????? Still, your country has countless cases of child/minor marriages, child/monir rapes, animal rapes, and the list goes on.
 
Because you diverted away from the main topic.
You presented Muslims as evil but we see your religion and history show these practises 10-100 times more than Islam.
Laws are there but who cares in India????? Still, your country has countless cases of child/minor marriages, child/monir rapes, animal rapes, and the list goes on.

no need to comment. any comment on this silly woman. She’s the problem of her family now, stupid woman. I feel ''sorry for the kids. My advice give your children Back to their dad and you can reap these new benefits of your new life .
 
Like Krishna groomed ?
You should applaud them
Lol improve your GK , krishna did not marry child of six years age he made girlfriends of mature girls . . We are not attached to krisna or any other god so much that we can go to murder any body who criticises krishna or any hindu god . There is no blasphemy law in hinduism no slogan of sar tan se juda .
 
Last edited:
Because you diverted away from the main topic.
You presented Muslims as evil but we see your religion and history show these practises 10-100 times more than Islam.
Laws are there but who cares in India????? Still, your country has countless cases of child/minor marriages, child/monir rapes, animal rapes, and the list goes on.
The Hindu Code Bill serves as a set of guidelines for Hindus, similar to how Sharia functions as a code of conduct for Muslims.
 
Last edited:
no need to comment. any comment on this silly woman. She’s the problem of her family now, stupid woman. I feel ''sorry for the kids. My advice give your children Back to their dad and you can reap these new benefits of your new life .
Now she has become problem of PDF .🤣🤣🤣
 
Child marriage is a crime no hindu will defend it . Hindu law does not endorse such acts , such criminal acts are very rare far far from the eyes of law , one in million . We condemn it .


Wise man .


Yeah but your lying, it's part and parcel of Hinduism

Why does the Vishnu Purana and Mahabharat promote Child Marriage?
Not just the Vishnu Purana and Mahabharata, but all Dharma Shastras promote child marriage:
Manu 9.94 - A man thirty years old shall marry a charming girl twelve years old; or one twenty four years old, a girl eight years old; in the event of his duties suffering, he may do it sooner.
Yama (Do.)—(Same as Manu.)
Āpastamba (Do., p. 767).—‘A man thirty-years old shall take a wife ten years old, before she has attained puberty; and one twenty-one years old, a girl seven years old.’
Āśvalāyana (Do.).—‘A maiden seven years old is called Śaiśavī; a man eighteen years of age shall marry her; a maiden eight years old is called Gaurī, conducive to richness of sons and grandsons; and she shall be married by a man twenty-five years old; a girl nine years old is called Rohiṇī conducive to richness of wealth; a wise man shall wed her for the accomplishment of all his desires; a girl over ten years age, until she has her courses, is called Gāndhārī; and she shall be married by a man desirous of living long.’
Someone said these are interpolations but that is ridiculous because dozens of dharma shastras mention this practice along with dozens of MEDIEVAL era commentaries by orthodox vaidikas! Not to mention that child marriage was practiced as recently as 100 years ago among orthodox Brahmins, and even today some communities in India practice child marriage.
The next doubt it is, why is the age gap so big as mentioned in Manu verse 9.94? The answer is that the age gap is just an example and not literal. This is mentioned by medieval Vedic scholar Medhatithi:
Nor is any stress meant to be laid upon the exact number of years mentioned; all that is meant is that one should many a girl very much younger than himself.
This is also supported by actual practice among the Vaidikas, as the 12 year old Rama married the 6 year old Sita, so we see an age gap of 6 years here.
Now, as for WHY child marriage is enjoined by the Vedas, there are several reasons. One reason is that procreation is very important:
Manu 9.96 - Women were created for the purpose of child-bearing, and men for the purpose of procreation. hence it is that Religious Rites have been ordained in the Veda as common between the man and his wife.
And it's known that a woman is able to bear children after she hits puberty at the start of menstruation.
Another reason is that if the father doesn't give his daughter for marriage before puberty, he incurs sin:
Gautama (18-21).—‘A girl should be given in marriage before puberty.’
Vaśiṣṭha (17.70).—‘Out of fear of the appearance of the menses, let the father marry his daughter while she still runs about naked. For if she stays in the home after the age of puberty, sin falls on the father.’
Baudhāyana (4. 1.11).—let him not keep the daughter in his house after she has reached the age of puberty.’
And it is sinful because he is depriving a soul from taking birth, which is very important. There is another verse that says that for every menstruation cycle that the daughter is not married, the father incurs the sin of bhrunahatya: killing the embryo, because the female egg is gone to waste.
So child marriage here means marrying a girl who has not yet reached puberty. However, actual sex does not happen until menstruation starts. This is important, because it refutes the claim that Hinduism supports pedophilia. Pedophilia strictly means sex with PRE-PUBESCENT children, but from the start of menstruation, the woman has reached puberty.
Another reason for child marriage is to prevent PRE-MARITAL sex and ensure that girls are VIRGINS, because one should only marry virgins:
Manu 8.226 - The marriage-ritual texts are applicable to virgins only, and nowhere among men, to non-virgins; and this because these latter are excluded from religious acts.
This is a common meaning of "kanyA". Virgin here means woman who has not been penetrated. There are other meanings of kanyA, like "younger girl". But with this meaning, in order to ensure the girls are virgins, they would be married before KAMA (sexual desire) sets in, because if one marries a woman in her 20s or 30s like people do today, then there is a high chance that she has had premarital sex through some form of dating or something since statistics today show that premarital sex is actually very common.
And because marriage is so important, the Rishis have even allowed the girl to marry a man of her own choice if her father doesn't marry her in time:
Manu 9.90 - Having reached puberty, the maiden may wait for three years; after that time, she shall procure a suitable husband.
9.91 - When a maiden, when not given away, herself procures a husband, she incurs no sort of sin; nor does the man whom she weds.
So, these are the reasons for child marriage.
The physical characteristics of women mentioned in that passage you cited is a general guideline to marry healthy women, and not an absolute rule. Some of those characteristics are indicators of disease and bad health, like fat hands (obesity).
Now, this type of marriage (child marriage) is actually a marriage that is focused on SPIRITUALITY and not Kama, valor, wealth, etc. Thus, it was mainly practiced among Brahmins, who by profession focused mainly on spirituality. There are 8 types of marriages, and 4 of them fall under this category.
For example, here is the most spiritual type of marriage, the BrAhma vivAha, or the marriage pertaining to Brahman (God):
Manu 3.27 - When one himself invites a man endowed with learning and character and gives to him his daughter, after having dressed and worshipped (them),—this is called the “Brāhma” form.
So when is child marriage not followed? In the gAndharva vivAha. The gAndharva marriage is love marriage.
Manu 3.32 - The mutual union of the bride and bridegroom, through love is to be known as the “Gāndharva” form; it has sexual intercourse for its end and it has its source in lust.
And one can only love and have sexual desire after puberty (kama) has set in. This form of marriage is not an arranged marriage by the parents, but based on mutual attraction like the "love marriages" of today.
And then various marriage types are prescribed for different castes. The first four ones are for Brahmanas whereas the gandharva and rakshasa are mainly for kshatriya. For the other castes, asura and gandharva are the main types. But the PrAjApatya child marriage can be performed by all. For example, in the Mahabharata we see the famous love marriage (gAndharva vivAha) between the Kshatriyas Dushyanta and Shakuntala.
But the first four marriages are superior because they have SPIRITUALITY as its goal and not lust, wealth, or valour:
Manu 3.39 - Only from the four marriages mentioned successively, beginning with the Brāhma, are born sons endowed with Brahmic glory and respected by cultured persons.

I've always told you HINDUISM is disgusting and worthless,, it is a absolute dog shit religion

there is a reason why hundreds of millions of people dumped Hinduism, it is absolutely abhorrent and destroying Hinduism to save humanity is a must
 
Allah replaces those who dont follow his religion with someone better. We see this all the time when reverts are actually more learned and better observers of Islam and its true meaning, than many of those who are born in muslim families.

Theere is little doubt that conversion from Hinduism to islam and other faiths is far more common than the other way. What more, many hindus who convert to islam are highly educated and even from top echeleon of hindu caste hirarchy: Brahmins.

This also why Indian ruling party: BJP, a essential fascist party, has banned conversion from Hinduism to other religions.
Islam permits conversion to hinduism .?
 
Lol improve your GK , krishna did not marry child of six years age he made girlfriends of mature girls . . We are not attached to krisna or any other god so much that we can go to murder any body who criticises krishna or any hindu god . There is no blasphemy law in hinduism no slogan of sar tan se juda .
Give your head a wobble pagan
Back tracking and changing again Indian as usual
Like I said Lying little dirty heathen

Krishna is considered to be avatar of Vishnu. If so, he is a rapist who raped his follower. According to

Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Yudha Khanda 5, Ch 23.38-45

”On seeing her husband, Vrinda too was delighted. She forgot her sorrow. She considered everything a dream. Delighted in the heart and with all the dormant passions kindled up, she sported with him for many days in the middle of that forest. Once at the end of the sexual intercourse she realised that it was Visnu. Vrinda rebuked him angrily and spoke thus. Vrinda said:—Fie on this misdeed of Visnu in outraging the modesty of another man’s wife. I have now realised you as the wielder of illusion, appearing in the guise of an ascetic. Sanatkumara said:—O Vyasa, saying thus in great anger she showed her brilliant powers as a staunch chaste lady by cursing Visnu. “O base foe of the Daityas, defiler of other people’s virtue, O wicked one, take this curse from me, greater in force than all persons. The two persons whom you made to appear in front of me shall become Raksasas and abduct your wife. You will be distressed on account of separation from your wife roaming about with Sesa ‘lord of snakes’ who posed as your disciple here. You will seek the help of monkeys in the forest.”

In sum, Krishna raped Vrinda/ Tulsi and this event is known as Tulsi Vivah.

Nasty dirty fucking rapist

Fucking no life Heathens good for nothing except sniffing used Pakistani underpants for pleasure
 
Give your head a wobble pagan
Back tracking and changing again Indian as usual
Like I said Lying little dirty heathen

Krishna is considered to be avatar of Vishnu. If so, he is a rapist who raped his follower. According to

Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Yudha Khanda 5, Ch 23.38-45

”On seeing her husband, Vrinda too was delighted. She forgot her sorrow. She considered everything a dream. Delighted in the heart and with all the dormant passions kindled up, she sported with him for many days in the middle of that forest. Once at the end of the sexual intercourse she realised that it was Visnu. Vrinda rebuked him angrily and spoke thus. Vrinda said:—Fie on this misdeed of Visnu in outraging the modesty of another man’s wife. I have now realised you as the wielder of illusion, appearing in the guise of an ascetic. Sanatkumara said:—O Vyasa, saying thus in great anger she showed her brilliant powers as a staunch chaste lady by cursing Visnu. “O base foe of the Daityas, defiler of other people’s virtue, O wicked one, take this curse from me, greater in force than all persons. The two persons whom you made to appear in front of me shall become Raksasas and abduct your wife. You will be distressed on account of separation from your wife roaming about with Sesa ‘lord of snakes’ who posed as your disciple here. You will seek the help of monkeys in the forest.”

In sum, Krishna raped Vrinda/ Tulsi and this event is known as Tulsi Vivah.

Nasty dirty fucking rapist

Fucking no life Heathens good for nothing except sniffing used Pakistani underpants for pleasure


The weird thing is Hinduism is literally full of this shit

The Hindus with their constant "Phul support saar" against anything Muslim, antagonized a whole bunch of Muslim activists etc
They then In response to the anti Muslim post of Hindus/indians started to take apart Hinduism and found it to be stock full of absolutely horrendous crap
They didn't have to do anything just write what's written in Hindu scriptures.

The crazy thing about Hindus is that they give this Phul support saar to Israelis and White nationalists and conservatives and those people hate Hindus and couldn't give a crap about them
So all they ended up doing was enlightening the Muslim world to how much of a enemy the Hindus are


It is our duty to push this more, and in a few years we will see the fruit of our efforts when that Hindu hatred spreads wide
 
Give your head a wobble pagan
Back tracking and changing again Indian as usual
Like I said Lying little dirty heathen

Krishna is considered to be avatar of Vishnu. If so, he is a rapist who raped his follower. According to

Shiva Purana, Rudra Samhita 2, Yudha Khanda 5, Ch 23.38-45

”On seeing her husband, Vrinda too was delighted. She forgot her sorrow. She considered everything a dream. Delighted in the heart and with all the dormant passions kindled up, she sported with him for many days in the middle of that forest. Once at the end of the sexual intercourse she realised that it was Visnu. Vrinda rebuked him angrily and spoke thus. Vrinda said:—Fie on this misdeed of Visnu in outraging the modesty of another man’s wife. I have now realised you as the wielder of illusion, appearing in the guise of an ascetic. Sanatkumara said:—O Vyasa, saying thus in great anger she showed her brilliant powers as a staunch chaste lady by cursing Visnu. “O base foe of the Daityas, defiler of other people’s virtue, O wicked one, take this curse from me, greater in force than all persons. The two persons whom you made to appear in front of me shall become Raksasas and abduct your wife. You will be distressed on account of separation from your wife roaming about with Sesa ‘lord of snakes’ who posed as your disciple here. You will seek the help of monkeys in the forest.”

In sum, Krishna raped Vrinda/ Tulsi and this event is known as Tulsi Vivah.

Nasty dirty fucking rapist

Fucking no life Heathens good for nothing except sniffing used Pakistani underpants for pleasure

Rape is very bad thing i will condemn this action , but i will appreciate he did not marry six year old girl .can you condemn ?

The weird thing is Hinduism is literally full of this shit

The Hindus with their constant "Phul support saar" against anything Muslim, antagonized a whole bunch of Muslim activists etc
They then In response to the anti Muslim post of Hindus/indians started to take apart Hinduism and found it to be stock full of absolutely horrendous crap
They didn't have to do anything just write what's written in Hindu scriptures.

The crazy thing about Hindus is that they give this Phul support saar to Israelis and White nationalists and conservatives and those people hate Hindus and couldn't give a crap about them
So all they ended up doing was enlightening the Muslim world to how much of a enemy the Hindus are


It is our duty to push this more, and in a few years we will see the fruit of our efforts when that Hindu hatred spreads wide

We Hindus have given shelter to 25 crore muslims in India , that shows the greatness of hindutva .
 
Last edited:
You did not reply to what I said. You are just trying to avoid reply what I said. I did not mention any constitution, martial law, or age of puberty. And I have no issue if you eat rats. I have only issue when you people eat rats and vomit here on this Pakistani forum.
When girls from pakistan will play PUBG and come to India to adopt hindu dharma , we will come here to welcome them .
 

Back
Top Bottom