What's new

“The US Economy is Collapsing Before Our Eyes” - Billionaire Sam Zell’s Economic Warning

GreatHanWarrior

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 27, 2022
Messages
2,562
Reaction score
-2
Country
China
Location
China

9798505444283.jpg


@CIA Mole Look. It seems that your American dads are as bad as your country.


@CIA Mole Look. It seems that your American dads are worse than your country.
 
Last edited:
The US economic crisis is simply temporary. Loans will be given and the debt shall be ridden out forevermore.
Chinese economic faltering is more problematic, as the population reduction will only lead to a contracting economy- a guaranteed problem for the next few generations at least.
 
The US economic crisis is simply temporary. Loans will be given and the debt shall be ridden out forevermore.
Chinese economic faltering is more problematic, as the population reduction will only lead to a contracting economy- a guaranteed problem for the next few generations at least.
How to prove that the US debt crisis is temporary? But China has economic problems. And it's more serious?

The US economic crisis is simply temporary. Loans will be given and the debt shall be ridden out forevermore.
Chinese economic faltering is more problematic, as the population reduction will only lead to a contracting economy- a guaranteed problem for the next few generations at least.
I mean. If China's economy has problems. Which country do you think has no economic problems?
 
How to prove that the US debt crisis is temporary? But China has economic problems. And it's more serious?


I mean. If China's economy has problems. Which country do you think has no economic problems?
Your answer is ridiculously uninformative.
The point is that the aftershocks of the 1 child policy's effect on the economy will be felt for the next few generations, as well as the fact that the population decline will only continue as China still hasn't made any proper progress on family planning innovation to set the population growth back on track.

This is a more dangerous factor in regards to economy than debt is.
 
The US economic crisis is simply temporary. Loans will be given and the debt shall be ridden out forevermore.
Chinese economic faltering is more problematic, as the population reduction will only lead to a contracting economy- a guaranteed problem for the next few generations at least.
If and only if it can stave off the de-dollarisation...otherwise the era of unfettered money printing to pay off all the excesses, perpetual war, war profiteering, oligarchy living it up in the US will be over...
 
Your answer is ridiculously uninformative.
The point is that the aftershocks of the 1 child policy's effect on the economy will be felt for the next few generations, as well as the fact that the population decline will only continue as China still hasn't made any proper progress on family planning innovation to set the population growth back on track.

This is a more dangerous factor in regards to economy than debt is.
Your answer is illogical.

Population structure is a social issue. It is not an economic issue. It doesn't mean that having a larger population will lead to a better economy. India's economy is still only 1/6 of that of China. The impact of population on the economy is almost negligible. The focus is on industrial structure. The industrial structure of a country determines its economic fate.

Unfortunately. China has the most complete industrial system in the world. It may have temporary difficulties. But the future is still bright.
 
Your answer is illogical.

Population structure is a social issue. It is not an economic issue. It doesn't mean that having a larger population will lead to a better economy. India's economy is still only 1/6 of that of China. The impact of population on the economy is almost negligible. The focus is on industrial structure. The industrial structure of a country determines its economic fate.

Unfortunately. China has the most complete industrial system in the world. It may have temporary difficulties. But the future is still bright.
Nope, Wrong on another account.
The impact of population decrease is accepted as an economic issue too, I don't know why you're denying it.
Are you aware that your aging population is giving rise to massive additional stress on the state funded healthcare system?
The state has to pay for the treatment of a larger ageing population than a working population.
Do the maths.
When a higher amount of money is required for daily upkeep of the country whilst daily output begins to drop, the two will eventually converge leading to sacrifice of other state sponsored institutions or projects, meaning that the effect of this problem will be felt throughout the entire country, both in terms of development, military output and most specifically the manufacturing industry.
Population decrease affects every damn aspect of the economy yet you're denying it.
Whilst India has a smaller economy than China at the moment, it's rate of economic growth was 7.2% in 2022 whilst it was 4.9% in 2022 for China.
The point is that the larger population base and vastly increasing literacy rates of the population mean that India will overtake China in the long run due to population size, therefore output size.
Your idea about Population and economic strength not being correlated is absolute madness.
The higher the population, the higher the output therefore GDP increases. In the meantime, the more populated countries are beginning to emerge, this is natural as a larger population base takes longer to stabilise into a world power compared to a state that gains its economic wealth from plundering other's resources (Majority of western countries)
 
Your answer is ridiculously uninformative.
The point is that the aftershocks of the 1 child policy's effect on the economy will be felt for the next few generations, as well as the fact that the population decline will only continue as China still hasn't made any proper progress on family planning innovation to set the population growth back on track.

This is a more dangerous factor in regards to economy than debt is.
Unless China is able to reverse the trend
Can it ? Yes but the problem is it's making it worse by cracking down on minorities where population growth was there.

It's can't expect to reverse population trend in urban China but rural China it can but then it's a racial issue as well.

Will China allow immigration to counter it in the future?
 
Nope, Wrong on another account.
The impact of population decrease is accepted as an economic issue too, I don't know why you're denying it.
Are you aware that your aging population is giving rise to massive additional stress on the state funded healthcare system?
The state has to pay for the treatment of a larger ageing population than a working population.
Do the maths.
When a higher amount of money is required for daily upkeep of the country whilst daily output begins to drop, the two will eventually converge leading to sacrifice of other state sponsored institutions or projects, meaning that the effect of this problem will be felt throughout the entire country, both in terms of development, military output and most specifically the manufacturing industry.
Population decrease affects every damn aspect of the economy yet you're denying it.
Whilst India has a smaller economy than China at the moment, it's rate of economic growth was 7.2% in 2022 whilst it was 4.9% in 2022 for China.
The point is that the larger population base and vastly increasing literacy rates of the population mean that India will overtake China in the long run due to population size, therefore output size.
Your idea about Population and economic strength not being correlated is absolute madness.
The higher the population, the higher the output therefore GDP increases. In the meantime, the more populated countries are beginning to emerge, this is natural as a larger population base takes longer to stabilise into a world power compared to a state that gains its economic wealth from plundering other's resources (Majority of western countries)
Do you know what "industrial structure" means?

You haven't industrialized. More people are just a burden on you. Population is just a factor driving the domestic market! It is not a factor that determines industrial structure and economic fate!

Do you think that over 1 billion farmers are not your burden on healthcare and education?

Promise me. First, solve the toilet problem for 600 million people. Then we'll talk about the economy.

Unless China is able to reverse the trend
Can it ? Yes but the problem is it's making it worse by cracking down on minorities where population growth was there.

It's can't expect to reverse population trend in urban China but rural China it can but then it's a racial issue as well.

Will China allow immigration to counter it in the future?
If your country cannot establish an effective industrial system. Even if you massacre all ethnic minorities(Like Rwanda or Cambodia). Your country is still poor and backward. Unfortunately. But this is the fact.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom