TIME - Is India Headed for an Anti-Muslim Genocide? ::

[Riyad]

Muslims of the subcontinents were Hindu converts. So all Muslims of India, Bangladesh and Pakistan are descendents of Hindus. Why would India commit genocide on Hinduic Muslim people?

Taj Mahal represents India. A Muslim architecture represents Hindu India. Hindu-Muslim are brothers from one mother India (incl. Pakistan and Bangladesh). So there is no question of Muslim genocide in India.

 

[bluesky]

Oh so that's the case! I wanted to say with Bangladeshi Muslims that Muslims of this region. And later during 1946 election also people from punjab region voted all India Muslim league that created a separate nation! It's very simple to understand, I don't know why you want to act as puritan!

You are a fool not to know the entire history of Pakistan Movement and this is why you are asking why India does not give a corridor to connect BD with Pakistan. What a foolhardy uneducated fool you are!!

 

[Avicenna]

Muslims of the subcontinents were Hindu converts. So all Muslims of India, Bangladesh and Pakistan are descendents of Hindus. Why would India commit genocide on Hinduic Muslim people?

Taj Mahal represents India. A Muslim architecture represents Hindu India. Hindu-Muslim are brothers from one mother India (incl. Pakistan and Bangladesh). So there is no question of Muslim genocide in India.

What planet are you from?

 

[AgnosticIndian]

Whatifalthist

that guy's a right wing neocon type loon I think. has werid ideas about essential distinctions between civilizations and a world view in which the world essentially requires wars to progress. now, I don't think no wars will happen in the future, but it's in no way about civilizational clashes or anything like that.

 

[Michael Corleone]

that guy's a right wing neocon type loon I think. has werid ideas about essential distinctions between civilizations and a world view in which the world essentially requires wars to progress. now, I don't think no wars will happen in the future, but it's in no way about civilizational clashes or anything like that.

And you disagree? Almost every human innovation can stem its source from war. Anyways a war with india isn’t a clash of civilization. We can’t call india a civilization because it’s not. Whereas China is, best explained by how nation state in both the countries developed. Meritocracy in China whereas india was focused on caste divide which failed to form a comprehensive state until the Mughals and British came along.

Muslims of the subcontinents were Hindu converts. So all Muslims of India, Bangladesh and Pakistan are descendents of Hindus. Why would India commit genocide on Hinduic Muslim people?

Taj Mahal represents India. A Muslim architecture represents Hindu India. Hindu-Muslim are brothers from one mother India (incl. Pakistan and Bangladesh). So there is no question of Muslim genocide in India.

Chodu

 

[Maula Jatt]

Muslims of the subcontinents were Hindu converts. So all Muslims of India, Bangladesh and Pakistan are descendents of Hindus. Why would India commit genocide on Hinduic Muslim people?

Taj Mahal represents India. A Muslim architecture represents Hindu India. Hindu-Muslim are brothers from one mother India (incl. Pakistan and Bangladesh). So there is no question of Muslim genocide in India.

What do you want us to do with India - put em on our heads and present Mujra?
I don't know where you wanna go with this

 

[VikingRaider]

You are a fool not to know the entire history of Pakistan Movement and this is why you are asking why India does not give a corridor to connect BD with Pakistan. What a foolhardy uneducated fool you are!!

Being uneducated isn't a crime, and uneducated folks have scopes to educate themselves unlike genius people like you!

However do you really listen what people want to say ?

My friendly suggestion is , at first read full message and then start trolling. That will make you look more relevant!

 

[AgnosticIndian]

Meritocracy in China whereas india was focused on caste divide which failed to form a comprehensive state until the Mughals and British came along.

you're watching too much YouTube. let me guess: Kraut? his whole video is based on the discredited Orientalist historiography and he accepts that in the video himself and defends it. but there's a reason Orientalism is discredited in serious academia

and obviously I disagree. wars can lead to progress through R&D spending and destabilization of oppressive regimes. plagues have done that too. but they're in no way necessary. the world will go on, Bangladesh isn't going to get annexed anytime soon, specially never through a violent war. WIAH is just delusional with essentialist and geographical determinist views.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

In 1941 a major fascist power bit off more than it could chew when it took on the socialist superpower while purging an Abrahamic religious minority.

Let's learn some lessons from history.

 

[Rusty2]

Did. We dissed them saying Bangladeshis doesn’t need to go to poor states in india when they can earn more in bd.

Anyone can say anything, that means nothing.
Why doesn't Bangladesh do what is the diplomatic norm, like withdraw ambassadors, send an official objection to India and speak about it at the UN?
Hassina is more than happy to talk about events that happened 50 years ago at the UN but can't mention things that are happening now?

 

[Michael Corleone]

Anyone can say anything, that means nothing.
Why doesn't Bangladesh do what is the diplomatic norm, like withdraw ambassadors, send an official objection to India and speak about it at the UN?
Hassina is more than happy to talk about events that happened 50 years ago at the UN but can't mention things that are happening now?

It’s not just “anyone” as you put it but representative of government. And unlike Pakistan we don’t need to take up arms at every excuse. Withdrawal of ambassadors is counterintuitive to the process of diplomacy.
Hasina is a cuck, she will say many things. Good things when it benefits her.

 

[Avicenna]

Anyone can say anything, that means nothing.
Why doesn't Bangladesh do what is the diplomatic norm, like withdraw ambassadors, send an official objection to India and speak about it at the UN?
Hassina is more than happy to talk about events that happened 50 years ago at the UN but can't mention things that are happening now?

It's called realpolitik.

 

[Rusty2]

It’s not just “anyone” as you put it but representative of government. And unlike Pakistan we don’t need to take up arms at every excuse. Withdrawal of ambassadors is counterintuitive to the process of diplomacy.
Hasina is a cuck, she will say many things. Good things when it benefits her.

Someone calling your race "cockroaches and termites" is a non issue for you?
Yikes!
any ways, its your issue, I just wanted to give more context to my previous comments.

It's called realpolitik.

What benefit did Hasina get from shit talking Pakistan at the UN a few years ago?
(Real question)

 

[PradoTLC]

Muslims of the subcontinents were Hindu converts. So all Muslims of India, Bangladesh and Pakistan are descendents of Hindus. Why would India commit genocide on Hinduic Muslim people?

Taj Mahal represents India. A Muslim architecture represents Hindu India. Hindu-Muslim are brothers from one mother India (incl. Pakistan and Bangladesh). So there is no question of Muslim genocide in India.

what cow pee you just drank?

 

[Hiptullha]

I feel really sad for Bangladeshis. All they needed to do was let Pak Fauj roll through the Commies and Bengali Hindu agitators. Now they've got to deal with a fifth column which will always oppose their sovereignty.