What's new

PAC And HAL Good Paint Job or Workmanship

As you are the one making indian FAKE NEWS claims the onus is on you to provide the CREDIBLE & GENUINE evidence that proves otherwise. If not then it means you are lying and making it all up like all indians do..................:disagree:
I posted your media covering the crash, now tell me which aircraft crashed with official source that it was not a JF-17.
 
That’s what I said, JF-17B Twin seater with door hinges, by the way you were saying it is a photoshop :azn: ?

Do you have any pic of a Wind tunnel testing facility in PAC Kamra?

When did PAC Kamra send out pictures of it's Wind Tunnel testing facilities? As per your claims, where is the GENUINE & CREDIBLE evidence that Pakistan does not have Wind Tunnels? if you are not lying then remember to post the links here.
 
Did ISPR acknowledge the crash in Pindigheb about which I’m talking? Phake newj haha.


Google it, don’t ask me for proof as you have a habbit to paint it phake newj.
Indian MOD claiming to shoot down F-16 then giving no proof has to be the biggest sanghi dhoti twist in the world [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
 
We openly did a Joint Venture with Safran for Kaveri engine, it has nothing to hide, and which design for helos? You think that all Helicopters we made have foreign designs? Lmao.

Dhruv
View attachment 716591

LUH
View attachment 716592

LCH
View attachment 716593

IMRH
View attachment 716594

Go get a life






Swedish trainers and Chinese fighters license produced in Pakistan.
If you had a brain you be dangerous, Pakistan producing Chinese fighter which China doesn't even field however let me introduce you to your pride and joy.

1613412577030.png
 
And you should rejoice when you fight on your own instead of relying on the likes of Muktis.
Mukti's didn't pound CTG port, your subs didn't disappear in Indian Ocean in search for Muktis, neither did Gen Niazi surrendered to Muktis or did he?
As i said in the OP, it's in Indian nature to demean others.....PAC may not be as big as HAL but it's building and exporting to foreign customers both trainers and fighters.....let me know when HAL achieves the same so save your self from further embarrassment.. :cheers:
You're doing exactly what you allege I am doing. If PAC is not big or comparable to HAL, then why are you comparing the in the first place? Tell me when you start making carbon composites for air crafts, it'll be a first step at 'comparison with HAL' game. Not your so-called export of Chinese jets which they advertise around the world as their own.
 
Mukti's didn't pound CTG port, your subs didn't disappear in Indian Ocean in search for Muktis, neither did Gen Niazi surrendered to Muktis or did he?

You're doing exactly what you allege I am doing. If PAC is not big or comparable to HAL, then why are you comparing the in the first place? Tell me when you start making carbon composites for air crafts, it'll be a first step at 'comparison with HAL' game. Not your so-called export of Chinese jets which they advertise around the world as their own.

You guys boast about composite materials as If it's the holy grail we produce things based on our requirements and come back to me when AZM is ready I'll show you what composites look like Also PAC is much smaller in terms of capacity but on in terms quality or even better get that through your thick brain
 
Last edited:
You guys boast about composite materials as If it's the holy grail we produce things based on our requirements and come back to me when AZM is ready I'll show you what composites look like Also PAC is much smaller in terms of capacity to quality get that through your thick brain
We are discussing the present, not the future. Carbon composites are an important and expensive part of aircraft designs around the world, so it is a holy grail. It has been used from F-22 to almost every modern fighter jet as well as passenger aircraft. Just because something is smaller, it doesn't automatically equate to quality. It's a lame way of thinking.
 
Indians on PDF, due to their nature, often refer to products such as JF-17 built in Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) as a mere paint job. Albeit the sheer frustration and heartburn is understandable. However, since the Indians claim that their LCA Tejas is indigenous and pride product of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) . Let's compare the two respective aircraft for their paint job and workmanship.

Tejas, Excellent paint job.

View attachment 716514

But a close look at the aircraft reveals some average workmanship.

View attachment 716515

Underneath the aircraft, it seems like patchwork and gun casing and surrounding has very basic if not poor finish.

View attachment 716520

JF-17 Thunder. An Average Paint Job.

View attachment 716521

Workmanship and Finishing.

View attachment 716523


View attachment 716522

JF-17 Gun Port.

View attachment 716525

Hope that clears the doubt as who is good at paint jobs and who is professional in workmanship. :D
U Ota be ashamed of ur self my brother. That's alian tech u making fun of, ita not a gun like u know it.

When u shoot from it, the bullets transforms into many shooting stars emitting waves that render all electronics useless.

So instead of making fun of their alian-ness, we have to say thank u for not trying it in us thus far.

Thank you India. .!..
 
Tejas has american Jet engines from General Electric. It uses the GE-F404:
Americans didn't design or develop the jet, did they? JF 17 is a Chinese jet, not a Russian jet because it uses Klimov engines. So, again you asked if there is an Indian designed and developed jet. There is, and it is Tejas. Anything else?
 
Back
Top Bottom