Rashid vows action within 72 hours for speaking against Pakistan Army, state institutions

[RAMPAGE]

Should the government accept insults and criticisms from a bunch of people who are some of the most corrupt people ever to have existed?

Yes.

 

[KurtisBrian]

That is quite the article. Is Pakistan heading for a civil war?

 

[Norwegian]

Yeah Generals are to be blamed only not Bureaucrats who have made records of "Haramkhori and Rishwatkhori" and Politicians who looted Pakistan from the roots up.. and fraudster Businessmen who have evaded income tax and are mafias in this country...

Generals are responsible for giving NRO to corrupt politicians, bureaucrats, judges instead of holding them accountable. Similarly civilians are responsible for not holding army generals accountable when they imposed martial laws and destroyed constitution.

That is quite the article. Is Pakistan heading for a civil war?

Yes on your Modi media

 

[pakistanitarzan]

According to El Sid and Batman? Yes

Should the government accept insults and criticisms from a bunch of people who are some of the most corrupt people ever to have existed?

 

[Jungibaaz]

Whats more democratic than enforcement of law ?

Is criticising institutions illegal? It isn't. However impinging on right of free expression is contravention of constitutional law. So yes, I agree the law should be enforced but not in whatever warped way you wish it were enforced.

 

[El Sidd]

Sheikh rasheed may mistakenly enter womens washroom and have charger cable hanging out from his pocket... but he definitely knows which people he needs to put in jail..

i wish i was this casual about the country

 

[Jungibaaz]

That is quite the article. Is Pakistan heading for a civil war?

No, civil society is robust, even if the system is a giant dumpster fire.

 

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

Secondly for section 5, it's irrelevant here, we're not talking about insulting some police officer's mother to his face, we're talking about political speech and related insults. You can see how it is defined, how it can be challenged, and that courts can take a view as to what is reasonable and what is criminal.



The few controversies we did have with section 5, none of them as far as I am aware led to a conviction. So pls try again.

Chapter 1: "Fundamental Rights" of Part II: "Fundamental Rights and Principles of Policy"

Yes.

Criticism yeah insults no as per law...

 

[HAIDER]

This SOB call for hanging 220 military officers ... lolzzz

 

[El Sidd]

Lmao if likes of Naju can be merited to lead that too through rigging why cant those who were chosen by people cant lead right ?

Lead what? Government has no policy thus why it's back to political victimisation and selected accountability

 

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

Is criticising institutions illegal? It isn't. However impinging on right of free expression is contravention of constitutional law. So yes, I agree the law should be enforced but not in whatever warped way you wish it were enforced.

As I said insulting and death threats are not criticism and no in is stopping anyone from criticism only from insulting/threatening institutions...

And here is what constitution says..Article19..

Chapter 1: "Fundamental Rights" of Part II: "Fundamental Rights and Principles of Policy"

 

[Jungibaaz]

Chapter 1: "Fundamental Rights" of Part II: "Fundamental Rights and Principles of Policy"

Was that meant to be some sort of comeback? Instead of quoting it at me, maybe you should read Article 19 within that same link::

19	Freedom of speech, etc. Every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, and there shall be freedom of the press, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, 33[commission of] 33 or incitement to an offence.

"Reasonable restrictions" can be death threats and incitement as we've already agreed, but simply insulting serving PM on twitter, or calling Nawaz or Zardari corrupt chors. Or criticising a state institution or the army, these are not unreasonable, let alone criminal.

 

[TheSnakeEatingMarkhur]

Lead what? Government has no policy thus why it's back to political victimisation and selected accountability

Lmao... yeah sadke nai bnai na...

Policies in terms of saying no to those who controlled Pakistan in guise of friendship...

Policies in terms of giving boost to industry...

Policies in terms of wellfare and health and serting up system that works on the ground level..

But patwario ko accountability of corrupt looter victimisation nazar ati he...

 

[KurtisBrian]

No, civil society is robust, even if the system is a giant dumpster fire.

Thank you for your answer. It was a real question asked because media always has their own angle.

Yes on your Modi media

Thank you also. I will take your sarcasm as a definite no. btw I have nothing to do with India unless you count eating at some Punjabi restaurants and staying at a hotel owned by Sikhs as having something to do with India.

 

[El Sidd]

Lmao... yeah sadke nai bnai na...

Policies in terms of saying no to those who controlled Pakistan in guise of friendship...

Policies in terms of giving boost to industry...

Policies in terms of wellfare and health and serting up system that works on the ground level..

But patwario ko accountability of corrupt looter victimisation nazar ati he...

why don't you copy paste the exact declared policy of the government in each regard.

i don't have to entertain your youtube patriotism