What's new

Has Pakistan suspended JF-17 deal with Myanmar?

Status
Not open for further replies.
pak cant cancel the deal as JFT is joint venture and secondly we are not that much islamic to sacrifice our export for poor muslims who can not return us any favor.
 
That's because Pakistan is the sole operator and no other variant exists except as a prototype for Myanmar. In reality, JF17 is the MKI to FC1 which is the Su30.

China has full rights to the design and can do and sell as they please. The only rights PAC has is to produce 58% of the airframe for PAF. Nothing on the design. Of course Pakistan can also make more and more subsystems as the capabilities improve. But these are not rights, just license.

I'd like to hear the opposite from other members of course.
Listen up motherfuker.

The JF project ia 60% funded by Pakistan and involved Pak team that was based in chengdu.

I know you bharato faggots have a problem but try taking this like a dildo up your gaand.. accept it !
 
Last edited:
I have came across a 6 months old news which claims that Pakistan suspended JF-17 fighter deal with myanmar due to it's treatment of Rohingya Muslims. Is it true?

Pakistan suspends JF- 17 deal with Myanmar
By Daily Morning Mail On Mar 11, 2018
http://www.morning.pk/2018/03/pakistan-suspends-jf-17-deal-myanmar/
No, but delayed probably since UN commission report pointed genocide by military.
Remember this deal is not with Pakistan only but China also involved with permission to re-export Russian engine from Russia.
 
That's because Pakistan is the sole operator and no other variant exists except as a prototype for Myanmar. In reality, JF17 is the MKI to FC1 which is the Su30.
China has full rights to the design and can do and sell as they please. The only rights PAC has is to produce 58% of the airframe for PAF. Nothing on the design. Of course Pakistan can also make more and more subsystems as the capabilities improve. But these are not rights, just license.
I'd like to hear the opposite from other members of course.
Apart from the highlighted nonsense, do you think that China which has been making and selling fighter aircraft for decades, now needs PAC & PAF to do the marketing for the JF-17.....in case you haven't noticed, it's the PAF which has been ferrying and displaying the aircraft all over the world.....so please don't give the impression as if your brain was installed by DRDO.
 
Apart from the highlighted nonsense, do you think that China which has been making and selling fighter aircraft for decades, now needs PAC & PAF to do the marketing for the JF-17.....in case you haven't noticed, it's the PAF which has been ferrying and displaying the aircraft all over the world.....so please don't give the impression as if your brain was installed by DRDO.
this is what happens in stunted growth! and we all know whats the economic and poverty related situation of Bharti Muslims is in india!:rofl:
 
wrong info paksitan is making more block-2 then pak order . these birds are for Myanmar and Nigeria


block2-no52

41399489_2202822803288398_8806384120331501568_n.jpg
 
Apart from the highlighted nonsense, do you think that China which has been making and selling fighter aircraft for decades, now needs PAC & PAF to do the marketing for the JF-17.....in case you haven't noticed, it's the PAF which has been ferrying and displaying the aircraft all over the world.....so please don't give the impression as if your brain was installed by DRDO.

PAF displays it because PAC can profit from the sales if the airframes are partially made in PAC, in which they've a big advantage thanks to a proper production line. As the sole user and operator of the biggest production line of this aircraft, they can also bargain for more and more portion of work, as will be the case with Nigeria, probably getting the full share of work that they receive for PAF aircrafts. (Myanmar case will be evident only once we see parts being made in PAC.)

But this doesn't mean PAC will always profit. For example, in a deal that CAC will sign for a production line in a third country, PAC will get nothing. It'll be another variant of FC1.

This is the difference between rights to design and rights to production.
 
PAF displays it because PAC can profit from the sales if the airframes are partially made in PAC, in which they've a big advantage thanks to a proper production line. As the sole user and operator of the biggest production line of this aircraft, they can also bargain for more and more portion of work, as will be the case with Nigeria, probably getting the full share of work that they receive for PAF aircrafts. (Myanmar case will be evident only once we see parts being made in PAC.)

But this doesn't mean PAC will always profit. For example, in a deal that CAC will sign for a production line in a third country, PAC will get nothing. It'll be another variant of FC1.

This is the difference between rights to design and rights to production.
Damn the quality of brain cells coming out of DRDO will surely be making Squadron Leader Baldev Singh turn in his grave. Since according to your brilliant mindset PAF is the sole operator and user of JF-17. i guess they must lend these aircraft to China where amongst other they are performing duties as chase aircraft for something like J-20.


J-20.JF-17STEALTH+FIFTH+GENERATION+PLAAF+PAF+FIGHTER+JET.jpg
 
There is no genocide in Myanmar. The muslim terrorists are trying to separate Arakan from Myanmar and they killed thousands of Buddhists and Buddhist monks. If military actions against insurgents are genocidal, then Pakistan army is also a genocidal army for killing millions bengalis in 1971.
Reported for your baseless blabbering @Gurkha13 :blah::blah::blah:
 
I think this thread holds some water.

http://www.mizzima.com/news-domestic/myanmar-air-force-induct-jf-17-fighters-end-2017

The JF-17 for myanmar supposed to handover to them by early 2018 but its Sept 2018 and still no news, nothing happen. I believe PAF cancel the deal and Myanmar goes for others.....

http://www.atimes.com/article/chinas-budget-jet-fighters-on-course-for-asian-airspace/

The state-owned Aviation Industry Corp of China (AVIC) indicated on its WeChat account earlier this week that it had a haul of orders from an unspecified Southeast Asian county for its FTC-2000G multipurpose aircraft, the export version of the J-7 interceptor jet that ceased production in 2013, which in turn was a license-built version of the Soviet Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21.


The Southeast asian country going for FTC-2000G is very likely Myanmar.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom