What's new

Unmanned Tejas cleared !! But what are its Utility?

The leading Q is used for target drones
Yes I'm aware...if the goal was to show a concept of Tejas as if it was converted into an unmanned version...like QF4 or QF16, the "artist" didn't need to try to blend in the cockpit with the body.

Even that inscription of "QF-005 LCA-TEJAS" is looking super fake. In any case, such a bad attempt shouldn't even be used in publications...and certainly shouldn't be labeled as an "artist's impression".
 
it was from starting sir you just notice it now ?
No,I started following PDF from 2009 Feb onwards,it has a wuaqual back then. Members from both sides were argue with facts on that days. But now it's a full of shit.
 
Neither tejas,nor jf-17 are frontline aircrafts but small multirole jets.Its obvious u cannot compare these to f-16,su-30,rafale etc.
Can't say anything about Tejas it is either even considered a fighter aircraft or no but JF-17 Block II is equivalent to F-16 MLU and Block three will be equals to F-16 block 52.

But now it's a full of shit.
And most shit is from India....all the safron chadeez joined PDF to boost their pompous ego.
 
Can't say anything about Tejas it is either even considered a fighter aircraft or no but JF-17 Block II is equivalent to F-16 MLU and Block three will be equals to F-16 block 52.

Support ur assertions with facts and u will realize tejas mk1 is not bad at all,its quite comparable to say the least.
But u like others wont bother the fact checking,i am sure of that.
Anyways have a good day.

And most shit is from India....all the safron chadeez joined PDF to boost their pompous ego
Equal number of chaddis from pakistan too came,not sure about their colour.
Point is its just a saas bahu match now.

No one wins and defence loses.
 
Then why air force pointed out 50+ changes ?

Why wouldnt they when their are teething issues?
Dosent mean jf-17 is flawless with no problems,the difference is about options,u dont have many(sorry to say this).

And yes simple jf-17(not block-2) with a simple klj-7 radar,no refuelling is just as gullible as mk1.We live in the times of aesa radars and stealth jets.Both are nothing special.And in an actual fight i see both faring 50-50% vs each other.
 
Why wouldnt they when their are teething issues?
Dosent mean jf-17 is flawless with no problems,the difference is about options,u dont have many(sorry to say this).

And yes simple jf-17(not block-2) with a simple klj-7 radar,no refuelling is just as gullible as mk1.We live in the times of aesa radars and stealth jets.Both are nothing special.And in an actual fight i see both faring 50-50% vs each other.

There's an ocean of difference between the avionics of these two.

If someone claims F16 comparisons, it's better to ignore.
 
Why wouldnt they when their are teething issues?
Dosent mean jf-17 is flawless with no problems,the difference is about options,u dont have many(sorry to say this).

And yes simple jf-17(not block-2) with a simple klj-7 radar,no refuelling is just as gullible as mk1.We live in the times of aesa radars and stealth jets.Both are nothing special.And in an actual fight i see both faring 50-50% vs each other.
Lols JF-17 blk 2 with refueling prob already in service and after completing deliveries of Block 2 all block 1 will be upgraded to block 2 standards. JF-17 is quite flawless and that is why we have courage to fly single engine aircraft over the crowd.
Block III will be stealthy and will came with AESA radar.....You know Project AZM which already started to build 5th Gen fighter and I am sure we will induct before India.
 
Lols JF-17 blk 2 with refueling prob already in service and after completing deliveries of Block 2 all block 1 will be upgraded to block 2 standards. JF-17 is quite flawless and that is why we have courage to fly single engine aircraft over the crowd.
Block III will be stealthy and will came with AESA radar.....You know Project AZM which already started to build 5th Gen fighter and I am sure we will induct before India.

Sure...u are way ahead of us.I just realized form the facts presented in ur argument.:coffee:


prob already


will came


Too much future here buddy but i like ur optimism:pleasantry:
 
unmanned fighterjet is more lethal as it has no pilot so airforce can easily use it to violate other country airspace because there is no fear of losing living pilot.u.s has also converted its many f16 to unmanned.we should consider this great threat as it will decrease india threshold of non violation of our airspace and can be used to bomb our nuclear sites
 
Sure...u are way ahead of us.I just realized form the facts presented in ur argument.:coffee:











Too much future here buddy but i like ur optimism:pleasantry:
Tejas ka will be tu last 30 years se sunn rehy hien...I must say too much optimism :lol:
 
Can't say anything about Tejas it is either even considered a fighter aircraft or no but JF-17 Block II is equivalent to F-16 MLU and Block three will be equals to F-16 block 52.


And most shit is from India....all the safron chadeez joined PDF to boost their pompous ego.
Yeah, found the shit right now itself.
 
Back
Top Bottom