Lt General
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
It's a truth that Pakistan is on the defensive against every terrorist and violence related activities India does/funds in Pakistan. More people have died in Pakistan due to Indian proxies working along Af-Pak border and in Baluchistan than vice-versa. But Pakistan would not pay India back in the same coin.
Why?
The history of Pakistan is its love for experimentation and change. Esp. when it said Naya-Pakistan to align itself with the paradigm shift in international relations where the locus of national power (and hence the quality of life of its citizens) will shift from military to economic.
The answer is a no-brainer - Pakistan does not want to beat India in its [India's] own game. That's because India's activities in Pakistan are designed to get a specifically shaped response from Pakistan which Pakistan is not giving them, and which if Pakistan does, will
1) fortify the image of Pakistan as a hotbed of 'terrorism' in front of international fraternity forever
2) bootstrap India's drive to isolate and tarnish image of Pakistan in the world and in the words of PMIK will discredit Kashmiri's just struggle for self-determination
3) roll back the $100+ billion CPEC
4) scare FDI's/foreign investors coming in Pakistan
5) rob Pakistan of its future leadership of Muslim Ummah
Pakistan is battle-hardened. But it's also policy-hardened. Pakistan is doing something by not doing anything - by not responding to Indian terrorism Pakistan is giving the lawmakers around the world data. Void of any data to blame Pakistan has frustrated Indian diplomatic missions, an hence the need for false-flag operations in Kashmir.
The wars onward will be least somatic and more economic and knowledge-based, and Pakistan has angled itself best by virtue of its geographical location to benefit from this paradigm shift.
In order to win economic wars, violence need to be shed. India does not want Pakistan to do that.
That's why.
Why?
The history of Pakistan is its love for experimentation and change. Esp. when it said Naya-Pakistan to align itself with the paradigm shift in international relations where the locus of national power (and hence the quality of life of its citizens) will shift from military to economic.
The answer is a no-brainer - Pakistan does not want to beat India in its [India's] own game. That's because India's activities in Pakistan are designed to get a specifically shaped response from Pakistan which Pakistan is not giving them, and which if Pakistan does, will
1) fortify the image of Pakistan as a hotbed of 'terrorism' in front of international fraternity forever
2) bootstrap India's drive to isolate and tarnish image of Pakistan in the world and in the words of PMIK will discredit Kashmiri's just struggle for self-determination
3) roll back the $100+ billion CPEC
4) scare FDI's/foreign investors coming in Pakistan
5) rob Pakistan of its future leadership of Muslim Ummah
Pakistan is battle-hardened. But it's also policy-hardened. Pakistan is doing something by not doing anything - by not responding to Indian terrorism Pakistan is giving the lawmakers around the world data. Void of any data to blame Pakistan has frustrated Indian diplomatic missions, an hence the need for false-flag operations in Kashmir.
The wars onward will be least somatic and more economic and knowledge-based, and Pakistan has angled itself best by virtue of its geographical location to benefit from this paradigm shift.
In order to win economic wars, violence need to be shed. India does not want Pakistan to do that.
That's why.