When Did Environmentalism Become So Political?

[Zibago]

 

[CBU-105]

 

[Zibago]

First is debatable on whether it was a fair deal or not but Infowars issues fatwa on global warming?

 

[CBU-105]

First is debatable on whether it was a fair deal or not but Infowars issues fatwa on global warming?

Did you watch both videos ?

Do it, force yourself to sit through them even if you feel it's just racist bile or whatever.

Only retarded bhengas can see from either their left or their right eye exclusively.

 

[Zibago]

Did you watch both videos ?

first one yes it uses the same justification trump used which got debunked the fair point in first video is china should pay more but is US wrong in being top contributor if its the top polluter and still per capita contribution of US was less than many European countries
On green tech yes it has some issues right now for European countries but they are more of technical problems that will be eventually resolved but everyone agrees that the future is green whether its Europe,South Asia,East Asia,Middle East or Africa all are going for a greener more oil free future
We may not see a complete shift in our lifetime but we will witness the slow replacement of petro fuels and march toward energy independence of many countries

Follow
France Diplomacy

✔@francediplo_EN


We’ve seen the @WhiteHouse video about the #ParisAccord. We disagree – so we’ve changed it. #MakeThePlanetGreatAgain.

10:52 PM - 2 Jun 2017

• https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?in_reply_to=870699642509512704
  
• 
  19,35519,355 Retweets
  
• 
  25,49125,491 likes

Perhaps looking at it from the perspective the world other than big oil funded media and politicians(and their supporters) see it may result in a fresh perspective

By going for a coal future America dumped leadership role in the green revolution that is taking place all over the world who is going to take over?
China

 

[SabzShaheen]

You must be out of your mind if you're gonna use Infowars as a factual source.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

f
By going for a coal future

The US is NOT going for a coal future. We just aren't going to close our coal powerplants while other big users are allowed 13 years to keep theirs open (or even build more).

 

[CBU-105]

You must be out of your mind if you're gonna use Infowars as a factual source.

You still living in the obongo era or what ?

Alex and Infowars were instrumental, and in no small part, in getting Trump elected. President Trump called him after being sworn in, and they've spoken on more occasions since. Alex has real sources inside the white house, Infowars is real news.

So, you (and everyone else) who use CNN, BBC, FOX and other MSM as factual sources in 2017 need to get your head examined.

 

[SabzShaheen]

You still living in the obongo era or what ?

Alex and Infowars were instrumental, and in no small part, in getting Trump elected. President Trump called him after being sworn in, and they've spoken on more occasions since. Alex has real sources inside the white house, Infowars is real news.

So, you (and everyone else) who use CNN, BBC, FOX and other MSM as factual sources in 2017 need to get your head examined.

So you think just because infowars had a hand in getting Trump elected and that Trump - TRUMP - thanked Alex Jones makes infowars and Alex Jones reliable? Also, Trump gets a lot of his news from Fox News anyway so I don't get what you're on about.

You're either a troll or really that delusional. Either way you're not worth my time so you can enjoy being the first person on my block list.

 

[CBU-105]

So you think just because infowars had a hand in getting Trump elected and that Trump - TRUMP

President Trump, president of the United States of America... yes ?

thanked Alex Jones makes infowars and Alex Jones reliable?

yes, si, oui, dah, haan.

Also, Trump gets a lot of his news from Fox News anyway so I don't get what you're on about.

I'm pretty damn sure that the 45th President of the United States of America has better sources than FOX news to get his intel.

You're either a troll or really that delusional.

no and no, I'm here for dialogue and debate, pwn my point and I'll concede and walk off.

Either way you're not worth my time so you can enjoy being the first person on my block list.

thank you, I consider it a high honour to be the first to enter your block list.

 

[SabzShaheen]

I'm here for dialogue and debate, pwn my point and I'll concede and walk off.

President Trump, president of the United States of America... yes ?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40205461
Explain how becoming the president makes someone intelligent and reputable.

I'm pretty damn sure that the 45th President of the United States of America has better sources than FOX news to get his intel.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...reasingly-shaped-by-fox-news-and-fox-by-trump
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/27/donald-trump-white-house-twitter-cable-news-sleep

 

[El Sidd]

It was unfair and unrealistic to ignore political oil. Though Europe did manage to lower its dependency on oil but for emerging markets it remains vital.

On the other hand a clever ploy to keep milking the arabic cow. Trump had to scratch the Saudi's oily back with that Paris agreement.

Although good to see Alex Jones still being relevant

 

[LeGenD]

first one yes it uses the same justification trump used which got debunked the fair point in first video is china should pay more but is US wrong in being top contributor if its the top polluter and still per capita contribution of US was less than many European countries
On green tech yes it has some issues right now for European countries but they are more of technical problems that will be eventually resolved but everyone agrees that the future is green whether its Europe,South Asia,East Asia,Middle East or Africa all are going for a greener more oil free future
We may not see a complete shift in our lifetime but we will witness the slow replacement of petro fuels and march toward energy independence of many countries

Follow
France Diplomacy

✔@francediplo_EN


We’ve seen the @WhiteHouse video about the #ParisAccord. We disagree – so we’ve changed it. #MakeThePlanetGreatAgain.

10:52 PM - 2 Jun 2017

• 
  
• 
  19,35519,355 Retweets
  
• 
  25,49125,491 likes

Perhaps looking at it from the perspective the world other than big oil funded media and politicians(and their supporters) see it may result in a fresh perspective

By going for a coal future America dumped leadership role in the green revolution that is taking place all over the world who is going to take over?
China

China is the largest emitter of CO2 in the world at present due to the simple fact it is the largest manufacturing hub of the world at present, and its CO2 emissions are projected to increase in coming years. Therefore, I don't get this cringe-worthy rooting for China to lead the Global Climate Change enterprise; not going to happen anytime soon.

Global Warming is inevitable and Paris Climate Summit is a farce:

References:

https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/05/31/in-one-graph-why-the-parisclimate-accord-is-useless/
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09...ially-useless-its-going-to-get-warmer-anyway/

 

[El Sidd]

China is the largest emitter of CO2 in the world at present due to the simple fact it is the largest manufacturing hub of the world at present, and its CO2 emissions are projected to increase in coming years. Therefore, I don't get this cringe-worthy rooting for China to lead the Global Climate Change enterprise; not going to happen anytime soon.

Global Warming is inevitable and Paris Climate Summit is a farce:

References:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/05/31/in-one-graph-why-the-parisclimate-accord-is-useless/
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09...ially-useless-its-going-to-get-warmer-anyway/

That's a good explanation scientifically. Geopolitics can be explained by this as well.

 

[CBU-105]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40205461
Explain how becoming the president makes someone intelligent and reputable.

Don't be shifting goalposts now.

My original point was that Infowars is credible, because they helped elect a POTUS.

btw, that Comey thing has people on both sides claiming victory. I think it'll fizzle out, no way Trump was colluding with the Russians during the campaign.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...reasingly-shaped-by-fox-news-and-fox-by-trump
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/27/donald-trump-white-house-twitter-cable-news-sleep

nonsense, he does watch the news but Trump's worldview is not shaped by FOX or anyone else.

Here's a foreign policy piece he put out 30 years ago.

He's been on message for 3 decades now.