highlighting an obvious contrasting reaction is called irony NOT crying victim
like you are suggesting.
pull the thumb out of your arse and note that my post mentions the obvious what if.. i.e him being black. unless you consider yourself as white and are offended then put that thumb back in your arse and don't worry about it...
Where have you highlighted a contrasting reaction when there are multiple variables instead of only the race. Maybe you should try to spend some time and comprehend the sentences I have written instead of having your head stuck so far up your arse and being biased that you can't quite possibly be objective.
The person in question wasn't running around screaming "Praise be to Jesus" and "kill all the non-Christians".
Wonder why I didn't mention anything about reactions incase he was black? .. Because the context is completely different.
Islam is not a race. It's a human ideology and man made belief system. Black refers to a race. The baseline being different, a comparison cannot be made.
Now ask yourself who are more infamous for being serial killers: White people or Black people? White.
As clear as day. They have their associated stereotypes too. Black people are associated more with gang violence.
Muslims with terrorism because that's what empirical data has been pointing towards (most recent).
and.. You again jump to playing the victim instead of analysing the statement. The fact that you agreed with a known terrorist supporter and one of the most retarded excuse for a human being shows your shallowness and absolutely cringe worthy state of mind right now (most likely - a heat of the moment thing.. still).
The thing is if he would have done that in the name of Jesus Christ there would have been a bigger hue and cry . Same inn the case of allahu akhbar and explosion . no one cares about crime until it is for a perceived stupid god in today's world .
THIS!!!..
What the hell is so hard to understand here? You go around crying jihad and doing despicable stuff based on some delusions and you will be judged as such. The north african and middle eastern crowd at Brussels-Nord involved in stealing are always not looked at as jihadis. They are looked at as Thieves. When you do shit in the name of some invisible being all over the globe, then it becomes prudent to mark that ideology as being faulty.
Finally, nowhere have I justified his actions or said that the reaction should be different if it was a mentally deranged muslim guy.
I have been to more than 20 countries in my lifetime and 5 different continents. Other than random cases of people doing random acts of violence based on varying reasons I have had no reason to jump towards the conclusion that white people are going to do and so despicable act (maybe economically take advantage ). On the other hand, every single country has had jihadist nutjobs run around amok and do shit in the name of a sky god. in the name of a man made ideology.. where they have no business.. Now what is the logical conclusion?? Use those brain cells will ya?
