What's new

US shutdown: a guide for non-Americans

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Please explain what just happened

The US government has begun shutting its non-essential services. Hundreds of thousands of workers are waking up to the news that they are on unpaid leave, and they don't know how long it will last. The shutdown, triggered at midnight Washington time, will bring a range of services to a standstill across the world's largest economy.

Why?

The Federal government had no choice. The US financial year ended on 30 September, and politicians on Capitol Hill have failed to agree a new budget for the 2013-2014 financial year. Even a 'stopgap' funding deal proved beyond them. Without a budget deal approved by both parts of Congress, the House of Representative and the Senate, there's no legal agreement to pay non-essential staff.

Weren't they supposed to fix this last night?

They tried. A series of proposals rattled between the two sides on Monday night until midnight struck without a deal.

Why couldn't they agree a deal?

Under the US constitution, the president cannot unilaterally bring in legislation. And despite weeks of talks, Republicans continue to include cuts and delays to Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act in the budget legislation they sent up to the Senate.

The House of Representatives is controlled by the Republican Party, whose Tea Party movement remain deeply opposed to Obamacare. They tried to use the budget as leverage to crowbar changes to the Act. The Senate, which is under the control of Obama's Democrats, has stood firm.

Will the shutdown mean the entire US government grinds to a halt?

No, it's not an anarchist's (or libertarian's?) dream. Essential services, such as social security and Medicare payments, will continue.
The US military service will keep operating, and Obama signed emergency legislation on Monday night to keep paying staff. But hundreds of thousands of workers at non-essential services, from Pentagon employees to rangers in national parks, will be told to take an unpaid holiday.

So what happens how?

US politicians are meeting again in Washington on Tuesday. Before Monday's session broke up, the lower house proposed a 'bipartisan committee' to consider a way forward. The Senate is expected to reject this proposal, sticking to its position that Obamacare cannot be unravelled. Federal staff will remain unpaid until a budget is agreed. A 'stopgap' funding plan is an option, but Obama appeared wary of that option, arguing that would simply guarantee a repeated fight in a few weeks' time.

How much damage will it cause?

If people aren't getting paid, they won't spend as much in the shops. They may be unable to meet essential financial commitments, such as mortgages and credit card payments.

Analysts at IHS Global Insight have calculated that it will knock $300m a day off US economic output (total US nominal GDP, or output, was around $16 trillion last year).

The key issue is how long it lasts. Moody's Analytics reckons that a two-week shutdown would cut 0.3% off US GDP, while a month-long outage would knock a whole 1.4% off growth.

When did this last happen?

It's the first shutdown since 1995-1996, when Bill Clinton and the House of Representatives (and its speaker, Newt Gingrich) also failed to agree on a budget to fund federal services. That row ran for 28 days (over two stages).
But it was a more regular event in the 1980s, usually for a few days at a time. In total, the US government has partially shut down on 17 occasions before today.

Why doesn't it happen in other countries?

The shutdown situation is a product of the US democratic system. The president is both head of state and head of the federal government, without a guaranteed majority in either of the legislative bodies where new laws are debated and voted upon (because presidents, congressmen and women and senators are elected separately). The president can't simply ram laws through Capitol Hill.

In Britain, for example, tax and spending policies are outlined in the budget, presented to parliament by the chancellor of the exchequer. These changes are brought into law in a finance bill in the House of Commons. That's in effect a confidence vote in the government, and even the most fractious backbench MP would balk at rebelling on it.

Finance bills are also one area where the elected House of Commons has the upper hand over the unelected House of Lords. The Lords have no power to reject a money bill; they can only delay it for a month.

How does the US shutdown row tie in with the debt ceiling battle?

They are separate issues, but the shutdown is raising fears over the debt ceiling.

America has a legal limit on its borrowing of $16.7tn dollars, and it's likely to hit that point in mid-October.

If a deal isn't reached, then America would run out of borrowing room, meaning the world's biggest economy would default on its debts. Both problems need solving – and a shutdown is now eating into valuable time to fix the debt ceiling.

Why can't they just raise the debt ceiling?

Again, legislation is needed. Republicans are again trying to link the plan to Obamacare – arguing that the healthcare reforms are unaffordable.

How are the markets reacting?

So far, there's no panic. Investors are calculating that the shutdown will be short. But prepare for nervousness as that debt ceiling deadline gets closer.
The dollar, though, is being hit – dropping half a cent against major currencies.

This article originally confused the two chambers of Congress. Now corrected. Apologies. Thanks to readers who flagged up. GW.
US shutdown: a new guide for non-Americans | World news | The Guardian
 
Haha, it is tidiculous!!!


The situation

Let’s make things clear now. Mr Obama is a Democrats. The Congress are Republicans. They can never stand the fact that: if Obamacare Act is in action, Americans will love the Act, and he the president deserves every respect and gratefulness from people. No they can’t.

The thing is: Affordable Care Act is a law that already passed. When saying about law, nobody say it is a good law or bad law. It is law.



FNOTW: The R.R - The Ridiculous Republicans
 
All is not lost yet, @CENTCOM is still posting. Only the veterans are not getting benefits, the rest of the machine that matters is still working.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
loool

now the idiots are debating whether or not to raise the debt ceiling!!!!!! By Oct 17, if they don't raise the debt ceiling, US WILL default on its interest payments. That's not even an issue up for debate, it's a certainty. But these extremist christian republinuts are actually debating whether or not to increase the ceiling.

USA has always been a messed up place, but in the past 1-2 decades it's become a zoo. USA needs the Canada Party.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's simple: the USA have so much debt that they are in bankrupt

Actually the USA are like a third world country with a lot of homeless since 2008 with the toxic credits crisis
 
Actually the USA are like a third world country with a lot of homeless since 2008 with the toxic credits crisis

Does that make France like a third-world country, too? About 1% of population in the US is homeless. In France, it's closer to 1.5%.
 
It's simple: the USA have so much debt that they are in bankrupt

Actually the USA are like a third world country with a lot of homeless since 2008 with the toxic credits crisis

*Shrugs could always have another Great Depression. It was a beautiful decade during the 30s for the rest of the world when America was weak.
 
Reality is that the world is due for another world war, as the population is higher then food production

After war the debt will be wiped clean
 
Are you kidding? In France we don't have evictions like you have. In USA you have been totally been owned by the banksters

It's very sad

Las Vegas, la faillite du rêve américain - YouTube

I'm afraid I don't speak French, so your video says very little to me. Yes, there are evictions, but that doesn't change US or French homeless statistics. I'm not saying that I'm satisfied with the number of homeless in the US. If I had my way, it would be 0%, but the suggestion that the United States has homelessness rivaling third world countries has little basis in the truth.
 
Back
Top Bottom