What's new

US Open 2009

H2O3C4Nitrogen

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
4,386
Reaction score
0
Comeback Queen Mom: Clijsters Wins US Open
By Matt Cronin
Sunday, September 13, 2009

In an extraordinary chapter to a delicious comeback to competition, new mother Kim Clijsters won her second US Open title with a decisive 7-5, 6-3 victory over Caroline Wozniacki on Sunday.

Battling swirling winds and an ambitious 19-year-old opponent, the 26-year-old Clijsters continued to go for her shots, dominated off the forehand side, stood strong in incredibly athletic rallies and grabbed the points that mattered the most.

Clijsters, who also won the 2005 US Open title, came into the match far more experienced and on a roll, having knocked off former champion Venus and Serena Williams en route to the final. Even though she had taken more than two years off to get married and have a child, Clijsters returned with the same weapons, just as quick, more mature and with a better understanding of her possibilities on the court.

“At that time I didn't look at it that way,” Clijsters said. “But maybe now I've become a lot more understanding of myself, how to deal when different emotions (that) come up.

"Maybe that's something when you're young and you get nervous. As an example, beating Venus a few rounds ago. Maybe in the past I would have been influenced a little bit about good results and then had the lack of that focus a little bit in the next round. So even the situation with Serena, those are things when you're 18, 19, can have a big impact on you. Now I have the experience of knowing how to deal with it and knowing myself a little bit better. I think that's the biggest difference, is that I know myself a lot better than I did a few years ago.”

Clijsters broke the Dane to go ahead 2-0 in the first set in a backhand crosscourt winner and it appeared that she might cruise to victory, but Wozniacki dug in, at times dictating play with her vicious backhand, running just as fast and hard as Clijsters and delighting in their crosscourt rallies.

Wozniacki broke Clijsters twice and went ahead 4-2, but the Belgian stormed back, and broke back to 4-4 when her foe double faulted. But the ninth seeded Wozniacki, who had won New Haven the week before the Open and who had upset Roland Garros champion Svetlana Kuznetsova en route to the final, broke again to 5-4 when she won a huge scramble point that had Clijsters sprinting back and forth chasing short balls and swerving lobs.

However, Clijsters wouldn't go away, and ran off three straight games to win the set, taking it when she got a ball into her wheelhouse and nailed her favored inside out forehand into the corner.

The wind calmed down in the second set and both women held serve to 3-2, but then Clijsters broke in the next game when Wozniacki erred on a backhand.

Clijsters appeared to grow a little nervous in the final few games but served intelligently, stayed steady and whenever she got an opportunity, banged heavy crosscourt forehands into Wozniacki's weaker side.

“The first couple of games I wanted to get into the match,” said Wozniacki, who was playing in her first major final. “I wanted to just know what I'm up against, and I fast found out that I'm up against a really strong player that doesn't give away any free points. I really had to fight for it. She played really well. She played aggressive. She just played better than me.”

The Belgian won the match when she put away a simple overhead and she became the first mother since Evonne Goolagong at 1980 Wimbledon to win a major.

Clijsters dropped to the ground in celebration and began to weep for joy.

Later, she would climb into the Friends' Box to hug her husband, New Jersey's Brian Lynch, as well as her coach, Wim Fisette, her trainer and friends.

Fisette knew once they began practicing at the beginning of the year that she'd have a shot at climbing back to the top, because Clijsters got stronger, was more relaxed as a happy mother to her 18-month-old daughter, Jada, and she began to further trust her weapons.

"It's a surprise, but the level isn't a surprise because she's such a big talent who doesn't need a year to get to her best level," he said. “She needed a few matches, but I knew she could do it at the Open. She went every day to practice and then to play with Jada and she didn't have the time to think about that she had to play Serena or a final tonight, because she was busy with Jada. It was perfect for her mind."

Right after the trophy presentation ended, Jada came down to the court, pranced around and played with the trophy. Clijsters said that she was happy to play the role as hero for working mothers.

“This is something that in my wildest dreams could never imagine happening,” she said. “So I kind of have to get used to the situation. I look forward to having that role a little bit maybe. It's something that I think as a woman and as a woman who has a family and being an athlete, I think it's possible. I think there are other athletes out there. Obviously in tennis we have Sybille Bammer, and she's doing really good, as well. But to win a Grand Slam now I think is obviously a big deal in women's tennis, and the history of women's tennis.”


The US Open 2009 - Grand Slam Tennis - Official Site by IBM
 
.
Matt Cronin's Men's Final Pick
Monday, September 14, 2009
By Matt Cronin

1-ROGER FEDERER vs. 6-JUAN MARTIN DEL POTRO

Federer has never faced this kind of foe in his five title runs here, one who is super tall and can move, has substantial power of both wings, is willing to attack second serves like a demon and can serve bullets. In previous finals, the great Swiss has bested grinders Lleyton Hewitt and Novak Djokovic, a baseline shotmaker like Andre Agassi, a serving flamethrower in Andy Roddick and creative mix and matcher like Andy Murray.

While all those foes are more accomplished than del Potro, the Argentine has youth, vim and vigor going for him and the ability to hurt Federer early and often. He hits his forehand with just as much force, can crack his two-handed backhand, can smoke serves in the 130s and has become a reasonable player at the net.

It's very possible that del Potro's time has come, a remarkable thought if you go back to the beginning of the year when he was mentally destroyed by Federer 6-3, 6-0, 6-0 in the quarterfinals of the Aussie Open. Then, it looked like that Argentine was way too immature to go far, and that he didn't have the nerve and heart for the big stage.

But his coach, Franco Davin, was convinced that he could pull more out of him, that his shot-making was top drawer and that it was OK for him to cut loose in the big moments.

So in Paris, when he faced Federer in the semifinals, he was a complete player, mixing up his serves, attacking the right balls and as the Swiss said, he had finally figured out what type of style he should be playing. Del Potro still lost the match 6-4 in the fifth set, but at least he showed himself that he could get close and maybe, just maybe, with more experience, he could punch his way through.

However, this is Federer's tournament and while del Potro is on a hot streak, it can't be dismissed that Federer owns a 6-0 record against him. Federer has the capability of serving him off the court, changing the pace and angle of his shots to confuse him and wow him with the speed and placement of his forehand. The Swiss is sure to feel del Potro out early, trying to gauge whether the Argentine is nervous before he goes on the consistent attack. He'll focus on holding in his own service games and playing steady in del Potro's service games until he can get a sense of how the tall guy is going to attack.

Like he did in Paris, Federer has to make sure to get del Potro bending low and guessing on his groundies. As Rafa Nadal found out, heavily top-spinned balls do little against the towering man from Tandil, but low slice and flat balls to sharp angles do.

While I wouldn't be stunned by a “Delpo” breakthrough here given how sweetly he's striking the ball, Federer always seems to figure things out in US Open finals and will get through in four sets, tying the great American Bill Tilden's mark of six straight championships. Many of us may not see that phenomenal feat pulled off in our lifetime again, but will never forget the utter beauty of Federer's sheer artistry.


The US Open 2009 - Grand Slam Tennis - Official Site by IBM
 
. .


fullstory

Paes wins US Open men's doubles title, his 10th Slam crown

New York, Sep 13 (PTI) Leander Paes won the battle of Indians as well as his 10th Grand Slam title after defeating old pal Mahesh Bhupathi and Mark Knowles in the US Open men's doubles final along with his partner Luaks Dlouhy here today.

Fourth seeds Paes and Czech Dlouhy scripted a sensational 3-6 6-3 6-2 win in the championship match over third seeds Bhupathi and his Bahamian partner.

The match was heading for a straight-set wash out for Bhupathi and Knowles but Paes enlivened the match with his inspiring play and changed the complexion of the game.

His sparkling play infused life into the match and Dlouhy complemented him well to emerge winners after a confidence shaking first set lapse.

For Paes it is his fifth men's doubles Grand Slam crown, 41st overall, and second with Dlouhy.
 
. .
where the fck was del poitro hiding all these years?
 
.
where the fck was del poitro hiding all these years?

Dude. He was not hiding anywhere. He is just 21 and hopefully has a good career ahead.

Beating Nadal and Fed in back to back matches is just incredible. No one in the past has done that and nobody has beaten Fed in a slam final other than Nadal.

The other good thing I liked about him is that unlike Djokovic and Murray he talks less.

Watching last night final I can just say that a new star is born. Way to go del-potro.:tup:
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom