What's new

U.S. Treasuries face test from China's yuan move

ao333

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
0
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
The U.S. Treasury market may be vulnerable to a sell-off on Monday on fear that China's move to allow more flexibility for its currency means the world's largest holder of U.S. sovereign debt will cut future purchases.

Adding to market tensions, the surprise move on Saturday occurred before next week's sales of $108 billion in shorter-dated debt by the U.S. Treasury and a Federal Reserve policy meeting this week.

In July 2005 when China abandoned its peg against the U.S. dollar and moved to a managed float, there was a sharp sell-off in U.S. Treasuries, a reaction that some analysts say could happen again.

"The knee-jerk reaction was a 10 to 15 basis point increase in yields. That was one of the biggest moves of the year and it continued to rise for two to three weeks thereafter," said George Goncalves, head of U.S. interest rate strategy at Nomura Securities International in New York.

Other analysts said China's announcement, which lacks details, will have little impact on bond prices and next week's U.S. Treasury auctions, which consist of $40 billion in two-year notes, $38 billion in five-year debt, and $30 billion in seven-year notes, may be the focus instead.

They said China's latest currency move is part of a gradual process, which has not slowed its accumulation of U.S. Treasuries since 2005.

As of April, China held $900.2 billion in U.S. government debt, ahead of Japan, which owned $795.5 billion, the U.S. Treasury said this week.

"The message from the Chinese authorities is that they are resuming the journey toward greater, but still measured reliance on, market-based instruments -- a journey that was interrupted by the financial crisis and that involves gradually allowing greater exchange rate flexibility," said Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive and co-chief investment officer at PIMCO in Newport Beach, California.

PIMCO's $228 billion Total Return Fund, the world's biggest bond fund, raised its market value weighting in U.S. government debt to 51 percent at the end of May from 36 percent in the previous month.

Citing the slow rate of change, IFR analysts see little immediate market response, but agree that in the bigger picture the revaluation is a clear negative for Treasuries.

Trade between China and the United States will move toward balance and income, or dollar flows into China from the United States will diminish, reducing Chinese demand for Treasuries, IFR said.

China will likely invest more in its own economy as well as the rest of Asia, further diverting flows away from U.S. Treasuries, IFR said. But the true market impact is down the road in two to five years time.

The timing of China's announcement may embolden bond bears, who are still smarting from the safehaven rally tied to Europe's public debt crisis. The intensity and duration of a bond sell-off will likely hinge on the perception of how much more flexibility China will allow in the yuan, analysts said.

"If a revaluation is in the cards, in the weeks ahead the market could push toward 3.50 percent on the 10-year Treasury note. It could cheapen the market to a new equilibrium between 3.00 to 4.00 percent," Nomura's Goncalves said.

China's yuan announcement could stoke the appetite for stocks and diminish the appeal of bonds, as it raises hopes of more competitive priced U.S. goods overseas and profits for U.S. exporters.

On Friday, the 10-year Treasury yield ended at 3.23 percent in New York trading, far below the 4.00 percent peak it hit in early April.

China's participation at next week's debt auctions will serve as an early litmus test on its latest currency move.

"We'll take confirmation from the auctions that something is going on," said Christopher Low, chief economist at FTN Financial in New York.

...THEN THERE IS THE FED

The weekend yuan news should make a big splash on Monday, but traders could quickly turn their attention to the Fed's two-day policy meeting, which begins on Tuesday.

With consumer prices falling and unemployment remaining near 10 percent, it is difficult to imagine the Fed expressing worries over inflation or any intention to rescind its "extended period" promise to keep rates low.

Obviously any retreat or softening by the Fed in its low-rates commitment would hurt bonds, but one must also wonder whether the risk is now for an even more dovish statement given the apparent economic deceleration.

The Fed's statement is due at 2:15 p.m. EDT (1815 GMT) on Wednesday.

The Fed has stuck with a near zero interest rate policy since adopting it in December 2008. The debt troubles in Europe have led traders to push back the timing of a Fed rate hike toward the middle of 2011.

"It's hard to see how rates, especially in the shorter end of the curve, can move very far given the fundamentals, given the Fed outlook and a lot of what's going on the inflation outlook," said Bill Schultz, chief investment officer at McQueen, Ball & Associates in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.

U.S. Treasuries face test from China's yuan move | Reuters

PS: As India's domestic economy grows ever so much more rapidly than its export sector, the demand from the resource-scarce repubic for foreign commidities has nevertheless not declined. As such, while Indian exports benefit little from a revaluation of the Chinese currency, the rise in commidity prices worldwide will be significantly detrimental to the Indian economy.
 
Last edited:
A question I just had is whether it is possible (politically/financially) for US to peg their currency to other country.

We all heard of complaints that China is pegging it's currency to the US. Discussion of right or wrong aside, the fact that Chinese currency is pegged to US currency also means vice versa, the difference being that it is China that decided to peg the yuan to dollars rather than the US.

So is it possible for US in the future to peg its currency to the Yuan?
 
Many countries peg their currencies to dollar as it is the world's reserve currency with the deepest liquidity, dollar itself was pegged onto gold before but abolished by Roosevelt, and in recent years the US is cutting down forests as far as eye can see to print more dollars backed by nothing but "good faith".

Technically it is possible for USD to peg onto other currencies but that won't happen for a very long time if ever, CNY won't be it as it is not the world's reserve currency and not fully convertible. It is clear that the Chinese government has began to take this "good faith" in US federal government with a pinch of salt and worried about their debts to the US, it has since advocated a super-sovereign currency backed by the IMF (or another super-sovereign body) rather than any individual country.

Incidentally all the cat-calling from US for the appreciation of CNY (hence relative depreciation of USD and USD denominated loans) and massively printing more USD (hence absolute depreciation of USD and USD denominated loans) are two cunning ways for them to devalue their debt to the Chinese and the rest of the world, and you wonder why China was reluctant to un-peg the dollar and worried about their loans.
 
Last edited:
Bernanke Economy May Get Boost From Stronger Chinese Currency

By Scott Lanman and Vivien Lou Chen

June 23 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s efforts to keep U.S. prices and employment from falling may get a helping hand from China’s decision to let its currency gain against the dollar.

Greater yuan flexibility will eventually raise prices of goods imported to the U.S. after a decline in the consumer price index for two straight months and as some Fed officials voice concern about inflation slowing too much. The move should also eventually increase U.S. exports of aircraft, steel and wheat to China, said Charles Lieberman, a former New York Fed official.

Fed officials, who are likely to repeat the commitment to an “extended period” of low interest rates in a Washington meeting today, are contending with joblessness that’s still close to a 26-year high. China’s announcement on June 19, which pushed global stocks higher, may ease their concerns that Europe’s debt crisis poses a risk to the recovery.

“It implies a little bit of a positive fillip to domestic growth,” said Lieberman, chief investment officer at Advisors Capital Management LLC in Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey. “It does also imply some upward pressure on import prices, but I don’t think that’s going to be particularly troublesome to the Fed when the unemployment rate is so high.”

At the last Federal Open Market Committee meeting in April, some policy makers saw inflation risks as “tilted to the downside in the near term” because of slack in the economy and the chance price expectations could decline. Other officials said inflation may pick up because of an expanding global economy and U.S. budget deficits.

Future Growth

Since taking over the U.S. central bank four years ago, Bernanke has joined other American officials in urging China to let the yuan appreciate, saying in 2006 that such action would “enhance China’s future growth and stability.”

Bernanke and his colleagues will probably keep interest rates near zero because of “modest” economic growth and an unemployment rate stuck close to 10 percent, said former Atlanta Fed research director Robert Eisenbeis, now chief monetary economist at Cumberland Advisors Inc. in Vineland, New Jersey. The FOMC is scheduled to issue a statement at around 2:15 p.m. Washington time at the conclusion of a two-day meeting.

The number of Americans applying for jobless benefits rose this month to a one-month high while housing starts in May fell 10 percent. Meanwhile, a 0.2 percent decline in the consumer price index last month was the biggest since December 2008.

Job Cuts

Hewlett-Packard Co., the world’s largest personal-computer maker, is planning to cut a net 3,000 jobs, the company said in a June 1 regulatory filing. Hewlett-Packard is eliminating the positions of 9,000 employees and replacing about 6,000 in varying countries.

“The risks are tilted to the downside and there are increased uncertainties,” Eisenbeis said. The FOMC “is clearly concerned about a double-dip recession.”

The U.S. Congress, to reduce unemployment and help manufacturers, should press China through tariff legislation to further raise the value of its currency, Senator Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, said yesterday.

“The pressure still needs to be on them from Congress,” Brown said in a Bloomberg Television interview.

Signs of economic frailty give Bernanke more time to delay a rate increase and formulate an “exit strategy” from record stimulus that threatens to eventually fuel a surge in prices. Policy makers are trying to fine tune tools for draining as much as $1 trillion in excess reserves from the banking system, including the use of reverse repurchase agreements and the sale of term deposits to banks.

Rate Increase

Investors’ expectations for a Fed rate increase have fallen since the conclusion of the last FOMC meeting in April. Investors are discounting about 40 basis points of tightening over the next 12 months, a decline from about 76 basis points on April 28, according to data that is calculated by Credit Suisse using the overnight index swap curve.

“There’s no reason to pull the plug on riskier asset classes like stocks,” said Mirko Mikelic, who helps oversee $18 billion in fixed-income assets as senior portfolio manager at Fifth Third Asset Management in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

“We do like commodities, like gold, and inflation plays like shipping companies, but you do have to be selective,” he said. Bonds are “a pretty safe play now for the short term,” but the “concern is that when the global economy turns around and the U.S. starts raising rates, people are going to run out on bonds” over the long term.

Europe Crisis

The impact from the Europe debt crisis on U.S. growth and financial markets will probably “take center stage” at the FOMC meeting, Laurence Meyer, vice chairman of Macroeconomic Advisors LLC in Washington and a former Fed governor, said in a note to clients.

As European leaders tried on May 20 to contain the region’s crisis, the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index, the benchmark gauge of U.S. stock options known as the VIX, rose on to the highest level in more than a year. It remains above its six-month average.

“What the market is going to be looking for is anything in the statement that says something about Europe,” said John Canally, investment strategist and economist at LPL Financial Corp. in Boston.

Officials “have been accused of whistling past the graveyard in 2006 with the subprime issue, and don’t want to get caught in the same vein where they’re accused of ignoring an issue and being late to react,” he said.

Smaller Gains

The world’s largest economy grew during the first quarter at 3 percent, down from a 3.2 percent initial estimate due to smaller gains in consumer and business spending.

A stronger yuan should help growth by improving the competitiveness of U.S. exporters to China. The U.S. trade deficit with China reached $71 billion for the first four months of the year, up 5.8 percent from the same period of 2009, according to U.S. government data.

“Given a projection of growth just slightly above trend, the committee will stress that economic conditions dictate no rate increases for the foreseeable future,” said New York University Professor Mark Gertler, who’s collaborated on research with Bernanke. “There is no danger of inflation now. If anything the risks of deflation are greater, given the overall weakness in the economy.”

Bernanke Economy May Get Boost From Stronger Chinese Currency - BusinessWeek
 
Will China raise its Yaun value to a level where it may hurt its export to US. What i think is US is slowly and steadilly going for a scenario where they would have to import less from China.And China would have to endup importing more from US.
Why the Chinese government is not realising the threat which there economy faces by raising the Yaun?? Is there some kind of Understanding btw US and China..??
 
Damn these ruthless Americans. An upward movement of the Yuan will only damage China, not help America. Years of strengthening of the Yuan did since it was first partially unpegged did not ease America's deficit. It won't this time either. Production won't relocate back to America, but to other third world nations. It's just easier to use the underlying racism to pin the blame on China.
 
Will China raise its Yaun value to a level where it may hurt its export to US. What i think is US is slowly and steadilly going for a scenario where they would have to import less from China.And China would have to endup importing more from US.
Why the Chinese government is not realising the threat which there economy faces by raising the Yaun?? Is there some kind of Understanding btw US and China..??

No my friend, China gets it! If you view this whole US and China situation as a chess game (and it is a chess game of strategies) then this is a clever move. Why?

1. For the immediate term, China's announcement pushes the Yuan appreciation agenda back down to the bottom of the priority list in the G20 meeting this month, instead the G20 members will focus on discussing the sovereign debt issue which is of a BIG concern to China. But in the mean time China's announcement on Yuan appreciation lacked any detail and will be a very gradual process at a pace that China (and only China) is happy with.

2. This is a more profound and important reason: the US/Europe laden with debt, high unemployment rate and slow economic growth will not be able to forever consume Chinese made products at a fast enough pace for China to grow properly, instead China has to grow regardless of what the west's economy is doing, the only way they can do this is to diversify away from a export driven model to a balanced export/domestic-consumption based model, unleash the consumer power of the 1.3 bln chinese people so they can consume themselves of what China is making. But to achieve this they will have to distribute the wealth back to its people through means of increasing pay, improving social securities, public healthcare, affordable education, and increasing the purchasing power of the chinese people, hence Yuan appreciation is one part of this plan, also appreciation of Yuan will make the purchase of global commodities cheaper for the Chinese and allowing them to buy more and consume more.

One of the two top contenders for the next Chinese president is Li Keqiang (Li Keqiang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), he has a PhD in economics from Beijing University and heavily advocates for this re-balancing of China's economy. You can be assured that this Yuan move is a very calculated one by the Chinese.
 
Last edited:
No my friend, China gets it! If you view this whole US and China situation as a chess game (and it is a chess game of strategies) then this is a clever move. Why?

1. For the immediate term, China's announcement pushes the Yuan appreciation agenda back down to the bottom of the priority list in the G20 meeting this month, instead the G20 members will focus on discussing the sovereign debt issue which is of a BIG concern to China. But in the mean time China's announcement on Yuan appreciation lacked any detail and will be a very gradual process at a pace that China (and only China) is happy with.

2. This is a more profound and important reason: the US/Europe laden with debt, high unemployment rate and slow economic growth will not be able to forever consume Chinese made products at a fast enough pace for China to grow properly, instead China has to grow regardless of what the west's economy is doing, the only way they can do this is to diversify away from a export driven model to a balanced export/domestic-consumption based model, unleash the consumer power of the 1.3 bln chinese people so they can consume themselves of what China is making. But to achieve this they will have to distribute the wealth back to its people through means of increasing pay, improving social securities, public healthcare, affordable education, and increasing the purchasing power of the chinese people, hence Yuan appreciation is one part of this plan, also appreciation of Yuan will make the purchase of global commodities cheaper for the Chinese and allowing them to buy more and consume more.

One of the two top contenders for the next Chinese president is Li Keqiang (Li Keqiang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), he has a PhD in economics from Beijing University and heavily advocates for this re-balancing of China's economy. You can be assured that this Yuan move is a very calculated one by the Chinese.

Actually, the Chinese domestic economy is fully saturated. People spend their life's saving on housing, education, medical services and pension. These 4 are all domestic consumption where their cash only circulate within China. Indian parents aren't fussed out about buying houses, funding their kids' education, paying health bills due to their young age, and growing older (because the chances of having 3 kids successfully supporting 2 parents is always higher than 1:2).

Translation? Domestic consumption is infeasible for China unless the rich is taxed more heavily, which will not happen, because China is high on red tape. And unlike the US where bureaucracy can be alleviated through a democratically elected congress, members of the NCCPC are autocratically appointed.
 
Last edited:
A question I just had is whether it is possible (politically/financially) for US to peg their currency to other country.

We all heard of complaints that China is pegging it's currency to the US. Discussion of right or wrong aside, the fact that Chinese currency is pegged to US currency also means vice versa, the difference being that it is China that decided to peg the yuan to dollars rather than the US.

So is it possible for US in the future to peg its currency to the Yuan?

It doesn't work.

China pegging Yuan to Dollar means that the Chinese reserve bank will only swap a set amount of Yuan for a dollar.

Conversely, if the US is to peg the Dollar to the Yuan, its Federal Reserve is to sell or buy Dollar at a fixed price, in terms of Yuan.

If the US pays less Yuan per Dollar than China does, everyone will buy Yuan from the Chinese side, and the US's peg has just failed.

It fails in another way, too. 2 perfect substitutes selling in the same market at different prices give rise to opportunities to profit by arbitrage. Some bastards will profit from all these peggings. They'll drain both countries foreign currency reserves till they can no longer support the peg.
 
Actually, the Chinese domestic economy is fully saturated. People spend their life's saving on housing, education, medical services and pension. These 4 are all domestic consumption of which their cash only circulate within China. India has it easy since parents aren't fussed out about buying houses, funding their kids' education, paying health bills (because they're young), and growing older (because the chances of having 3 kids successfully supporting 2 parents is always higher than 1:2).

Translation? Domestic consumption is infeasible for China unless the rich is taxed more heavily, which will not happen, because China is high on red tape. And unlike the US where bureaucracy can be alleviated through a democratically elected congress, members of the NCCPC are autocratically appointed.

I partially agree with you but just need to point out a couple of things -- average chinese household does not spend all their savings on housing (only city areas have inflated housing prices, and many of the older generations in the cities bought their houses with government subsidies way back), the average chinese family hoards cash mainly for medical care and pensions, and the national averaging savings rate has increased drastically since china introduced the one child policy precisely because they are worried about their own welfare when they get old, so instead of spending what they earn and let money circulate around they hold it and only buy minimal life necessities, and when they die they pass the savings on for the next generation to hoard. The government is doing what it should be doing -- increasing public health care and public pensions, increase rural incomes etc etc, and this will encourage people to spend their incomes more (hence stimulate the economy) and hoard less cash.

Btw, I don't think heavily taxing the higher incomers like what Canada does is a good system, it does not necessarily encourage the consumption of its average citizens, what matters is how the government makes use of the money it taxed. I guess we can forever argue on this point but its just a matter of personal belief of what a better society should be :-)
 
Last edited:
Damn these ruthless Americans. An upward movement of the Yuan will only damage China, not help America. Years of strengthening of the Yuan did since it was first partially unpegged did not ease America's deficit. It won't this time either. Production won't relocate back to America, but to other third world nations. It's just easier to use the underlying racism to pin the blame on China.

No. That peg is inflationary for China. This revaluation was planned by China long before Geithner made a fuss. Pegging has a price. There are benefits and there are cost and the mix between them changes with time. For now, the cost overweight the benefits.
 
If Obama and Geithner wants people to think exports can be used as leverage, why not let them think that...

Why the Export Slump Won't Doom China's Economy - BusinessWeek

China April 20, 2009, 9:36AM EST text size: TT
Why the Export Slump Won't Doom China's Economy
China's exports contribute far less to GDP growth than many assume, with domestic spending and investment and knowledge gained from exports driving growth

By Anil K. Gupta and Haiyan Wang

The role of exports as the driver of China's economic growth is exaggerated. So is the fear that, as export growth slows, the country's economy will come to a grinding halt. The numbers tell us the real story.

Measured on a top-line basis, China's exports are indeed very large. World Bank figures put the 2007 numbers at $1.22 trillion, or about 37% of gross domestic product. Comparing raw data for GDP and exports, however, is like comparing apples and oranges. GDP refers to value added within the economy and not the sum of top-line revenues. According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China, 58% of China's exports constitute so-called processing trade where components are imported into China and the final assembled product shipped out.

Take, for example, consumer electronic goods such as an iPod or an iPhone. These Apple (AAPL) devices are assembled in China, but the value added within China accounts for less than 10% of the export value. Aggregated across all exports, estimates of value added within China range from a low of 25% to a high of 50%. Our own discussions with senior officials at China's Commerce Ministry suggest that their estimates are around 33%. In other words, even after two decades of explosive growth, in 2007 exports contributed about 12% of China's GDP, or one-third of the top-line figure of 37%.
Unsustainable Growth Trend

China's exports have indeed grown at a 25% annual rate, over twice the rate of growth in GDP. Since the value added by exports presently contributes about 12% to China's GDP, this means that, in recent years, export growth has contributed about 3% of the 11%-13% growth rate in GDP. This is an important component. However, these numbers also show that about three-quarters of the growth rate in China's GDP has come from domestic spending and domestic investment.

What about likely future trends? Simple back-of-the-envelope analysis tells us that, just as trees do not grow to the sky, the days of high growth rate in China's exports are over. China's exports currently account for about 10% of the world's exports and are almost tied with Germany for the No. 1 position in the world. If these numbers continue to grow at their historic 25% rate (and world exports at their historic 10% rate), then by 2020 exports from China would account for almost 50% of the entire world's exports. Such a situation is economically and politically impossible. For one thing, as China gets richer, its labor costs will increase, and the more labor-intensive processing trade will begin migrating to lower labor-cost countries such as India and Vietnam. For another, belief in free trade or not, other big economies will find it politically impossible to accept such a high level of dependence on imports from China.

The most likely scenario is that China's exports will now grow at a much more modest 10% rate. To maintain their value-added contribution to GDP at current levels, the Chinese government will need to proactively push for an increase in the domestic value in its exports. This is where we can see part of the logic behind the government's explicit focus in its 11th five-year plan, launched in 2006, to start building China's future competitive advantage on science, technology, and innovation rather than just cost efficiency. Some of the key initiatives in this new thrust include an increase in the research and development-to-GDP ratio from about 1.3% in 2005 to 2.5% by 2020 and, for the first time, seriousness about enforcing laws regarding intellectual-property rights.

Some of the early evidence regarding a move up the value chain in China's exports is already in. Its exports to India heavily comprise capital goods such as power plants and other infrastructure equipment, where much of the value in the products is added within China.

In terms of the role that exports have played in China's growth so far, the more important contribution has come not from the size of value added to GDP, but from the knowledge China has gained as a result of exports. The large volume of processing trade has taught vast numbers of Chinese managers how to produce high-quality products for the world's most demanding markets, how to build a responsive supply chain for customers located thousands of miles away, and how to efficiently manage production operations employing tens of thousands of workers at a single location. The spillover of this know-how into the rest of the economy has been one of the major factors in helping boost domestic productivity, the single biggest driver of China's economic growth.

Anil K. Gupta is the Michael Dingman Chair in Global Strategy and Entrepreneurship at the Smith Business School, the University of Maryland. Haiyan Wang is managing partner of the China India Institute. They are the coauthors of Getting China and India Right (Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 2009) and The Quest for Global Dominance (Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 2008).
 
The unpegging is gradual, rather than a total unpeg it might just be pegged value adjusting upwards overtime as the ratio of chinese domestic consumption and export changes over time.

This is really not much of a concession as they can return the peg at anytime. Its a test before the G20 summit.
 
This YUAN pegging sh^t demanded by Uncle Sam is ******* shitty!!!

Does anyone here really believe increasing the value of YUAN will solve the problems with the US manufacturing sector?

The ******* unions in the US should be blamed for the ******* up of US manufacturing sector not the ******* YUAN. The unions are responsible for hiring incompetent, lazy, etc., employees.

These ******* unions drive the cost of manufacturing exorbitantly high by demanding more money and benefits every ******* year.

As a business man why should I be forced to pay more money to my employees who are incompetent, lazy, etc.?

Have you worked for a union before? Sh&t you got the whole ******* stupid family and relatives working in a company. Just go visit the car assembling plants in Michigan.
 
Back
Top Bottom