What's new

Trump's biggest failure

Goenitz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
7,752
Reaction score
9
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
A very good documentary with satire and a little racism. Worthy to watch. A summary is:

"It tells about China history and importance of silk route, and how EU fought wars to access China and India market. How Chinese Han gained supremacy through soft power. It is the same policy with which Chinese are gaining foothold through the world, and is called sinicization. It tells how China operate with economic and trade instead of wars and threatening like US and USSR."
It also highlights how China takes it foreign policy, which is actually is its strategic/economic/military. Whereas, Trump being 'businessman' just tried to hit China economically and in return China gained strategically and sometimes economically by out manoeuvring US policy.

@_NOBODY_ @aziqbal @beijingwalker @Bilal. @Hamartia Antidote @Samlee @MastanKhan @waz @khansaheeb
 
Last edited:
.
A very good documentary with satire and a little racism. Worthy to watch. A summary is:

"It tells about China history and importance of silk route, and how EU fought wars to access China and India market. How Chinese Han gained supremacy through soft power. It is the same policy with which Chinese are gaining foothold through the world, and is called sinicization. It tells how China operate with economic and trade instead of wars and threatening like US and USSR."
It also highlights how China takes it foreign policy, which is actually is its strategic/economic/military. Whereas, Trump being 'businessman' just tried to hit China economically and in return China gained strategically and sometimes economically by out manoeuvring US policy.

@_NOBODY_ @aziqbal @beijingwalker @Bilal. @Hamartia Antidote @Samlee @MastanKhan @waz @khansaheeb

Eh I already seen this video lol , kinda interesting
 
. .

I watched until some of chapter 2. Though it speaks a bit about history about even Chinese trade ( some of whose elements I didn't know ) the documentary didn't speak about Muslim contribution to European Renaissance.

And me being a Communist all that talk being mostly limited to Capitalist trade wasn't so interesting. :D

We should all be speaking more about the economics of the near-future, of the mid-2040s when there will be trade of some kind from mining in the Asteroid Belt.
 
.
the documentary didn't speak about Muslim contribution to European Renaissance
That is the beauty. The reseracher just revolves around the topic and ignore everything else. Watch his documentry on India/pakistan, he just merely touched history for the introduction.
mid-2040s when there will be trade of some kind from mining in the Asteroid Belt.
Very far far goal, even cannot happen in this century, economically at least. Unless,, you find a cheap and abundant propulsion system.
 
.
That is the beauty. The reseracher just revolves around the topic and ignore everything else. Watch his documentry on India/pakistan, he just merely touched history for the introduction.

OK.

Very far far goal, even cannot happen in this century, economically at least. Unless,, you find a cheap and abundant propulsion system.

1. The American company Ad Astra Rocket Company has been for years been developing the VASIMR propulsion system which the company claims can take a spacecraft from Earth to Mars in 39 days. But the thing is for the biggest current variant of the engine the electricity needed would be 200 MW. Below is a nice description :
A DIFFERENT KIND OF ROCKET

In 1983, MIT researchers used their magnetic mirror plasma device to conduct the first Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR) propulsion experiment. A decade and a half later, NASA’s Advanced Space Propulsion Laboratory (ASPL) created the first VASIMR rocket, the VX-10. By 2005, the lab had developed the VX-50, which was capable of up to 50kW of plasma discharge.

So, what’s so significant about this design that it was worth decades of research?

MARS IN 39 DAYS

In 2012, the Curiosity Rover was sent to explore the surface of Mars with an Atlas Vchemical rocket acting as the rover’s launch vehicle. The Curiosity Rover took 8 months and 11 days to land on Mars because the propulsion systems of chemical rockets like the Atlas V require large amounts of fuel and have a static rate of propulsion.

However, the design of a VASIMR allows for continuous generation of propulsion. In other words, if the rocket had a infinite supply of fuel and didn’t fail mechanically, it could theoretically keep accelerating to near the speed of light.



In theory, a VASIMR could allow us to reach Mars in a mere 39 days.

The variables used to determine a 39-day trip included a engine operating at 60 percent efficiency and a required power of 200MW. It would take the rocket a total of approximately 18 days to reach full velocity, and then it would travel at that speed for roughly five days before it began to slow back down. Finally, it would reach Mars another 16 days later. A 200MW engine would be able to make a round trip to Mars with a 600 metric tonne payload in approximately five months (cutting several months off the current travel time).

HOW VASIMR WORKS

VASIMR utilizes gasses such as argon, hydrogen, or xenon as a propellent. However, the gas is not combusted directly as it would be with chemical rockets.

First, the gas is injected into a tube, the interior of which is lined with superconducting magnets. The tube itself is surrounded by two radio wave couplers.



The helicon coupler is designed to convert the gas into plasma by knocking a electron lose from each gas atom. Once the gas has passed through the helicon section, it is known as “cold plasma” even though its temperature is approximately 5,526 degrees Celsius (9,980 degrees Fahrenheit) — that is just slightly hotter than the surface of the Sun.

Then, the ion cyclotron heating coupler uses a technique borrowed from fusion experiments to heat the plasma upwards of 10 million degrees Celsius (18 million degrees Fahrenheit), which is comparable to the core of our Sun.

Using a magnetic nozzle, VASIMR can convert the plasma ions’ orbital motion into a useful linear motion that results in ion speeds of up to 180,000 km/h (111,846 mph). This gives VASIMR an effective specific impulse of upwards of 5,000 seconds at 200 kW. For comparison, the main engine of the rocket used to launch Curiosity had a specific impulse of 311 seconds at sea level. This means VASIMR has the potential to generate exponentially higher cruising speeds.

Current VASIMR engines are operating at higher than 60 percent efficiency. However, researchers have hit a wall on how to power the units while in space. To meet the needs of the engine, they would need to design some form of nuclear reactor, fusion reactor, or matter-antimatter reactor as a supply of power in space. Theoretically, large solar panels could be used as well, but the weight of such panels would pose an issue at launch.

Some are skeptical of Ad Astra’s claims regarding a 39-day trip to Mars. Part of this controversy appears to be due to miscommunication. The company doesn’t think its current VX-200 engine design could do the trick — as some seem to believe — instead proposing that a theoretical 200MW engine would be used.

Another bit of controversy concerns the first part of the trip. A VASIMR does not produce enough thrust to escape the Earth’s gravity, but this is not a design flaw. Since ion engines work best in a vacuum, the VASIMR engine is suited for space travel only. Any spacecraft intended to work with the engine would either need to be built in space or would have to reach space via a chemical rocket.

For now, Ad Astra will continue to develop its technology in the hopes of helping humanity cut way down on its travel time to Mars and beyond.
I am not an expert in electrical engineering but maybe the electricity can come from the Nano Diamond Battery that the NDB company in America is developing.

2. The Indian company Bellatrix Aerospace ( Wikipedia page ) ( website ) has been developing a satellite propulsion system that uses water that serves as fuel to convert to microwave and electrically propel the satellite :
He gives an example. “So, if you have a satellite that chemical propulsion system that weighs about three and a half tonnes, you’d need almost two tonnes of fuel for orbit raising. It renders the exercise inefficient and expensive,” says Yashas.

Seeing this gap, the team led by Rohan came up with something called the ‘Microwave Plasma Thrusters’ (MPT), an electric propulsion system that uses water as a propellant as opposed to chemical or any kind of fuel.

This innovation is cost-friendly as it would use about 250 kgs of fuel for the same three and a half tonne satellite. Additionally, it is also environmentally friendly because it doesn’t use any kind of chemicals.
Now since Hydrogen can be used as fuel for VASIMR, water can be a safe container for the Hydrogen. Maybe.

@Hamartia Antidote, what do you think ?
 
Last edited:
.
A very good documentary with satire and a little racism. Worthy to watch. A summary is:

"It tells about China history and importance of silk route, and how EU fought wars to access China and India market. How Chinese Han gained supremacy through soft power. It is the same policy with which Chinese are gaining foothold through the world, and is called sinicization. It tells how China operate with economic and trade instead of wars and threatening like US and USSR."
It also highlights how China takes it foreign policy, which is actually is its strategic/economic/military. Whereas, Trump being 'businessman' just tried to hit China economically and in return China gained strategically and sometimes economically by out manoeuvring US policy.

@_NOBODY_ @aziqbal @beijingwalker @Bilal. @Hamartia Antidote @Samlee @MastanKhan @waz @khansaheeb
Thanks for the tag. Will watch and comment.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom