What's new

Trump says will pull US troops from 'delinquent' Germany

striver44

BANNED
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
4,832
Reaction score
-16
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
President's plan to reduce US troops by 9,500 would undermine a long established pillar of transatlantic security

8 hours ago

8e11d0decc1041ebba53c9cc2223b3bc_18.jpg

Trump is threatening to pull US troops from Germany. The country has been a key ally in Europe and NATO as part of the post-war settlement, and the two countries hold frequent military exercises [File: Focke Strangmann/EPA]

President Donald Trump said on Monday that he would cut the number of US troops in Germany to 25,000, claiming the country had failed to meet NATO's defence spending target and accusing it of taking advantage of the United States on trade.

The reduction of about 9,500 troops would be a remarkable rebuke to one of the US's closest allies and trading partners and undermine a pillar of post-war European security: that US forces would help defend alliance members against Russian aggression.

More:
It was not clear whether Trump would be able to carry through on his plan, which first emerged in media reports on June 5, given criticism from some of the president's fellow Republicans in Congress who have argued a cut would be a gift to Russia.

Speaking to reporters, Trump accused Germany of being "delinquent" in its payments to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and pledged to stick with the plan unless Berlin changed course.

"So, we're protecting Germany, and they're delinquent. That doesn't make sense. So, I said, 'we're going to bring down the count to 25,000 soldiers,'" Trump said, adding that "they treat us very badly on trade" but providing no details.

In 2014, NATO set a target that each of its 30 members should spend 2 percent of GDP on defence. Most, including Germany, do not.

Plan triggers unease
Trump's remarks were the first official confirmation of the planned troop cut, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal and later confirmed to Reuters by a senior US official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

What if NATO members ignore Trump's call on spending? | Inside Story (24:40)


That official said it stemmed from months of work by the US military and had nothing to do with simmering tensions between Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel who recently declined the president's invitation for an in-person summit of the G7 nations.

Asked about Trump's statement, German Ambassador to the United States Emily Haber said US soldiers were in Europe to defend transatlantic security and in an arrangement that also benefitted the United States.

"This is about transatlantic security but also about American security," she told a virtual think-tank audience, saying US-German security cooperation would remain strong, and that her government had been informed of the decision.

Last week, sources told Reuters that German officials as well a number of US officials at the White House, State Department and Pentagon were surprised by the Wall Street Journal report and they offered explanations ranging from Trump's pique over the G7 to the influence of Richard Grenell, the former US ambassador to Germany and a Trump loyalist.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/06/trump-pull-troops-delinquent-germany-200616023431139.html
 
.
US could send those troops to the Baltics and Scandinavian countries, and in the long run if Europe don't show any sort of progress toward rearming or shifting towards US security interest, US redeploy all of em in the Asia Pacific, 63000+ troops is quite huge. station them in either Japan or SK. I'm sure europe could defend herself against russia.

if Europe doesn't want to fight china, Asia Pacific will.
 
.
US could send those troops to the Baltics and Scandinavian countries, and in the long run if Europe don't show any sort of progress toward rearming or shifting towards US security interest, US redeploy all of em in the Asia Pacific, 63000+ troops is quite huge. station them in either Japan or SK. I'm sure europe could defend herself against russia.

if Europe doesn't want to fight china, Asia Pacific will.
LOL.. Japan and SK are busy earning more money from China. The last thing they want to do is to fight war with China. US withdraw from Europe and less influence on them so Europe will work with China more.
 
.
LOL.. Japan and SK are busy earning more money from China. The last thing they want to do is to fight war with China. US withdraw from Europe and less influence on them so Europe will work with China more.
Sure I support those. Europe would stay neutral and the US would also stay neutral when russia decide to send some little green man.

Asia Pacific is a more important theatre. More ships, more missile and more troops pulled out from europe will be perfect.

Japan and SK should be happy to facilitate those. And maybe the philippines once duterte got violently removed by the cia
 
.
President's plan to reduce US troops by 9,500 would undermine a long established pillar of transatlantic security

8 hours ago

8e11d0decc1041ebba53c9cc2223b3bc_18.jpg

Trump is threatening to pull US troops from Germany. The country has been a key ally in Europe and NATO as part of the post-war settlement, and the two countries hold frequent military exercises [File: Focke Strangmann/EPA]

President Donald Trump said on Monday that he would cut the number of US troops in Germany to 25,000, claiming the country had failed to meet NATO's defence spending target and accusing it of taking advantage of the United States on trade.

The reduction of about 9,500 troops would be a remarkable rebuke to one of the US's closest allies and trading partners and undermine a pillar of post-war European security: that US forces would help defend alliance members against Russian aggression.

More:
It was not clear whether Trump would be able to carry through on his plan, which first emerged in media reports on June 5, given criticism from some of the president's fellow Republicans in Congress who have argued a cut would be a gift to Russia.

Speaking to reporters, Trump accused Germany of being "delinquent" in its payments to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and pledged to stick with the plan unless Berlin changed course.

"So, we're protecting Germany, and they're delinquent. That doesn't make sense. So, I said, 'we're going to bring down the count to 25,000 soldiers,'" Trump said, adding that "they treat us very badly on trade" but providing no details.

In 2014, NATO set a target that each of its 30 members should spend 2 percent of GDP on defence. Most, including Germany, do not.

Plan triggers unease
Trump's remarks were the first official confirmation of the planned troop cut, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal and later confirmed to Reuters by a senior US official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

What if NATO members ignore Trump's call on spending? | Inside Story (24:40)


That official said it stemmed from months of work by the US military and had nothing to do with simmering tensions between Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel who recently declined the president's invitation for an in-person summit of the G7 nations.

Asked about Trump's statement, German Ambassador to the United States Emily Haber said US soldiers were in Europe to defend transatlantic security and in an arrangement that also benefitted the United States.

"This is about transatlantic security but also about American security," she told a virtual think-tank audience, saying US-German security cooperation would remain strong, and that her government had been informed of the decision.

Last week, sources told Reuters that German officials as well a number of US officials at the White House, State Department and Pentagon were surprised by the Wall Street Journal report and they offered explanations ranging from Trump's pique over the G7 to the influence of Richard Grenell, the former US ambassador to Germany and a Trump loyalist.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/06/trump-pull-troops-delinquent-germany-200616023431139.html
VERY NICE IDEA.

It will help and accelerate the building of a true independant european force.

Congrats Donald !
 
Last edited:
. . .
Why riding Asia pacific thingy now? Why your embarrassed bhart cannot fight its own wars?
Ehhh I dont know if a migrant in america like you have been living under a rock. But asia pacific are currently the most likely place where ww3 gonna start.
US gonna need those manpower pulled out from europe for some island hopping campaign in addition to defend their treaty allies such as Japan, SK or even to defend Taiwan.
 
.
Ehhh I dont know if a migrant in america like you have been living under a rock. But asia pacific are currently the most likely place where ww3 gonna start.
US gonna need those manpower pulled out from europe for some island hopping campaign in addition to defend their treaty allies such as Japan, SK or even to defend Taiwan.
AGREE !
 
.
Ehhh I dont know if a migrant in america like you have been living under a rock. But asia pacific are currently the most likely place where ww3 gonna start.
US gonna need those manpower pulled out from europe for some island hopping campaign in addition to defend their treaty allies such as Japan, SK or even to defend Taiwan.

Keep riding Asian Pacific thing dear Bharti economic migrant in Indonesia.

And unlike you im not embarrassed to show my flags, besides US is the country made by migrants for the migrants. Bharti migrating to Indonesia is just an opportunist Bharti running because he know reality abt bhart his homeland. And now he is riding Asia pacific.
 
.
Keep riding Asian Pacific thing dear Bharti economic migrant in Indonesia.

And unlike you im not embarrassed to show my flags, besides US is the country made by migrants for the migrants. Bharti migrating to Indonesia is just an opportunist Bharti running because he know reality abt bhart his homeland. And now he is riding Asia pacific.
Lol funny people like you keep calling people "economic" "migrants" I'm sure you're in the USA just for the purpose of distributing humanitarian aid . Lol

When did I'm embarrassed using my flag? I use Indonesian flag and yes I don't need to be an immigrant to live well.
 
.
Lol funny people like you keep calling people "economic" "migrants" I'm sure you're in the USA just for the purpose of distributing humanitarian aid . Lol

When did I'm embarrassed using my flag? I use Indonesian flag and yes I don't need to be an immigrant to live well.
Do you have comprehension issues dear Bharti economic opportunist migrant.
 
.
Do you have comprehension issues dear Bharti economic opportunist migrant.
Opportunist? Lol aren't you the actual opportunist here, why go to america if not for the money, why not stay in Pakistan lol. Are you telling me that you set foot on america to establish some sort of humanitarian aid. Hahahahaha.


Funny that actual economic migrants are calling other migrants. You should change your account name into American Pakistani immigrants lol. Don't be shy. Nothing wrong lol
 
.
Europe should remain neutral.

Orange baby pissed at canada too for not contributing more money to nato.

Sure I support those. Europe would stay neutral and the US would also stay neutral when russia decide to send some little green man.

Asia Pacific is a more important theatre. More ships, more missile and more troops pulled out from europe will be perfect.

Japan and SK should be happy to facilitate those. And maybe the philippines once duterte got violently removed by the cia
Lol wet dreams has limitations. But cool story bro.

Keep writing.
 
.
Europe should remain neutral.

Orange baby pissed at canada too for not contributing more money to nato.


Lol wet dreams has limitations. But cool story bro.

Keep writing.
sure ....everything start with a dreams . right??
 
.

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom