What's new

The Chinese people never forgot night the US bombed its Belgrade embassy, Nato still owes blood debt to the Chinese people not settled

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
The Chinese people never forgot night the US bombed its Belgrade embassy
H&M boycott and Beijing diplomacy tour show country's new ability to punch back

KATSUJI NAKAZAWA, Nikkei senior staff writer
APRIL 1, 2021 04:31 JST

TOKYO -- Within days of the heated U.S.-China diplomatic exchange in Alaska, senior officials from both countries were flying around the world, bolstering ties with nations they deem to be on their side.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi left March 24 on a six-nation tour of the Middle East. But it was Defense Minister Gen. Wei Fenghe, through a carefully chosen itinerary, who sent the strongest message.

On Friday, the general was in Belgrade, meeting Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic. After inspecting Serbian troops, exchanging pleasantries and thanking Serbia for respecting China's "core interests," Wei told Vucic that he had made a trip to a special place earlier in the day.

"The Chinese people will never forget this period of history," Wei said. "And the Chinese People's Liberation Army will never allow such history to repeat itself."
1557284949426.jpg



That history was the night of May 7, 1999, when as part of airstrikes on Belgrade by U.S.-led NATO forces during operations against Yugoslavia, an American B-2 aircraft accidentally bombed the Chinese Embassy, killing three Chinese journalists. Wei visited the site of the former embassy and paid tribute to the deceased.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F_aliases%252Farticleimage%252F8%252F5%252F4%252F2%252F33342458-3-eng-GB%252FCropped-1617174242photo_SXM2021032900012223%2520%25281%2529.png


Chinese Defense Minister Wei Fenghe on March 26 visits the site of the country's embassy in Belgrade that was bombed by NATO in 1999 during operations against Yugoslavia. Three Chinese journalists died in the bombing. (Photo courtesy of the Chinese Ministry of National Defense)

"China is fully capable and determined to defend its national sovereignty, security and development interests," Wei told the Serbian leader.

Wei holds the highest rank in the military and is a member of the Central Military Commission, the top armed forces organ that supervises the PLA. Footage of Wei visiting the embassy site evoked the strong anti-U.S. and anti-NATO feelings among the Chinese people.

China never accepted the U.S. explanation that the bombing was a mistake. Even after Xi Jinping became the Chinese president in 2013, the country's media outlets continued to claim that it was a "deliberate" bombing.

Following the incident in 1999, tens of thousands of Chinese student protesters gathered in front of the U.S. Embassy in Beijing. The building turned yellow, red and blue as protesters threw plastic bottles of paint. The embassy's front windows were shattered.

Two decades later, anti-U.S. sentiment is rife again, as can be seen by the blistering attacks on social media following the Alaska meeting that began March 18.

Yet no high-profile anti-American demonstration has occurred within China so far. A look back on how the demonstrations were organized in 1999 provides clues as to why.

Cheng Chunhua was an assistant to the chairperson of the Peking University Students' Union and one of the organizers of the embassy protest. At the time, Cheng spoke frankly to Nikkei in an interview.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F_aliases%252Farticleimage%252F6%252F8%252F1%252F4%252F33344186-1-eng-GB%252Fphoto_SXM2021032900006300re2.jpg


The embassy bombing in 1999 sparked anti-U.S. protests in China, including by Peking University students. Five buses bound for the embassy district were arranged through Beijing's municipal government.
"As soon as the bombing incident became public, the momentum toward holding a protest grew on the campus," Cheng had said. "Some people were already heading to the scene."

"I thought instinctively that authorities, including the police, will approve of such a demonstration. So I applied for permission to organize one through my school," Cheng said. "As expected, I was quickly given the green light by the municipal government of Beijing, and five buses bound for the embassy district were arranged."

Peking University had played a central role during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests for democracy. With memories of that bloody crackdown still fresh, the top priority for Chinese authorities was to prevent the protests from running out of control -- thus, the buses. An orderly outburst of patriotism was acceptable to them.

Back in 1999, there was a world of difference between the U.S. and China in terms of economic and military power. Student protesters carried banners with the slogan, "Don't insult the Chinese nation." The slogan also represented an outburst of their pent-up feelings.

China stands in quite a different position today. It now possesses the weight to punch back.

The diplomatic visits last week were a display of such clout. In the Middle East, Wang spoke to his hosts as the world's top energy purchaser. In eastern Europe and the Balkans, Wei proposed expanding military exchanges, raising eyebrows among NATO observers.

The supply of made-in-China coronavirus vaccines also provides the country with powerful ammunition.

At home, China's manufacturing and consumption muscles were flexed as foreign apparel companies faced intense pressure for criticizing the country's actions in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region, where human rights violations against the Uyghur ethnic group are alleged.

It has become impossible to find H&M products on major Chinese shopping websites, apparently due to past statements by the fast fashion chain declaring it will not trade with Chinese companies that operate factories in Xinjiang.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F_aliases%252Farticleimage%252F8%252F8%252F2%252F4%252F33344288-5-eng-GB%252FCropped-1617174961-03-25T074810Z_1138864029_RC27IM9UPLOO_RTRMADP_3_CHINA-XINJIANG-COTTON-RETAILERS%2520%25281%2529.JPG


A security guard stands outside an H&M store in Beijing on March 25. The Swedish fashion retailer's products have suddenly vanished from major Chinese shopping websites, apparently due to the company's statements against alleged human rights abuses in China's Xinjiang region. © Reuters

The mass scrutiny campaign has spilled over to other clothing retailers, including Nike and Adidas, as they also take heat for past statements on the alleged use of Uyghur forced labor in cotton production.

Chinese actors and celebrities have rushed to join the criticism, terminating endorsement and sponsorship contracts with H&M, Nike, Adidas and other international fashion brands. These celebrities issued statements saying they cannot tolerate any act to "smear" China -- comments reminiscent of the "Don't insult the Chinese nation" slogan chanted by student protesters in 1999.

In the age of e-commerce, a sudden, peremptory blockage of online shopping is equivalent to the street demonstrations that blocked access to downtown districts back in the day.

After the U.S.-China talks in Alaska, a social media outlet affiliated with the People's Daily, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party, cited China's history of being trampled upon by Western powers 120 years ago.

It published two photographs side by side, one of them showing the humiliating 1901 Boxer Protocol being signed with the Eight-Nation Alliance. The other was a photo of the Alaska meeting.

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F_aliases%252Flarge_image%252F7%252F1%252F8%252F7%252F33127817-6-eng-GB%252FCropped-1616257360File%2520%25281%2529.jpg
This collage comparing the signing of the unfair Boxer Protocol in 1901 to the U.S.-China meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, went viral on Chinese social media. (Photo taken from Weibo)
The eight nations were the U.K., the U.S., Germany, France, Italy, Russia, Japan and Austria-Hungary, to whom the Qing government had to pay damages. Signatories receiving damages also included Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain.

The message was loud and clear: "Never again." China and the U.S. now can engage in a shouting match on equal footing, thanks to the Communist Party regime's "strong country" policy.

During the demonstrations in front of the U.S. Embassy in Beijing at the end of the 20th century, some students shouted, "China will become the world's No. 1 country sometime in the future."

That seemed to be a mere pipe dream then, but such status is now within China's reach.

The lack of current anti-American demonstrations in China could reflect the confidence the country has amassed. Street demonstrations, after all, are a method for people in weaker positions to stand up against the strong as a last resort.

China's public today does not feel the need to use such a method. The people are confident about how they brought the coronavirus outbreak under control. They are proud that the economy is back on a growth track.

But it is also true that China faces increased criticism from around the world. Especially troublesome for Beijing was the decision by the European Union to join the U.S. in sanctioning China over the treatment of the Uyghur minority.

China is not sitting idle. Ahead of Wei's eastern Europe visit, Xi made a surprise appearance at the "17+1" online summit of leaders from China and 17 central and eastern European countries Feb. 9. For a long time, China's representative to the "17+1" dialogue had been Premier Li Keqiang.

Xi advocated strengthening China's relations with eastern European and Balkan countries, a countermeasure to the attempts by U.S. President Joe Biden's administration to build an international coalition against China.

The confrontation between the camps led by the U.S. and China continues to intensify.
 
Last edited:
Ironically westerners now criticize China doesn't condemn/sanction Russia for the Ukraine war. Why would we feel unhappy if anybody stops expansion of US gangster group? Which also sees China as the biggest enemy.

We should also not forget that when Japan invaded China in 1930's, the whole west world did nothing to help China. And even worse, US was Japan's major exporter of oil, steel and all kinds of materials for war.
 
China was a supporter of Slobodan Milošević. Milosevic much scandalized by the west, was actually a patriot, who did his best to preserve the nation. The west arm the Muslim insurgencies on one hand, conducting massive rape against the Serb, and when the Serb militia + regulars came in and revenge, West market it as Christians genocide against Muslim. Then rogue US commander Westly Clark decide to bomb Chinese embassy.
 
If NATO war criminals attacks Russia, it’s time for China to send help to Russia with weapons. Time for Russia and China to confront these NATO criminals together.

If NATO attacks Russia, China cannot sit on the sidelines with ‘sovereignty and territorial integrity’ talk. It’s an all out war and China cannot afford to see Russia defeated. China will be eaten alive geopolitically without Russia.

Russia and China must stick together. I’m not interested in moral grandstanding. National interest supersede everything else in this world.
 
Last edited:
US now tries to do a Milosevic on Myanmar, and Rohingya is the Bosniak.
 
US now tries to do a Milosevic on Myanmar, and Rohingya is the Bosniak.
The Burmese govt is not the same as Milosevic, nor are Rohingya and Croatia.
Rohingyas did not declare independence like Croats, nor did they persecute Burmese people, and the Burmese govt was indeed oppressing Rohingyas.
We can sympathize with Milosevic, but we cannot support the Burmese govt.
 
The Burmese govt is not the same as Milosevic, nor are Rohingya and Croatia.
Rohingyas did not declare independence like Croats, nor did they persecute Burmese people, and the Burmese govt was indeed oppressing Rohingyas.
We can sympathize with Milosevic, but we cannot support the Burmese govt.

The Myanmese are not oppressive Muslims per se until they wage insurgencies. I was in Yangon not too long ago. Everywhere they are mosque and megaphone blasted koran loud.

You think Rohingya are rabbit?

China not supporting Myanmar? :D :D :D :D
 
US now tries to do a Milosevic on Myanmar, and Rohingya is the Bosniak.

Are you mentally ill or something.. Your posts are disturbing? Bosniaks are a nation and have their own country whereas Rohingya are just few thousands of people and basically villagers exiled from Myannmar how is what is happening in Mynammar civil war their fault..

There are plenty of proxies in Myanmar..

You comments have been extremely disturbing.. I don't see where they have fault in Mynamar civil war? They ain't even party to it but other players and characters are fighting including foreign players.

Besides your comments on the Bosniaks is extremely disguesting.. They were actully not defeated unlike the Chinese communists insurgency that got wipped out across South East Asia
 
Are you mentally ill or something.. Your posts are disturbing? Bosniaks are a nation and have their own country whereas Rohingya are just few thousands of people and basically villagers exiled from Myannmar how is what is happening in Mynammar civil war their fault..

There are plenty of proxies in Myanmar..

You comments have been extremely disturbing.. I don't see where they have fault in Mynamar civil war? They ain't even party to it but other players and characters are fighting including foreign players.

Besides your comments on the Bosniaks is extremely disguesting.. They were actully not defeated unlike the Chinese communists insurgency that got wipped out across South East Asia

The one who Bosniak fought earnestly initially were Croats. It was later US and West ask Bosniak and Croats to sit down, tag team, and wage war against Serb,

Then Serb were branded as anti Islam.

You tell me a day when 100 mosque not operating in Yangon.... That says a lot about Myanmese attitude towards Islam.

I was in Yangon ok....

On the other hand, Tatmadaw did scotch earth Rohingya and drive millions into Bangadesh. I have to admit.

 
Last edited:
When Nato attacked Yugoslavia to aid the anti government rebels in 1999, did Nato respect the sovreignty of Yugoslavia? They just went ahead and dismembered a sovreingn country.

In 1836, Texas declared its independence and USA recognized its independence.
In 1991, Croatia declared independence and NATO recognized Croatia's independence.
In 2014, Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk declared their independence, and Russia recognized the independence of Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk.

In 1840s, USA invaded Mexico.
In 1999, NATO invaded the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
In 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine.

In 1845, Texas voted to join USA.
In 2009, Croatia joined NATO.
In 2014, Crimea joined Russia.

Only China's hands are clean in the P5 countries of the UN.
 
The Myanmese are not oppressive Muslims per se until they wage insurgencies. I was in Yangon not too long ago. Everywhere they are mosque and megaphone blasted koran loud.

You think Rohingya are rabbit?

China not supporting Myanmar? :D :D :D :D

China supports several ethnic minority autonomous regions in northern Myanmar. To be honest, they are warlords and separatists in Myanmar.

The Burmese govt is afraid and dare not provoke the Chinese govt, maintaining good relations between the two countries does not mean that the Chinese govt supports the Burmese govt's ethnic policy. On the contrary, China has always opposed Myanmar's ethnic policy.

The Karen army in Rakhine state has been fighting with the Burmese government army, and most of their supplies come from Chinese Karen donations. Do you really think the Karen people in China can support Rakhine state without the tacit consent of the Chinese govt?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom