STRICTLY SECURITY - news report

[DavidSling]

http://www.i24news.tv/en/tv/replay/STRICTLY-SECURITY/x5bysdo
STRICTLY SECURITY | With Barbara Opall-Rome | We take a look at the iran nuclear deal one year after it came into effect, talk to retired IAF General and former head of Israeli Military intelligence Amos Yadlin, the only man on the planet to take part in the destruction of two nuclear reactors in Iraq and in Syria

http://www.i24news.tv/en/tv/replay/STRICTLY-SECURITY/x5cf208


@Penguin @500 @Natan @Archdemon @GBU-28 @F-15I @mike2000 is back @Blue Marlin @Mountain Jew@Beny Karachun @Adir-M @Ilay @theman111

 

[YeBeWarned]

and Israel Nuclear Program is threat to Iran and every ME country ? why you guys always crying like B!tch ? even you are the bullies in ME ..

 

[DavidSling]

and Israel Nuclear Program is threat to Iran and every ME country ? why you guys always crying like B!tch ? even you are the bullies in ME ..

Israel never threatened to wipe countries off the map

 

[YeBeWarned]

Israel never threatened to wipe countries off the map

but you did attack two countries for no reason .. that make you aggressor not them ..

 

[R Wing]

Israel never threatened to wipe countries off the map

This notion, popularized by the West, that holds rhetorical political statements more seriously than actual action (that takes lives, is aggressive, etc.) is flawed (i.e. Iran is bad because some leaders there use the "wipe off the map" argument to appease the local population, but Israel is an angel because it simply occupies, kills and imprisons Palestinians illegally yet doesn't state that it wants to wipe countries off the map).

Since Israel has nukes despite having a pretty bad human rights and UN Resolution-breaking record, Iran should surely be encouraged to have nukes too.

Just my 2c...

I also wonder if Pakistan has ever considered sharing nuclear tech with Iran to re-balance the Middle East...

 

[DavidSling]

This notion, popularized by the West, that holds rhetorical political statements more seriously than actual action (that takes lives, is aggressive, etc.) is flawed (i.e. Iran is bad because some leaders there use the "wipe off the map" argument to appease the local population, but Israel is an angel because it simply occupies, kills and imprisons Palestinians illegally yet doesn't state that it wants to wipe countries off the map).

Since Israel has nukes despite having a pretty bad human rights and UN Resolution-breaking record, Iran should surely be encouraged to have nukes too.

Just my 2c...

I also wonder if Pakistan has ever considered sharing nuclear tech with Iran to re-balance the Middle East...

Yeah, writing on it's missiles "Israel should wipe off the map" is to appease the local population. do me a favor

 

[R Wing]

Yeah, writing on it's missiles "Israel should wipe off the map" is to appease the local population. do me a favor

Writing on missiles + talking
VS.
Illegally occupying a territory + Dropping missiles / bombs on it

 

[DavidSling]

Writing on missiles + talking
VS.
Illegally occupying a territory + Dropping missiles / bombs on it

Yeah well, make it sound like Palestinians are so peaceful and Israelis are monsters , every coin got two sides but not in this forum .
Anyway, offtopic

 

[R Wing]

Yeah well, make it sound like Palestinians are so peaceful and Israelis are monsters , every coin got two sides but not in this forum .
Anyway, offtopic

I never said Palestinians are angels. I am not saying Israel should be nuked and civilians should be killed. I am not insane.

All I am saying is that:
a.) the Two State Solution is the future (and the continued Israeli occupation of / expanding settlements in Palestine are illegal under intl law / the UN)
b.) if Israel has nukes, the world should have no problem with Iran having nukes

I think these are both fair and unbiased opinions. Of course you have every right to disagree.

 

[DavidSling]

http://www.i24news.tv/en/tv/replay/STRICTLY-SECURITY/x5dnzdo

 

[DavidSling]

http://www.i24news.tv/en/tv/replay/STRICTLY-SECURITY/x5dxs0a