What's new

SIX THINGS YOU DIDN’T KNOW THE U.S. AND ITS ALLIES DID TO IRAN

Arminkh

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
3,036
Reaction score
15
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Canada
I often see members from other countries question Iranian's attitude towards west and consider its stances and its endeavors towards military independence warmongering.

Here is an article, written by an American, that explains some history and why Iranian are so pessimistic about west and its intentions.

SIX THINGS YOU DIDN’T KNOW THE U.S. AND ITS ALLIES DID TO IRAN
BY JON SCHWARZ
@tinyrevolution
YESTERDAY AT 10:44 AM



It’s hard for some Americans to understand why the Obama administration is so determined to come to an agreement with Iran on its nuclear capability, given that huge Iranian rallies are constantly chanting “Death to America!” I know the chanting makes me unhappy, since I’m part of America, and I strongly oppose me dying.

But if you know our actual history with Iran, you can kind of see where they’re coming from. They have understandable reasons to be angry at and frightened of us — things we’ve done that if, say, Norway had done them to us, would have us out in the streets shouting “Death to Norway!” Unfortunately, not only have the U.S. and our allies done horrendous things to Iran, we’re not even polite enough to remember it.

Reminding ourselves of this history does not mean endorsing an Iran with nuclear-tipped ICBMs. It does mean realizing how absurd it sounds when critics of the proposed agreement say it suddenly makes the U.S. the weaker party or that we’re getting a bad deal because Iran, as Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham put it, does not fear Obama enough. It’s exactly the opposite: This is the best agreement the U.S. could get because for the first time in 35 years, U.S.-Iranian relations aren’t being driven purely by fear.

1. The founder of Reuters purchased Iran in 1872





Paul Julius Reuter (Getty)



Nasir al-Din Shah, Shah of Iran from 1848-1896, sold Baron Julius de Reuter the right to operate all of Iran’s railroads and canals, most of the mines, all of the government’s forests, and all future industries. The famous British statesman Lord Curzon called it“the most complete and extraordinary surrender of the entire industrial resources of a kingdom into foreign hands that has probably ever been dreamed of.” Iranians were so infuriated that the Shah had to rescind the sale the next year.


2. The BBC lent a hand to the CIA’s 1953 overthrow of Iran’s Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh





Kermit Roosevelt (AP)



If the Reuters thing weren’t enough to give Iranians a grudge against the Western media, the BBC transmitted a secret code to help Kermit Roosevelt (Teddy’s grandson) lay the groundwork for an American and British coup against Mosaddegh. (BBC Persian also assisted by broadcasting pro-coup propaganda on the orders of the British government.) Soon enough the U.S. was training the regime’s secret police in how to interrogate Iranians with methods a CIA analyst said were “based on German torture techniques from World War II.”


3. We had extensive plans to use nuclear weapons in Iran
In 1980 the U.S. military was terrified the Soviet Union would take advantage of the Iranian Revolution to invade Iran and seize the Straits of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf. So the Pentagon came up with a plan: If the Soviets began massing their troops, we would use small nuclear weapons to destroy the mountain passes in northern Iran the Soviets needed to move their troops into the country.

So we wouldn’t be using nukes on Iran, just in Iran. As Pentagon historian David Crist put it, “No one reflected on how the Iranians might view such a scenario.” But they probably would have been fine with it, just as we’d be fine with Iran nuking Minnesota to prevent Canada from gaining control of the Gulf of Mexico. “No problem,” we’d say. “Nuestra casa es su casa.”

4. U.S. leaders have repeatedly threatened to outright destroy Iran
It’s not just John McCainsinging “bomb bomb bomb Iran.” Admiral William Fallon, who retired as head of CENTCOM in 2008, said about Iran: “These guys are ants. When the time comes, you crush them.” Admiral James Lyons Jr., commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet in the 1980s,has said we were prepared to “drill them back to the fourth century.” Richard Armitage, then assistant secretary of defense, explainedthat we considered whether to “completely obliterate Iran.” Billionaire and GOP kingmaker Sheldon Adelson advocates an unprovoked nuclear attack on Iran — “in the middle of the desert” at first, then possibly moving on to places with more people.

Most seriously, the Obama administration’s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review declared that we will not use nuclear weapons “against non-nuclear weapons states that are party to the NPT [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] and in compliance with their nuclear non-proliferation obligations.” There’s only one country that’s plausibly not in this category. So we were saying we will never use nuclear weapons against any country that doesn’t have them already — with a single exception, Iran. Understandably, Iran found having a nuclear target painted on it pretty upsetting.

5. We shot down a civilian Iranian airliner — killing 290 people, including 66 children




Funeral for victims of downing of Flight 655. (AP)



On July 3, 1988, the USS Vincennes, patrolling in the Persian Gulf, blew Iran Air Flight 655 out of the sky.The New York Times had editorialized about “Murder in the Air” in 1983 when the Soviet Union mistakenly shot down a South Korean civilian airliner in its airspace, declaring, “there is no conceivable excuse for any nation shooting down a harmless airliner.” After the Vincennes missile strike, a Times editorial announced that what happened to Flight 655 “raises stern questions for Iran.” That’s right — for Iran. Two years later the U.S. Navy gave the Vincennes’s commander the highly prestigious Legion of Merit commendation.

6. We worry about Iranian nukes because they would deter our own military strikes
Our rhetoric on Iran seems nonsensical: Do U.S. leaders actually believe Iran would engage in a first nuclear strike on Israel or the U.S., given that would lead to a quick and devastating retaliation from those well-armed nuclear powers?

Even conservative U.S. foreign policy experts know that’s incredibly unlikely. They’re not worried that we can’t deter a nuclear-armed Iran — they’re worried that a nuclear-armed Iran could deter us. As Thomas Donnelly, a top Iran analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, put it in 2004, “the prospect of a nuclear Iran is a nightmare … because of the constraining effect it threatens to impose upon U.S. strategy for the greater Middle East. … The surest deterrent to American action is a functioning nuclear arsenal.”

This perspective — that we must prevent other countries from being able to deter us from waging war — is a bedrock belief of the U.S. establishment, and in fact was touted as a major reason to invade Iraq.

Photo: Sipa/AP

Six Things You Didn’t Know the U.S. and Its Allies Did to Iran - The Intercept

At the end, I'd like to add the following from another rational commenter:

- One third, yes one third of Iran’s population starved to death during WWII because of take over of food sources by British forces to feed their soldiers. Yes, it is not mentioned but a genocide happened in Iran by Brits in WWII.
– British and US propped the Shah and took the oil for 3 decades with Iran only getting less than 20% of the proceeds. That 20% was then returned to the west in the form of Iran buying billions of dollars of arms from the US and EU companies.
– The west encouraged Saddam to attack Iran in 1980’s and then supported it fully by providing arms, chemical weapons, and other material support. It cost Iran and Iraq over a million killed and millions injured and 100’s of billions of dollars in damages.
– Many Iranian scientists killed by the Israeli, CIA, and MI5 agents in the past 30 years.
 
I often see members from other countries question Iranian's attitude towards west and consider its stances and its endeavors towards military independence warmongering.

Here is an article, written by an American, that explains some history and why Iranian are so pessimistic about west and its intentions.

SIX THINGS YOU DIDN’T KNOW THE U.S. AND ITS ALLIES DID TO IRAN
BY JON SCHWARZ
@tinyrevolution
YESTERDAY AT 10:44 AM



It’s hard for some Americans to understand why the Obama administration is so determined to come to an agreement with Iran on its nuclear capability, given that huge Iranian rallies are constantly chanting “Death to America!” I know the chanting makes me unhappy, since I’m part of America, and I strongly oppose me dying.

But if you know our actual history with Iran, you can kind of see where they’re coming from. They have understandable reasons to be angry at and frightened of us — things we’ve done that if, say, Norway had done them to us, would have us out in the streets shouting “Death to Norway!” Unfortunately, not only have the U.S. and our allies done horrendous things to Iran, we’re not even polite enough to remember it.

Reminding ourselves of this history does not mean endorsing an Iran with nuclear-tipped ICBMs. It does mean realizing how absurd it sounds when critics of the proposed agreement say it suddenly makes the U.S. the weaker party or that we’re getting a bad deal because Iran, as Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham put it, does not fear Obama enough. It’s exactly the opposite: This is the best agreement the U.S. could get because for the first time in 35 years, U.S.-Iranian relations aren’t being driven purely by fear.

1. The founder of Reuters purchased Iran in 1872





Paul Julius Reuter (Getty)



Nasir al-Din Shah, Shah of Iran from 1848-1896, sold Baron Julius de Reuter the right to operate all of Iran’s railroads and canals, most of the mines, all of the government’s forests, and all future industries. The famous British statesman Lord Curzon called it“the most complete and extraordinary surrender of the entire industrial resources of a kingdom into foreign hands that has probably ever been dreamed of.” Iranians were so infuriated that the Shah had to rescind the sale the next year.


2. The BBC lent a hand to the CIA’s 1953 overthrow of Iran’s Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh





Kermit Roosevelt (AP)



If the Reuters thing weren’t enough to give Iranians a grudge against the Western media, the BBC transmitted a secret code to help Kermit Roosevelt (Teddy’s grandson) lay the groundwork for an American and British coup against Mosaddegh. (BBC Persian also assisted by broadcasting pro-coup propaganda on the orders of the British government.) Soon enough the U.S. was training the regime’s secret police in how to interrogate Iranians with methods a CIA analyst said were “based on German torture techniques from World War II.”


3. We had extensive plans to use nuclear weapons in Iran
In 1980 the U.S. military was terrified the Soviet Union would take advantage of the Iranian Revolution to invade Iran and seize the Straits of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf. So the Pentagon came up with a plan: If the Soviets began massing their troops, we would use small nuclear weapons to destroy the mountain passes in northern Iran the Soviets needed to move their troops into the country.

So we wouldn’t be using nukes on Iran, just in Iran. As Pentagon historian David Crist put it, “No one reflected on how the Iranians might view such a scenario.” But they probably would have been fine with it, just as we’d be fine with Iran nuking Minnesota to prevent Canada from gaining control of the Gulf of Mexico. “No problem,” we’d say. “Nuestra casa es su casa.”

4. U.S. leaders have repeatedly threatened to outright destroy Iran
It’s not just John McCainsinging “bomb bomb bomb Iran.” Admiral William Fallon, who retired as head of CENTCOM in 2008, said about Iran: “These guys are ants. When the time comes, you crush them.” Admiral James Lyons Jr., commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet in the 1980s,has said we were prepared to “drill them back to the fourth century.” Richard Armitage, then assistant secretary of defense, explainedthat we considered whether to “completely obliterate Iran.” Billionaire and GOP kingmaker Sheldon Adelson advocates an unprovoked nuclear attack on Iran — “in the middle of the desert” at first, then possibly moving on to places with more people.

Most seriously, the Obama administration’s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review declared that we will not use nuclear weapons “against non-nuclear weapons states that are party to the NPT [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] and in compliance with their nuclear non-proliferation obligations.” There’s only one country that’s plausibly not in this category. So we were saying we will never use nuclear weapons against any country that doesn’t have them already — with a single exception, Iran. Understandably, Iran found having a nuclear target painted on it pretty upsetting.

5. We shot down a civilian Iranian airliner — killing 290 people, including 66 children




Funeral for victims of downing of Flight 655. (AP)



On July 3, 1988, the USS Vincennes, patrolling in the Persian Gulf, blew Iran Air Flight 655 out of the sky.The New York Times had editorialized about “Murder in the Air” in 1983 when the Soviet Union mistakenly shot down a South Korean civilian airliner in its airspace, declaring, “there is no conceivable excuse for any nation shooting down a harmless airliner.” After the Vincennes missile strike, a Times editorial announced that what happened to Flight 655 “raises stern questions for Iran.” That’s right — for Iran. Two years later the U.S. Navy gave the Vincennes’s commander the highly prestigious Legion of Merit commendation.

6. We worry about Iranian nukes because they would deter our own military strikes
Our rhetoric on Iran seems nonsensical: Do U.S. leaders actually believe Iran would engage in a first nuclear strike on Israel or the U.S., given that would lead to a quick and devastating retaliation from those well-armed nuclear powers?

Even conservative U.S. foreign policy experts know that’s incredibly unlikely. They’re not worried that we can’t deter a nuclear-armed Iran — they’re worried that a nuclear-armed Iran could deter us. As Thomas Donnelly, a top Iran analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, put it in 2004, “the prospect of a nuclear Iran is a nightmare … because of the constraining effect it threatens to impose upon U.S. strategy for the greater Middle East. … The surest deterrent to American action is a functioning nuclear arsenal.”

This perspective — that we must prevent other countries from being able to deter us from waging war — is a bedrock belief of the U.S. establishment, and in fact was touted as a major reason to invade Iraq.

Photo: Sipa/AP

Six Things You Didn’t Know the U.S. and Its Allies Did to Iran - The Intercept

At the end, I'd like to add the following from another rational commenter:

- One third, yes one third of Iran’s population starved to death during WWII because of take over of food sources by British forces to feed their soldiers. Yes, it is not mentioned but a genocide happened in Iran by Brits in WWII.
– British and US propped the Shah and took the oil for 3 decades with Iran only getting less than 20% of the proceeds. That 20% was then returned to the west in the form of Iran buying billions of dollars of arms from the US and EU companies.
– The west encouraged Saddam to attack Iran in 1980’s and then supported it fully by providing arms, chemical weapons, and other material support. It cost Iran and Iraq over a million killed and millions injured and 100’s of billions of dollars in damages.
– Many Iranian scientists killed by the Israeli, CIA, and MI5 agents in the past 30 years.
1) If you create the technology to extract oil and finance its discovery it's quite right that you should have some of the proceeds.
2) Iran and not Libya is believed by all serious intelligence experts to have blown up Pan Am Flight 103 using the PFLP-GC as revenge for Vincennes.
3) Had the Shah remained in power Iran would probably be as wealthy as the Arab Gulf states today
4) Iran was the only country to receive US arms during the war courtesy of Iran-Contra. Everything Saddam was given was dual use technology.
5) Iran pioneered suicide bombings and hostage taking by armed groups during the 1980s in Lebanon. Scores of people were kidnapped and sometimes murdered simply because of their nationality.
6) MI5 is a domestic intelligence organisation. If you don't know this you're probably not that knowledgeable about much else in our foreign policy.
 
A car bomb takes place and kills innocent civilians. Is it a terrorist act? How would it be perceived if it happened in West? CIA and Mossad conducted several of these bombings in Iran to kill scientists.
 
A car bomb takes place and kills innocent civilians. Is it a terrorist act? How would it be perceived if it happened in West? CIA and Mossad conducted several of these bombings in Iran to kill scientists.
Mossad certainly did. No evidence the CIA has ever done so.
 
1) If you create the technology to extract oil and finance its discovery it's quite right that you should have some of the proceeds.
2) Iran and not Libya is believed by all serious intelligence officials to have blown up Pan Am Flight 103 using the PFLP-GC as revenge for Vincennes.
3) Had the Shah remained in power Iran would probably be as wealthy as the Arab Gulf states today
4) Iran was the only country to receive US arms during the war courtesy of Iran-Contra. Everything Saddam was given was dual use technology.
5) Iran pioneered suicide bombings and hostage taking by armed groups during the 1980s in Lebanon. Scores of people were kidnapped and sometimes murdered simply because of their nationality.
6) MI5 is a domestic intelligence organisation. If you don't know this you're probably not that knowledgeable about much else in our foreign policy.

MI5 may not been involved in killing Iranian scientists. But British had a big part in overthrowing Iranian government in 50s over Iran's attempt to nationalize its petroleum. Do you deny that Britain tried to block this attempt and even used its navy to blockade Iran's ports?

Yes, the investing country should have some share of the proceeds not all of it which is what was Britain doing in early 1900. Did you know BP used to be British-Persian Co.? Did you know the fuel of British fleet during the WWII was supplied by Iran whiteout being properly paid for it or even choosing to do it?

Do you deny that Britain separated Afghanistan from Iran to safe guard India from possible Russian invasion?

All the rest mentioned in the article is true and backed by well documented facts. While everything you have mentioned are assumptions and stipulations at best.

Iran was neutral in both WWI and WWII none of which was respected by British and their allies. In both cases foreign troops took the liberty to enter Iran when they wanted.

All of these was because Iran was ruled by a bunch of stupid leaders who didn't care about what is happening to Iran and I understand that another country like Britain would use this opportunity in its favor but it doesn't make what British did any more favorable among Iranians.
 
MI5 may not been involved in killing Iranian scientists. But British had a big part in overthrowing Iranian government in 50s over Iran's attempt to nationalize its petroleum. Do you deny that Britain tried to block this attempt and even used its navy to blockade Iran's ports?

Yes, the investing country should have some share of the proceeds not all of it which is what was Britain doing in early 1900. Did you know BP used to be British-Persian Co.? Did you know the fuel of British fleet during the WWII was supplied by Iran whiteout being properly paid for it or even choosing to do it?

Do you deny that Britain separated Afghanistan from Iran to safe guard India from possible Russian invasion?

All the rest mentioned in the article is true and backed by well documented facts. While everything you have mentioned are assumptions and stipulations at best.

Iran was neutral in both WWI and WWII none of which was respected by British and their allies. In both cases foreign troops took the liberty to enter Iran when they wanted.

All of these was because Iran was ruled by a bunch of stupid leaders who didn't care about what is happening to Iran and I understand that another country like Britain would use this opportunity in its favor but it doesn't make what British did any more favorable among Iranians.
I'm not saying it's right. But don't pretend you've never done anything wrong.
As I say, it was Hezbollah, created by Iran,that invented suicide bombing and perfected the art of hostage taking.
 
I'm not saying it's right. But don't pretend you've never done anything wrong.
As I say, it was Hezbollah, created by Iran,that invented suicide bombing and perfected the art of hostage taking.

There is no country that can claim it has never done anything wrong. I'm just trying to explain where Iranian are coming from.
 
1) If you create the technology to extract oil and finance its discovery it's quite right that you should have some of the proceeds.
2) Iran and not Libya is believed by all serious intelligence experts to have blown up Pan Am Flight 103 using the PFLP-GC as revenge for Vincennes.
3) Had the Shah remained in power Iran would probably be as wealthy as the Arab Gulf states today
4) Iran was the only country to receive US arms during the war courtesy of Iran-Contra. Everything Saddam was given was dual use technology.
5) Iran pioneered suicide bombings and hostage taking by armed groups during the 1980s in Lebanon. Scores of people were kidnapped and sometimes murdered simply because of their nationality.
6) MI5 is a domestic intelligence organisation. If you don't know this you're probably not that knowledgeable about much else in our foreign policy.

I hear what you're saying, but I cannot fathom how you're attempting to indirectly defend the indefensible.
 
I hear what you're saying, but I cannot fathom how you're attempting to indirectly defend the indefensible.
Never defended anything. Mossadeq shouldn't have been overthrown but if you're comparing the misdeeds of the Shah to that of the mullahs then his look very small next to theirs.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying it's right. But don't pretend you've never done anything wrong.
As I say, it was Hezbollah, created by Iran,that invented suicide bombing and perfected the art of hostage taking.

Actually it was invented by Tamil Tigers of Srilanka. And what US was doing in Lebanon, I never understood. In the middle of a bloody civil war, while the country was occupied.

1) If you create the technology to extract oil and finance its discovery it's quite right that you should have some of the proceeds.
2) Iran and not Libya is believed by all serious intelligence experts to have blown up Pan Am Flight 103 using the PFLP-GC as revenge for Vincennes.
3) Had the Shah remained in power Iran would probably be as wealthy as the Arab Gulf states today
4) Iran was the only country to receive US arms during the war courtesy of Iran-Contra. Everything Saddam was given was dual use technology.
5) Iran pioneered suicide bombings and hostage taking by armed groups during the 1980s in Lebanon. Scores of people were kidnapped and sometimes murdered simply because of their nationality.
6) MI5 is a domestic intelligence organisation. If you don't know this you're probably not that knowledgeable about much else in our foreign policy.

1) Only if the nation in question consents. Iran had signed a contract with a private British company. The British government takes over that company and declares Iran's natural resources as its own. Colonial thinking at its height.

2) Maybe.

3) Debatable. But wealth can not replace independence.

4) Saddam received chemical weapons from West, while Iran was put under sanctions so that it could not buy gas masks.

5) It was Tamil Tigers who invented it.

6) Domestic, foreign, who gives a hoot. They are all the same.
 
Excellent article. White British american Jew worshippers do not want to leave Iran or any strong country in ME due to their love for illegal fake Israel. Iraq, Syria, Yemen or even Libya are examples.
They hate muslims to death and only love Zionists and their slaves.

Since the fake 9/11 more than 2 million muslims have get killed and they are laughing to muslims.

Seven Things You Didn’t Know the U.S. and Its Allies Did to Iran
 
Iran was neutral in both WWI and WWII none of which was respected by British and their allies. In both cases foreign troops took the liberty to enter Iran when they wanted.
As you said the rulers were just a bunch of empty-head drunk Kings like those of today's Arabs... Days to "HIT and RUN" as Iranian leader described recently is long Gone, Iran treats British or other Western forces like this:

2004 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1) If you create the technology to extract oil and finance its discovery it's quite right that you should have some of the proceeds.
2) Iran and not Libya is believed by all serious intelligence experts to have blown up Pan Am Flight 103 using the PFLP-GC as revenge for Vincennes.
3) Had the Shah remained in power Iran would probably be as wealthy as the Arab Gulf states today
4) Iran was the only country to receive US arms during the war courtesy of Iran-Contra. Everything Saddam was given was dual use technology.
5) Iran pioneered suicide bombings and hostage taking by armed groups during the 1980s in Lebanon. Scores of people were kidnapped and sometimes murdered simply because of their nationality.
6) MI5 is a domestic intelligence organisation. If you don't know this you're probably not that knowledgeable about much else in our foreign policy.
You missed one more thing:

Iran was charged guilty and convicted to pay a fine to 9/11 victims in a court in USA!!!!

Yes Iran was behind Wahhabi Saudi terrorist actions including 9/11 and it should be fined because of that!!

USA citizens and leaders truely deserve a nobel peace prize for their peaceful intentions and actions for the whole world + Academy Award for their realistic performance!!
 
Back
Top Bottom