What's new

Role of Afghans in Tughlaq Empire (1320 -1413)

Samandri

BANNED
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
1,959
Reaction score
-10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Afghans made a marked progress during Muhammad bin Tughlaq's reign, Malik Ikhtiyar-ud-din Yal Afghan who had been noticed earlier in connection with nobility under Ala-ud-din Khalji continued to hold the position under Muhammad bin Tughlaq. Malik Makh Afghan, his younger brother was sent by Ghiyas-ud-din to the expedition against Warangal in A.D 1321 under the leadership of his son Ulugh khan. Other notable Afghans of Muhammad bin Tughlaq were Malik Khattab Afghan, Jalhu Afghan, Tughal-al-Afghan, Bahram Afghan, Gul Afghan,Mandi Afghan and last but the least Malik Shahu Lodhi. His successor Firuz Tughlaq continued to patronize the Afghans and prominent among them were Malik Afghan, Malik Daud Khan Afghan, the muqti of |Bihar, Malik Muhammad Shah Afghan, the muqti of Tughluqpur, Malik Bali Afghan and Yasin, son of Malik Shah Afghan.[1]

During Muhammad bin Tughlaq reign, the lower grade officers came to be called Sadah. Sadah or hundred (centurion) was the term used in Mongol military for one who commanded a hundred men.. But in india, the word sadah began to used as a territorial divisions , to signify a hundred villages. The Sadah amirs were, either Mongols or Afghans.The Mongol and Afghan Sadah amirs behaved differently than much loyal Turkish and Hindustani nobles [2]. Due to position as Sadah amirs, large number of Afghan zamindars emerged during the latter part of 14th century [3]. Some of the Afghans took advantage of imperial favour and endeavored to build up their military strength on the meager resources which they possessed [4].Being largely cut off from west asia after the rise of Mongols , the Turkish rulers had to rely increasingly on Afghans and Indian muslims for their armies. Thus armies of turk rulers was a mixed up, consisting of descendents of original Turkish soldiers, Afghans and Indian muslims [5].

In 1341 Malik Shahu Lodhi, an Afghan noble,who had considerable following of his own tribe, went to the extent of assuming sovereignty by killing Bihzad, the governor of Multan. When this news reached Delhi, the Sultan Muhammad bin Tughlaq assembled large army and set out to crush him. He had hardly covered two or three stages, when he heard that his mother had died but sultan continued his march. When he reached Dipalpur, he learnt that Shahu had fled to afghanistan. The sultan thereupon return to his capital and issued orders for the wholesale arrest of Afghans in his empire.[6]

Qazi Jalal Afghan was posted with his Afghan followers in Gujarat. He put his claim to kingship over the territories of Gujarat and and defeated Muqbil, the naib governor of Gujarat. His assocates in rebellion were Jhallu Afghan, Bimbal and Jalal Ibn Lala Yal. Sultan Muhammad Bin Tughlaq sent troops against him but Qazi Jalal defeated them. So Sultan personally went against rebels and Afghans suffered a severe defeat at the hands of the royal army , their leader Qazi Jalal was killed in the battle. [7]

In 1345 An Afghan noble, Malik Makh, brother of Malik Mal Afghan, led revolt of Deccan's nobles against Tughluqs and founded the new kingdom after capturing Daulatabad. Malik Mukh became the King of Deccan and assumed the title Nasir-ud-din Shah. Nasir-ud-din Shah was an old man and hence he resigned from the post and the nobles nominated Hasan Gangu or Zafar Khan as the new chief under the title Abul Muzaffar Alauddin Bahman Shah. Thus Afghans lost the golden opportunity of establishing new Afghan dynasty in 14th century, Afghans amirs and soldiers were in large number in Deccan. It is said that Hasan Ganju or Zafar Khan himself was of Afghan or Turkish descent but thats in doubt.[8]

In 1345 AD, Malik Khattab Afghan, showed defiance to the sultanate's authority and captured the fort of Rapri, though he was later pardoned and restored to his original position.[9]

During Feroz Shah Tughlaq's times , In 1376-1377 the fief of Bihar was given to Malik Bir Afghan .Malik Bir was succeeded on his death, by his son, Daud Khan. In 1377 Malik Bulli Afghan was appointed to the muqta of Ikhal [10]. Malik Muhammad Shah Afghan, was muqta' of Tughluqpur. Behram Lodi, the grandfather of Bahlul Lodi, came as a horse-dealer during the reign of Firoz Shah Tughlaq.

Soon after the death of Firuz Shah Tughluq in 1388A.D. the disintegration of Empire started. Zafar Khan Lodhi and his sons Sarang Khan and Iqbal Khan became very powerful in the Delhi court. Sarang Khan became the Governor of Dipalpur in 1394A.D. Sarang Khan Lodhi occupied Lahore, which increased his prestige.Then he attacked Khizr Khan in 1395 A.D. and captured Multan and Uch. Khizr Khan ran away to Central Asia and joined the service of Amir Timur. Amir Timur deputed his grandson Pir Muhammad Jahangir to march on Hindustan in 1397 A.D. Amir Timur fowled him in 1398 A.D. Pir Muhammad Khan appeared before the Fort of Uch. Malik Ali, the deputy of Sarang Khan, decided to resist. Pir Muhammad besieged Uch and ultimately the fort was captured. Then Pir Muhammad proceeded towards Multan where Sarang Khan resisted and the siege lasted for six months.The news of the arrival of Amir Timur near Tulamba dismayed the people of Multan. The Multani army was defeated and Sarang Khan was captured. Multan was occupied in 1398A.D. Later Sarang Khan was killed under the order of Amir Timur.

In Meerut, Timur's soldiers indiscriminately plundered the houses of the common masses. This brutal treatment greatly perturbed the local population, including Hindus and Afghans. They resented this highhandedness and consequently rebelled under the leadership of Ilyas Afghan and Ahmad Thanseri [11] . Equally assisted by the Hindus, the Afghans offered tough resistance to the invading army. Timur besieged the city and a fierce fight took place. At the end the invading army captured the city in January 1399. This incident increased the already existing gulf between the Afghans and the Mongols [12] . According to Tarikh-i-Khurshid Jahan, the brutal devastation of the Afghan houses and the killing of their men was the first case in terms of conflict between the two peoples. Moreover, on his way back to Samarqand, Timur brought havoc in Kabul by large-scale plundering. For the second time he faced the Afghan challenge in Kabul. As a result he destroyed their localities indiscriminately and thousands of them were executed. [13]

On his way, Timur held his court in Lahore and appointed Khizr Khan Governor of Lahore, Dipalpur and Multan. Being a viceroy of Timur, he availed of the opportunity and defeated Mallu Iqbal Khan Lodhi (brother of Sarang Khan Lodhi) in 1405 AD. In 1412 Daulat Khan Lodhi won the support of most of the nobles and managed to occupy the Delhi throne. He sent several expeditions to establish the imperial hold over Punjab but in vain. He had defeated Bairam Khan, naib (second in command) of Khizar Khan on 22 December 1406, and then established himself at Samana. But on the approach of Khizar Khan's army, majority of his soldiers deserted and went to the enemy camp. With the passage of time his own people, for instance Ikhtiyar Khan also joined the army of Khizar Khan. At last in March 1414, Daulat Khan Lodhi was besieged at Siri by 60,000 strong army of Khizar Khan. The unrelenting process of desertion gravely weakened his position and at the eleventh hour too some of his officers treacherously deserted and went to the side of Khizar Khan. In this way he was forced by circumstances to surrender. On May 28, Khizar Khan Captured Delhi, imprisoned Daulat Khan Lodhi and founded a new dynasty known as the Sayyed Dynasty of India. [14]



References:

1- Essays on Medieval India by Raj Kumar , p-263

2- Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526 ... By Satish Chandra, p-110

3- The Muslims of Indian origin: during the Delhi sultanate : emergence, attitudes, and role, 1192-1526 A.D, p-179

4- The Afghan nobility and the Mughals: 1526-1707 by Rita Joshi, p-123

5- Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals-Delhi Sultanat (1206-1526 ...By Satish Chandra, p-137

6- Islamic Concept of Crime and Justice, Volume 1 By N. Hanif, p-142

7. Gujarat State Gazetteers: Vadodara - Page 88, and, The Rise of Muslim Power in Gujarat: A History of Gujarat from 1298 to 1442, p-101

8- The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The ..., Volume 3 By Sir Henry Miers Elliot, p-258

9. Central Asiatic Journal - Volume 26 - Page 254

10- Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North West ..., Volume 1, p-212

11- Agha Hussain Hamadani, 'The Frontier Policy of the DelhiSultans', p-157

12- Haig,The Cambridge History, p. 199.

13- Sardar Sher Muhammad Gandapur, Tarikh-i-Khurshid Jahan, Urdu tr. Siraj AhmadAlvi (Karachi: Shaikh Shaukat Ali and Sons, 1991), p. 208.

14- Joshi,The Afghan Nobility, p. 26.
Role of Afghans in Tughlaq Empire (1320 -1413)
 
.
KingMamba i am not permitted to post reply in Senior cafe due to lack of sufficient posts so i am sharing ani interesting part of history with you here in relevance with thread Ahmad Shah Durrani's place in Pakistani history

The excerpt is from Ganda Singh's book "Ahmad Shah Durrani", page-378

'By the beginning of January, 1767, the news of Ahmad Shah's arrival in the Panjab and of the probability of his march towards Hindustan had spread throughout the country. There was feverish activity both among the English and the Marathas. The Maratha chief Reghunath Rao made peace with Jawahir Singh, son of Suraj Mall, the Jat ruler of Bharatpur, and invited other chiefs of Hindustan, including the Nawab Wazir of Oudh, Shuja-ud-Daulah, to combine
against the Durrani invader. Raghunath Rao at the same time seems to have suggested to Shuja-ud-Daulah that the combined forces of the Marathas, Shuja-ud-Daulah and the English should escort Emperor Shah Alam to Delhi. Mr. Verelest saw no harm in Shuja-ud-Daulah's alliance with the Marathas, but he would not agree to lending any English force to escort the Emperor to Delhi. Writing on January 16, 1767, Verelest told Shuja-ud-Daulah that he did not "see harm in the interview [between Shujah-ud-Daulah and Raghunath Rao] which may even lead to more cordial relations with the Marathas. The question rests entirely with the addressee. If he and the Marathas conduct the King to Shahjahanabad, it is well; but the English forces cannot lend their assistance in such an expedition. ... As regards Shah Abdali, he may penetrate towards these parts as far as Shahjahanabad, but his progress will not extend further. Should he bend his march this way, all the English forces will unite with the addressee's and inflict upon him an utter defeat."

After his settlement with Jawahir Singh Jat, Raghunath Rao, it seems, had planned to pounce upon the Rajas of Jodhpur and Jaipur. He captured Bhilsa and marched to Kota.The Shah in the meantime seems to have heard about the impending coalition of the Marathas with Nawab Wazir of Oudh and the English, and of the intentions of Raghunath Rao against his faithful and devoted Rajput Rajas. He wrote from the Panjab a stern note of warning to Raghunath "threatening him with war and rapine, 'should he act contrary to the dictates" of the victor of Panipat. This unnerved the Maratha warrior and he quietly disappeared from the scene and moved away to Indore, leaving all his plans against the Rajputs and the Shah unexecuted. All efforts of Shuia-ud-Daulah and the English failed to keep him by their side and all their assurances of armed assistance fell flat upon him.

...........................
It is a fact that Maratha's power, morale and confidence was crushed in 1761 Battle, they never fully recovered from it and in the above case you can see that the grand Maratha-English-Awadh-Jat alliance against Abdali melted away due to due to psychological impact of 1761 battle on Marathas. Some Pakistanis underestimate the threat of Maratha empire and significance of their defeat in panipat battle. At the peak of their power, Marathas at one end had invaded and looted Bengal in 1747-51 and on another end , their army had reached near attock. Had they remained undefeated in 1761, they would have been masters of entire India including Punjab, Sindh, KPK and Balochistan. Marathas invaded Rohilkhand, Farrukhabad and other areas of Northren India in 1772 , only after death of Ahmad Shah Abdali and Najibu-daula, and East India company in alliance with Awadh invaded Rohilkhand in 1774........it seems death of Ahmad Shah Abdali had provided them a great chance.
 
.
@KingMamba
I don't know about Abdali but there certaimly wouldn't be Pakistan and Afghanistan without glorious Ghaznavi. Both these countries would still be pagan at this point if not for him.
 
.
@KingMamba
I don't know about Abdali but there certaimly wouldn't be Pakistan and Afghanistan without glorious Ghaznavi. Both these countries would still be pagan at this point if not for him.
Ghaznavis dislodged Hindu Shahis from Hindu Kush range and Trans-Indus area, making India vulnerable for all the subsequent invasions from central asia. One must see ruins of kafirkot in DI Khan and Bannu, the signs of destruction of Hindus by Mahmud Ghaznavi. If any nation has benefited the most from Mahmud Ghaznavi, it were Pashtuns or Afghans who were confined mostly to Sulieman mountains range but decline of Hindus in Kabulistan and frontier , provided them vast territories for colonization. So we Pashtuns owe a lot to Mahmud Ghaznavi. After loss of Peshawer and Kabul, the Punjab was bound to fall. Punjab was still mostly pagan during Ghazanvid period.

I give greater credit to Shahabudin ghauri, the founder of muslim power in northern India in real sense......Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti accompanied his army to ajmer and it seems his invasion opened the door for muslim preachers. I dont believe sufi preachers could have preached islam in India, without a muslim sultan sitting on throne of Delhi.
 
.
Ghaznavis dislodged Hindu Shahis from Hindu Kush range and Trans-Indus area, making India vulnerable for all the subsequent invasions from central asia. One must see ruins of kafirkot in DI Khan and Bannu, the signs of destruction of Hindus by Mahmud Ghaznavi. If any nation has benefited the most from Mahmud Ghaznavi, it were Pashtuns or Afghans who were confined mostly to Sulieman mountains range but decline of Hindus in Kabulistan and frontier , provided them vast territories for colonization. So we Pashtuns owe a lot to Mahmud Ghaznavi. After loss of Peshawer and Kabul, the Punjab was bound to fall. Punjab was still mostly pagan during Ghazanvid period.

I give greater credit to Shahabudin ghauri, the founder of muslim power in northern India in real sense......Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti accompanied his army to ajmer and it seems his invasion opened the door for muslim preachers. I dont believe sufi preachers could have preached islam in India, without a muslim sultan sitting on throne of Delhi.

I tagged you in another thread.

@KingMamba
I don't know about Abdali but there certaimly wouldn't be Pakistan and Afghanistan without glorious Ghaznavi. Both these countries would still be pagan at this point if not for him.

Islam was already spreading in Pakistani regions under the local Sindhi and Multani sultanates so there is a good chance that eventually most of present day Pakistan would have been Muslim but I definitively agree with @Samandri that their attacks opened up the road to Delhi and if they had not done so then perhaps Islamic preachers would not have reached deep into Bharat as they eventually did.
 
. .
I cant post in Senior cafe

Wow lol, anyway what are your thoughts?

KingMamba i am not permitted to post reply in Senior cafe due to lack of sufficient posts so i am sharing ani interesting part of history with you here in relevance with thread Ahmad Shah Durrani's place in Pakistani history

The excerpt is from Ganda Singh's book "Ahmad Shah Durrani", page-378

'By the beginning of January, 1767, the news of Ahmad Shah's arrival in the Panjab and of the probability of his march towards Hindustan had spread throughout the country. There was feverish activity both among the English and the Marathas. The Maratha chief Reghunath Rao made peace with Jawahir Singh, son of Suraj Mall, the Jat ruler of Bharatpur, and invited other chiefs of Hindustan, including the Nawab Wazir of Oudh, Shuja-ud-Daulah, to combine
against the Durrani invader. Raghunath Rao at the same time seems to have suggested to Shuja-ud-Daulah that the combined forces of the Marathas, Shuja-ud-Daulah and the English should escort Emperor Shah Alam to Delhi. Mr. Verelest saw no harm in Shuja-ud-Daulah's alliance with the Marathas, but he would not agree to lending any English force to escort the Emperor to Delhi. Writing on January 16, 1767, Verelest told Shuja-ud-Daulah that he did not "see harm in the interview [between Shujah-ud-Daulah and Raghunath Rao] which may even lead to more cordial relations with the Marathas. The question rests entirely with the addressee. If he and the Marathas conduct the King to Shahjahanabad, it is well; but the English forces cannot lend their assistance in such an expedition. ... As regards Shah Abdali, he may penetrate towards these parts as far as Shahjahanabad, but his progress will not extend further. Should he bend his march this way, all the English forces will unite with the addressee's and inflict upon him an utter defeat."

After his settlement with Jawahir Singh Jat, Raghunath Rao, it seems, had planned to pounce upon the Rajas of Jodhpur and Jaipur. He captured Bhilsa and marched to Kota.The Shah in the meantime seems to have heard about the impending coalition of the Marathas with Nawab Wazir of Oudh and the English, and of the intentions of Raghunath Rao against his faithful and devoted Rajput Rajas. He wrote from the Panjab a stern note of warning to Raghunath "threatening him with war and rapine, 'should he act contrary to the dictates" of the victor of Panipat. This unnerved the Maratha warrior and he quietly disappeared from the scene and moved away to Indore, leaving all his plans against the Rajputs and the Shah unexecuted. All efforts of Shuia-ud-Daulah and the English failed to keep him by their side and all their assurances of armed assistance fell flat upon him.

...........................
It is a fact that Maratha's power, morale and confidence was crushed in 1761 Battle, they never fully recovered from it and in the above case you can see that the grand Maratha-English-Awadh-Jat alliance against Abdali melted away due to due to psychological impact of 1761 battle on Marathas. Some Pakistanis underestimate the threat of Maratha empire and significance of their defeat in panipat battle. At the peak of their power, Marathas at one end had invaded and looted Bengal in 1747-51 and on another end , their army had reached near attock. Had they remained undefeated in 1761, they would have been masters of entire India including Punjab, Sindh, KPK and Balochistan. Marathas invaded Rohilkhand, Farrukhabad and other areas of Northren India in 1772 , only after death of Ahmad Shah Abdali and Najibu-daula, and East India company in alliance with Awadh invaded Rohilkhand in 1774........it seems death of Ahmad Shah Abdali had provided them a great chance.

My bad I just saw this.

@Samandri exactly my thoughts, which is exactly why I say Ahmad Shah deserves a much greater place in Pakistani history. Like I mentioned in my other thread Marathas had plans of a grand Hindu Empire all the way up to and into Afghanistan since the days of their first Peshwa. Had they won at Panipat they would have been no Muslim force left to stop them and they would have captured Rohilla, Oudh, and perhaps even Kabul proper. Another benefit of Ahmad Shah defeating them was that it killed off much of their top leadership and their future leaders were ineffective in comparison often time making dumb deals with the British that led to their own eventual defeat at their very hands. For example Marathas helped British general Wellington to defeat Tipu only for that same Wellington to then crush them lol.
 
.
Wow lol, anyway what are your thoughts?



My bad I just saw this.
If a Scholar of Shah waliullah caliber , invites Abdali to deal with Marathas, then it adds lot of weight to character and prestige of Abdali. When Nasir Khan Brahui of Kalat revolted against Abdali, and latter was bombing his fort in Kalat for days in siege, then a saint in the region told him that unnecessary blood of muslims is spilling in this battle, he should agree on a treaty with ruler of Kalat. Abdali immediately stopped the bombing, and signed a treaty with Nasir Khan basically granting him not just great deal of independence but also Quetta and Dhadar were given as gift to him. He was a God fearing man and listened to that sufi saint, such was the impact that we see Nasir Khan riding with him to Panipat with 1000 Baloch horsemen.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom