What's new

Remembering Bacha Khan's Message In Pakistan And Afghanistan

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aka123

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
2,050
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
United States
C2F18062-00AD-471F-BA91-CC439BE4CCF1_w640_r1_s.jpg

Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Bacha Khan) delivers a speech to followers at an undetermined location in India (image courtesy of the Bacha Khan Centre in Peshawar, Pakistan).

Followers of the nonviolent Pashtun movement known as Khudai Khidmatgar Movement (Servants of God) are marking 23 years since the death of their legendary leader, Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan. In addition to celebrations in Pakistan and Afghanistan, peace gatherings, discussions, and seminars are being held in Europe, United States, and the Middle East to pay tribute to a beloved leader who admirers say dedicated his life to social, political, economic, and cultural emancipation for Pashtuns.

These days, the region along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border garners international headlines mostly with images of war, destruction, and violence. From the rugged and mountainous Waziristan tribal region to the picturesque Swat Valley, the conflict between Pakistani security forces and Taliban militants has displaced millions of people, left thousands dead or wounded, and destroyed health and educational infrastructure in the region.

Many outside observers in the West do not know that peace-loving Pashtuns living in the violence-marred border regions once struggled under the banner of an epoch-making nonviolent movement. In the 1930s, Khan (1890-1988), also known as Bacha Khan (King Khan), launched his nonviolent movement to reform the stagnant Pashtun society and to mobilize Pashtuns to struggle for their rights against British imperial rule in the Indian subcontinent through peaceful agitation.

"Very rarely does the world see leaders who raise their society from the ignominious depths of ignorance and obscurity to the heights of enlightenment and glory. Abdul Ghaffar Khan was one of this rare breed of leaders," writes Sher Zaman Taizi, an eminent Pashtun scholar.

Himself the son of a feudal lord, Abdul Ghafar Khan advocated land reforms, equal economic opportunities, social justice, change through education, and peaceful coexistence of all communities irrespective of their ethnic and religious affiliations.


Despite high claims and yearning for lasting peace and stability in the region by the international community, the fact remains that we have failed to revive Bacha Khan’s philosophy of non-violence. The perpetrators of violence have seized the upper hand by popularizing characters like Mullah Omar and Baitullah Mehsud and marginalizing true heroic figures like Bacha Khan -- who is not very well known to the younger generations either inside or outside of the Pashtun heartlands.

"I was shocked at how we in the West know nothing about Bacha Khan," says Human Rights Watch's Peter Bouckaert. "We learned about Gandhi in school. Almost everybody in the United States and Europe has seen the movies about Gandhi and the role he played in the nonviolence movement and then as an inspiration for Martin Luther King and others."

Bouckaert tells RFE/RL's Radio Mashaal that he first learned about Bacha Khan in 2001, when, while sifting through some pictures in the home of a friend, he saw a photo of Gandhi standing next to a bearded man. His host then told him the story of Khan and his importance in the Pashtun community.

"As I learned more about Bacha Khan, I realized he was as important and as courageous a figure as Gandhi was," Bouckaert says. "He played an important role not only in the struggle for nonviolence, but also in the struggle against extremism."

Bacha Khan was a true visionary who believed that world peace is not possible without healthy debate on all outstanding issues between nations. He was a person who thought beyond the narrow interest of Pakistan, or India, or Afghanistan and pursued an agenda that sought to ensure peace in the region.


Khan paid a very high price for his activism. He spent almost half of his life in prison.

"I think if his message of peace and co-existence had been embraced by more people in the region, we would not be faced with the very difficult condition that we continue to see in Pakistan and Afghanistan," Bouckaert says.

Unlike in Pakistan, Bacha Khan is both well-known and looked upon with great respect in India, where he is known as "the Frontier Gandhi." The Indian government even bestowed two prestigious awards on Khan, the Jawaharlal Nehru Award for International Understanding in 1969, and the Bharat Ratna Award in 1987.

B.R. Singh, a former senior Indian civil servant, told RFE/RL of a visit by Gandhi to the frontier regions where he met with the leaders of Khan's Khudai Khidmatgar Movement.

"Gandhi asked them, 'What would you do if tomorrow Bacha Khan turns violent?' Now such was the impact that Bacha Khan had created, that they replied, 'We would remain nonviolent.'

"Certainly the Pashtuns had a reputation for violence, yet it is remarkable that Bacha Khan was able to bring about a peaceful transformation, and the Pashtun people followed him. He made them commit themselves to nonviolence," Singh recalls.

After struggling against social evils, superstition, and suppression for 70 years, Bacha Khan breathed his last at the age of 98 on January 20, 1988, at Lady Reading Hospital in Peshawar. Pashtuns -- indeed, all the people of the world -- would do well to recall Khan's message of nonviolence and peace. Today, we remember him.

-- Shaheen Buneri


Remembering Bacha Khan's Message In Pakistan And Afghanistan
 
Pakistani Pashtoons remembered Bacha Khan by obliterating ANP party in 2013 elections. Bacha Khan's son Wali Khan formed ANP in 1986 and these people have been totally rejected by Pashtoon People. They have no relevance in Present day Pakistan and are only remembered by Indians because Bacha Khan was a Gandhi Stooge.
 
Pakistani Pashtoons remembered Bacha Khan by obliterating ANP party in 2013 elections. Bacha Khan's son Wali Khan formed ANP in 1986 and these people have been totally rejected by Pashtoon People. They have no relevance in Present day Pakistan and are only remembered by Indians because Bacha Khan was a Gandhi Stooge.

Don't know if he was a Gandhi stooge or not and maybe he's looked down in Pakistan, but he's remembered in India, with respect. Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan was also covered considerably in our History books in India.
 
Don't know if he was a Gandhi stooge or not and maybe he's looked down upon in Pakistan, but he's remembered in India, with respect. Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan was also covered considerably in our History books in India.



Of Course he was well respected in India. Anyone who opposed the creation of Pakistan was well respected and well covered in Indian History text books including Maulana Azad, Bacha Khan and many others. They were well respected in India NOT because Indians thought of them highly but because they opposed creation of Pakistan and that made them heroes in Indian eyes.

I think anyone who is despised by his own people but praised by the enemy of country they hail from is sad history of a TRAITOR.
 
Of Course he was well respected in India. Anyone who opposed the creation of Pakistan was well respected and well covered in Indian History text books including Maulana Azad, Bacha Khan and many others.

I think anyone who is despised by his own people but praised by the enemy of country they hail from is sad history of a TRAITOR.

Well, yes Maulana Azad was also covered considerably in our History. Both were born in British India and not present day India/Pakistan. The fact of the matter is Maulana was always Indian, hence part of our History and Abdul Ghaffar Khan was pro India, hence huge respect was showered on him, from India.

PS - Maulana Azad was born in Mecca and not India, but he was brought up and spent rest of his life in India.
 
Indira Gandhi had offered him the Presidency of India. Badshah Khan traveled around the country and came back to reject the offer. He told Indira that he could not find anywhere the India he had followed Gandhi to establish. His courage of conviction and staunch adherence to principles is rare to find among SA leaders except Jinnah himself. Unfortunately both held differing ideologies.
 
Well, yes Maulana Azad was also covered considerably in our History. Both were born in British India and not present day India/Pakistan. The fact of the matter is Maulana was always Indian, hence part of our History and Abdul Ghaffar Khan was pro India, hence huge respect was showered on him, from India.

PS - Maulana Azad was born in Mecca and not India, but he was brought up and spent rest of his life in India.



Born in British India has no relevance in this debate as every Indian Muslim in that era was born in British India. My Parents were born in India and so were everyone else's Parents or Grandparents.

Pakistan did not exist prior to 1947 so I don't see the relevance of BORN IN INDIA comment.
 
Born in British India has no relevance in this debate as every Indian Muslim in that era was born in British India. My Parents were born in India and so were everyones Parents of Grandparents.

Pakistan did not exist prior to 1947 so I don't see the relevance of BORN IN INDIA comment.

Of Course he was well respected in India. Anyone who opposed the creation of Pakistan was well respected and well covered in Indian History text books including Maulana Azad, Bacha Khan and many others.

I think anyone who is despised by his own people but praised by the enemy of country they hail from is sad history of a TRAITOR.


I said that only because of the above ....... Maulana Azad was always an Indian and they were born in British India, there was no separate, this country - that country during their era.

You as a Pakistani, might call them traitor as they opposed partition, but we as Indians don't feel that way (though current generation Indian youths also feel, partition occurred for a better cause similar to the views of their Pakistani counterparts).
 
Bacha Khan is history. Let him stay there.

For me the ultimate test of his loyalty was his wish to be buried in Afghanistan that was under occupation of USSR troops, and not Pakistan. The reason he gave was that Pakistan was occupied and Afghanistan was 'free'. He and his party continued to receive financial support from India. That is why ANP were at one point considered to be traitors. It was PML's (much criticized) policy of inclusion that brought them into national mainstream. ANP pays lip service to Bacha Khan, but times have changed. Today, educated Pakistanis like myself do not consider him a principled person, but more as a crank who could not accept the decision of his people to opt for Pakistan.
 
To all Indians and Pakistanis, our view points might not match, but that's were a debate and discussion comes up. But that doesn't mean we have to start ugly and inflammatory posts. Rather we can counter and cross counter each others arguments(without abuses).

I find it amazing here, a long discussion is only that discussion which have a bunch of abusive and derogatory posts. The threads which are devoid of that, goes dead!
 
Bacha Khan had some good things about him and some bad things. He stood against the partition and wanted to buried in Afghanistan instead of his home town of charsadda... that was bad. His advocacy of peaceful means was admirable though though his son Ghani Khan did operate a militia to "protect the Khudai Khidmatgars."
 
Bacha Khan had some good things about him and some bad things. He stood against the partition and wanted to buried in Afghanistan instead of his home town of charsadda... that was bad. His advocacy of peaceful means was admirable though though his son Ghani Khan did operate a militia to "protect the Khudai Khidmatgars."

Is jalalabad land of kafirs? Do chinese live on other side of durand line?.....Is any shinwari or mohamand of pakistan is traitor who is buried in mohamand or shinwari territory of afghanistan per his wish?.........
 
You can tell how much Pakistani pushtuns love Bacha Khan by looking at KP elections results 2013.
 
Remembering Bacha Khan and voting for a party which his son created is not the same. Example - Indians will always remember Mahatma Gandhi, but that doesn't mean it's necessary that they will always vote for Congress now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom