What's new

Plans are in motion to Impose Emergency in Country after provoking Imran Khan - Adeel Habib

Ghazwa-e-Hind

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Messages
4,192
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Words directly from SiasatPK founder:

AS guys, I just went through the content on the forum, and there are tons of comments about why Khan isn't doing enough. I spoke to a few who are close to Khan, and according to them, they're looking to impose an emergency in the country because there is no other way out for them. They can not afford to have Khan back in power as he is too powerful right now.


 
.
Bajwa wants people to go crazy so he can impose martial law.

IK isn’t stupid enough to get baited by Bajwa. Unfortunately, awam is not understanding this.

When it comes to badmashi nobody can outdo Army, so IK needs to go about things the right way politically.

Keep giving Bajwa enough rope to hang himself with.
 
Last edited:
. .
Bajwa wants people to go crazy so he can impose martial law.

IK isn’t stupid enough to get baited by Bajwa. Unfortunately, awam is not understanding this.

When it comes to badmashi nobody can outdo Army, so IK needs to go about things the right way politically.

Keeping giving Bajwa enough rope to hang himself with.
IK had a small window right after he was ousted when the people came out spontaneously in his support.

Unfortunately, IK has had a pretty pathetic sense of timing and political instinct.

Now it's too late and he's turned into a caricature of Muneer Niazi's "Humaisha Dair Kar Dayta Hoon"

IMO, the best scenario for IK will be sidelined from politics for life and worst being Morsi's fate. So far it's the former being the most likely, but if IK tries to take the bull/Army by the horn he may very well end up with the latter scenario.
 
.
I think Army is bringing TTP back, maybe there is some behind doors deal between Army and TTP, they will use TTP to target politicians and so Army can impose Martial law, Bajwa and co has gone full retard.
 
.
I think Army is bringing TTP back, maybe there is some behind doors deal between Army and TTP, they will use TTP to target politicians and so Army can impose Martial law, Bajwa and co has gone full retard.


I agree. I would not be surprised if Bajwa has also made overtures to India with respect to Kashmir.
 
Last edited:
.
One easy way for the Pakistani Establishment is to impose Martial Law and Bajwa the Boss is to really murder Imran Khan by blowing him away... Like they did in the past.

I do not think there really would be any reaction by the public... Because most of Imran Khan supported are educated professionals that are too civilized. They can easily by subdued by imposing a curfew for a few weeks.

The the Army will just need to create a few SSG hit squads and murder all the supporters in their houses. They can take out all the leadership of PTI and rest of them will fall inline. A few bombing sorties of collages and university will take care of the youth that support PTI.


The Establishment really cannot allow this crisis of imported government being questioned and exposing their hand in all of this. The Pakistan Army will need to do in Pakistan what Indian Army has done in Kashmir.


That is really honestly the only way to get control and put fear into the hearts of everyone.

That was their plan. But unfortunately there were too many supporters of Imran Khan so they couldn't carry this out. They will I think just wait for the right opportunity
 
.
IK had a small window right after he was ousted when the people came out spontaneously in his support.

Unfortunately, IK has had a pretty pathetic sense of timing and political instinct.

Now it's too late and he's turned into a caricature of Muneer Niazi's "Humaisha Dair Kar Dayta Hoon"

IMO, the best scenario for IK will be sidelined from politics for life and worst being Morsi's fate. So far it's the former being the most likely, but if IK tries to take the bull/Army by the horn he may very well end up with the latter scenario.
Depends
I thought he was right
People in Pakistan are too docile.
They aren't the types like afghans or Persians or Turks.

Hence why British ruled us but not them.

Bhutto failed with much larger support base..IK wouldn't have been successful

But zardari won against mushi so did benazir against Zia through a political struggle
 
. .
Depends
I thought he was right
People in Pakistan are too docile.
They aren't the types like afghans or Persians or Turks.

Hence why British ruled us but not them.

Bhutto failed with much larger support base..IK wouldn't have been successful

But zardari won against mushi so did benazir against Zia through a political struggle

Afghans, Turks, Persians have never faced haramis of this caliber. Afghans still bow down to Pakistani establishment... :lol:

What are you on about?
 
.
Depends
I thought he was right
People in Pakistan are too docile.
They aren't the types like afghans or Persians or Turks.

Hence why British ruled us but not them.

Bhutto failed with much larger support base..IK wouldn't have been successful

But zardari won against mushi so did benazir against Zia through a political struggle
Mushi's hands were tied by international establishment/colonial masters to accommodate their favorite colonial pet BB, whereas Zia was a benevolent dictator, had he been even half as ruthless as Mushi or Bajra, he'd still be ruling Pakistan.

And Bhutto didn't have wide spread support, he was reviled by Islamists and in those days Islamist controlled a big chuck of electorate. Nor did he have many fans amongst the Pukhtun or Baloch nationalists. His support base mainly stemmed from his connections in the establishment, whom he shamelessly partnered with to deny Mujib/Awami League their rightful place as duly elected representatives of the people to be heading the gov't.

I see IK to be a more broader and organic representative of the masses in direct conflict with the established order whereas Bhutto was brought forth by the establishment to save face after their '71 debacle.

Afghans, Turks, Persians have never faced haramis of this caliber. Afghans still bow down to Pakistani establishment... :lol:

What are you on about?
Indeed our hindu legacy lives on...we will never resist foreign invaders not even their local collaborators.
 
.
Mir Bajwa also has limitations, personal, institutional, as well as of circumstances. Things are not going 100%, as was his desire.
 
.
I agree. I would not be surprised if Bajwa has also made overtures to India with respect to Kashmir.
He made compromises on almost everything, Kashmir is long gone and buried. Army don't care, Pakistani's don't care and Indians are now too powerful to give up Kashmir as well, to get Kashmir back one needs a miracle and seeing the corrupt nation of Pakistan, I doubt Allah SWT would do any.
 
.
Mushi's hands were tied by international establishment/colonial masters to accommodate their favorite colonial pet BB, whereas Zia was a benevolent dictator, had he been even half as ruthless as Mushi or Bajra, he'd still be ruling Pakistan.

And Bhutto didn't have wide spread support, he was reviled by Islamists and in those days Islamist controlled a big chuck of electorate. Nor did he have many fans amongst the Pukhtun or Baloch nationalists. His support base mainly stemmed from his connections in the establishment, whom he shamelessly partnered with to deny Mujib/Awami League their rightful place as duly elected representatives of the people to be heading the gov't.

I see IK to be a more broader and organic representative of the masses in direct conflict with the established order whereas Bhutto was brought forth by the establishment to save face after their '71 debacle.


Indeed our hindu legacy lives on...we will never resist foreign invaders not even their local collaborators.
IK till recently had no support in heart of pakistan i.e punjab

Neither he is known outside balochistan
 
.

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom