What's new

Photo proves F-35 has bigger RCS than F-16.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
28,401
Reaction score
-82
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
You can see F-35 has much larger rear flaps and canopy. Bigger surface area overall. And having 2 tails instead of 1 does not help either.

imagesvc-timeincapp-com-jpg.520448
 
. . .
do you even know what an RCS is? It stands for radar cross-section..so it has nothing to do with how an airplane appears in a photo. @pakistanipower samjhao issko

RCS depends on angles of deflection and surface area. From the photo we can compare RCS between 2 planes.
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
Yes, I do......

And I believe many people here would agrees with me...

Science is not based on consent. Galileo beat the crap out of thousands of scientists over thousands of years when he dropped 2 balls from a tower.
 
.
F22 is bigger than them both and has proven itself (and it's stealth features) in countless international military exercises. Don't count size alone or number of tails.

And please - when you open up a new thread to make a point, add something of substance! Give proof to back up the claims you are making or else the other members will only mock you.

For example - you may be right here. But give proof that the larger flaps or two tails make the F35 non stealth. Give us something to take your point seriously.
 
.
F22 is bigger than them both and has proven itself (and it's stealth features) in countless international military exercises.

Yeah. How about bring it to France or Germany or Russia or China and see how it proves itself. They don't dare because it don't work.

F22 is bigger than them both and has proven itself (and it's stealth features) in countless international military exercises. Don't count size alone or number of tails.

And please - when you open up a new thread to make a point, add something of substance! Give proof to back up the claims you are making or else the other members will only mock you.

For example - you may be right here. But give proof that the larger flaps or two tails make the F35 non stealth. Give us something to take your point seriously.

You don't need to be a rocket scientist to judge RCS. There are only 2 factors determine RCS. Surface area and angles. F-35 has lots of surface area, very little angles, so bigger RCS than F-16. This anyone can see.
 
.
Yeah. How about bring it to France or Germany or Russia or China and see how it proves itself. They don't dare because it don't work.



You don't need to be a rocket scientist to judge RCS. There are only 2 factors determine RCS. Surface area and angles. F-35 has lots of surface area, very little angles, so bigger RCS than F-16. This anyone can see.
YOU WIN MY FRIEND
 
.
Do you think I'm stupid or something?
No, mate I don't think you're stupid. But you're a funny little boy who thinks about subject about which you do not have enough knowledge.

Yes, I do......

And I believe many people here would agrees with me...
I don't know about others but some of his posts make me laugh so loudly that people get scared
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom