What's new

Pakistan’s amazing shrinking private sector

roach

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Found this article on HT blogs. Is there any truth in this? If so, it is an alarming sign.

Pakistan’s amazing shrinking private sector

I am a stolid believer that, in the long run, it is the health of a country’s private sector that will decide how well that country will do in the coming years. It is arguably the strongest reason why India may yet prove an economic challenge to China. This idea is propagated by people like Yasheng Huang at MIT and Tarun Khanna at Harvard Business School.

When I visited Pakistan to cover the foreign ministers’ fiasco meeting, I took some time off to buy some tomes on the Pakistan economy. The bookshop proprietor was surprised, saying, “No one in Pakistan reads about the economy any more.”

While Pakistan’s economy is in rude health, thanks in part to remittances and foreign aid handouts, the story is less rosy-tinted for the country’s private sector. And, in the long run, that is what will matter when it comes to the country’s ability to produce jobs, generate growth and be globally competitive.

A couple of statistically significant pointers about the state of corporate Pakistan.

One, gross fixed capital formation by the private sector is a descending curve. This key sign of confidence in the future of an economy, GFCF in the private sector in 2009-10 was less than what it was in 2007 and almost the same as what GFCF was in 2005. That was in absolute terms, as a percentage of GDP the figures looks even worse.

Two, there is a startling trend of de-corporatization in Pakistan. In other words, firms preferring to get out of the stockmarket and the formal sector because of bad regulations or poor economic environment. In 1995, Pakistan had 13 manufacturing firms with a paid up capital over Rs 500 million. In 2009, this figure was down to only two. In 1990 there were 58 manufacturing companies with paid up capital between Rs 50 and Rs 500 million. The number in 2009: four.

Only small sector industries saw their numbers keep rising. But as the Pakistan Economic Survey of 2009, points out this effectively means these firms are giving up on trying to scale themselves larger. The State Bank of Pakistan figures show this to be the case: new capital raised and issued in the economy went from Rs 123.7 billion in 2004-05 to Rs 101.4 billion in 2008-09. Bank credit disbursement as a percentage of GDP has gone off a cliff: 6.7% of GDP in 2004-05 and 0.14 in 2008-09.

Three, this should manifest itself in stagnant corporate profits. Look elsewhere and this is confirmed. The Karachi Stock Exchange did an analysis showing that the corporate profits of its listed firms peaked in 2006 at about 375 billion Pakistani rupees and fell to Rs 250 billion by 2009. The number of loss-making firms in such mainstays of the economy as textiles and finance outnumber those that made a profit in 2008-09.

Small scale sector remains marvelously active. GFCF in this sector between 2005 and 2009 has more than doubled. And firms with a paid up capital of less than Rs 50 million have gone from 568 in 2005 to 680 in 2009. Combined with the above data and you have a remarkable story of non-dynamism in the corporate sector.

In effect, Pakistan’s private sector is moving on a path opposite to what you would expect in a thriving economy. Pakistani firms are shrinking, avoiding raising capital, moving out of the formal and into the informal sector, and otherwise declining to do what you would expect a private sector to do. Not, as they would say, a good sign.

Pakistan’s amazing shrinking private sector : Foreign Hand
 
Interesting article. I am tempted to think that the internal security scenario has a lot to do with the declining corporate profits. The de-listing of companies is a very alarming sign.

What would be interesting to see is similar metrics for the growth years under Musharraf. Was the private sector in decline during those years as well?
 
I think that it has more to do with the security scenario than anything else-and yes, I'm sure it was better under Musharraf. Strange how everyone wants him back after how he was unceremoniously shown the door.
 
well indians as usual have a field day!!! and jump around with joy!

BUT THEY FORGET that from 2008-2010 there is severe world wide recession!! i think similar survey done in UK,USA,JAPAN etc would show similar results!!! so this is another doomsday scenario which actually is a world wide phenomenon!!!
 
well indians as usual have a field day!!! and jump around with joy!

BUT THEY FORGET that from 2008-2010 there is severe world wide recession!! i think similar survey done in UK,USA,JAPAN etc would show similar results!!! so this is another doomsday scenario which actually is a world wide phenomenon!!!

Well, no. Contrary to what you think, IMHO if Pakistan does well economically it would be good for South Asia. The better you do, the more you have to lose from foolhardy military adventures.
 
Private sectors needs to take a leaf out of China on how it deals with them.

Chinese law does not consider a unit with a single industrial or commercial proprietor employing eight or less workers as an enterprise, and leaves such units out of the category of private enterprises. Units deemed to be privately owned enterprises are one of eight categories of domestically funded enterprises along with state-owned enterprises, collectively owned enterprises, cooperative enterprises, joint-ownership enterprises, limited liability enterprises, shareholding enterprises, and other enterprises.

Besides these, there are foreign-funded enterprises, including those funded from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Reform has meant that in almost all these categories, private stakeholders have been accommodated to differing degrees. But none of them can be considered as being fully private, inasmuch as some of these enterprises still only have a minority private stake. Even foreign-funded enterprises need not be privately controlled, since foreign-funded shareholding corporations require only a minimum 25 per cent foreign capital contribution to registered capital.


This rapid rise of the private sector implies that it is not just the result of private firms accounting for a disproportionate share of the increase in domestic and export markets. The private sector is displacing the collective state-owned sectors in pre-existing markets as well, partly as a result of the conversion of these units into private-controlled entities and partly as a result of their closure.


Further, the state share in aggregate fixed capital formation remains high, making it the prime driver of growth.
 
I think that it has more to do with the security scenario than anything else-and yes, I'm sure it was better under Musharraf. Strange how everyone wants him back after how he was unceremoniously shown the door.

Yes, we badly want him back. Pakistanis really wants to get rid of Zardari and Nawaz. Both ruined Pakistan. Specially, God punishing the Pakistani people for intentional mistake of electing the thieve in the office. Pakistani people and voters are paying the price of their feudal lover affair and branded parties loyalty. But hope this should be end of PPP and complete close of this dark chapter of Pakistan history.
Both leaders and their cronies own wheat and sugar mill and now look at price from 2007. After Musharraf left they just increase price like crazy. A poor man is not more then a thirsty dog who is looking for shade. Ruthless people....don't know what they will do with that much wealth.
Thank God media is free, we see the real faces.
 
Yes, we badly want him back. Pakistanis really wants to get rid of Zardari and Nawaz. Both ruined Pakistan. Specially, God punishing the Pakistani people for intentional mistake of electing the thieve in the office. Pakistani people and voters are paying the price of their feudal lover affair and branded parties loyalty. But hope this should be end of PPP and complete close of this dark chapter of Pakistan history.
Both leaders and their cronies own wheat and sugar mill and now look at price from 2007. After Musharraf left they just increase price like crazy. A poor man is not more then a thirsty dog who is looking for shade. Ruthless people....don't know what they will do with that much wealth.
Thank God media is free, we see the real faces.

What is the current political status of Pakistan? Are you guys going to elect Musharraf back to office?:undecided:
 
What is the current political status of Pakistan? Are you guys going to elect Musharraf back to office?:undecided:

what u expect where more then 70 percent population lives in villages. They will re elect the feudal lords again.
 
Yes, we badly want him back. Pakistanis really wants to get rid of Zardari and Nawaz. Both ruined Pakistan. Specially, God punishing the Pakistani people for intentional mistake of electing the thieve in the office. Pakistani people and voters are paying the price of their feudal lover affair and branded parties loyalty. But hope this should be end of PPP and complete close of this dark chapter of Pakistan history.
Both leaders and their cronies own wheat and sugar mill and now look at price from 2007. After Musharraf left they just increase price like crazy. A poor man is not more then a thirsty dog who is looking for shade. Ruthless people....don't know what they will do with that much wealth.
Thank God media is free, we see the real faces.

That is a huge plus, also the judiciary is quite independent if I am not wrong.

Rich expatriate Pakistanis should take the bull by the horns and come back to Pakistan, bringing capital and starting new ventures.
 
what u expect where more then 70 percent population lives in villages. They will re elect the feudal lords again.

so what u want to say those 70% r delusional and fools,they dont know what is good for them
 
so what u want to say those 70% r delusional and fools,they dont know what is good for them

Not delusional fools, but uneducated and poor- like a large part of our own electorate who vote for people who promise to give free TVs to everyone.
 
well indians as usual have a field day!!! and jump around with joy!

BUT THEY FORGET that from 2008-2010 there is severe world wide recession!! i think similar survey done in UK,USA,JAPAN etc would show similar results!!! so this is another doomsday scenario which actually is a world wide phenomenon!!!
:what::what:

What Pakistan has to do with recession???:azn:
 
:what::what:

What Pakistan has to do with recession???:azn:
Recession ? our present politicians only know the word commission not recession. Those who understand the word recession they quit job. Zaradari hand picked finance minster quit job every two or three months. Obviously Zardari is ruining the State Bank fast as possible. Every single channel in Pakistan makes fun of this president ,, call him a beggar who just made foreign trips to beg money. We never seen such type of president in life. He is the biggest failure, he is only good for local politics, like member for local bodies. Person is not aware of international norms.Luckly he is president otherwise Benazir was already separated from this guy. And when she came Pakistan, she strictly instructed him just stay in Dubai and not to interfere in party politics.
 

Back
Top Bottom