What's new

Pakistan vs india missile symbolism

Status
Not open for further replies.

New Recruit

Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Pakistan's missile symbolism

By Zaffar Abbas
BBC correspondent in Islamabad

Pakistani officials say the successful test-firing of three of its surface-to-surface missiles in the last few days has confirmed the country's capability to strike deep inside enemy territory in the event of a war.

Interestingly, these tests have not only demonstrated the effectiveness of Pakistan's missile technology; the names given to these missiles are full of symbolism.

They suggest that Pakistan relates the present conflict in South Asia to the conflicts of the mediaeval period when Muslim warriors from Afghanistan frequently invaded India.

Ghauri, Ghaznavi, Abdali - these are the three ballistic missiles Pakistan test-fired in the last week.

But these are also names of three prominent Muslim warlords, or conquerors, who invaded India from Afghanistan between the 11th and 18th centuries in an attempt to expand their empires.

Historical histrionics

The medium-range Ghauri missile is Pakistan's answer to India's Prithvi missile, and here the symbolism is perhaps most interesting.

Muhammad Ghauri was a powerful Afghan warlord who in the 12th century had two fierce battles with the Hindu ruler of northern India, Prithviraj Chouhan.

Ghauri was defeated in the first battle and later on, he returned with a bigger army to achieve a convincing victory.

Although India insists that the name Prithvi given to its missile means "earth" and has nothing to do with any Hindu ruler of the past, Pakistan wants the world to believe otherwise.

Battle fetish

The other two missiles Pakistan tested during the week are also named after 11th and 18th-century Afghan conquerors, Mehmood Ghaznavi and Ahmed Shah Abdali.

Ghaznavi is described in history books as a temple-destroyer who attacked India 17 times.

Pakistan has never given any specific reason for naming these missiles after such historical figures.

But the symbolism is a clear reflection of the official mindset in the country.

It shows that for Islamabad, the present conflict with India is a continuation of the battles of the past between people described in Pakistani history books as just Muslim invaders and several of India's cruel Hindu emperors.
 
and the point of this thread is?
by the way where is the link?
 
Well here is a bit of info..if u know history....All these Afghan conquerors were Pushtun...except Ghaznavi ( who was half Turk and half Pushtun)....today Pakistan has 28 million Pushtuns while Afghanistan has only 12 million Pushtuns...thus its legitimate for Pakistan to use their names..no matter what Afghanistan thinks !!!
 
Well here is a bit of info..if u know history....All these Afghan conquerors were Pushtun...except Ghaznavi ( who was half Turk and half Pushtun)....today Pakistan has 28 million Pushtuns while Afghanistan has only 12 million Pushtuns...thus its legitimate for Pakistan to use their names..no matter what Afghanistan thinks !!!

Even many claim that the Great Ahmed Shah Durrani was born in Multan.... :woot:
 
Well here is a bit of info..if u know history....All these Afghan conquerors were Pushtun...except Ghaznavi ( who was half Turk and half Pushtun)....today Pakistan has 28 million Pushtuns while Afghanistan has only 12 million Pushtuns...thus its legitimate for Pakistan to use their names..no matter what Afghanistan thinks !!!

There is a reason why the synonym of Pashtun is Afghan and not Pakistani. Anyway if you are confortable with it no worries.
 
Well here is a bit of info..if u know history....All these Afghan conquerors were Pushtun...except Ghaznavi ( who was half Turk and half Pushtun)....today Pakistan has 28 million Pushtuns while Afghanistan has only 12 million Pushtuns...thus its legitimate for Pakistan to use their names..no matter what Afghanistan thinks !!!

It's really not about any specific ethnicity, if you look at the names given to our Missiles, they represent Muslim history in general, not some specific nation or ethnicity, like Babur, Ra'ad, Nas'r etc, you'll find Arab touch as well lol so basically it's about Islamic history more than the anything else.
 
There is a reason why the synonym of Pashtun is Afghan and not Pakistani. Anyway if you are confortable with it no worries.

Pakistan is a very diverse country. We DONT have ONE ethnics, culture, religion, sects, languages etc but in fact many.
You can argue whatever you want but as long as you're an Indian, you won't know our real history or know our people. Heck even wikipedia (anyones site to edit) won't help. There is no need for you to argue with us. If we are talking about Missile names you should tell us how many Hindu and non-Hindu names are there and what they are named after? Please educate us with your information then teaching us are own.... Thank You....
 
Well here is a bit of info..if u know history....All these Afghan conquerors were Pushtun...except Ghaznavi ( who was half Turk and half Pushtun)....today Pakistan has 28 million Pushtuns while Afghanistan has only 12 million Pushtuns...thus its legitimate for Pakistan to use their names..no matter what Afghanistan thinks !!!

And Pakistan found no one from 91 mln Punjabis to name her missiles? your post makes no sense!

All I think is that those rulers were anti Hindu/India in their respective eras that's why these missiles have the names of Afghan rulers in Pakistan.
 
next should be Hafiz Saeed, Zaid Hamid, etc..
 
And Pakistan found no one from 91 mln Punjabis to name her missiles? your post makes no sense!

All I think is that those rulers were anti Hindu/India in their respective eras that's why these missiles have the names of Afghan rulers in Pakistan.


They where Muslim that counts for us and Pakistan was not there when they where you not capable to build a missile so stop wining about it and move on bro

there is Tipu ICBM in devlopment
 
They recognised themselves with the afghan invaders ..so nothing surprising here ..let them relive victory of their role models ..who cares ?
 
They where Muslim that counts for us and Pakistan was not there when they where you not capable to build a missile so stop wining about it and move on bro

there is Tipu ICBM in devlopment

In that case you should name a missile 'Ghani' (Ghani Khan); he was the greatest among all of them :)
 
They where Muslim that counts for us and Pakistan was not there when they where you not capable to build a missile so stop wining about it and move on bro

there is Tipu ICBM in devlopment
ICBM named on Tipu :cheesy:
What next, will Pakistan name her next missile on some well-known King from Indonesia or Kazakhstan or Bosnia.:rofl::rofl:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom