'Pak agrees to give S Arabia N-bomb'

[Janbaz]

Our monitoring desk
THE India-Israel nexus is again active in putting Pakistan in trouble by accusing the Islamic Republic of nuclear proliferation which is evident from the news carried by an Israeli website and later highlighted by an Indian newspaper.
The news was first carried by an Israeli website Debka.com and lifted by leading Indian newspaper Hindustan Times.
The Israeli site claimed that Pakistan had agreed to provide Saudi Arabia nuclear weapons and missiles last month.
The website stated Musharraf and Saudi King Abdullah concluded an agreement with ‘seven secret clauses’ on January 21, during his visit to Saudi Arabia.
Pakistan agreed to provide an atomic deterrent in the event of ‘a nuclear emergency’. The transfer of control would also occur in case Iran threatened the Persian Gulf Emirates, Egypt or Jordan, the site claims.
According to intelligence sources, the agreement is impossible to confirm, however, it is a logical extension of a long-standing Saudi-Pakistan nuclear understanding. The goal: ensure a nuclear Iran does not dominate the Gulf, the site claims.
Retired senior Indian officials believe the Saudis have financed Pakistan’s nuclear programme through shipments of cheap petrol since the 90s. In return, Pakistan was to provide a nuclear weapon on request. However, it is uncertain how the exchange will occur. While, Indian intelligence believes a number of missiles will be designated as Saudi, but physically remain in Pakistan with Riyadh controlling the launch button, others differ. A Pentagon nuclear consultant said: “Saudis would have to develop a system of ground-tracking stations and satellites. This would be too much trouble and attract too much attention.” But John Pike, head of globalsecurity.org, said a large airplane could easily move warheads. The implications of such a nexus for India would be negative, added the Pentagon advisor.

The Nation.
http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/feb-2007/19/index3.php

 

[kidwaibhai]

i thought v already have an understanding with KSA that if anyone attacks it v will attack them isnt that y v have 15000 troops there
i might be wrong abt the number but i am sure v have troops there

 

[alamgir]

nothing new several time israeli and indian media crying that saudi, pak.relations are dangurios for iran

 

[EagleEyes]

Why would Iran attack Saudis? I still have to figure out what is going on in that arena.

 

[Awesome]

They are all chumming up to one another. Since the west has adopted the "We can attack anyone of you Muslims, beware!" attitude. I don't think we'd ever just give one to them. But yeah they do definitely fall under our nuclear umbrella of safety.

 

[Adux]

Asim,

You have been in forums way too long to take this report seriously, DDM in Pakistani version

 

[Cheetah786]

Why would Iran attack Saudis? I still have to figure out what is going on in that arena.

simple DIVIDE AND RULE.

 

[kidwaibhai]

i think this whole thing is perpetuated by the US to contain iran
i personally believe tht v should stay out of it this is a ARAB PERSIAN thing and v should not get involved

 

[EagleEyes]

simple DIVIDE AND RULE.

I see, but any information on what events are leading to this division in relationship between two countries?

i think this whole thing is perpetuated by the US to contain iran
i personally believe tht v should stay out of it this is a ARAB PERSIAN thing and v should not get involved

Not a good idea. Pakistan must act as a peace inforcer, and Musharraf has been doing it. It was sad to see Iran-Iraq fight while the whole Muslim world slept.

 

[Averroes]

The Iran - Iraq war did not occur while the Muslim world slept, it occured with the entire Muslim world rulers, apart from Syria, supplying the tyrant saddam with weapons from the US.

I echo brother Cheetah's statement. We can break it down to difference levels, but eventually all the facts lead back to US wanting to divide us. Every step taken by them, every action that causes drift in the Ummah leads ultimately back to Zionist aims.

Saudi arabia, a country named after a family, has always been a launching pad of US interests will always pursue goals that benefit their Masters.

 

[EagleEyes]

I believe Pakistan should have stepped up, and possibly could have done a little more.

 

[kidwaibhai]

I believe Pakistan should have stepped up, and possibly could have done a little more.

i dont know what pakistan could have done saddam never liked us and i dont believe v had gr8 relations with IRAN