What's new

Once upon a time in Umerkot ( Amarkot)

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
I have intentionally added the original name to the title as its current name twists its history.

54b82e548ba03.jpg

Whitewash appears to have been used to erase the graffiti, mostly political slogans, written on the walls of the entrance to the fort in Umerkot.

The boundary wall is damaged in many parts. The signboards that should give information to visitors have faded in the sun. The staircase leading to the top of a watchtower has many missing steps.

This is the fort of Umerkot or, as it was once called, Amarkot. Not only has its history been ‘Islamised’ by overlooking its original builder, Amar Singh, who used to rule this region, the heritage site is also facing slow extinction.

Locals here will tell you the famous story of Umer-Marvi — a local Romeo and Juliet folklore — and how Marvi was kept at this fort, built by Umer Soomro who once ruled Sindh.

Vikram Singh, who is from the Sodha family, a sub-tribe of the Rajputs who settled in Umerkot in the 11th century, calls the official history of the fort, inscribed on signboards around the place, “a bunch of lies”. Pointing to the fort, he slams the government for not “giving credit to our ancestors for building this”.

Vikram, who shows us around the fort that he insists once belonged to his ancestors, laments the current state of affairs in this part of Sindh which borders India and is called the gateway to the Thar desert.

“Rana Rattan Singh, one of our ancestors, was hanged by the British at this very fort for standing up for the rights of the Sindhis, but there is no mention of him anywhere,” Vikram points out as he shows us the place where the execution took place.

Just a few kilometres from the fort is the birthplace of Mughal emperor Akbar. Humayun was given refuge by Vikram’s ancestors when he was on the run after Sher Shah Suri overthrew him.

“We gave protection to many Muslims seeking refuge, and the person who went on to become one of the greatest rulers of the region was born here. Yet today, the Hindus in this region are on the run,” Vikram remarks.

Vikram’s first-cousin, Hamir Singh, is the present Rana of what was once the kingdom of Amarkot.

At his ancestral home built over a 100 years ago on the outskirts of Umerkot, Hamir Singh is surrounded by villagers. Many are wearing colourful turbans and they have come to pay their respect to the Rana.

Hamir’s grandfather, Rana Arjun Singh, had opted for Pakistan at the time of the partition of the subcontinent. The family says their historical roots in Sindh made Rana Arjun Singh choose Pakistan over India. “He loved Sindh and did not join Congress even though Nehru had personally approached him,” Hamir tells us.

But now the family appears to regret that decision.

“This area used to have a Hindu majority,” Vikram explains. “But migration has been on the rise.” He mentions the persecution of the Hindu community, religious intolerance, and the government’s lack of interest in improving inter-faith harmony for Hindus, especially the trading community, as factors making them want to leave. “Many of them are now settled in India,” Vikram says.

Most households have strong connections with India as the Hindus here tend not to marry within their community and try to find a bride or a groom across the border. Currently, the population of Umerkot is estimated to be equally divided between Hindus and Muslims. At the time of partition, Umerkot was estimated to be 80 per cent Hindu.

“Unlike Punjab, Sindh’s border regions remain neglected,” says Sohail Sangi, a teacher at Sindh University who belongs to Umerkot.

According to Sangi, the military has been in control of most of this region under the pretext of it being next to India, but has not bothered developing it. He blames this on their “paranoia of anyone not Muslim, and not from Punjab”.

Umerkot’s rich culture and history is something to be proud of, Sangi says, but instead Pakistan continues to forget the diversities it has.

Published in Dawn, January 16th, 2015

O
 
It's not late. They still can migrate to India. By migrating, they'll just loose their property and heritage. By staying there they will anyways loose their property and heritage and in addition to that, they'll also loose their honor,dignity,peace and finally...life.
 
its albakistan soon ranjeet singh will become rajab ali saieeng :rofl:
 
@third eye At the time of the Partition,Amarkot had 80% hindu population according to the OP. Well I feel AmArkot should have gone to India. Accorrding to the Partition plan only Muslim majoirity areas would go to Pakistan
 
@third eye At the time of the Partition,Amarkot had 80% hindu population according to the OP. Well I feel AmArkot should have gone to India. Accorrding to the Partition plan only Muslim majoirity areas would go to Pakistan

It was their decsion to stay on.
 
According to partition plan logic then kashmir has to go with Pakistan :-D :-D.

As the article says , those in Amarkot decided to stay on in Sind . Similarly those in J&K decided to join India.
 
@third eye At the time of the Partition,Amarkot had 80% hindu population according to the OP. Well I feel AmArkot should have gone to India. Accorrding to the Partition plan only Muslim majoirity areas would go to Pakistan
in his infinite wisdom nehru C decided to gift entire sindh to Pakistan !

J&k people or govt of kashmir sign deal with india :-D :-D. By the its off topic so no need to discuss it here.
to bhai topic late hi kyon ho. Jop beet gayi wo baat gayi. Lekin Amarkot .. Umerkot kaise ? ;)
 
According to partition plan logic then kashmir has to go with Pakistan :-D :-D.
Yr History is weak.Firstly there was a provison to exchange Kashmir with Junagadh & Hyderabad(Deccan) during 1947which was vehemently rejected by Mr.Liaquat Ali Khan. He was lest interested in Kashmir.During those days Hyderabad was one of the richest provinces and the Nizam of Hyderabad was one of the richest person in the world. Lastly Karachi had substantial Hindu Population.It was 51% while Muslim population was 42%,are u aware of that

The following is the conversation between Liaquat Ali Khan,Pakistan first prime minister & Shaukat Hyat Khan,the son of Sikander Hyat Khan former Punjab Premier of the Punjab Unionist Party.

But Liaqat Ali Khan turned to me and said, “Sardar Sahib! Have I gone mad that I should leave the state of Hyderabad Deccan, which is even larger than the Punjab, in exchange for the mountains and peaks of Kashmir?” I was stunned at Liaqat Ali Khan’s reaction, shocked that our Prime Minister was so ignorant of geography, and at his preferring Hyderabad Deccan over Kashmir. This was nothing but living in a fool’s paradise. To acquire Hyderabad was clearly impossible, and we were rejecting an opportunity that would have given us Kashmir. Yet, Liaqat was totally unaware of the importance of Kashmir for Pakistan. That is why I resigned in protest as in-charge of Kashmir operations.”

Jinnah Pakistan Kashmir Untangling the Braid Lastupdate:- Sun, 19 May 2013 18:30:00 GMT GreaterKashmir.com
 
I believe this is an issue, Islamicization of history just like Hinduisation of history is done in India. The best way to preserve history is to give the opposing views surrounding it as well. Hindu and Muslim history will forever differ, to us Rana Sanga or Ranjit Singh might not be heroes but they are to Hindus and Sikhs. That is why on the inscriptions the Hindu version of history should be included.

Also even though the person blames the army, lets not forget there is a Hindu temple on military land of Kanora island and its repair and functioning is the duty of the army. The army has done much to mould itself into a secular force. Unfortunately a lot of people do not appreciate this. @Dalit what say you? @jamahir is the problem existant there too, because in my Lucknow they constantly teach hindu history and have tried to impose their versions of reality on us.

Much like a question I had on my paper in UAE that stated "How did Arab inacceptance of Israel cause problems for the Palestinians... as if there is only one view on history and that is the Israeli view.

Everyone sees history differently and it cannot hurt to give viewpoints of multiple sources, readers can decide what to believe on their own.
 
@jamahir is the problem existant there too, because in my Lucknow they constantly teach hindu history and have tried to impose their versions of reality on us

it exists in high levels... for example, tipu sultan is maybe the greatest of all historic south asian rulers, greater than mughals or chandragupta maurya or ashok... for muslims, he is a hero, but he has been promoted as villain by the hinduvaadi elements, especially in the current states of karnataka ( region of his birth ) and kerala ( region of his conquests )... in fact, bangalore's new international airport is in a area called devanahalli... it is the specific area of his birth, yet the karnataka state government bowed to the demands of the kannada language fanatics ( hindus who form the majority in the state ) and named the new airport after a local hindu luminary instead of after tipu's name.

Everyone sees history differently and it cannot hurt to give viewpoints of multiple sources, readers can decide what to believe on their own.

i agree with the underlined part but for the next part, all readers are not political aware and sensible, so there should be a sensible person or group who can rightly guide the readers on what is actual history, what is cultural self-glorification, what is prejudiced belief against the others and what is outright religious mythology.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom