What's new

No role for India in Afghan reconciliation: US Tells

Baby Leone

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
5,437
Reaction score
-2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
WASHINGTON, Oct 5 (APP): The United States (US) has welcomed the latest moves by Afghanistan and India towards strengthening their bilateral ties but sees no mediatory role for New Delhi in the Afghan reconciliation process. Instead, the US believes that the trilateral structure that is alreay in place and engages Islamabad, Kabul and Washington, provides a valuable platform for the way forward, the State Department said. “With regard to playing a mediating role, I don’t think that’s what we’re looking for here. We do believe this trilateral structure is of value and we should continue it,” Spokesperson Victoria Nuland remarked, when asked if Washington saw a mediatory role for India in reconciliation process Afghanistan, which shares a long border with Pakistan.
The Afghan-led reconciliation process involves engaging militants who renounce violence and ties with al-Qaeda as part of the political effort to end the ten-year old conflict in Afghanistan.
Asked about recent reports from Kabul that indicated President Hamid Karzai’s losing hope in talks with the Taliban, the spokesperson said the US special envoy Marc Grossman would be discussing the subject with the Afghan leadership during his upcoming visit.
“We’ve seen the public statements, President Karzai’s speech and other things. We’ve had our own conversations. I think this is one of the subjects that Ambassador Grossman will want to talk about when he’s in Afghanistan. You know that we continue to believe that this trilateral structure is of value to all three of us, so we will have that conversation when he’s out there”.
Grossman - who is on a long trip to Central and South Asia, meeting leaders on the Silk Road Initiative event in November- would be visiting both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
“Obviously, he will seek to have intensive conversations with both governments on the full range of issues.”
Nuland welcomed the strategic partnership beween Afghanistan and India, that India’s participation in the New Silk Road Initiative.

The spokesperson also backed a recent meeting between Pakistani and Indian commerce ministers.
“We support any and all warming between Pakistan and India. We’ve been strong supporters of the dialogues that the two governments have been having.”
The spokespeson would not speak specifically about reports that Islamabad has indicated its willingness to enter into talks with militants who lay down arms but thought the same conditions would be applied to militants everywhere wishing to join reconcilaition talks (that they must give up violence and sever any links with al-Qaeda).


Associated Press Of Pakistan ( Pakistan's Premier NEWS Agency ) - US sees no role for India in Afghan reconciliation
 
.
ts known already that no mediating role will be doing.. so nothing new here,..
 
.
Any other news source plz....Associated Press Of Pakistan (Pakistan's Premier NEWS Agency) does not actually generate confidence...:mps:
 
.
guys(indians) no need to get hyper its just a news and a reality if u cannt stand with it dont poke nose here and in afghanistan as well..

@Eastwest
does it care to anyone abt ur confidance or wht eva..:D?
 
.
This is just because the US doesn't want further annoy the volatile Pakistanis who are already concerned with India's involvement in Afghanistan. Without Pakistan on side the "peace process" has failed before it's even started because that is the main source of trouble for Afghanistan. Sensible I'd say.
 
.
Status Quo. Nothing has changed. In fact it's better that the US is reassuring Pakistan. We don't want them getting edgy.
 
.
why members club ? And the credibility of AFP ? Here is a news item I found in AFP on F1 India

AFP: Farmers threaten India's debut F1 race

I know this is off topic. I am posting it here to highlight the credibility of AFP. It is interesting to note that there are no farmers protest going on against F1 in India
 
.
This is just because the US doesn't want further annoy the volatile Pakistanis who are already concerned with India's involvement in Afghanistan. Without Pakistan on side the "peace process" has failed before it's even started because that is the main source of trouble for Afghanistan. Sensible I'd say.

Good joke ...
with ths logic we can say that after even Pakistan's objection US did nuclear agreement with extremist endia just to prepare them against China? which obviously they(endia) cann't do herself
 
.
Pakistanis..calm down...you are unsettling us with your reactions...

chod do yaar..its just the Mayor of Kabul, not the President of Afghanistan :D
 
.
Pakistanis..calm down...you are unsettling us with your reactions...

chod do yaar..its just the Mayor of Kabul, not the President of Afghanistan :D


lol we kno tht and ths too ke he cannot even walk without US permission...but atleast our indian freinds should not invite him at that time...:P
 
.
The US believes that the trilateral structure that is already in place and engages Islamabad, Kabul and Washington, provides a valuable platform for the way forward, the State Department said. “With regard to playing a mediating role, I don’t think that’s what we’re looking for here.
Whoever wrote this seems to be pretty clueless. These Americans must learn to think beyond their noses! Does this yahoo for a moment think that once they withdraw from Afghanistan, all would be hunky dory?

The predators waiting in the wings are countries like Iran, the CIS Republics, Russia, and not too far away, China, Iraq, and India. And then you have the 'Northern Alliance' which will have nothing to do with Pakistan or the Taliban and would never recognize any Pak-Afghan brokered government there.

It would be back to square one once the Yanks withdraw - back to the 90s when the Northern Alliance swept to power after some bitter fighting against the Taliban who were routed and fled to Pakistan to fight another day!

But according to the plan, at least three American combat divisions or about 45,000 men would be stationed PERMANENTLY in and around Kabul to ensure that a pro West government is installed there. This resembles an alphabet soup of conflicting interests in Afghanistan. Let's wait and watch how things unfold.
 
.
Good joke ...
with ths logic we can say that after even Pakistan's objection US did nuclear agreement with extremist endia just to prepare them against China? which obviously they(endia) cann't do herself
Newbie here?? Watch what you write buddy. We can do without more crap around here. Like when you termed India as 'extremist'!! Oh well, another Mullah joins the ranks! With such bozos around any intellectual debate and discussion is passe! Oh woe!

And by the way it's INDIA and NOT ENDIA! Heck! Why am I even responding to uneducated juveniles? I'm outta here!
 
.
Newbie here?? Watch what you write buddy. We can do without more crap around here. Like when you termed India as 'extremist'!! Oh well, another Mullah joins the ranks! With such bozos around any intellectual debate and discussion is passe! Oh woe!

And by the way it's INDIA and NOT ENDIA! Heck! Why am I even responding to uneducated juveniles? I'm outta here!


some of the members frm our neibours only deserve this kinda words.....and ur comments showing who is uneducated.....

nyways please if someone dont have any good thing to contribute regarding the topic than please instead of getting frustrated, crying and doing personal attacks leave the thread and stop pissing us....
 
.

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom