What's new

Nikki Haley calls U.N. report on poverty in U.S. 'misleading and politically motivated'

BHarwana

MODERATOR
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
24,827
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
la-1529621058-b0p2ew7an3-snap-image

“The administration’s overarching view is that the best way to help people get out of poverty is to help them get a job," U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said in a letter to Congress. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds / AFP/Getty Images)




Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, intensified the Trump administration’s feud with the U.N. on Thursday, sharply criticizing a new report on extreme poverty in the United States as “misleading and politically motivated” and questioning the very idea that the U.N. Human Rights Council would investigate poverty in America.

The report, written by Philip Alston, the U.N.’s special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, examines inequality in the United States and condemns President Trump’s administration for pursuing high tax breaks for the rich and removing basic protections for the poor.

“Poverty is an issue the Trump administration takes very seriously,” Haley wrote in a letter to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), one of 20 lawmakers who urged the Trump administration to present Congress with a plan to reduce poverty across the nation. “The administration’s overarching view is that the best way to help people get out of poverty is to help them get a job.”

It is patently ridiculous for the United Nations to examine poverty in America.

NIKKI HALEY, U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE UNITED NATIONS
Share quote & link
Rather than focus on the United States, which Haley noted has its lowest unemployment rate in decades, the former governor of South Carolina said Alston should have used his voice “to shine a light” on vulnerable populations in countries such as Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo.


“It is patently ridiculous for the United Nations to examine poverty in America," Haley wrote. “In our country, the President, Members of Congress, Governors, Mayors, and City Council members actively engage on poverty issues every day. Compare that to the many countries around the world, whose governments knowingly abuse human rights and cause pain and suffering.”

Haley’s remarks came two days after she announced the U.S. was pulling out of the U.N. Human Rights Council, criticizing it as “protector of human rights abusers and a cesspit of political bias.”

Alston, a native Australian and law professor at New York University, published his report June 1 after touring California, Alabama, Puerto Rico and West Virginia at the end of last year.

“The American dream is rapidly becoming the American illusion,” Alston states in the report. “The equality of opportunity, which is so prized in theory, is in practice a myth, especially for minorities and women, but also for many middle-class white workers.”

Alston was scheduled to present his report Thursday to the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva. Shortly before it was set to begin, he tweeted that the event was postponed until Friday.

On Twitter, he said he looked forward to responding in the Human Rights Council.

“Too bad the U.S. won't be there,” he added.

In her letter, Haley said she was “deeply disappointed” that Alston used his platform to make “misleading and politically motivated” statements about American domestic policy.

“Regrettably, his report is an all too common example of the misplaced priorities and poor use of funds proven to be rampant throughout the U.N. system,” she wrote.

While Haley said Alston “categorically misstated the progress the United States has made in addressing poverty and purposely used misleading facts and figures in its biased reporting,” she did not specify what facts the Trump administration disputed.

Sanders responded swiftly to Haley’s letter Thursday, writing that he considered it “totally appropriate” for the U.N. special rapporteur to focus on poverty in the United States. He noted that more than 40 million Americans still live in poverty, 30 million have no health insurance, and 140 million struggle to pay for basic living expenses.

“You are certainly right in suggesting that poverty in many countries including the Democratic Republic of Congo and Burundi is far worse than it is in the United States,” Sanders wrote. “But what is important to note about poverty in America is that it takes place in the richest country in the history of the world.”

In an interview with The Times early this month, Alston anticipated that U.S. officials would not appreciate his report.

“The United States is a proud nation,” he said. “I don’t think that it will particularly appreciate being given such a poor report card before the international community. But I would very much like it if the U.S., when I present the report on June 21 to the Human Rights Council, would come out and try to defend its policies. I think that would be a very helpful step in getting serious debate going.”

http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-un-us-poverty-20180621-story.html
 
.
@Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA bro now look this is the actual state USA is in and USA is suffering every day because of it's large aid and wars it has started due to Israel and in an attempt to contain China. That propaganda you saw is a desperate attempt from USA. lol
 
. .
The Irony is that USA is giving Aid to India and it has no money for it's own population lol.

USA blocked Aid to Pakistan because USA has no money lol. This is the current state of America.

Trump is using hate politics just like Modi in India because they cannot deliver on progress this is a fall back strategy.
 
.
The Irony is that USA is giving Aid to India and it has no money for it's own population lol.

USA blocked Aid to Pakistan because USA has no money lol. This is the current state of America.

Trump is using hate politics just like Modi in India because they cannot deliver on progress this is a fall back strategy.

1- US is not giving the country any aid. If it does give some money, it is to its many shady NGOs which are being rapidly shut. It did in the past for non-defence purposes to Indian government but not anymore.

2- You need to stop measuring yourself with us; you chose a different path of progress and we chose another.

3- If you, the leftists and the haters are having the same dislike for Modi, then our choice is absolutely spot on.
 
.
1- US is not giving the country any aid. If it does give some money, it is to its many shady NGOs which are being rapidly shut. It did in the past for non-defence purposes to Indian government but not anymore.
India received $205 million in 2017 data for 2018 will be available in last month of the year.

2- You need to stop measuring yourself with us; you chose a different path of progress and we chose another.
My post about Pakistan had nothing to do with you I was giving reason for US cutting aid to Pakistan

3- If you, the leftists and the haters are having the same dislike for Modi, then our choice is absolutely spot on.
I want you to vote Modi to power again.
 
.
@BHarwana

Do you know GDP per capita of the US? It puts even that of UK to shame.

There is poverty in every country. However, in the US, mostly unproductive drug-addicts are in poverty.
 
.
the best way to help people get out of poverty is to help them get a job," U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said in a letter to Congress.

and for that you need to cut imports...
 
.
The US infrastructure is fragile, and rail transport is often derailed, in this respect similar to India.

A project in the United States takes 5 years to discuss, 5 years to build, and 5 years to evaluate the acceptation.

Sometimes 20 or 25 years.

and for that you need to cut imports...
It is the fundamental way to create a local company that can increase the number of employees employed!
The next step is to consider how to attract companies to invest.


Reducing imports is only a superficial approach.
For example, Chinese people are becoming more and more rich. China is expanding imports of agricultural products from Chile (such as cherries, Chilean wines, etc.), and reducing imports is meaningless.
 
.
The US infrastructure is fragile, and rail transport is often derailed, in this respect similar to India.

A project in the United States takes 5 years to discuss, 5 years to build, and 5 years to evaluate the acceptation.

Sometimes 20 or 25 years.


It is the fundamental way to create a local company that can increase the number of employees employed!
The next step is to consider how to attract companies to invest.


Reducing imports is only a superficial approach.
For example, Chinese people are becoming more and more rich. China is expanding imports of agricultural products from Chile (such as cherries, Chilean wines, etc.), and reducing imports is meaningless.

you better talk rape...
 
.
Tommy Singh is upset no one takes US serious anymore. :lol:
 
.
“It is patently ridiculous for the United Nations to examine poverty in America," Haley wrote. “In our country, the President, Members of Congress, Governors, Mayors, and City Council members actively engage on poverty issues every day. Compare that to the many countries around the world, whose governments knowingly abuse human rights and cause pain and suffering.”
She's right: the comparison is scarcely valid. If you read the report you'll discover the U.N. isn't using a uniform definition of poverty applicable world-wide but one specifically for the United States, the measures crafted by the U.S. Census Bureau.

As an example, in 2016 the Census Bureau classed a family of five as living in poverty if its income (before taxes, capital gains, and assistance) was less than $29,360. The Census Bureau notes,
  • "Although the [poverty] thresholds in some sense reflect a family’s needs, they are intended for use as a statistical yardstick, not as a complete description of what people and families need to live."
 
.
She's right: the comparison is scarcely valid. If you read the report you'll discover the U.N. isn't using a uniform definition of poverty applicable world-wide but one specifically for the United States, the measures crafted by the U.S. Census Bureau.

As an example, in 2016 the Census Bureau classed a family of five as living in poverty if its income (before taxes, capital gains, and assistance) was less than $29,360. The Census Bureau notes,
  • "Although the [poverty] thresholds in some sense reflect a family’s needs, they are intended for use as a statistical yardstick, not as a complete description of what people and families need to live."

The problem is people here simply don’t understand the definition of poverty in the US. They think it means the UN definition of poverty of ~$2/day. You can be 65 yrs old living in a $5M house collecting $20K disbursements from a $1M retirement account and still be considered in poverty.

It just depends upon your income..not your worth.
 
Last edited:
.
Look who is talking about misleading and politically motivated nonsense the whore who tried to make iran protest as UN issue with failed with slap on her ugly face
 
.
The problem is people here simply don’t understand the definition of poverty in the US. They think it means the UN definition of poverty of ~$2/day. You can be 65 yrs old living in a $5M house collecting $20K disbursements from a $1M retirement account and still be considered in poverty.

It just depends upon your income..not your worth.
The poor in other countries, including China and Pakistan, wish they could be poor in the US. So yeah, I do not take these UN reports seriously. These 'reports' are the equivalent of trolling for attention.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom