What's new

New Study Suggests that Man and Dog Have Been Close Friends for 33,000 Years

Kashmiri Pandit

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
3,023
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
A-Tamaskan-dog.jpg


A new study reveals that the origin of man’s best friend may not have been where, or when, the scientific community previously believed. The analysis of a variety of ancient canine DNA has also helped researchers create a map of the journey of the domestic dog across the world.

This is believed to be the most complete study of dog genomes to date, and as the researchers wrote in their article published online in the journal Cell Research, “For the first time, our study unravels an extraordinary journey that the domestic dog has traveled on earth.”

Peter Savolainen of Sweden's KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and one of the contributors to the current study’s international team, told Phys.org that while past studies also analyzed the entire nuclear genome, they failed to include samples from South East Asia – following the general belief that domesticated dogs had originated in the Middle East, Central Asia, or Europe.

This time the researchers conducted a DNA analysis using samples from more regions of the world and different time periods. They used this information to look for series of admixtures (events that occur when individuals from two or more separate species begin to interbreed). The results of their study have led them to assert that domesticated dogs most likely descended from gray wolves in South East Asia, about 33,000 years ago. Furthermore, they claim that the “founder population” numbered approximately 4,600 canines.

gray-wolf.jpg


A gray wolf. (Gunner Ries/CC BY SA 3.0)

The sample was composed of genomes from 58 canids. Specifically, the scientists analyzed DNA from:

“Dogs from Central Asia (Afghan Hound) and North Africa (Sloughi), Europe (eight different breeds), the Arctic and Siberia (Greenland dog, Alaska Malamute, Samoyed, Siberian Husky, and East Siberian Laika), the New World (Chihuahua, Mexican and Peruvian naked dog) as well as the Tibetan Plateau (Tibetan Mastiff). These dogs were chosen to cover as many major geographic regions as possible.”

canids-Geographic-locations.jpg


Geographic locations of the 58 canids sequenced in the study. (Guo-Dong Wang, et. al)

Through their research, they have also provided an explanation for the migration of the domesticated dogs to the rest of the world:

“Around 15,000 years ago, a subset of ancestral dogs started migrating to the Middle East, Africa and Europe, arriving in Europe at about 10,000 years ago. One of the out-of-Asia lineages also migrated back to the east, creating a series of admixed populations with the endemic Asian lineages in northern China before migrating to the New World.”

3-dog-breeds.jpg


Three of the dog breeds that were chosen for the DNA study: Siberian Husky (CC BY SA 3.0), Tibetan Mastiff (CC BY SA 3.0), and Peruvian naked/hairless dog (CC BY SA 3.0)

The reasoning for the delay in migration may have been due to climatic conditions. Ya-Ping Zhang of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming Institute of Zoology, and one of the co-authors of the current study told Discovery News: "For some reason, dogs stayed around East Asia for a long time before their migration out of Asia. We speculated that the glacial period might have been the environmental factor that prevented dogs from migrating out of Asia."

migratory-history-map.jpg


A proposed migratory history for domestic dogs across the world based on the evidence from the current study. Solid arrows show migratory tracts with complete dating information and dashed arrows indicate those without accurate dating. (Guo-Dong Wang, et. al)

Although it is probable that the migration of dogs and humans were often interconnected, the recent study suggests that the first movement may have been chosen first by the canines, and not their human companions.

As for the path to domestication, it has been said that the current research provides evidence for three main stages, instead of the former assumption of two: pre-domesticated scavengers that had loose contact with ancient humans, then closer human-dog interactions that led to domesticated “non-breed dogs,” and finally human selection for specific traits in dogs – selecting and creating breeds.

Savolainen told The Telegraph that the domestication process was not quick, and that it could have been created by “[…] waves of selection for phenotypes (mutations) that gradually favored stronger bonding with humans, a process called self-domestication.”

German-Shepherd.jpg


A German Shepherd dog. (Public Domain) The German Shepherd is a relatively new breed of dog, that is often prized for its strength, intelligence, trainability, and obedience.

While the results of the current study are intriguing, the debate still continues on the origins of man’s best friend - a 2011 study of a 33,000-year-old skull of a partly domesticated dog found in a cave of the Altai Mountains of Siberia have led scientists to that area. However, the high genetic diversity of canines in Central Asia, as reported in a study released in October, has suggested Nepal or Mongolia for the beginnings for humanity’s loyal companion.

Additionally, analysis of an ancient wolf’s bones (also from Siberia), published in May state that the genetic split from wolves to dogs began sometime between 27,0000 – 40,000 years ago - although the scientists from this study acknowledged that these wolf-dog hybrids may not have been domesticated until later.
 
. .
.
There was some analysis from way back that Australian Dingos were actually brought by human travellers from India:

Study links ancient Indian visitors to Australia's first dingoes

India's gift to Australia: The dingo? - CNN.com

These dogs were traded as goods. So was chicken taken to Mesopotamia from the Indus Valley and then spread to the rest of the world. Even the cattle from Indus Valley was taken to Africa. These were dog pups and young calves being traded in ancient world.
 
.
:o::o::o: 4000 years ago !!!! Talks about the Naval Technology of that time .

One anthropologist/historian went around the world on primitive boat technology. You can read up on Thor Heyerdahl expeditions if you are interested:

Heyerdahl sails papyrus boat - May 17, 1970 - HISTORY.com

Thor Heyerdahl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of course route from India to Australia had various landbridges that dont exist today and also there are plenty of islands along the way (Indonesia) to island hop off.

It is definitely one area where I feel there has not been enough research, the links between Indians and peoples of South East Asia and Australia Aborigines. In some of the Aboriginal culture, there is definitely things I would not be surprised if they came from cultural contact with Indians and the likes (and/or vice versa)...but its all speculative and may remain so forever since we Indians ourselves are not too interested in researching these things.
 
.
These dogs were traded as goods. So was chicken taken to Mesopotamia from the Indus Valley and then spread to the rest of the world. Even the cattle from Indus Valley was taken to Africa. These were dog pups and young calves being traded in ancient world.
Barter System
dog-7.gif
 
. . .
How is it possible that Dogs do not show up in Hindu Mythology amoung all the animals , Dog is quite loyal

Did dog did not exist in Ancient lands
 
.
How is it possible that Dogs do not show up in Hindu Mythology amoung all the animals , Dog is quite loyal

Did dog did not exist in Ancient lands

Bhairava (a form of Shiva) companion is a dog.

Dogs (Shvan) are mentioned many times in Vedas

The story of the dog that follows Yudishtira to the gates of heaven, and he refuses to enter heaven unless the dog is allowed as well is a well known one in Mahabharat.
 
.
Bhairava (a form of Shiva) companion is a dog.

Dogs (Shvan) are mentioned many times in Vedas

The story of the dog that follows Yudishtira to the gates of heaven, and he refuses to enter heaven unless the dog is allowed as well is a well known one in Mahabharat.

Interesting never knew that thanks for share
 
.
Of course route from India to Australia had various landbridges that dont exist today and also there are plenty of islands along the way (Indonesia) to island hop off

There were no direct contacts. The small trading posts along the way took these to all the way to Australia. The Arabs took spices from Kerala to Yemen. Then from Yemen they either traveled overland or by ships to trading posts in Palestine, Cyprus, Egypt, etc then sold to European traders. They changed hands few time by many middlemen before ending up with the consumer.
 
. .
There were no direct contacts. The small trading posts along the way took these in several generations all the way to Australia. The Arabs took spices from Kerala and then sold them to Europeans in trading posts in Palestine, Cyprus, Egypt, etc They changed hands few time by middlemen before ending up with the consumer.

From the gene flow from the genetic analysis....given specific markers cropped up only in the 4000 year ago period:

Study links ancient Indian visitors to Australia's first dingoes

However, an international research team examining genotyping data from Aboriginal Australians, New Guineans, island Southeast Asians and Indians found ancient association between Australia, New Guinea, and the Mamanwa group from the Philippines.

“We also detect a signal indicative of substantial gene flow between the Indian populations and Australia well before European contact, contrary to the prevailing view that there was no contact between Australia and the rest of the world. We estimate this gene flow to have occurred during the Holocene, 4,230 years ago,” the researchers said in a paper titled ‘Genome-wide data substantiate Holocene gene flow from India to Australia’ and published in the journal PNAS.

“This is also approximately when changes in tool technology, food processing, and the dingo appear in the Australian archaeological record, suggesting that these may be related to the migration from India.”

The researchers said that around the time the Indian visitors arrived on Australia’s shores, stone tools called microliths began appearing for the first time and new plant processing techniques were used.

“It has been a matter of controversy as to whether these changes occurred in situ or reflect contact with people from outside Australia or some combination of both factors. However, the dingo also first appears in the fossil record at this time and must have come from outside Australia. Although dingo mtDNA appears to have a Southeast Asian origin, morphologically, the dingo most closely resembles Indian dogs,” the researchers said.

============

i.e the dingos are clearly closer cousins to Indian wild dogs (like pariah dogs) than they are to such wild dogs found in S.E. Asia

But later it says:

“It does not necessarily indicate direct contact with mainland India. For example it could be via populations elsewhere whose original source was mainland India,” said Professor Cooper, who was not involved in the research.

So you may also be right. Further research is needed.
 
.
From the gene flow from the genetic analysis....given specific markers cropped up only in the 4000 year ago period:

I was talking about the goods, plants and animal being traded. Around 60,000 to 35,000 modern Human traveled from Africa to Australia passing through, Middle East to South Asia to South East Asia and then to Australia. The connection with Aborigines and some Indian tribes shows the remnants of ancient population whose ancestors were migrating eastwards.
 
.

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom