This conspiracy theory of labeling Taliban as RAW/?CIA agents is also used To boost the morale of Pakistani armed forces and the general population when the army sees a need for any military operation or intervention
Why a conspiracy theory created to portray Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as Foreign Agents?
This is because: To defend the image of pro Pakistan Militants or Jihadists and Pakistan Army.
Pakistan formed the Afghan Taliban after U.S. conveniently left Afghanistan in dilapidated condition. In order to protect its regional rivalry with India (that was supporting Northern Alliance), Pakistan has supported the Taliban since the beginning to influence Afghanistans domestic and foreign policies. While the Taliban continued to pummel Afghani women and children as well as men, the women elite of Pakistan continued to party away late into the nights with their partners life was lavish. Most of the masses in Pakistan had no idea about the existence of Taliban and their brutal tactics which only was to spill onto their lives a few years later. In his book Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, Ahmed Rashid provided an in-depth insight into Pakistani support in the creation and nourishment of the Afghan Taliban. Some pertinent details of this support are:
Pakistani Finance Ministry was authorizing 300 million rupees (US$6 million) every six months in salaries for the Taliban administration.
In 1997/8 Pakistan provided the Taliban with an estimated US$30 million in aid.
Taliban and Pakistani transport, trade and drug mafia nexus where due to illegal transit trade, Pakistan lost 3.5 billion rupees (US$80million) in customs revenue in the financial year 1992/3, 11 billion rupees in 1993/4, 20 billion rupees during 1994/5 and 30 billion rupees (US$600million) in 1997/8.
By the year 2001, Taliban had a fighting force of 45,000 which had over 28,000 Pakistanis
However, things dramatically changed after 9/11 with U.S.s War on Terror. Pakistan was forced to rethink its policy towards the Taliban due to American pressure and strategic reasons, and a general consensus against them was formed the world over. The Taliban were brought to the forefront and their dirty deeds were exposed through the internet and the media.
At the same time, under Musharraf, Pakistani media became relatively free which led to the scrutiny of Pakistans relations with the Taliban. Images of public beatings of women, killings and executions in soccer grounds were all over TV channels. This contributed towards forming a negative image of the Taliban among the Pakistani people. (Except the conservatives, extremists and political parties such as Jamait e Islami)
Specifically after the TV Boom in Pakistan which also happened simultaneously, the new free media and the newly hosted Talk Shows exposed the role of the Military in the formation of the Taliban or militants through prominent politicians who came up and spoke out. Military rule came under fire as Pakistans history of exploitative politics and ISIs role in it came to light through critics in talk shows and electronic media.
Thus a negative perception of the military was also created.
By 2007 Pakistan came under the strain of excessive bombings by a newly formed group known as Pakistani Taliban. This group was formed on the same ideological lines as the Afghan Taliban i.e. to enforce puritanical Sharia in Pakistan and to fight against any occupying forces. This creation of Pakistani Taliban (TTP) is a part of AL Qaedas wider strategy to extend the war into Pakistan, and from there strategizing and launching the war from central Asian Republics to India for the sole purpose of defeating the Nato forces in Afghanistan.
Soon after the suicide bombings in 2007, TTP (Pakistani Taliban) openly started to claim responsibility for the attacks and got significant coverage by the electronic media. In these circumstances it became increasingly difficult for the extremists and the conspiracy theorists to openly defend the Islamist militant organizations and to simultaneously have the Afghan Taliban and Kashmiri militants as a regional lever for control. Since the Pakistani Taliban were openly claiming on television to have carried out suicide bombings in Pakistan in the name of Jihad, ISI and its Islamist allies became increasingly worried as this was tainting the image of mujahids (Islamic Fighters), Jihad (a motivational weapon of Army) and spreading the perception that the militants were retaliating against Pakistan because of the indiscriminate bombings by the Pakistani army in tribal areas.
In addition to this, the Lawyers Movement added fuel to the fire and acted as a catalyst in forming a negative image of the military. The Military however had to come up with a plan which was politically safe in the short run and which also served their interests in the long run.
To counter all this, Pakistan army, Islamists, and allied conspiracy theorists devised a plan to launch a conspiracy theory that would easily blame all the attacks in Pakistan on India, Israel and the U.S. Hence TTP and any other affiliated militant group that was attacking Pakistan was then tagged by these conspiracy theorists as Indian or American agents working in disguise as Taliban to malign the reputation of the Taliban and jihad in particular.
The Pakistan Army did not stop here however. They launched a proponent agent in the public: someone who would act as a defender as well as a promoter. Right about that time, and apparently without any associations to the army, Zaid Hamid appeared on the horizon and took two stances that the army was in dire need of. In order to rally support for his perspective, he gave his ideas a religious aspect insofar as glorification of the army was concerned.
This conspiracy theory of labeling Taliban as RAW/?CIA agents is also used To boost the morale of the Pakistani armed forces and the general population when the army sees a need for any military operation or intervention.
Before any Military operation, it is a tendency of the army to label its adversaries as Indians or Zionist agents. This is because the army is predominantly trained and indoctrinated to fight against the Hindus (infidels Indians).
A common exploitative tactic is to give a conflict a religious context e.g. by presenting the enemy as enemies of Islam. Before the 1971 operation for East Pakistan (operation searchlight) Bengalese were targeted by issuances of fatwas for their infidel activities, thus painting the Bengalese as unfaithful and conspirators against Islam. This ideological manipulation influences the public sentiment by projecting a unislamic and imperialist image of foreign country/peoples. Prejudiced and censored history also makes the public vulnerable, making it easy to get their support for a military operation. The 1992 operation against MQM is a textbook case. Members of the MQM were portrayed as traitors who were secretly plotting to create a separate state with the help of the Indians. Similar strategy is employed in Swat and Waziristan operations where with the help of conspiracy theorists such as Zaid Hamid, the army is successful in gaining public support and motivation for troops.
Myths about Taliban vs empirical evidences
Why a conspiracy theory created to portray Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as Foreign Agents?
This is because: To defend the image of pro Pakistan Militants or Jihadists and Pakistan Army.
Pakistan formed the Afghan Taliban after U.S. conveniently left Afghanistan in dilapidated condition. In order to protect its regional rivalry with India (that was supporting Northern Alliance), Pakistan has supported the Taliban since the beginning to influence Afghanistans domestic and foreign policies. While the Taliban continued to pummel Afghani women and children as well as men, the women elite of Pakistan continued to party away late into the nights with their partners life was lavish. Most of the masses in Pakistan had no idea about the existence of Taliban and their brutal tactics which only was to spill onto their lives a few years later. In his book Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, Ahmed Rashid provided an in-depth insight into Pakistani support in the creation and nourishment of the Afghan Taliban. Some pertinent details of this support are:
Pakistani Finance Ministry was authorizing 300 million rupees (US$6 million) every six months in salaries for the Taliban administration.
In 1997/8 Pakistan provided the Taliban with an estimated US$30 million in aid.
Taliban and Pakistani transport, trade and drug mafia nexus where due to illegal transit trade, Pakistan lost 3.5 billion rupees (US$80million) in customs revenue in the financial year 1992/3, 11 billion rupees in 1993/4, 20 billion rupees during 1994/5 and 30 billion rupees (US$600million) in 1997/8.
By the year 2001, Taliban had a fighting force of 45,000 which had over 28,000 Pakistanis
However, things dramatically changed after 9/11 with U.S.s War on Terror. Pakistan was forced to rethink its policy towards the Taliban due to American pressure and strategic reasons, and a general consensus against them was formed the world over. The Taliban were brought to the forefront and their dirty deeds were exposed through the internet and the media.
At the same time, under Musharraf, Pakistani media became relatively free which led to the scrutiny of Pakistans relations with the Taliban. Images of public beatings of women, killings and executions in soccer grounds were all over TV channels. This contributed towards forming a negative image of the Taliban among the Pakistani people. (Except the conservatives, extremists and political parties such as Jamait e Islami)
Specifically after the TV Boom in Pakistan which also happened simultaneously, the new free media and the newly hosted Talk Shows exposed the role of the Military in the formation of the Taliban or militants through prominent politicians who came up and spoke out. Military rule came under fire as Pakistans history of exploitative politics and ISIs role in it came to light through critics in talk shows and electronic media.
Thus a negative perception of the military was also created.
By 2007 Pakistan came under the strain of excessive bombings by a newly formed group known as Pakistani Taliban. This group was formed on the same ideological lines as the Afghan Taliban i.e. to enforce puritanical Sharia in Pakistan and to fight against any occupying forces. This creation of Pakistani Taliban (TTP) is a part of AL Qaedas wider strategy to extend the war into Pakistan, and from there strategizing and launching the war from central Asian Republics to India for the sole purpose of defeating the Nato forces in Afghanistan.
Soon after the suicide bombings in 2007, TTP (Pakistani Taliban) openly started to claim responsibility for the attacks and got significant coverage by the electronic media. In these circumstances it became increasingly difficult for the extremists and the conspiracy theorists to openly defend the Islamist militant organizations and to simultaneously have the Afghan Taliban and Kashmiri militants as a regional lever for control. Since the Pakistani Taliban were openly claiming on television to have carried out suicide bombings in Pakistan in the name of Jihad, ISI and its Islamist allies became increasingly worried as this was tainting the image of mujahids (Islamic Fighters), Jihad (a motivational weapon of Army) and spreading the perception that the militants were retaliating against Pakistan because of the indiscriminate bombings by the Pakistani army in tribal areas.
In addition to this, the Lawyers Movement added fuel to the fire and acted as a catalyst in forming a negative image of the military. The Military however had to come up with a plan which was politically safe in the short run and which also served their interests in the long run.
To counter all this, Pakistan army, Islamists, and allied conspiracy theorists devised a plan to launch a conspiracy theory that would easily blame all the attacks in Pakistan on India, Israel and the U.S. Hence TTP and any other affiliated militant group that was attacking Pakistan was then tagged by these conspiracy theorists as Indian or American agents working in disguise as Taliban to malign the reputation of the Taliban and jihad in particular.
The Pakistan Army did not stop here however. They launched a proponent agent in the public: someone who would act as a defender as well as a promoter. Right about that time, and apparently without any associations to the army, Zaid Hamid appeared on the horizon and took two stances that the army was in dire need of. In order to rally support for his perspective, he gave his ideas a religious aspect insofar as glorification of the army was concerned.
This conspiracy theory of labeling Taliban as RAW/?CIA agents is also used To boost the morale of the Pakistani armed forces and the general population when the army sees a need for any military operation or intervention.
Before any Military operation, it is a tendency of the army to label its adversaries as Indians or Zionist agents. This is because the army is predominantly trained and indoctrinated to fight against the Hindus (infidels Indians).
A common exploitative tactic is to give a conflict a religious context e.g. by presenting the enemy as enemies of Islam. Before the 1971 operation for East Pakistan (operation searchlight) Bengalese were targeted by issuances of fatwas for their infidel activities, thus painting the Bengalese as unfaithful and conspirators against Islam. This ideological manipulation influences the public sentiment by projecting a unislamic and imperialist image of foreign country/peoples. Prejudiced and censored history also makes the public vulnerable, making it easy to get their support for a military operation. The 1992 operation against MQM is a textbook case. Members of the MQM were portrayed as traitors who were secretly plotting to create a separate state with the help of the Indians. Similar strategy is employed in Swat and Waziristan operations where with the help of conspiracy theorists such as Zaid Hamid, the army is successful in gaining public support and motivation for troops.
Myths about Taliban vs empirical evidences
